Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative wood anatomy of Eucryphia wilkiei and E. jinksii (Cunoniaceae): two narrow endemics from Queensland, Australia

Imogen Poole A D and Richard W. Barnes B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Wood Anatomy Section, National Herbarium of The Netherlands, University of Utrecht Branch, PO Box 80102, Utrecht 3585 CS, The Netherlands & Palaeontological Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172 Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway.

B School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, PO Box 252-55, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.

C Present address: Forest Practices Board, 30 Patrick Street, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: i.poole@geo.uu.nl

Australian Journal of Botany 52(6) 739-745 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT04046
Submitted: 26 March 2004  Accepted: 6 August 2004   Published: 24 December 2004

Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative wood anatomical data are given for two narrow Queensland endemic Eucryphia species, E. wilkiei B.Hyland and Eucryphia jinksii P.I.Forst. Comparisons of wood anatomy of all extant Eucryphia taxa show that E. jinksii and E. wilkiei are distinct from each other, and other Eucryphia species. However, for both species characters relating to perforation plates, helical thickening (E. wilkiei only) and fibres are shared with the South American species, whereas the presence of crystals in the axial parenchyma is shared only with the Australian species. These data suggest that, based on wood anatomy, E. jinksii and E. wilkiei are basal among Australian species.


Acknowledgments

We thank Paul Forster (Queensland Herbarium) for supplying the wood sample of Eucryphia jinksii, and Dewanad Makaham (Utrecht University) for sectioning the wood samples.


References


Barnes RW, Jordan GJ (2000) Eucryphia (Cunoniaceae) reproductive and leaf macrofossils from Australia Cainozoic sediments. Australian Systematic Botany 13, 373–394.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Barnes RW, Jordan GJ, Hill RS, McCoull CJ (2000) A common boundary between distinct northern and southern morphotypes in two unrelated Tasmanian rainforest species. Australian Journal of Botany 48, 481–491. open url image1

Bausch J (1938) A revision of the Eucryphiaceae. Kew Bulletin 8, 317–349. open url image1

Bradford JC, Barnes RW (2001) Phylogenetics and classification of Cunoniaceae (Oxalidales) using chloroplast DNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Botany 26, 354–385. open url image1

Dickison WC (1978) Comparative anatomy of Eucryphiaceae. American Journal of Botany 65, 722–735. open url image1

Forster PI, Hyland BPM (1996) Two new species of Eucryphia Cav. (Cunoniaceae) from Queensland. Austrobaileya 4, 589–596. open url image1

Gregory, M (1998). Eucryphiaceae. In ‘Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Vol. IV. Saxifragales’. pp. 35–40. (Clarendon Press: Oxford)

Helman, C (1987). Rainforest in southern New South Wales. In ‘The rainforest legacy. Australian national rainforests study 1’. pp. 47–70. (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra)

Hill RS (1991) Leaves of Eucryphia (Eucryphiaceae) from Tertiary sediments in south eastern Australia. Australian Systematic Botany 4, 481–497. open url image1

Hill RS, McPhail MK (1983) Reconstruction of the Oligocene vegetation at Pioneer, North East Tasmania. Alcheringa 7, 281–299. open url image1

IAWA Committee (1989) IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bulletin 10, 219–332. open url image1

Jarmen, SJ , Brown, MJ ,  and  Kantvilas, G (1987). The classification, distribution and conservation status of Tasmanian rainforests. In ‘The rainforest legacy. Australian national rainforests study 1’. pp. 9–22. (Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra)

Poole I, Mennega AMW, Cantrill DJ (2003) Valdivian ecosystems on the Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary of Antarctica: further evidence from myrtaceous and eucryphiaceous fossil wood. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 124, 9–27.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rancusi, HM , Nishida, M ,  and  Nishida, H (1987). Xylotomy of important Chilean woods. In ‘Contributions to the botany of the Andes II. Vol. 2’. pp. 68–154. (Academia Scientific Books Inc.: Tokyo)

Record, SJ ,  and  Hess, RW (1943). ‘Timbers of the New World’. (Yale University Press: New Haven, CT)

Taylor F, Hill RS (1996) A phylogenetic analysis of Eucryphiaceae. Australian Systematic Botany 9, 735–748. open url image1

Torres T (1990) Etude paléobotanique du Tertiaire des Iles Roi Georges et Seymour, Antarctique. PhD Thesis (l’Université Claude Bernard: Lyon, France)

Wollenweber E, Dorr M, Rozefelds AC, Minchin P, Forster PI (2000) Variation in flavonoid exudates in Eucryphia species from Australia and South America. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 28, 111–118.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1