Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > AR05164
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 57(4)

Associations between earliness, Ascochyta response, and grain yield in chickpea

D. J. Bonfil A , Judith Lichtenzveig B , I. Shai B , A. Lerner B , Sharon Tam B and S. Abbo B C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Agricultural Research Organization, Gilat Research Center, M.P. Negev 2, 85280, Israel.

B The Levi Eshkol School of Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel.

C Corresponding author. Email: abbo@agri.huji.ac.il

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57(4) 465-470 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05164
Submitted: 2 May 2005  Accepted: 16 December 2005   Published: 27 April 2006

Abstract

Evidence from an array of dryland systems suggests that chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grain yield could be improved through better phenological adaptation. However, information on the relationship between phenology and Ascochyta response genes, and their possible interaction with biomass and grain yield, is missing. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to determine the associations between the above factors and biomass and grain yield in chickpea. To that end, standard Israeli cultivars and advanced generation bulked progeny from the cv. Hadas × ICC5810 cross were used. Hadas is a late-flowering, high-yielding Israeli kabuli (0.45 g/seed) cultivar with moderate field resistance to Ascochyta blight, whereas ICC5810 is a day-neutral desi (0.15 g/seed) genotype with a strong temperature response, from India. Higher yields were observed among the late-flowering bulks of the Hadas × ICC5810 progeny. No relationship between the Ascochyta response and biomass and grain yield was observed. No interaction between the phenology and Ascochyta response grouping on biomass and grain yield was observed. The results demonstrate the feasibility of combining Ascochyta resistance with earlier flowering and its potential to improve chickpea adaptation to dryland systems.

Additional keywords: agronomic adaptation, Ascochyta blight response, Cicer arietinum L., phenology.


Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a grant from the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Agriculture to D. J. Bonfil and S. Abbo. Additional support was obtained from a bi-national US–Israel (BARD) grant to D. J. Bonfil and S. Abbo.


References


Bonfil DJ, Pinthus MJ (1995) Response of chickpea to nitrogen, and a comparison of the factors affecting chickpea seed yield to those affecting wheat grain yield. Experimental Agriculture 31, 39–47. open url image1

Clarke HJ, Khan TN, Siddique KHM (2004) Pollen selection for chilling tolerance at hybridization leads to improved chickpea cultivars. Euphytica 139, 65–74.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Erskine W , Kosmenuglu I , Muehlbauer FJ , Summerfield RJ (2000) Breeding for increased biomass and persistent crop residues in cool-season food legumes. In ‘Linking research and marketing opportunities for pulses in the 21st Century’. (Ed. R Knight) pp. 191–197. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Evans LT (1993) ‘Crop evolution, adaptation and yield.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

FAO (2004) Statistical database. At: www.fao.org

Hovav R, Upadhyaya KC, Beharav A, Abbo S (2003) Major flowering time gene and polygenes effects on chickpea grain weight. Plant Breeding 122, 539–541.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Keatinge JDH, Cooper PJM (1983) Kabuli chickpea as a winter-sown crop in northern Syria: moisture relations and crop productivity. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Cambridge) 100, 667–680. open url image1

Kostrinski J (1974) ‘Problems in chickpea cultivation and grain crop rotations in Israel (Hebrew, English summary).’ Special Publication No. 34. (Agricultural Research Organization: Bet-Dagan, Israel)

Kumar J, Abbo S (2001) Genetics of flowering time in chickpea and its bearing on productivity in semi-arid environments. Advances in Agronomy 72, 107–138. open url image1

Ladizinsky G (1995) Chickpea. In ‘Evolution of crop plants’. (Eds J Smartt, NW Simmonds) pp. 258–261. (Longman Scientific & Technical: Harlow, UK)

Lichtenzveig J, Shtienberg D, Zhang HB, Bonfil DJ, Abbo S (2002) Biometric analyses of the inheritance of resistance to Dydimella rabiei in chickpea. Phytopathology 92, 417–423. open url image1

Miller PR, McConkey BG, Clayton GW, Brandt SA, Staricka JA, Johnston AM, Lafond G, Schatz BG, Baltensperger DD, Neill K (2002) Pulse crop adaptation in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 94, 261–272. open url image1

Or E, Hovav R, Abbo S (1999) A major gene for flowering time in chickpea. Crop Science 39, 315–322. open url image1

Roberts EH, Hadley P, Summerfield RJ (1985) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on flowering in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Annals of Botany 55, 881–892. open url image1

Sandhu SS, Hodges HF (1971) Effects of photoperiod, light intensity, and temperature on vegetative growth, flowering, and seed production in Cicer arietinum L. Agronomy Journal 63, 913–914. open url image1

Shai I (2000) The effect of flowering time on agronomic performance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). MSc thesis (Hebrew, English summary), Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

Singh KB, Malhotra RS, Saxena MC, Bejiga G (1997) Superiority of winter sowing over traditional spring sowing of chickpea in the Mediterranean region. Agronomy Journal 89, 112–118. open url image1

Singh KB, Reddy MV (1996) Improving chickpea yield by incorporating resistance to ascochyta blight. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92, 509–515.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Slinkard AE , Sindhu JS (1988) Role of physiology in pulse crop improvement: a plant breeding perspective. In ‘World crops: cool season food legumes’. (Ed. RJ Summerfield) pp. 931–939. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Turner NC, Wright GC, Siddique KHM (2001) Adaptation of grain legumes (pulses) to water limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 71, 193–231. open url image1