Variation in feed intake of grazing crossbred ewes and genetic correlations with production traits
N. M. Fogarty A D , G. J. Lee A , V. M. Ingham A , G. M. Gaunt B and L. J. Cummins CA The Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
B Primary Industries Research Victoria (PIRVic), Department of Primary Industries, Rutherglen Centre, Rutherglen, Vic. 3685, Australia.
C Primary Industries Research Victoria (PIRVic), Department of Primary Industries, Hamilton Centre, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: neal.fogarty@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(10) 1037-1044 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05403
Submitted: 21 November 2005 Accepted: 2 June 2006 Published: 27 September 2006
Abstract
Feed for maintenance of the ewe flock is a major cost in lamb production systems and a reduction in these feed requirements could have an effect on carrying capacity and both biological and economic efficiency in sheep flocks. Inclusion of feed intake in breeding programs requires knowledge of its genetic variation and genetic relationships with other production traits. This study reports on the variation in relative digestible dry matter intake (rDDMI) of 2528 mature, non-pregnant, crossbred ewes that are the progeny of 91 rams of various maternal breeds. Feed intake of pasture under grazing conditions was estimated using the faecal marker dilution technique with chromium sesquioxide controlled-release devices. There was significant variation in intake associated with liveweight, liveweight gain, prior reproductive status, fat depth, and muscle depth of the ewes. Sire breed was not significant for rDDMI, although there was a considerable range of >30% across sire progeny groups within most sire breeds, and rDDMI had an estimated heritability of 0.41 ± 0.07 (s.e.). The genetic correlations with a range of production traits (growth, carcass, wool, and reproduction) were all close to zero. The potential for inclusion of genetic improvement of efficiency of feed utilisation in breeding programs for sheep is discussed.
Additional keywords: feed efficiency, lamb production, heritability, Border Leicester.
Acknowledgments
Meat and Livestock Australia and the Australian Government through the Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre provided financial support. Staff from the NSW Department of Primary Industries and Primary Industries Research Victoria are thanked for their assistance, including Dr Arthur Gilmour, Sharon Nielsen, Lynette McLeod, and Rachel Gordon at Orange; Robynne Tuckwell, Jayce Morgan, Tony Markham, and David Stanley at Cowra; Greg Seymour, Paul Curran, Taffy Phillips, and Max Daniel at Rutherglen; and Trevor Pollard and Kerrie Groves at Hamilton. Staff at Wollongbar Agricultural Institute are thanked for the chromium analyses of the faecal samples. The breeders who entered sires in the MCPT are thanked for making the project possible. Dr Rob Woolaston is thanked for his comments on an earlier report.
Arthur PF,
Archer JA, Herd RM
(2004) Feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle: overview of recent Australian research and challenges for the future. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 361–369.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arthur PF,
Archer JA,
Herd RM, Melville GJ
(2001b) Response to selection for net feed intake in beef cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 135–138.
Arthur PF,
Archer JA,
Johnston DJ,
Herd RM,
Richardson EC, Parnell PF
(2001a) Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2805–2811.
| PubMed |
Brown DJ,
Atkins KD, Huisman AE
(2005) Expression of body weight, fleece weight and fibre diameter in across flock genetic evaluation. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 16, 84–87.
Bunter KL,
Hermesch S,
Luxford BG,
Graser H-U, Crump RE
(2005) Insulin-like growth factor-I measured in juvenile pigs is genetically correlated with economically important performance traits. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 783–792.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cammack KM,
Leymaster KA,
Jenkins TG, Nielsen MK
(2005) Estimates of genetic parameters for feed intake, feeding behavior, and daily gain in composite ram lambs. Journal of Animal Science 83, 777–785.
| PubMed |
Costigan P, Ellis KJ
(1987) Analysis of faecal chromium derived from controlled release marker devices. New Zealand Journal of Technology 3, 89–92.
Dickerson GE
(1978) Animal size and efficiency: basic concepts. Animal Production 27, 367–379.
Dove H,
Mayes RW,
Lamb CS, Ellis KJ
(2002) Factors influencing the release rate of alkanes from an intra-ruminal, control-release device, and the resultant accuracy of intake estimation in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 681–696.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fogarty NM,
Ingham VM,
Gilmour AR,
Cummins LP,
Gaunt GM,
Stafford J,
Hocking Edwards JE, Banks RG
(2005b) Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 1. Breed and fixed effects for birth and weaning weight of first cross lambs, gestation length and reproduction of base ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 443–453.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fogarty NM,
McLeod LJ, Morgan JE
(2003) Variation among crossbred ewes in lamb productivity and profit on a feed unit basis. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 314–317.
Herd RM,
Oddy VH, Lee GJ
(1993) Effect of divergent selection for weaning weight on liveweight and wool growth responses to feed intake in Merino ewes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33, 699–705.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Knott SA,
Cummins LJ,
Leury BJ, Dunshea FR
(2004) Less efficient sheep are more responsive to an ACTH induced stress challenge. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition Suppl. 13, S89.
| PubMed |
Lee GJ,
Atkins KD, Mortimer SI
(1995a) Variation between Merino ewes in pasture intake. 1. Between flock differences and some environmental sources of variation. Livestock Production Science 41, 133–142.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee GJ,
Atkins KD, Mortimer SI
(1995b) Variation between Merino ewes in pasture intake. 2. Within-flock genetic parameters for intake and some production traits. Livestock Production Science 41, 143–150.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee GJ,
Atkins KD, Swan AA
(2001) Genetic parameters for pasture intake and wool growth efficiency in Merino sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 505–508.
Lee GJ,
Atkins KD, Swan AA
(2002) Pasture intake and digestibility by young and non-breeding adult sheep: the extent of genetic variation and relationships with productivity. Livestock Production Science 73, 185–198.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moore KL,
Johnston DL,
Herd RM, Graser H-U
(2003) Genetic and non-genetic effects on plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentration and production traits in Angus cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 222–226.
Pitchford WS
(2004) Genetic improvement of feed efficiency of beef cattle: what lessons can be learnt from other species? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 371–382.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Snowder GD, van Vleck LD
(2003) Estimates of genetic parameters and selection strategies to improve the economic efficiency of postweaning growth in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2704–2713.
| PubMed |
van der Werf JHJ
(2004) Is it useful to define residual feed intake as a trait in animal breeding programs? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 405–409.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |