Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Precipitation effect on flowering and propagule setting in mangroves of the family Rhizophoraceae

Anand Prakash Tyagi
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Department of Biology, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, The University of the South Pacific, PO Box 1168, Suva, Fiji Islands; Email: tyagi_ap@usp.ac.fj

Australian Journal of Botany 52(6) 789-798 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT02077
Submitted: 17 September 2002  Accepted: 20 July 2004   Published: 24 December 2004

Abstract

Fijian seashores are dominated by Rhizophora samoensis (Hochr.), Rhizophora stylosa Griff. and Bruguiera gymnorhiza (L.) Lam. These three species were studied at two locations—western (dry zone) and eastern (wet zone) parts of Viti Levu (the Main Island of Fiji)—over 2 years consisting of a normal-precipitation and a low-precipitation (drought) year. The research was conducted to understand the flowering pattern, propagule development and propagule size at maturity before dispersal from the mother plant. The flowering pattern and number of propagules at maturity were observed to be significantly different among the three species and within species between a normal-precipitation and very low-precipitation (drought) year. In the drought year (1998), the number of flowers produced per plant and propagule setting were significantly lower than in the normal-precipitation year (1997) at both locations. Only 1–2% of total flowers in each species became mature propagules in the normal-precipitation year. This percentage was significantly lower in the drought year for all three species. Propagule size (weight, length and girth) was found to be significantly different in the three species. R. stylosa produced the biggest propagules, followed by R. samoensis and B. gymnorhiza. Longer and heavier propagules were recorded in the normal-precipitation year than in the low-precipitation year. Flowering patterns, propagule setting and propagule size at maturity are species specific, while differences within species between two zones could be due to different climatic conditions (the amount of rainfall, relative humidity and temperature regimes) prevailing over the 2 years.


Acknowledgments

The author thanks the University of the South Pacific Research Committee for funding this project (Grant 6292-1311-70766-15). The author also records his sincere gratitude to the Weather Bureau of Fiji for providing weather reports for the years 1997 and 1998.


References


Wium-Anderson S (1977) Seasonal growth of mangrove trees in southern Thailand. I. The phenology of Rhizophora apiculata Bl. Aquatic Botany 3, 281–286.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Cousins, J ,  and  Saenger, P (2002). Developing a protocol for in-vitro propagation of the grey mangrove—Avicennia marina. In ‘The importance of plant tissue culture and biotechnology in plant sciences, 2002’. (University of New England Publications Unit: Armidale, NSW)

Duke NC (1990) Phenological trends with lattitude in the mangrove tree Avicennia marina.  Journal of Ecology 78, 113–133. open url image1

Duke NC, Butt JS, Williams WT (1984) Observation on the floral and vegetative phenologies of north-eastern Australian mangroves. Australian Journal of Botany 32, 87–99. open url image1

Eganathan, P ,  and  Rao, CS (2001). ‘Manual of vegetative and micropropagation of mangroves.’ (M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation: Chennai, India)

Fiji Weather Bureau Reports (1997–1998). ‘Fiji Weather Bureau Reports.’ pp. 23–27. (Department of Mateorology: Namaka, Nadi)

Garner WW, Allard HA (1920) Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 533–607. open url image1

Gill AM, Tomlinson PB (1971) Studies on the growth of red mangroves (Rhizophora mangle L.). III. Phenology of the shoot. Biotropica 3, 109–124. open url image1

Hartmann, HT , Kofranek, AM , Rubatzky, VE ,  and  Flocker, WJ (1988). ‘Plant science: growth development, and utilisation of cultivated plants.’ 2nd edn. Chapters 6 and 10.. (Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

Juncosa AM (1982) Developmental morphology of the embryo and seedling of Rhizophora mangle L. (Rhizophoraceae). American Journal of Botany 69, 1599–1611. open url image1

Lugo, AE ,  and  Snedaker, SC (1975). Properties of a mangrove forest in southern Florida. In ‘Proceedings of the international symposium on biology and management of mangroves. Vol. 1’. pp. 170–212. (University of Florida: Gainesville, FL)

Macnae W (1966) Mangroves in eastern and southern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 14, 67–104. open url image1

Macnae W (1968) A general account of the fauna and flora of mangrove swamps and forests in the Indo-West Pacific Region. Advances in Marine Biology 6, 73–270. open url image1

Pillai, G (1990). ‘Mangroves of Fiji.’ (The University of the South Pacific Publication: Suva, Fiji)

Rabinowitz D (1978) Dispersal properties of mangroves propagules. Biotropica 10, 47–57. open url image1

Stephenson RA, Gallagher (1987) Effects of temperature, tree water status and relative humidity on premature nut drop from macadamia. Scientia Horticulturae 33, 113–121.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stephenson RA, Gallagher EC, Rasmusen S (1989) Effect of growth manipulation on carbohydrate regimes of macadamia trees. Scientia Horticulturae 40, 227–235.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tomlinson, PB (1986). ‘The botany of mangroves.’ (Cambridge University Press: Sydney)

Trueman SJ, Turnbull CGN (1994) Effects of cross-pollination and flower removal on fruit set in macadamia. Annals of Botany 73, 23–32.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Watling, D (1985). ‘A mangrove management plan for Fiji, Phase I.’ (Government Press: Suva, Fiji)