Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > AR05204
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 57(8)

Physiological and seed yield responses to water deficits among lentil genotypes from diverse origins

R. Shrestha A B C , Neil C. Turner A D E , K. H. M. Siddique A and D. W. Turner B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture (CLIMA), M080, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

B School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

C Present address: Agronomy Division, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Khumaltar, Kathmandu, Nepal.

D Previous address: CSIRO, Plant Industry, Private Bag No. 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: ncturner@clima.uwa.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(8) 903-915 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05204
Submitted: 14 June 2005  Accepted: 9 March 2006   Published: 9 August 2006

Abstract

The effect of water deficits at 2 growth stages on the physiology and growth of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus subsp. culinaris) genotypes bred/selected for 3 regions was examined in a glasshouse experiment. The water regimes imposed were: (i) a well-watered control, (ii) water withheld at flowering, from 72 to 93 days after sowing (DAS), and (iii) water withheld from podding (93 DAS) to maturity. The genotypes were a West Asian genotype released in Australia (Cassab), 2 South Asian Nepali cultivars (Khajura 2 and Simal), and 3 crossbreds between West Asian and South Asian parents (ILL 6829, ILL 7979, and ILL 7982). ILL 7979 and Simal had significantly greater total dry matter, water use, seed yield, number of pods and seeds per plant, and harvest index (HI) than the other genotypes under well-watered conditions. Water deficits reduced seed yield by up to 60% in the crossbreds and the South Asian cultivar, Simal. However, seed yield was increased by the water deficit at flowering and the water deficit at podding in the West Asian genotype, Cassab, and the South Asian genotype, Khajura 2, respectively. In the other genotypes, withholding water at flowering or podding reduced leaf area (48–55%), total dry matter (32–50%), flower production (22–55%), and number of pods and seeds (27–66%), with significantly higher flower drop and empty pods when water was withheld. The higher seed yield in Cassab and Khajura 2 when water was withheld was related to the production of more flowers and the maintenance of pod and seed set when they were re-watered after the period of water deficit.

When water was withheld during flowering, the West Asian genotype Cassab and the crossbred ILL 6829 used less water and hence maintained a high leaf water potential (ψleaf), whereas ψleaf decreased earlier to lower values in the crossbred ILL 7979 and the South Asian genotypes Khajura 2 and Simal. There were no significant differences in leaf net photosynthesis (PN), or stomatal conductance (gS), among genotypes during flowering and early podding, but PN and gS were reduced by 22–38 and 19–67%, respectively, when water was withheld. The lower ψleaf in ILL 7979, Simal, and Khajura 2 induced greater osmotic adjustment (OA) during the drying cycle at flowering, whereas there was no or little OA when water was withheld at podding. Variation in physiological traits (PN, gS, OA) under both watering regimes was not directly related to seed yield, but seed number was related to seed yield under both well-watered and water-deficit conditions.

Additional keywords: drought, green area, flower initiation, seed number, water-use efficiency.


Acknowledgment

Ms R. Shrestha is grateful to the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) for providing a John Allwright Fellowship to undertake PhD studies. The glasshouse and laboratory facilities were provided for this work by CSIRO, Floreat Park, Perth. Christiane Ludwig and Renee Buck are thanked for technical assistance. We thank Dr Jens Berger for valuable assistance with statistical analysis, and Dr Jairo Palta for his advice on plant water relations. Thanks to Drs Steve Milroy, Jens Berger, and Jairo Palta for their valuable advice and comments on the manuscript.


References


Amoabin S , Stern WR , Turner NC (1987) Seed yield of three annual pasture legumes in response to water deficits during flowering and seed development. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th Australian Agronomy Conference’. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic., p. 165. (Australian Society of Agronomy: Parkville, Vic.)

Brevedan RE, Egli DB (2003) Short periods of water stress during seed filling, leaf senescence, and yield of soybean. Crop Science 43, 2083–2088. open url image1

Burch GJ, Smith RCG, Mason WK (1978) Agronomic and physiological responses of soybean and sorghum crops to water deficits. II. Crop evaporation, soil water depletion and root distribution. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5, 169–177. open url image1

Erskine W, Tufail M, Russell A, Tyagi MC, Rahman MM, Saxena MC (1994) Current and future strategies in breeding lentil for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica 73, 127–135.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Flower DJ, Ludlow MM (1986) Contribution of osmotic adjustment to the dehydration tolerance of water-stressed pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) millsp.) leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment 9, 33–40. open url image1

GenStat (2002) ‘GenStat for Windows.’ 6th edn (VSN International) www.vsn-intl.com

Hamdi A, Erskine W, Gates P (1992) Adaptation of lentil seed yield to varying moisture supply. Crop Science 32, 987–990. open url image1

