Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Recovery in plants and soils of 15N applied as subsurface bands of urea to sugarcane

I Vallis, VR Catchpoole, RM Hughes, RJK Myers, DR Ridge and KL Weier

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47(3) 355 - 370
Published: 1996

Abstract

The recovery of fertiliser N by sugarcane crops is low in comparison with most other field crops. Application of urea in subsurface bands instead of by broadcasting can greatly reduce loss of fertiliser N due to ammonia volatilisation, but the fertiliser N is still susceptible to loss from leaching or denitrification, which could be affected by soil internal drainage, trash management, or tillage practice. The recovery of fertiliser N in crops and soil from 15N-labelled urea applied as subsurface bands was measured in ratoon crops in southern Queensland and northern New South Wales. Two soil types, with contrasting internal drainage, were used in each region. In Queensland, the cultural practice was either trash burnt with inter-row cultivation or trash retained on the surface ('trash blanket') with no cultivation. In northern New South Wales, where the trash was burnt prior to harvest, the practice was either inter-row cultivation or zero tillage. Crop recovery of fertiliser N was nearly always in the range 20-40% of the amount applied. Residual fertiliser N in the soil at crop maturity ranged from 13 to 42% (average 26%). Total recovery of fertiliser N in the soil-plant system ranged from 35 to 76% (average 52%) at 6 months after application, and from 35 to 96% (average 56%) at crop maturity. Urea fertiliser supplied only 20-40% of the crop N uptake in a given season. Neither crop recovery nor loss of fertiliser N from the soil-plant system were related to the soil type or cultural practice used, indicating that compensatory effects occurred.

Keywords: nitrogen recovery; tillage; trash

https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9960355

© CSIRO 1996

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions