Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Relationships between body weight and some follicle and fleece characters in an Australian fine-wool Merino flock

T Nay and RH Hayman

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20(6) 1177 - 1187
Published: 1969

Abstract

Phenotypic correlations between body weight, follicle characters, and fleece characters have been investigated in a flock of 95 fine-wool non-Peppin Merino wethers, reared in the same locality under the same conditions.

The results indicated that three follicle characters, follicle chord, follicle depth, and the index of follicle bending, were independent of body weight.

It was found, in agreement with the results of other workers, that body weight was highly correlated with both greasy and clean wool weights (r = 0.53 and 0.51 respectively).

It was also found that follicle characters were significantly correlated with most of the fleece characters which contribute to the clean fleece weight per unit area of skin. The correlation coefficient of wool weight per unit area of skin with follicle chord was 0.33, with follicle depth 0.28, and with follicle bending index –0.35. The follicle characters were also correlated with greasy and clean fleece weights.

Crimp number per inch was predicted for individual animals by using as criterion the length of the follicle chord. A highly significant correlation coefficient of 0.67 was obtained between predicted and observed crimp number.

The close relationship between crimp chord and follicle chord reported in previous work was confirmed.

It is suggested that simultaneous selection for body weight and certain follicle characters may have an additive effect on the production of clean wool.

It is also suggested that the genetic antagonism between clean wool weight and number of crimps per inch can be explained in anatomical terms.

https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9691177

© CSIRO 1969

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions