Feeding an energy supplement with white clover silage improves rumen fermentation, metabolisable protein utilisation, and milk production in dairy cows
D. C. Cohen A B , C. R. Stockdale A and P. T. Doyle A CA Primary Industries Research Victoria (PIRVic), Department of Primary Industries, Kyabram Centre, 120 Cooma Road, Kyabram, Vic. 3620, Australia.
B Present address: Business and Corporate Services Division, Department of Primary Industries, 1 Spring Street, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: peter.doyle@dpi.vic.gov.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(4) 367-375 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05166
Submitted: 13 May 2005 Accepted: 16 November 2005 Published: 27 April 2006
Abstract
Six rumen-fistulated Holstein-Friesian cows were used in a Latin square design to test the hypothesis that more frequent feeding of a high energy supplement to cows consuming high-protein white clover silage would improve microbial protein production, resulting in greater N retention and higher milk yields. The white clover silage (10.7 MJ metabolisable energy (ME)/kg DM) was fed to cows either alone (WCS) or with 4.5 kg DM of rolled barley grain (12.1 MJ ME/kg DM). The grain was offered either 24 times (WCS/24B) or twice daily (WCS/2B, at 0800 and 1700 hours).
Cows offered the supplements, regardless of feeding frequency, had higher (P < 0.05) organic matter (17.3 v. 16.0 kg/day) and estimated ME (208 v. 189 MJ/day) intakes than cows offered white clover silage alone. Mean daily ruminal fluid pH (P < 0.05) and ammonia-N concentrations (P < 0.05) were lower in the supplemented treatments, with total VFA concentrations being highest (P < 0.05) in the WCS/2B treatment. Nitrogen intake and output in the faeces were similar for all 3 treatments. However, nitrogen excretion was lower (P < 0.05) in urine (174 v. 218 g/day) and higher (P < 0.05) in milk (115 v. 93 g/day) of cows offered the supplements.
The crude protein consumed by cows on all 3 diets was estimated to be well in excess of cow requirements. The supplements reduced the calculated net losses of ammonia-N from the rumen from 25% of total crude protein intake for WCS to 14% in the 2 supplement treatments, and increased the metabolisable protein supply available for milk production. Increases in metabolisable protein were estimated to be due to a higher microbial crude protein contribution in the supplemented treatments compared with the WCS treatment.
Grain supplements increased (P < 0.05) milk yield (22.4 v.19.6 kg/day) and although there were no significant differences in milk fat and protein concentrations between treatments, the latter tended to increase with grain supplementation. Milk yield was higher in the WCS/24B treatment than in the WCS/2B treatment, but neither the calculated nor the measured rumen variables were sufficiently different to explain this effect of frequency of feeding the grain. One possible explanation for the difference was the marked fluctuations in key rumen variables throughout the day in the WCS/2B compared with the WCS/24B treatment. Such fluctuations in the rumen environment are not accounted for in theoretical calculations since associative effects are not considered. The benefits of a higher milk production as a result of more frequent feeding of the supplement to cows should be considered in context of the additional effort or costs associated with more frequent feeding.
Additional keywords: frequency of feeding of supplements, microbial crude protein, nitrogen retention, metabolisable energy.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Dave Dellow, Prof. Graham McDowell, and Mr Kevin Chandler for their valuable contributions, the laboratory and farm staff at DPI Kyabram for technical assistance, Dairy Australia for supporting Daphne Cohen’s studies, and the Victorian Department of Primary Industries for financial support.
AFRC
(1992) Technical committee on the responses to nutrients, Report 9. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B: Livestock Feed and Feeding 62, 787–835.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beever DE
(1993) Ruminant animal production from forages: present position and future opportunities. Proceedings of the XVII International Grassland Congress 1, 535–542.
Beever DE,
Cammell SB,
Thomas C,
Spooner MC,
Haines MJ, Gale DL
(1988) The effect of date of cut and barley substitution on gain and on the efficiency of utilization of grass silage by growing cattle. 2. Nutrient supply and energy partition. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 307–319.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Beever DE,
Dhanoa MS,
Losada HR,
Evans RT,
Cammell SB, France J
(1986) The effect of forage species and stage of harvest on the processes of digestion occurring in the rumen of cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 56, 439–454.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Bremner JM, Edwards AP
(1965) Determination and isotope ratio analysis of different forms of N in soils. II. Apparatus and procedure for distillation and determination of ammonium. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 29, 504–507.
Butler WR
(1998) Review: effect of protein nutrition on ovarian and uterine physiology in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2533–2539.
| PubMed |
Castle ME,
Reid D, Watson JN
(1984) Silage and milk production: a comparison between supplements of barley and soybean meal offered with white clover silage. Grass and Forage Science 39, 287–289.
Clark DA, Wilson JR
(1993) Implications of improvements in nutritive value on plant performance and grassland management. Proceedings of the XVII International Grassland Congress 1, 543–549.
