Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of physical form of a lucerne hay on digestion and rate of passage in sheep

G. J. Faichney A D , E. Teleki A C and G. H. Brown B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Division of Animal Production (now CSIRO Livestock Industries), Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia.

B CSIRO, IAPP Biometrics Unit, PO Box 52, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia (retired).

C Retired.

D Corresponding author; present address: School of Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: grahamf@bio.usyd.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55(12) 1253-1262 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR04138
Submitted: 21 June 2004  Accepted: 7 October 2004   Published: 21 December 2004

Abstract

Six 2-year-old Corriedale wethers fitted with rumen and abomasal cannulas were given a lucerne hay to appetite then at restricted intakes, first as chopped hay (CH) then as ground and pelleted hay (GP). Voluntary feed consumption (VFC) was 43% greater on GP hay. Water intake increased as feed intake increased and was greater on GP. Organic matter digestibility (OMD) decreased as intake increased (P < 0.001) but was greater on GP hay at restricted intakes (P < 0.001). Potential OMD was marginally greater for GP hay. The digestibility of fibre constituents decreased as intake increased but was not significantly affected by grinding and pelleting. Rumen OM content and OM flow to the duodenum increased as intake increased on CH hay (P < 0.001), but only rumen OM content increased with grinding and pelleting (P < 0.001). Consequently, the mean retention times (MRT) of solutes, particles, and microbial protein decreased as intake increased (P < 0.001) and increased with grinding and pelleting (P < 0.001). However, at VFC, the MRT of each component was not affected by grinding and pelleting. Nitrogen digestibility decreased as intake increased but was greater on GP hay at restricted intakes. Non-ammonia nitrogen flow to and digestion in the intestines increased with intake but was not affected by grinding and pelleting. Ammonia synthesis in the rumen increased as feed intake increased (P < 0.001) but its 26–32% contribution to non-ammonia nitrogen flowing to the duodenum, which reflects microbial synthesis, was not affected by intake or grinding and pelleting. It was concluded that rate of passage cannot be accurately predicted because it is a derived parameter, determined by the differential responses of rumen digesta content and digesta outflow to the dietary, environmental, and physiological factors affecting the animal. These differential responses are involved in determining the effects of intake and grinding of hay on its digestibility.

Additional keywords: grinding and pelleting, organic matter, digestibility, digesta flow, partition of digestion, mean retention time, solutes, particles, microbial protein, microbial synthesis, ammonia synthesis, transfer quotient.


Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mrs P. Cummings, Ms S. Thorpe, and Mr J. Rawlinson for their skilled technical assistance.


References


ARC (1980). ‘The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock.’ pp. 121–181. (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: Farnham Royal, UK)

Balch CC (1950) Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition , 361–388. open url image1

Beever DE, Black JL, Faichney GJ (1981a) Simulation of the effects of rumen function on the flow of nutrients from the stomach of sheep: Part 2. Assessment of computer predictions. Agricultural Systems 6, 221–241.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Beever DE, Osbourne DF, Cammell SB, Terry RA (1981b) The effect of grinding and pelleting on the digestion if Italian ryegrass and timothy. The British Journal of Nutrition 46, 357–370.
PubMed |
open url image1

Black JL, Beever DE, Faichney GJ, Howarth BR, Graham NMcC (1981) Simulation of the effects of rumen function on the flow of nutrients from the stomach of sheep: Part 1. Description of a computer program. Agricultural Systems 6, 195–219.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) B26, 211–252. open url image1

Campling RC, Freer M (1966) Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 8. Experiments with ground, pelleted roughages. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 229–244.
PubMed |
open url image1

Czerkawski JW (1979) Compartmentation in the rumen. Hannah Research Institute Report 1979

Downes AM, McDonald IW (1964) The chromium-51 complex of ethylene-diamine tetra-acetic acid as a soluble rumen marker. British Journal of Nutrition 18, 153–162.
PubMed |
open url image1

Fahey GC, Bourquin LD, Titgemeyer EC, Atwell DG (1993) Postharvest treatment of fibrous feedstuffs to improve their nutritive value. ‘Forage cell wall structure and digestibility’. (Eds RD Hatfield, HG Jung, J Ralph, DR Buxton, DR Mertens, PJ Weimer) pp. 715–766. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA: Madison, WI)

Faichney GJ (1975) The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastro-intestinal tract of ruminants. ‘Digestion and metabolism in the ruminant’. (Eds ACI Warner, IW McDonald, J Ralph, DR Buxton, DR Mertens, PJ Weimer) pp. 277–291. (University of New England Publishing Unit: Armidale, NSW)

