Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > BT > BT06136
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 55(4)

Reproductive success in a reintroduced population of a critically endangered shrub, Symonanthus bancroftii (Solanaceae)

Qigang Ye A , Eric Bunn B C D , Siegfried L. Krauss B C and Kingsley W. Dixon B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Wuhan Botanic Garden/Wuhan Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Moshan, Wuhan City, Hubei Province 430074, P.R. China.

B Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Kings Park and Botanic Garden, West Perth, WA 6005, Australia.

C School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: ebunn@bgpa.wa.gov.au

Australian Journal of Botany 55(4) 425-432 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT06136
Submitted: 27 June 2006  Accepted: 8 January 2007   Published: 20 June 2007

Abstract

Symonanthus bancroftii is a critically endangered dioecious shrub, with only one male and one female plant known in the wild. Micropropagated, clonal plants of the male and female parents were hand-pollinated. Seed was germinated in sterile culture and a subsequent daughter (F1) seedling was multiplied in vitro. Micropropagated plants of the original parents and daughter were reintroduced to a natural habitat site. We detail the first study of pollination biology and reproductive success in this extremely rare species. Floral morphology, flowering phenology, pollen viability, female receptivity and fruit set of reintroduced plants of S. bancroftii were investigated. Flower viability of S. bancroftii shows a 25-day maximum for male flowers, whereas non-pollinated female flowers remain viable for a maximum of 38 days (female parent) and 41 days (daughter), respectively. Flowering of reintroduced male and female plants overlaps from mid-June to early November. Pollen remained viable for at least 8 days after anther dehiscence. Maximum stigma longevity recorded was 28 days (female parent) and 39 days (daughter) and maximum ovule longevity varied from 13 days (female parent) to 28 days (daughter). The mean percentage of flowers setting fruit was 39 ± 13% for female parent plants and 48 ± 4% for daughter plants. Empirical reproductive success measures for male–daughter crosses generally exceeded those of the original parent crosses. The reproductive success of S. bancroftii so soon after reintroduction of plants is a positive sign indicating that rapid accumulation of a soil seedbank is feasible and is thus an important first step towards successful establishment of self-sustaining populations of this critically endangered species.


Acknowledgements

We thank the following Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority employees for their valuable assistance: Mr Bob Dixon (field work) and Ms Keran Keys (laboratory and tissue culture).


References


Arroyo MTK, Armesto JJ, Villagran C (1981) Plant phenological patterns in the high Andean cordillera of central Chile. Journal of Ecology 69, 205–223.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ashman TL, Schoen DJ (1994) How long should flowers live? Nature 371, 788–791.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bingham RA, Orthner AR (1998) Efficient pollination of alpine plants. Nature 391, 238–239.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Blionis GJ, Vokou D (2001) Pollination ecology of Campanula species on Mt Olympos, Greece. Ecography 24, 287–297.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Blionis GJ, Halley JM, Vokou D (2001) Flowering phenology of Campanula on Mt Olympos, Greece. Ecography 24, 696–706.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Brown A , Thompson-Dans C , Marchant N (1998) ‘Western Australia’s threatened flora.’ (Department of Conservation and Land Management: Como, WA)

Byers DL, Waller DM (1999) Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30, 479–513.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cochrane A (2003) Western Australia’s ex situ program for threatened species: a model integrated strategy for conservation. In ‘Ex situ plant conservation supporting species survival in the wild’. (Eds EO Guerrant Jr, K Havens, M Maunder) pp. 40–66. (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Dafni A (1992 ) ‘Pollination ecology.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)

Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, Reed C (1989) Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245, 477–480.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Khadari B, Gibernau M, Anstett MC, Kjellberg F, Hossaert-mckey M (1995) When figs wait for pollinators: the length of fig receptivity. American Journal of Botany 82, 992–999.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Martin FW (1959) Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technology 34, 903–913. open url image1

Mascarenhas AF , Gupta PK , Kulkarni VM , Mehta U , Iyer RS , Khuspe SS , Jagannathan V (1982) Propagation of trees by tissue culture. In ‘Tissue culture of economically important plants’. (Ed. AN Rao) pp. 175–179. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Singapore 1981. (Costed and ANBS Publishers)

Nepi M, Pacini E (1993) Pollination, pollen viability and pistil receptivity in Cucurbita pepo. Annals of Botany 72, 527–536.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Panaia M, Senaratna T, Bunn E, Dixon K, Sivasithamparam K (2000) Micropropagation of the critically endangered Western Australian species Symonanthus bancroftii (F.Muell) L. haegi (Solanaceae). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 63, 23–29.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Primack RB (1985) Longevity of individual flowers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 15–37.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rathcke BJ (2003) Floral longevity and reproductive assurance: seasonal patterns and an experiment test with Kalmia latifolia (Ericaceae). American Journal of Botany 90, 1328–1332. open url image1

Sarrazin F, Barbault R (1996) Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11, 474–478.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Schuiteman A , Vogel E (2003) Taxonomy for conservation. In ‘Orchid conservation’. (Eds KW Dixon, SP Kell, RL Barrett, PJ Cribb) pp. 55–68. (Natural History Publications: Kota Kinabalu, Borneo)

Skene KGM , Barlass M (1981) Micropropagation of grapevine. Combined Proceedings of the International Plant Propagators Society 30, 564–570.

Stratton DA (1989) Longevity of individual flowers in a Costa Rican cloud forest: ecological correlates and phylogenetic constraints. Biotropica 21, 308–318.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tweed EJ, Foster JT, Woodworth BL, Oesterle P, Kuehler C, Lieberman AA, Powers AT, Whitaker K, Monahan WB, Kellerman J, Telfer T (2003) Survival, dispersal, and home-range establishment of reintroduced captive-bred puaiohi, Myadestes palmeri. Biological Conservation 111, 1–9.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vallee L , Hogbin T , Monks L , Makinson B , Matthes M , Rossetto M (2004) ‘Guidelines for the translocation of threatened plants in Australia.’ 2nd edn. (Australian Network for Plant Conservation: Canberra)