Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > AR07277
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 59(6)

The effect of dairy effluent on dry matter yields, nutritive characteristics, and mineral content of summer-active regrowth forage crops in southern Australia

J. L. Jacobs A C , G. N. Ward A and Gavin Kearney B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, 78 Henna Street, Warrnambool, Vic. 3280, Australia.

B 36 Paynes Road, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: joe.jacobs@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(6) 578-588 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR07277
Submitted: 23 July 2007  Accepted: 22 February 2008   Published: 10 June 2008

Abstract

In southern Australia, the majority of dry land dairy farms use a 2-pond system to treat and contain dairy effluent collected at the milking platform. This effluent contains a range of nutrients that have the potential to affect forage dry matter (DM) yields, nutritive characteristics, and mineral content of forages.

The effect of applying second-pond dairy effluent to the summer-active forages chicory (Chichorium intybus L. cv. Grouse), Hunter (Brassica campestris L. × Brassica napus L.), Winfred (Brassica napus L.), and Sweet Jumbo (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench × Sorghum sudanese (Piper) Stapf.) over two summer periods was measured. Effluent was applied at rates of 0, 40, 80, and 100 mm with application split into two equal application times. The first occurred 6–10 weeks after sowing and the second immediately after the first grazing. Forages were assessed for DM yield, nutritive characteristics, and mineral content over the two growth periods in each year.

Analysis of effluent showed that on average over the 2 years, the effluent contained 146, 34, 439, and 18 kg/ML of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sulfur (S), respectively. Furthermore, the effluent also contained 161 kg/ML of calcium (Ca) and 222 kg/ML of magnesium (Mg).

For the total growth period in Year 1, all crops showed a linear increase (P < 0.05) in DM yield to applied effluent, with response values varying for each crop. Responses were 49, 52, 29, and 51 kg DM/ha.mm applied effluent for chicory, Hunter, Sweet Jumbo, and Winfred, respectively. For Year 2, all crops also showed a linear increase (P < 0.05) in DM yield (15 kg DM/ha.mm applied effluent) with applied effluent. In Year 1, crude protein (CP) content of all crops increased (P < 0.05) in a linear manner at rates of 0.073 and 0.047% per mm applied effluent for growth periods 1 and 2. There were also linear responses (P < 0.05) in Year 2, with responses varying for each crop for each growth period. For chicory there was no effect of effluent application on CP content in either growth period, while other crops generally exhibited a linear increase with responses of up to 0.08% per mm applied effluent. The greatest changes in mineral content of herbage were those of K, Ca, and Mg. There was a linear increase (P < 0.05) in K content for all growth periods in Years 1 and 2. Magnesium content of chicory (periods 1 and 2) and Winfred (period 2) showed a linear decrease (P < 0.05) in response to effluent application in Year 1, whereas there was no effect in Year 2 for any crops.

The results from this study highlight the potential of second-pond dairy effluent to increase DM yields of a range of summer-active forage crops. The data also suggest that while effluent can improve DM yields when soil moisture is limiting, when additional moisture as rainfall occurs, responses from effluent are even more pronounced. In addition, the CP content of forages can be improved when effluent is applied. The combination of increased DM yield with higher CP content provides greater flexibility in dairy cattle feeding options through the dry summer period.


Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Victorian Government, Dairy Australia, WestVic Dairy, Gipps Dairy, and Murray Dairy for providing financial assistance for this study. We also thank DemoDAIRY for the use of land on their farm to undertake the experiment. The technical support of Stewart Burch, Troy Jenkin, Rachael Ward, and Robyn Bush is also acknowledged.


References


AFIA (2002) ‘Laboratory methods manual.’ (Australian Fodder Industry Association: Melbourne, Vic.)

APHA (1998) ‘Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.’ 20th edn (Eds LS Clesceri, AE Greenberg, AD Eaton) (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation)

Barry TN (1998) The feeding value of chicory (Cichorium intybus) for ruminant livestock. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 131, 251–257.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Belesky DP, Turner KE, Ruckle JM (2000) Influence of nitrogen on productivity and nutritive value of forage chicory. Agronomy Journal 92, 472–478. open url image1

Bolan NS, Horne DJ, Currie LD (2004) Growth and chemical composition of legume-based pasture irrigated with dairy farm effluent. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 85–93. open url image1

Clarke T, Flinn PC, McGowan AA (1982) Low cost pepsin-cellulase assays for prediction of digestibility of herbage. Grass and Forage Science 37, 147–150.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Collins M, McCoy JE (1997) Chicory productivity, forage quality and response to nitrogen fertiliser. Agronomy Journal 89, 232–238. open url image1

