Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > BT > BT05151
TURNER REVIEW
Contents Vol 54(5)

The ecology and evolution of gender strategies in plants: the example of Australian Wurmbea (Colchicaceae)

Spencer C. H. Barrett A C and Andrea L. Case A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Botany, 25 Willcocks St, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B2.

B Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: barrett@botany.utoronto.ca

Australian Journal of Botany 54(5) 417-433 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT05151
Submitted: 7 September 2005  Accepted: 9 March 2006   Published: 3 August 2006

Abstract

Angiosperms possess diverse sexual systems, often with different combinations of hermaphroditic, pistillate and staminate flowers. Despite this sexual diversity, most populations are either monomorphic or dimorphic with respect to gender strategy, where gender refers to the relative contribution that individuals make to fitness through female and male function. An important problem in evolutionary biology is to determine how and why variation in gender strategies originates and is maintained. Wurmbea (Colchicaceae), a genus of insect-pollinated geophytes, has recently become the focus of ecological and evolutionary studies aimed at understanding these issues. Phylogenetic reconstructions suggest dispersal from Africa to Australia, then New Zealand, and multiple transitions between monomorphic and dimorphic sexual systems within Australia. Microevolutionary studies of W. dioica and W. biglandulosa, two wide-ranging taxa with monomorphic and dimorphic populations, provide insights into the selective mechanisms governing transitions between sexual systems. Dimorphic populations of these taxa likely comprise independent origins of dimorphism via the gynodioecious pathway by invasion of females into monomorphic populations. Shifts in pollination biology and flower size, and their consequent effects on mating patterns, may have contributed to the evolution of gender dimorphism. Pollinator-mediated selfing and inbreeding depression provide a sufficient fertility advantage for females to be maintained in dimorphic populations. Once dimorphism establishes, increasing gender specialisation is associated with invasion of more arid environments. Inbreeding avoidance, particularly under stressful ecological conditions, is the most likely selective mechanism maintaining gender dimorphism in Wurmbea. We conclude our review by suggesting avenues for future research that might provide a more comprehensive picture of the evolution of gender strategies in Wurmbea.


Acknowledgments

We thank the many colleagues who have helped us in our studies of Wurmbea, especially Sean Graham, Terry Macfarlane, Greg Peters and Lynda Delph. We are particularly grateful to Mike Ramsey and Glenda Vaughton for sending us material of W. biglandulosa for our phylogenetic analyses, as well as their reprints and unpublished manuscripts and many informal discussions. Pat Lorch and Bill Cole assisted with field studies in Australia, Linley Jesson helped with collections from South Africa, and Bill Cole prepared the figures. This research was funded through Discovery Grants from NSERC and the Canada Research Chair’s Program to SCHB. ALC was supported by Connaught Graduate Fellowships from the University of Toronto.


References


Alonso C, Herrera CM (2001) Neither vegetative nor reproductive advantages account for high frequency of male-steriles in southern Spanish gynodioecious Daphne laureola (Thymelaeaceae). American Journal of Botany 88, 1016–1024.
| PubMed |
open url image1

Ashman T-L (1999) Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, 648–661.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ashman T-L (In press) The evolution of separate sexes: a focus on the ecological context. In ‘Ecology and evolution of flowers’. (Eds LD Harder, SCH Barrett) (Oxford University Press: Oxford)

Asikainen E, Mutikainen P (2003) Female frequency and relative fitness of females and hermaphrodites in gynodioecious Geranium sylvaticum (Geraniaceae). American Journal of Botany 90, 226–234. open url image1

Baker HG (1967) Support for Baker’s Law—as a rule. Evolution 21, 853–856.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Barr CM (2004) Soil moisture and sex ratio in a plant with nuclear-cytoplasmic sex inheritance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 271, 1935–1939.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Barrett SCH (1992) Gender variation and the evolution of dioecy in Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 5, 423–444.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Barrett SCH (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews. Genetics 3, 274–284.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Barrett SCH (2003) Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 358, 991–1004.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Barrett SCH , Eckert CG (1990) Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. In ‘Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants’. (Ed. S Kawano) pp. 229–254. (Academic Press: London)

Barrett SCH, Morgan MT, Husband BC (1989) Dissolution of a complex genetic polymorphism: the evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 43, 1398–1416.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Barrett SCH, Harder LD, Worley AC (1996) The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 351, 1271–1280. open url image1

Barrett SCH, Case AL, Peters GB (1999) Gender modification and resource allocation in subdioecious Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae). Journal of Ecology 87, 123–137.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bates RJ (1995) The species of Wurmbea (Liliaceae) in South Australia. Journal of the Adelaide Botanical Gardens 16, 33–53. open url image1

Bawa KS (1980) Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 15–39.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bell G (1985) On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 224, 223–265. open url image1