Cohen DC
(2001) Degradability of crude protein from clover herbages used in irrigated dairy production systems in northern Victoria. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 415–425.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cohen DC, Doyle PT
(2001) Effect of sample preparation on in situ estimates of protein degradability for white clover herbages. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 619–624.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coulombe JJ, Favreau VL
(1963) A new simple semi-micro method for colorimetric determination of urea. Clinical Chemistry 9, 102–108.
| PubMed |
Dewhurst RJ,
Evans RT,
Scollan ND,
Moorby JM,
Merry RJ, Wilkins RJ
(2003) Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 2. In vivo and in sacco evaluations of rumen function. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2612–2621.
| PubMed |
Doyle PT,
Francis SA, Stockdale CR
(2005) Associative effects between feeds when concentrate supplements are fed to grazing dairy cows: a review of likely impacts on metabolisable energy supply. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1315–1329.
Erwin ES,
Marco GL, Emery EM
(1961) Volatile fatty acid analysis of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 1768–1771.
Fitch NA,
Gill M,
Lomax MA, Beever DE
(1989) Nitrogen and glucose metabolism by the liver of forage and forage-concentrate fed cattle. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 48, 76A.
Gabel M,
Pieper B,
Friedel K,
Radke M,
Haemann A,
Voigt J, Kuhla S
(2003) Influence of nutrition level on digestibility in high yielding cows and effects on energy evaluation systems. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3992–3998.
| PubMed |
Gasa J,
Holtenius K,
Sutton JD,
Dhanoa MS, Napper DJ
(1991) Rumen fill and digesta kinetics in lactating Friesian cows given two levels of concentrates with two types of grass silage ad libitum. British Journal of Nutrition 66, 381–398.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Gibson JP
(1984) The effects of frequency of milk production on dairy cattle: an analysis of published results. Animal Production 38, 181–189.
Gloag CM,
Doyle PT,
Stockdale CR, Heard JW
(2005) Rumen fluid pH in lactating cows consuming irrigated annual clovers. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 15, 25A.
Greaney KB,
Reynolds GW,
Ulyatt MJ,
Mackenzie DDS, Harris PM
(1996) The metabolic cost of hepatic ammonia detoxification. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 56, 130–132.
Grovum WL, Williams VJ
(1973) Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 1. The effect of level of food intake on marker retention times along the small intestine and on apparent water absorption in the small and large intestines. British Journal of Nutrition 29, 13–21.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Henning PH,
Steyn DG, Meissner HH
(1993) Effect of synchronisation of energy and nitrogen supply on ruminal characteristics and microbial growth. Journal of Animal Science 71, 2516–2528.
| PubMed |
MacLeod GK,
Colucci PE,
Moore AD,
Grieve DG, Lewis N
(1994) The effects of feeding frequency of concentrates and feeding sequence of hay on eating behaviour, ruminal environment and milk production in dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74, 103–113.
Nocek JE, Russell JB
(1988) Protein and energy as an integrated system. Relationship of ruminal protein and carbohydrate availability to microbial synthesis and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 2070–2107.
Nolan JV, Leng RA
(1972) Dynamic aspects of ammonia and urea metabolism in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 27, 177–195.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Nolan JV, Leng RA
(1974) Isotope techniques for studying the dynamics of nitrogen metabolism in the ruminant. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 33, 1–8.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Oldham JD
(1984) Protein-energy interrelationships in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 1090–1114.
| PubMed |
Ørskov ER, Mehrez AZ
(1977) Estimation of extent of protein degradation from basal feeds in the rumen of sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 78A.
| PubMed |
Oshima M, McDonald P
(1978) A review of the changes in nitrogenous compounds of herbage during ensilage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29, 497–505.
Parker DS,
Lomax MA,
Seal CJ, Wilton JC
(1995) Metabolic implications of ammonia production in the ruminant. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 54, 549–563.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Robinson PH, McNiven MA
(1994) Influence of flame roasting and feeding frequency of barley on performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 3631–3643.
| PubMed |
Roseler DK,
Ferguson JD,
Sniffen CJ, Herrema J
(1993) Dietary protein degradability effects on plasma and milk urea nitrogen and milk non-protein nitrogen in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 525–534.
Russell JB, Hespell RB
(1981) Microbial rumen fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 64, 1153–1169.
| PubMed |
Tamminga S
(1992) Nutrition management of dairy cows as a contribution to pollution control. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 345–357.
Thomas C,
Gibbs BG,
Beever DE, Thurnham BR
(1988) The effect of date of cut and barley substitution on gain and on the efficiency of utilization of grass silage by growing cattle 1. Gains in live weight and its components. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 297–306.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Tilley JMA, Terry RA
(1963) A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.
Trevaskis LM,
Fulkerson WJ, Nandra KS
(2004) Effect of time of feeding carbohydrate supplements and pasture on production of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 85, 275–285.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Soest PJ,
Robertson JB, Lewis BA
(1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
| PubMed |
Wales WJ,
Dellow DW, Doyle PT
(1999) Degradabilities of dry matter and crude protein from perennial herbage and supplements used in dairy production systems in Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 645–656.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wales WJ,
Stockdale CR, Doyle PT
(2001) Increasing energy intake improves milk protein concentration in cows in spring and summer. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 56, 154.
Yang CMJ, Varga GA
(1989) Effect of three feeding frequencies on rumen protozoa, rumen digesta kinetics and milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 950–957.
| PubMed |