Hooda RS, Sheoran IS, Randhir S (1989) Ontogenetic changes in photosynthesis, respiration, nitrogen fixation and water use efficiency in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown at two moisture levels. Photosynthetica 23, 189–196. open url image1

Khanna-Chopra R (1982) ‘Physiological and biochemical basis of adaptation to water stress in crop plants.’ (Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute: New Delhi, India)

Khanna-Chopra R, Sinha SK (1982) Photosynthetic rate and photosynthetic carboxylation enzymes during growth and development in Cicer arietinum L. cultivars. Photosynthetica 16, 509–513. open url image1

Kramer PJ (1980) Drought, stress, and the origin of adaptations. In ‘Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress’. (Eds NC Turner, PJ Kramer) pp. 7–19. (Wiley-Inter Science Publication: New York)

Leport L, Turner NC, French RJ, Barr MD, Duda R, Davies SL, Tennant D, Siddique KHM (1999) Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. European Journal of Agronomy 11, 279–291.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Leport L, Turner NC, French RJ, Tennant D, Thomson BD, Siddique KHM (1998) Water relations, gas exchange and growth of cool-season grain legumes in a Mediterranean-type environment. European Journal of Agronomy 9, 295–303.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Meckel L, Egli DB, Phillips RE, Radcliffe D, Leggett JE (1984) Effect of moisture stress on seed growth in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 76, 647–650. open url image1

Muchow RC (1985) Phenology, seed yield and water use of grain legumes grown under different soil water regimes in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crops Research 11, 81–97.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Niknam SR, Ma Q, Turner DW (2003) Osmotic adjustment and seed yield of Brassica napus and B. juncea genotypes in a water-limited environment in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 1127–1135.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Rosales-Serna R, Kohashi-Shibata J, Acosta-Gallegos JA, Trejo-Lopez C, Ortiz-Cereceres J, Kelly JD (2004) Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Research 85, 203–211.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shackel KA, Foster KW, Hall AE (1982) Genotypic differences in leaf osmotic potential among grain sorghum cultivars grown under irrigation and drought. Crop Science 22, 1121–1125. open url image1

Shrestha R (2005) Adaptation of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus subsp. culinaris) to rainfed environments – response to water deficits. PhD thesis, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.

Shrestha R, Siddique KHM, Turner NC, Turner DW, Berger J (2005) Growth and seed yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) genotypes of West Asian and South Asian origin and crossbreds between the two under rainfed conditions in Nepal. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 971–981.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Shrestha R, Turner NC, Siddique KHM, Turner DW, Speijers J (2006) A water deficit during pod development in lentils reduces flower and pod numbers but not seed size. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 427–438.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Siddique KHM (2000) Registration of ‘Cassab’ lentil. Crop Science 40, 1198–1199. open url image1

Siddique KHM , Loss SP , Thomson BD (2003) Cool season grain legumes in dryland Mediterranean environments of Western Australia: significance of early flowering. In ‘Management of agricultural drought: agronomic and genetic options’. (Ed. NP Saxena) pp. 151–161. (Science Publishers: Enfield, NH)

Silim SN, Saxena MC, Erskine W (1993) Adaptation of lentil to the Mediterranean environment. 1. Factors affecting yield under drought conditions. Experimental Agriculture 29, 9–19. open url image1

SPSS (2002) ‘SPSS 11.5 for Windows.’ (www.spss.com)

Subbarao GV, Chauhan YS, Johansen C (2000) Patterns of osmotic adjustment in pigeonpea — its importance as a mechanism of drought resistance. European Journal of Agronomy 12, 239–249.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Thomson BD, Siddique KHM, Barr MD, Wilson JM (1997) Grain legume species in low rainfall Mediterranean-type environments. 1. Phenology and seed yield. Field Crops Research 54, 173–187.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Turner NC (1988) Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique. Irrigation Science 9, 289–308.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Turner NC (1990 a) The benefits of water deficits. In ‘Proceedings of the International Congress of Plant Physiology’. New Delhi, India. (Eds SK Sihna, PV Sane, SC Bargava, PK Agrawal) pp. 806–814. (Society of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry: New Delhi, India)

Turner NC (1990b) Plant water relations and irrigation management. Agricultural Water Management 17, 59–73.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilson JR, Fisher MJ, Schulze ED, Dolby GR, Ludlow MM (1979) Comparison between pressure-volume and dewpoint-hygrometry techniques for determining the water relations characteristics of grass and legume leaves. Oecologia 41, 77–88.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zhang H, Pala M, Oweis T, Harris H (2000) Water use and water-use efficiency of chickpea and lentil in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 295–304.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1