Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Developmental sequences for simulating crop phenology for water-limiting conditions

Gregory S. McMaster A D , W. W. Wilhelm B and A. B. Frank C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A USDA-ARS, Great Plains Systems Research Unit, 2150 Centre Avenue, Building D, Suite 200, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.

B USDA-ARS, Soil & Water Conservation Research Unit, 120 Keim Hall, East Campus, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

C USDA-ARS (retired), Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, PO Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554-0459, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: Greg.McMaster@ars.usda.gov

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(11) 1277-1288 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05068
Submitted: 7 March 2005  Accepted: 20 October 2005   Published: 29 November 2005

Abstract

The timing, duration, and pace of developmental events, or phenology, are among the many responses of plants to limited soil water. Understanding and predicting plant responses to availability of soil water are important in improving the efficacy of management practices. However, the first steps towards gaining this understanding, summarising the complete developmental sequence of the shoot apex and correlating the timing of these events, have rarely been reported. Also, the effect of water-limiting conditions on crop phenology and shoot apex development is variable. The objective of this paper is to present the developmental sequence of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and corn (Zea mays L.) shoot apices and correlate events in these sequences with growth stages for both well-watered and water-limiting conditions. We note that phenological responses to water availability occur at 3 different scales: among crops, among cultivars of a crop, and among growth stages within a cultivar or crop. Clearly, genotype × environment interaction affects the accuracy of predicting phenology. However, the fact that plants develop in an orderly, predictable pattern allows a general foundation for synthesising the complete sequence of developmental events of the shoot apex and correlate these with growth stages when water is not limiting. These patterns and relationships are the foundation to build upon in quantifying our understanding of crop phenology under water-limiting environments.

Additional keywords: growth stages, water stress, shoot apex, development, GDD, growing degree-days; GEI, genotype by environment interaction.


References


Abrecht DG, Carberry PS (1993) The influence of water deficit prior to tassel initiation on maize growth, development and yield. Field Crops Research 31, 55–69.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Baba T, Yamazaki K (1996) Effects of phase transition on the development of lateral buds in maize. Crop Science 36, 1574–1579. open url image1

Baker JT, Pinter PJ, Reginato RJ, Kanemasu ET (1986) Effects of temperature on leaf appearance in spring and winter wheat cultivars. Agronomy Journal 78, 605–613. open url image1

Bassetti P, Westgate ME (1994) Floral asynchrony and kernel set in maize quantified by image analysis. Agronomy Journal 86, 699–703. open url image1

Bauer A, Black AL, Frank AB (1984) Estimation of spring wheat leaf growth rates and anthesis from air temperature. Agronomy Journal 76, 829–835. open url image1

Bauer A, Black AL, Frank AB, Vasey EH (1990) Agronomic Characteristics of Spring Barley in the Northern Great Plains. North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station (Fargo) Bulletin No.523, 48 pp.

Bonnett OT (1948) Ear and tassel development in maize. Missouri Botanical Gardens Annals 35, 269–287. open url image1

Bonnett OT (1966) Inflorescences of maize, wheat, rye, barley, and oats: their initiation and development. University of Illinois College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 721, 105 pp.

Campos H, Cooper M, Habben JE, Edmeades GO, Schussler JR (2004) Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Research 90, 19–34.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Carter MW, Poneleit CG (1973) Black layer maturity and filling period variation among inbred lines of corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Science 13, 436–439. open url image1

Daynard TB, Duncan WG (1969) The black layer and grain maturity in corn. Crop Science 9, 473–476. open url image1

Frank AB, Bauer A (1995) Phyllochron differences in wheat, barely, and forage grasses. Crop Science 35, 19–23. open url image1

Frank AB, Bauer A, Black AL (1992) Effects of air temperature and fertilizer nitrogen on spike development in spring barley. Crop Science 32, 793–797. open url image1

Frank AB, Cardwell VB, Ciha AJ, Wilhelm WW (1997) Growth staging in research and crop management. Crop Science 37, 1039–1040. open url image1

Hall AJ, Lemcoff JH, Trapani N (1981) Water stress before and during flowering in maize and its effects on yield, its components, and their determinants. Maydica 29, 19–38. open url image1

Hanway JJ (1963) Growth stages of corn (Zea mays L.). Agronomy Journal 55, 487–492. open url image1

Haun JR (1973) Visual quantification of wheat development. Agronomy Journal 65, 116–119. open url image1

Kiesselbach AT (1949) The structure and reproduction of corn. Nebraska Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin 161, 96 pp.