Feigin A , Ravina I , Shalhevet J (1991) ‘Irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Management for environmental protection.’ (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)

GenStat Committee (2003) ‘GenStat® Release 7.1.’ (VSN International Ltd: Oxford)

Heatley P (2001) ‘Dairying and the environment, managing dairy effluent.’ (Dairying and the Environment Committee, New Zealand Dairy Research Committee: Palmerston North, New Zealand)

Isbell RF (1996) ‘The Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)

Jacobs JL, McKenzie FR, Ward GN (1999) Changes in the botanical composition and nutritive characteristics of pasture, and nutrient selection by dairy cows grazing rainfed pastures in western Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 419–428.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jacobs JL , Rigby SE (1999) ‘Minerals in dairy pastures in Victoria.’ (Department of Natural Resources and Environment: Melbourne, Vic.)

Jacobs JL , Ward GN (2003) Effect of different rates of dairy effluent on turnip DM yields and nutritive characteristics. In ‘11th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Geelong, Victoria. (Australian Society of Agronomy)

Jacobs JL , Ward GN (2004) Effect of dairy effluent on millet yields and quality. Agronomy New Zealand. In ‘Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference’. Ashburton, New Zealand. pp. 51–56. (Agronomy Society of New Zealand, Inc.)

Jacobs JL, Ward GN (2007a) Effect of second-pond dairy effluent applied in spring to silage regrowth of perennial ryegrass based pasture in southern Australia. 1. Dry matter yield and botanical composition changes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 137–143.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jacobs JL, Ward GN (2007b) Effect of second-pond dairy effluent applied in spring to silage regrowth of perennial ryegrass based pasture in southern Australia. 2. Changes in nutritive characteristics and mineral content. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 145–151.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jacobs JL, Ward GN (2007c) Effect of second-pond dairy effluent on turnip dry matter yield, nutritive characteristics, and mineral content. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 884–892.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jacobs JL, Ward GN, McDowell AM, Kearney G (2001) A survey on the effect of establishment techniques, crop management, moisture availability and soil type on turnip dry matter yields and nutritive characteristics in western Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 743–751.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jacobs JL, Ward GN, McDowell AM, Kearney G (2002) Effect of seedbed techniques, variety, soil type and sowing time, on brassica dry matter yields, water use efficiency and crop nutritive characteristics in western Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 945–952.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jacobs JL, Ward GN, McKenzie FM, Kearney G (2006) Irrigation and nitrogen fertiliser effects on dry matter yield, water use efficiency and nutritive characteristics of summer forage crops in south west Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1139–1149.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kemp A, Hart ML (1957) Grass tetany in grazing milking cows. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 4–17. open url image1

Lainé P, Ounny A, MacDuff JH, Boucaud J, Salette J (1993) Kinetic parameters of nitrate uptake by different catch crop species: effects of low temperatures or previous nitrate starvation. Physiologia Plantarum 88, 85–92.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lautenenschlaeger W (1989) Atomic spectroscopy advances. Microwave digestion in a closed-vessel, high pressure system. Spectroscopy 4, 16–21. open url image1

Longhurst RD, Roberts AHC, O’Connor MB (2000) Farm dairy effluent: a review of published data on chemical and physical characteristics in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 7–14. open url image1

Nakashima S, Sturgeon E, Willie SN, Berman SS (1988) Acid digestion of marine samples for trace element analysis using microwave heating. Analyst 113, 159–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Notman P (1994) Turnips—a farmer’s experience. In ‘Proceedings of the Grassland Society of Victoria 35th Annual Conference’. pp. 60–68. (Grasslands Society of Victoria: Parkville, Vic.)

Sanderson MA, Labreveux M, Hall MH, Elwinger GF (2003) Nutritive value of chicory and English plantain forage. Crop Science 43, 1797–1804. open url image1

Shenk JS, Westerhaus MO (1991) Population definition, sample selection and calibration procedures for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Crop Science 31, 469–474. open url image1

Standing Committee on Agriculture (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publications: Melbourne, Vic.)

van Soest PJ, Wine RH (1967) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. Journal – Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50, 50–55. open url image1

Waugh CD, Clark DA, Harris SL, Thom ER, Copeman PJA, Napper AR (1998) Chicory for milk production. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 60, 33–37. open url image1

Yemm EW, Willis AJ (1954) The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochemistry 57, 508–514. open url image1