Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > AR06306
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(7)

Water stress and reduced fruit size in micro-irrigated pear trees under deficit partial rootzone drying

Mark G. O’Connell A B and Ian Goodwin A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, Private Bag 1, Tatura, Vic. 3616, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: mark.oconnell@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58(7) 670-679 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06306
Submitted: 23 October 2006  Accepted: 22 March 2007   Published: 26 July 2007

Abstract

Crop water relations, vegetative and reproductive growth, and soil water status were studied during 2 seasons to determine the effectiveness of partial rootzone drying (PRD) in a mature micro-irrigated pear orchard in the Goulburn Valley, Australia. PRD treatments were 50% (PRD50) and 100% (PRD100) of predicted crop water requirement (ETc) applied on one side of the tree alternated on a 14-day cycle compared with a Control treatment, which received 100% of ETc irrigated on both sides of the tree. Irrigation was applied daily by micro-jets to replace ETc estimated using reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) and a FAO-56 crop coefficient of 1.15 adjusted for tree size. The PRD50 regime applied 174–250 mm for the season v. 347–470 mm for both the Control and PRD100 treatments. Irrigation maintained a well watered rootzone under the emitter compared with the drying profiles of the alternated wet/dry irrigated zones of the PRD treatments. There was no significant benefit of PRD100 compared with the Control irrigation regime. Similar vegetative growth (canopy radiation interception), reproductive growth (fruit growth rate, final fruit size, yield), fruit quality (total soluble solids, flesh firmness), and crop water relations (midday leaf conductance, midday leaf and stem water potential) were measured between the Control and PRD100. Trees under the PRD50 regime showed symptoms of severe water stress, that being greater fruit drop, reduced fruit size, lower yield, reduced leaf conductance, and lower leaf and stem water potential. The 50% water saving afforded by PRD50 led to a yield penalty of 16–28% compared with the Control and PRD100. PRD50 fruit failed to meet commercial cannery requirements due to poor fruit size. We conclude from an agronomic basis that deficit PRD irrigation management is not recommended for micro-irrigated pear orchards on fine-textured soils in the Goulburn Valley, Australia.


Acknowledgments

The technical support and assistance of Jim Selman, Neil Penfold, and Yinghong Wang is gratefully acknowledged. Financial support was provided by the STI Project 1.3.1 ‘Next generation sustainable production systems—Megabucks from Megalitres’, NPIRD Project CDH2 ‘Improving the water use efficiency of horticultural crops’, and the Department of Primary Industries. Finally, thanks to Dr Horst Caspari for his helpful comments on the manuscript.


References


Allen RG , Pereira LS , Raes D , Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy.

Andersen PC (1989) Leaf gas exchange characteristics of eleven species of fruit crops in north Florida. Proceedings Florida State Horticultural Science Society 102, 229–234. open url image1

Andersen PC (1991) Leaf gas exchange of 11 species of fruit crops with reference to sun-tracking/non-sun-tracking responses. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71, 1183–1193. open url image1

Ayars JE, Johnson RS, Phene CJ, Trout TJ, Clark DA, Mead RM (2003) Water use by drip-irrigated late-season peaches. Irrigation Science 22, 187–194.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Boland A-M , Ziehrl A , Beaumont J (2002) ‘Guide to best practice in water management: orchard crops.’ (Department of Natural Resources and Environment: Knoxfield, Vic.)

Caspari HW, Einhorn TC, Leib BG, Redulla CA, Andrews PK, Lombardini L, Auvil T, McFerson JR (2004b) Progress in the development of partial rootzone drying of apple trees. Acta Horticulturae 664, 125–132. open url image1

Caspari HW, Neal S, Alspach P (2004a) Partial rootzone drying. A new deficit irrigation strategy for apple? Acta Horticulturae 664, 93–100. open url image1

Dry PR (1997) Response of grapevines to partial drying of the root system. PhD thesis, The University of Adelaide, Australia.

Dry PR, Loveys BR (1999) Grapevine shoot growth and stomatal conductance are reduced when part of the root system is dried. Vitis 34, 151–156. open url image1

Kang S, Hu X, Goodwin I, Jerie P (2002) Soil water distribution, water use, and yield response to partial rootzone drying under a shallow groundwater table condition in a pear orchard. Scientia Horticulturae 92, 277–291.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Loveys BR, Dry PR, Stoll M, McCarthy MG (2000) Using plant physiology to improve the water use efficiency of horticultural crops. Acta Horticulturae 537, 187–199. open url image1

McCutchan H, Shackle KA (1992) Stem-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French). Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 117, 60.7–60.11. open url image1

Mitchell PD (1986) Pear fruit growth and the use of diameter to estimate fruit volume and weight. HortScience 21, 1003–1005. open url image1

Monteith JL (1977) Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 281, 277–294.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Naor A (2001) Irrigation and crop load influence fruit size and water relations in field-grown ‘Spadona’ pear. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 126, 252–255. open url image1

Naor A, Peres M, Greenblat Y, Doron I, Gal Y, Stern RA (2000) Irrigation and crop load interactions in relation to pear yield and fruit-size distribution. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 75, 555–561. open url image1

Northcote KH , Skene JKM (1972) Australian soils with saline and sodic properties. CSIRO Australian Soil Publication No. 27.

O’Connell MG, Goodwin I, Dunn GM (2006) Towards a better understanding of crop water requirement in orchards: a case study from the Goulburn Valley. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 405–412.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Poni S, Tagliavini M, Neri D, Scudellari D, Toselli M (1992) Influence of root pruning and water stress on growth and physiological factors of potted apple, grape, peach and pear trees. Scientia Horticulturae 52, 223–236.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shackle KA, Ahmadi H, Biasi W, Buchner R, Goldhamer D , et al. (1997) Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees. HortTechnology 7, 23–29. open url image1

Stoll M, Loveys B, Dry P (2000) Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1627–1634.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Zegbe AJ, Behboudian MH, Clothier BE (2004) Partial rootzone drying is a feasible option for irrigating processing tomatoes. Agricultural Water Management 68, 195–206.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1