Kirby, EJM ,  and  Appleyard, M (1984). ‘Cereal development guide.’ 2nd edn . (Arable Unit, National Agricultural Centre: Coventry, UK)

Lancashire PD, Bleiholder H, Van den Boom T, Langeluddeke P, Strauss R, Weber E, Witzenberger A (1991) A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Annals of Applied Biology 119, 561–601. open url image1

Large EC (1954) Growth stages in cereals. Plant Pathology 3, 128–129. open url image1

Leng ER (1951) Time-relationships in tassel development of inbred and hybrid corn. Agronomy Journal 43, 445–449. open url image1

McMaster GS (1997) Phenology, development, and growth of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) shoot apex: a review. Advances In Agronomy 59, 63–118. open url image1

McMaster GS (2005) Centenary review: phytomers, phyllochrons, phenology and temperate cereal development. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 143, 137–150.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McMaster GS, Smika DE (1988) Estimation and evaluation of winter wheat phenology in the central Great Plains. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 43, 1–18.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW (1995) Accuracy of equations predicting the phyllochron of wheat. Crop Science 35, 30–36. open url image1

McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW (1997) Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 87, 291–300.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW (2003) Simulating wheat and barley phenological responses to water and temperature stress. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 141, 129–147.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW, Morgan JA (1992) Simulating winter wheat shoot apex phenology. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 119, 1–12. open url image1

McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW, Palic DB, Porter JR, Jamieson PD (2003) Spring wheat leaf appearance and temperature: extending the paradigm? Annals of Botany 91, 697–705.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Muchow RC, Carberry PS (1989) Environmental control of phenology and leaf growth in a tropically adapted maize. Field Crops Research 20, 221–236.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Randolph LF (1936) Developmental morphology of the caryopsis in maize. Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 881–916. open url image1

Rawson HM (1970) Spikelet number, its control and relation to yield per ear in wheat. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 23, 1–15. open url image1

Rench WE, Shaw RH (1971) Black layer development in corn. Agronomy Journal 63, 303–305. open url image1

Rickman RW, Klepper BL (1995) The phyllochron: where do we go in the future? Crop Science 53, 44–49. open url image1

Ritchie SW, Hanway JJ, Benson GO (1986) How a corn plant develops. Special Report No.48, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service, Ames, IA.

Sato K, Sasaki S (1987) Effects of shoot apex excision and leaf cutting on development of axillary shoots in maize plants. Nihon Sakumotsu Gakkai Kiji 56, 351–355. open url image1

Stout DG, Kannangara T, Simpson GM (1978) Drought resistance of Sorghum bicolor. 2. Water stress effects on growth. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58, 225–233. open url image1

Streck NA, Weiss A, Baenziger PS (2003) A generalized vernalization response function for winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 95, 155–159. open url image1

Tollenaar M, Daynard TB (1978) Kernel growth and development at two positions on the ear of maize (Zea mays). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58, 189–197. open url image1

Vinocur MG, Ritchie JT (2001) Maize leaf development biases caused by air-apex temperature differences. Agronomy Journal 93, 767–772. open url image1

Warrington IJ, Kanemasu ET (1983) Corn growth response to temperature and photoperiod II. Leaf-initiation and leaf-appearance rates. Agronomy Journal 75, 755–761. open url image1

Weatherwax P (1916) Morphology of the flowers of Zea mays. Torrey Botanical Club Bulletin 43, 127–143. open url image1

Wilhelm WW, McMaster GS (1995) Importance of the phyllochron in studying development and growth in grasses. Crop Science 35, 1–3. open url image1

Wilhelm WW, McMaster GS (1996) Spikelet and floret naming scheme for grasses with a spike inflorescence. Crop Science 36, 1071–1073. open url image1

Wilhelm WW, Varvel GE (1998) Vegetative development of corn under various N management strategies. ‘1998 Agronomy Abstract’. p. 94. (ASA: Madison, WI)

Wuethrich K (1997) Vegetative and reproductive phenology of fourteen hybrids of dent corn (Zea mays L.). MS thesis, Purdue University, Indiana.

Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421. open url image1