Case AL, Barrett SCH (2001) Ecological differentiation of combined and separate sexes of Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae) in sympatry. Ecology 82, 2601–2616.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Case AL, Barrett SCH (2004a) Floral biology of gender monomorphism and dimorphism in Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae) in Western Australia. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165, 289–301.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Case AL, Barrett SCH (2004b) Environmental stress and the evolution of dioecy: Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae) in Western Australia. Evolutionary Ecology 18, 145–164.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Charlesworth D (1999) Theories of the evolution of dioecy. In ‘Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants’. (Eds MA Geber, TE Dawson, LF Delph) pp. 33–60. (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1978) A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 141, 481–490.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Charnov EL (1982) ‘The theory of sex allocation.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ)

Comes HP, Abbott RJ (2001) Molecular phylogeny, reticulation, and lineage sorting in Mediterranean Senecio sect. Senecio (Asteraceae). Evolution 55, 1943–1962.
| Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Cox P (1988) Monomorphic and dimorphic sexual strategies: a modular approach. In ‘Plant reproductive strategies: patterns and strategies’. (Eds J Lovett Doust, L Lovett Doust) pp. 80–97. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)

Darwin C (1877) ‘The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species.’ (John Murray: London)

Delph LF (1990) Sex ratio variation in the gynodioecious shrub Hebe strictissima (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 44, 134–142.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Delph LF (2003) Sexual dimorphism in gender plasticity and its consequences for breeding system evolution. Evolution & Development 5, 34–39.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Delph LF, Wolf DE (2005) Evolutionary consequences of gender plasticity in genetically dimorphic breeding systems. New Phytologist 166, 119–128.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Donoghue MJ (1989) Phylogenies and the analyses of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43, 1137–1156.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Dorken ME, Barrett SCH (2004) Sex determination and the evolution of dioecy from monoecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 271, 213–219.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dudash MR (1990) Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparion in three environments. Evolution 44, 1129–1139.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Fishman L, Wyatt R (1999) Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 53, 1723–1733.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Ganders FR (1978) The genetics and evolution of gynodioecy in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 56, 1400–1408. open url image1

Geber MA (1999) Theories of the evolution of sexual dimorphism. In ‘Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants’. (Eds MA Geber, TE Dawson, LF Delph) pp. 97–122. (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Geber MA , Dawson TE , Delph LF (1999) ‘Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants.’ (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Goodwillie C, Kaliz S, Eckert CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36, 47–79.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Harder LD , Barrett SCH (1996) Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In ‘Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants’. (Eds DG Lloyd SCH Barrett) pp. 140–190. (Chapman and Hall: New York)

Hart JA (1985) Evolution of dioecism in Lepechinia Willd. sect. Parviflorae (Lamiaceae). Systematic Botany 10, 134–146.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Heilbuth JC (2000) Lower species richness in dioecious clades. American Naturalist 156, 221–241.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Heilbuth JC, Ives KL, Otto SP (2001) The consequences of dioecy for seed dispersal: modeling the seed shadow handicap. Evolution 55, 880–888.
| Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Jackson HD, Steane DA, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE (1999) Chloroplast DNA evidence for reticulate evolution in Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae). Molecular Ecology 8, 739–751.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jain SK (1976) The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7, 469–495.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jones A, Burd M (2001) Vegetative and reproductive variation among unisexual and hermaphroditic individuals of Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 49, 603–609.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kalisz S, Vogler DW, Hanley KM (2004) Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430, 884–887.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lloyd DG (1965) Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 19, 3–134. open url image1

Lloyd DG (1976) The transmission of genes via pollen and ovules in gynodioecious angiosperms. Theoretical Population Biology 9, 299–316.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lloyd DG (1979) Parental strategies of angiosperms. New Zealand Journal of Botany 17, 595–606. open url image1

Lloyd DG (1980) Sexual strategies in plants. III. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plants. New Zealand Journal of Botany 18, 103–108. open url image1

Lloyd DG (1982) Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. American Naturalist 120, 571–585.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lloyd DG, Bawa KS (1984) Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evolutionary Biology 17, 255–338. open url image1

Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1977) Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review 43, 177–212. open url image1

Macfarlane TD (1980) A revision of Wurmbea (Liliaceae) in Australia. Brunonia 3, 145–208. open url image1

Macfarlane TD (1986) Two new species of Wurmbea (Colchicaceae or Liliaceae s. lat.) from south western Australia. Nuytsia 5, 407–413. open url image1

Macfarlane TD (1987) Wurmbea (Liliaceae). Flora of Australia 45, 387–405. open url image1

Macfarlane TD (1993) Wurmbea calcicola (Colchicaceae), a new species from Cape Naturaliste, South western Australia. Nuytsia 9, 233–236. open url image1

Macfarlane TD, van Leeuwen SJ (1996) Wurmbea saccata (Colchicaceae), a lepidopteran pollinated new species from Western Australia. Nuytsia 10, 429–435. open url image1

Miller JS, Diggle PK (2003) Diversification of andromonoecy in Solanum section Lasiocarpa (Solanaceae): the roles of phenotypic plasticity and architecture. American Journal of Botany 90, 707–715. open url image1

Miller JS, Venable DL (2000) Polyploidy and the evolution of gender dimorphism. Science 289, 2335–2338.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Moeller DA, Geber MA (2005) Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance. Evolution 59, 786–799.
| Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Nordenstam B (1978) The genus Wurmbea in Africa except the Cape region. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 36, 211–233. open url image1

