Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Differential tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to metribuzin

S. G. L. Kleemann A B and G. S. Gill A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Agriculture and Wine, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: samuel.kleemann@adelaide.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58(5) 452-456 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06093
Submitted: 21 March 2006  Accepted: 15 February 2007   Published: 11 May 2007

Abstract

Field and glasshouse experiments were undertaken at 2 locations in South Australia to evaluate wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) tolerance to metribuzin. Sloop SA barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was used as a standard in the evaluation. Linear and logistic regression models were used to describe the response of wheat genotypes to metribuzin. Parameter estimates of B (slope) and ED50 (dose required for 50% inhibition) estimated by the models were used to compare the responses of the genotypes with that of the known sensitive cv. Spear. In the field, wheat cvv. Blade, Kite, EGA Eagle Rock, and Sloop SA barley showed tolerance to metribuzin, exhibiting little change in seedling density and anthesis dry matter (DM) when treated with metribuzin (187.5 and 375 g/ha). In contrast, wheat cv. Spear, which has 50% common parentage with Blade, showed a strong negative response to metribuzin for both seedling density (B = –0.308) and anthesis DM (B = –0.482), indicating sensitivity to the herbicide. Sonora 64 and Tezanos Pinto Precoz, parental lines of Blade, were also sensitive to metribuzin (>187.5 g/ha), showing similar negative responses to that of Spear for anthesis dry matter (B = –0.307 and –0.387). However, Kite, which is another parent of Blade, showed excellent tolerance to this herbicide, exhibiting only a small response (B = –0.076), which was statistically (P < 0.05) different from that of Spear. In the second field study, cvv. Blade, EGA Eagle Rock, and Sloop SA barley were again far more tolerant to metribuzin than the sensitive cv. Spear, requiring almost double the dose of metribuzin to induce 50% inhibition (ED50). Glasshouse studies, where metribuzin was highly active in a light sandy potting soil at what would be considered low rates in the field (50 and 100 g/ha), confirmed the sensitivity differences among wheat genotypes observed in the field. Wheat genotypes Blade, Kite, EGA Eagle Rock, and daughter line RAC 0824 were consistently tolerant to metribuzin. Sensitivity to metribuzin (50 g/ha) was observed in Spear, and most parental lines of Blade with the exception of Kite. Interestingly, Kite showed equivalent tolerance to its progeny, Blade and EGA Eagle Rock, exhibiting similar ED50 and B (slope) values. It is noteworthy that EGA Eagle Rock has recently been specifically bred for tolerance to metribuzin using Blade as a parent.

Considering Kite was the only parent to show tolerance to metribuzin in these field and glasshouse studies, it would appear to be the major contributor to metribuzin tolerance in cv. Blade. At present, Kite is not favoured by wheat breeders due to the presence of a rust-resistant gene (SR26) linked to yield penalty. Further research is required to determine alleles responsible for metribuzin tolerance in wheat and to identify alternative sources of metribuzin tolerance.

Additional keyword: metribuzin tolerance.


Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation. We thank wheat breeder Mr H. Kuchel (Australian Grain Technologies Pty Ltd) for selecting and providing germplasm for screening, and Mr D. Radulovic for technical assistance during the course of this project.


References


Devlin DL, Gealy DR, Morrow LA (1987) Differential metabolism of metribuzin by downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Science 35, 741–745. open url image1

Gawronski SW, Haderlie LC, Stark JC (1986) Metribuzin absorption and translocation in two barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars. Weed Science 34, 491–495. open url image1

Gill GS, Blacklow WM (1985) Variations in seed dormancy and rates of development of great brome, Bromus diandrus Roth., as adaptations to the climates of Southern Australia and implications for weed control. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 295–304.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gill GS, Bowran DG (1990) Tolerance of wheat cultivars to metribuzin and implications for the control of Bromus diandrus and B. rigidus in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 373–378.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Heap I (2005) Herbicide resistant weeds. www.weedscience.org.html (accessed December 2005).

Ratliff RL, Carver BF, Peeper TF (1991) Expression of metribuzin sensitivity in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) populations. Weed Science 39, 130–133. open url image1

Runyan TJ, McNeil WK, Peeper TF (1982) Differential tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Science 30, 94–97. open url image1

Schroeder J, Banks PA, Nichols RL (1985) Soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivar response to metribuzin. Weed Science 34, 66–69. open url image1

Villarroya M , Chueca MC , Garcia-Baudin JM (1993) Variation in metribuzin response between wheat cultivars and Bromus diandrus (great brome). In ‘Proceedings 1993 Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds’. Brighton, UK. pp. 607–612. (Brighton Crop Protection Council: Farnham, Surrey, UK)

Villarroya M, Escorial MC, Garcia-Baudin JM, Chueca MC (2000) Inheritance of tolerance to metribuzin in durum wheat. Weed Research 40, 293–300.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1