Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > AR07415
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 59(9)

Identification of variability in phenological responses in canola-quality Brassica juncea for utilisation in Australian breeding programs

W. A. Burton A B G , R. F. Flood A C , R. M. Norton B , B. Field D , D. A. Potts E , M. J. Robertson F and P. A. Salisbury A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, Grains Innovation Park, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Vic. 3401, Australia.

B Faculty of Land and Food Resources, University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.

C Deceased.

D Department of Primary Industries, Environment and Water, Tas. 7000, Australia.

E Saskatchewan Wheat Pool, Research and Development, 201-407 Downey Road, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4L8 Canada.

F CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

G Corresponding author. Email: wayne.burton@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(9) 874-881 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07415
Submitted: 2 November 2007  Accepted: 16 June 2008   Published: 26 August 2008

Abstract

Canola-quality Brassica juncea is a potential alternative crop species in lower rainfall Australian environments due to its superior heat and drought tolerance, disease resistance, and pod-shatter resistance compared with the currently grown B. napus species. Canola-quality types of B. juncea that are adapted to flower and mature before water deficits and high temperatures significantly limit yield potential are currently being developed. In this study, the variability in phenological characteristics in canola-quality B. juncea is assessed, with a view to identifying the potential for including a range of genetic phenological controls on the development of the crop to assist with adaptation.

Vernalisation response was compared among 17 lines of B. juncea and 3 of B. napus, using a cold treatment of 2.6°C for 25 days. Leaf number, and duration to first flower and maturity were compared in response to the vernalisation treatments. To assess day length response, the same 20 genotypes were sown at five locations with a range of sowing times, and one controlled environment, where day length was artificially extended. Development stages were assessed and the duration of particular phenological phases determined in relation to time, thermal time, and photoperiod.

The major factor controlling flowering in canola-quality B. juncea genotypes was day length, with only small responses to vernalisation detected. There was sufficient variability in these traits and in thermal time to flowering under long days (intrinsic earliness) within the current canola-quality germplasm in Australia to select early flowering genotypes with potential adaptation to low-rainfall environments.

Additional keywords: flowering, vernalisation, temperature, adaptation.


Acknowledgments

We thank Mr D. Robson, Mr S. Barnes, Mr T. Clancy, and Mr P. Flett, Department of Primary Industries breeding program based at Horsham. We also thank Mr P. Lim and Ms C. Wright, formally of Victorian Department of Primary Industries, for statistical analyses, and Dr Maarten van Ginkel for constructive comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation.


References


Burton W , Pymer S , Salisbury P , Kirk J , Oram R (1999) Performance of Australian canola quality Brassica juncea breeding lines. In ‘GCIRC 10th International Rapeseed Congress’. Canberra, ACT. (CD-ROM)

Burton W, Ripley V, Potts D, Salisbury P (2004) Assessment of genetic diversity in selected breeding lines and cultivars of canola quality Brassica juncea and their implications for canola breeding. Euphytica 136, 181–192.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Friend DJC, Helson VA (1966) Brassica campestris L.: Floral induction by long days. Science 153, 1115–1116.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Gomez-Campo C , Prakash S (1999) Origin and domestication. In ‘Biology of Brassica coenospecies’. (Ed. C Gomez-Campo) pp. 33–58. (Elsevier Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Hodgson AS (1978) Rapeseed adaptation in northern New South Wales. 1. Phenological responses to vernalisation, temperature and photoperiod by annual and biennial cultivars of Brassica campestris L., Brassica napus L. and wheat cv. Timgalen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 693–710.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kirk JTO, Oram RN (1978) Mustards as possible oil and protein crops for Australia. The Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 44, 143–156. open url image1

Kirk JTO, Oram RN (1981) Isolation of erucic acid free lines of Brassica juncea: Indian mustard now a potential oilseed crop in Australia. The Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 47, 51–52. open url image1

Love HK, Rakow G, Raney JP, Downey RK (1990) Development of low glucosinolate mustard. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 70, 419–424. open url image1

Mendham N , Salisbury P (1995) Physiology: crop development, growth and yield. In ‘Brassica oilseeds: production and utilization’. (Ed. D Kimber) pp. 11–64. (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK)

Murphy LA, Scarth R (1994) Vernalization response in spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 74, 275–277. open url image1

Myers LF, Christian KR, Kirchner RJ (1982) Flowering response of 48 lines of oilseed rape (Brassica spp.) to vernalization and daylength. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 33, 927–936.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nanda R, Bhargava SC, Mamta G, Gautam M (1996) Effect of flowering time on rate of dry matter accumulation, duration of filling period and total oil content in Brassica seeds. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 1, 88–92. open url image1

Nanda R, Bhargava SC, Rawson HM (1995) Effect of sowing date on rates of leaf appearance, final leaf numbers and areas in Brassica campestris, B. juncea, B. napus and B. carinata. Field Crops Research 42, 125–134.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Oram RN , Salisbury PA , Kirk JTO , Burton WA (1999) Brassica juncea breeding. In ‘Canola in Australia: the first thirty years. 10th International Rapeseed Congress’. (Ed. PA Salisbury) pp. 37–40. (Organising Committee of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress: Canberra, ACT)

Payne RW , Lane PW , Digby PGN , Harding SA , Leech PK , et al. (1993) ‘Genstat 5, Release 3, reference manual.’ (Claredon Press: Oxford, UK)

Rakow G , Raney JP , Males D (1995) Field performance of canola quality Brassica juncea. In ‘GCIRC 9th International Rapeseed Congress’. Cambridge, UK. (Ed. D Murphy) pp. 228–230. (Organising Committee of the 9th International Rapeseed Congress under the aegis of the Groupe Consultatif International de Recherche sur le Colza)

Richards RA, Thurling N (1978) Variation between and within species of rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 469–477.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Robertson MJ (2001) Understanding how environment and genotype determine time to flowering in canola and indian mustard. In ‘Australian Research Assembly on Brassicas’. Geelong, Vic., Australia. (Ed. SM Marcroft) pp. 96–100.

Robertson MJ , Holland JF , Cawley S , Bambach R , Cooks B , Watkinson AR (2001) Phenology of canola cultivars in the northern region and implications for frost risk. In ‘10th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Hobart, Tas. (CD-ROM)

Robertson MJ, Watkinson AR, Kirkegaard JA, Holland JF, Potter TD , et al. (2002) Environmental and genotypic control of time to flowering in canola and Indian mustard. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 793–809.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Salisbury PA , Green AG (1991) Developmental responses in spring canola cultivars. In ‘GCIRC – 8th International Rapeseed Congress’. Saskatoon, Canada. pp. 1769–1774. (Organising Committee of the 8th International Rapeseed Congress under the aegis of the Groupe Consultatif International de Recherche sur le Colza (GCIRC) and the Canola Council of Canada)

Thurling N , Kaveeta R (1991) Yield improvement of Brassica napus through introgression of genes for earliness from primary and secondary gene pools. In ‘GCIRC 8th International Rapeseed Congress’. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. (Ed. DI McGregor) pp. 123–136. (Organising Committee of the 8th International Rapeseed Congress under the aegis of the Groupe Consultatif International de Recherche sur le Colza (GCIRC) and the Canola Council of Canada)

Woods DL (1992) Comparative performance of mustard and canola in the Peace River region. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 72, 829–830. open url image1