Nordenstam B (1986) The genus Wurmbea (Colchicaceae) in the Cape Region. Opera Botanica 87, 1–41. open url image1

Nordenstam B (1998) Colchicaceae. In ‘The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. III. Flowering plants. Monocotyledons: Lilianae (except Orchidaceae)’. (Ed. K Kubitzki) pp.175–185. (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Ornduff R (1985) Comparative fecundity of morphs in a mixed monoclinous-andromonoecious population of Wurmbea subsp. alba (Liliaceae) in Western Australia. Plant Systematics and Evolution 149, 299–302.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pate J , Dixon K (1982) ‘Tuberous, cormous and bulbous plants.’ (University of Western Australia Press: Perth)

Policansky D (1982) Sex change in plants and animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13, 471–495.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Queller DC (1997) Pollen removal, paternity and the male function of flowers. American Naturalist 149, 585–595.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ramsey M, Vaughton G (2001) Sex expression and sexual dimorphism in subdioecious Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162, 589–597.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ramsey M, Vaughton G (2002) Maintenance of gynodioecy in Wurmbea biglandulosa (Colchicaceae): gender differences in seed production and progeny success. Plant Systematics and Evolution 232, 189–200.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ramsey M, Vaughton G, Peakall R (2006a) Inbreeding avoidance and the evolution of gender dimorphism in Wurmbea biglandulosa (Colchicaceae). Evolution 60, 529–537.
| Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Ramsey M, Vaughton G, Peakall R (2006b) Does inbreeding avoidance maintain gender dimorphism in Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae)? Journal of Evolutionary Biology , open url image1

Renner SS, Ricklefs RE (1995) Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82, 596–606.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Richards AJ (1996) ‘Plant breeding systems.’ 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall: London)

Routley MB, Mavraganis K, Eckert CG (1999) Effect of population size on the mating system in a self-compatible, autogamous plant, Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Heredity 82, 518–528.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Sakai AK , Weller SG (1999) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants: a review of terminology, biogeographic patterns, ecological correlates, and phylogenetic approaches. In ‘Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants’. (Eds MA Geber, TE Dawson, LF Delph) pp. 1–31. (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Sarkissian TS, Barrett SCH, Harder LD (2001) Gender variation in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): is size all that matters? Ecology 82, 360–373.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Schoen DJ (1982) The breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outcrossing rates. Evolution 36, 352–360.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Schultz ST (1994) Nucleo-cytoplasmic male sterility and alternative routes to dioecy. Evolution 48, 1933–1945.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Seger J, Eckhart VM (1996) Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 263, 833–841. open url image1

Tsitrone A, Kirkpatrick M, Levin DA (2003) A model for chloroplast capture. Evolution 57, 1776–1782.
| Crossref | PubMed |
open url image1

Vamosi JC, Otto S, Barrett SCH (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16, 1006–1018.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Van Raamsdonck LWJ, Smiech MP, Sandbrink JM (1997) Introgression explains incongruence between nuclear and chloroplast DNA-based phylogenies in Allium section Cepa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 123, 91–108.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vaughton G, Ramsey M (1998) Floral display, pollinator visitation and reproductive success in the dioecious perennial herb Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Oecologia 115, 93–101.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vaughton G, Ramsey M (2002) Evidence of gynodioecy and sex ratio variation in Wurmbea biglandulosa (Colchicaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 232, 167–179.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vaughton G, Ramsey M (2003) Self-compatibility and floral biology in subdioecious Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 51, 39–45.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vaughton G, Ramsey M (2005) Dry environments and the establishment of females in monomorphic populations of Wurmbea biglandulosa (Colchicaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 18, 323–341.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Vinnersten A, Reeves G (2003) Phylogenetic relationships within Colchicaceae. American Journal of Botany 90, 1455–1462. open url image1

Webb CJ (1979) Breeding systems and the evolution of dioecy in New Zealand apioid Umbelliferae. Evolution 33, 662–672.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Webb CJ (1999) Empirical studies: evolution and maintenance of dimorphic breeding systems. In ‘Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants’. (Eds MA Geber, TE Dawson, LF Delph) pp. 61–95. (Springer-Verlag: New York)

Weller SG, Sakai AK (1990) The evolution of dicliny in Scheidea (Caryophyllaceae), an endemic Hawaiian genus. Plant Species Biology 5, 83–95.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Weller SG, Sakai AK (1999) Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30, 167–199.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Weller SG, Sakai AK, Wagner WL, Herbst DR (1990) Evolution of dioecy in Scheidea (Caryophyllaceae) in the Hawaiian Islands: biogeographical and ecological factors. Systematic Botany 15, 266–276.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Willson MF (1979) Sexual selection in plants. American Naturalist 113, 777–790.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wolfe AD, Elisens WJ (1995) Evidence of chloroplast capture and pollen mediated gene flow in Penstemon sect. Pelteranthera (Scrophulariaceae). Systematic Botany 20, 395–412.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Wolfe LM, Shmida A (1997) The ecology of sex expression in a gynodioecious Israeli desert shrub (Ochradenus baccatus). Ecology 78, 101–110.
| Crossref |
open url image1