Faichney GJ (1980) Measurement in sheep of the quantity and composition of rumen digesta and of the fractional outflow rates of digesta constituents. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 1129–1137.
Crossref |
open url image1

Faichney GJ (1983) The effect of physical form of lucerne hay on the passage of markers through the rumen of sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 8, 186. open url image1

Faichney GJ (1984) Application of the double-marker method to the estimation of rumen particle fractions. ‘Techniques in particle size analysis of feed and digesta in ruminants’. (Ed. PM Kennedy) p. 179. (Canadian Society of Animal Science: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada)

Faichney GJ (1985) The mean retention time of particles in the rumen of sheep given chopped or ground lucerne hay. ‘Ruminant physiology—concepts and consequences’. (Eds SK Baker, JM Gawthorne, JB Mackintosh, DB Purser) p. 126. (School of Agriculture, University of Western Australia: Perth)

Faichney GJ (1986) Kinetics of particulate matter in the rumen. ‘Control of digestion and metabolism in ruminants’. (Eds LP Milligan, WL Grovum, A Dobson) pp. 173–195. (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

Faichney GJ (1993) Digesta flow. ‘Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism’. (Eds JM Forbes, J France) pp. 53–85. (CAB International: Oxford, UK)

Faichney GJ (1995) Transit des digesta dans le tube digestif des ruminants. ‘Nutrition des ruminants domestiques’. (Eds R Jarrige, Y Ruckebusch, C Demarquilly, MH Farce, M Journet) pp. 431–464. (INRA: Paris)

Faichney GJ, Brown GH (2004) Effect of physical form of a lucerne hay on rumination and the passage of particles from the rumen of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 1263–1270. open url image1

Faichney GJ, Gherardi SG (1986) Relationships between organic matter digestibility, dry matter intake and solute mean retention times in sheep given a ground and pelleted diet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 219–222. open url image1

Faichney GJ, Poncet C, Boston RC (1989) Passage of internal and external markers of particulate matter through the rumen of sheep. Reproduction Nutrition Development 29, 325–337. open url image1

Faichney GJ, Teleki E (1988) The effect of grinding lucerne hay on microbial N contribution to and dietary N disappearance from particles in the rumen of sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 13, 114. open url image1

Faichney GJ, Teleki E (1989) Ammonia-N transactions in the omasum of sheep given chopped or ground lucerne hay. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 2, 305–306. open url image1

Faichney, GJ ,  and  White, GA (1983). ‘Methods for the analysis of feeds eaten by ruminants.’ pp. . (CSIRO: Melbourne)

Graham NMcC, Black JL, Faichney GJ, Arnold GW (1976) Simulation of growth and production on sheep. 1. A computer program to estimate energy and protein utilization, body composition and liveweight change day by day for sheep of any age. Agricultural Systems 1, 113–138.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mertens DR (1993) Kinetics of cell wall digestion and passage in ruminants. ‘Forage cell wall structure and digestibility’. (Eds RD Hatfield, HG Jung, J Ralph, DR Buxton, DR Mertens, PJ Weimer) pp. 535–570. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA: Madison, WI)

Minson DJ (1982) Effects of chemical and physical composition of herbage eaten upon intake. ‘Nutritional limitations to animal production from pastures’. (Ed. JB Hacker) pp. 167–182. (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: Farnham Royal, UK)

Rode LM, Weakley DC, Satter LD (1985) Effect of forage amount and particle size in diets of lactating dairy cows on site of digestion and microbial protein synthesis. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 65, 101–111. open url image1

Sauvant D, Dijkstra J, Mertens D (1995) Optimisation of ruminal digestion: a modelling approach. ‘Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores’. (Eds M Journet, E Grenet, M-H Farce, M Thériez, C Demarquilly) pp. 143–165. (INRA Editions: Paris)

Schneider, BH ,  and  Flatt, WP (1975). ‘The evaluation of feeds through digestibility experiments.’ pp. . (University of Georgia Press: Athens, GA)

Seber, GAF (1977). ‘Linear regression analysis.’ pp. . (Wiley: New York)

Stielau WJ (1967) The rate of passage of food particles through the digestive tract of sheep. South African Journal of Agricultural Science 10, 753–760. open url image1

Tan TN, Weston RH, Hogan JP (1971) Use of 103Ru-labelled tris-(1,10-phenanthroline)-ruthenium(II) chloride as a marker in digestion studies with sheep. International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 22, 301–308.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Thomson DJ, Beever DE (1980) The effect of conservation and processing on the digestion of forages by ruminants. ‘Digestive physiology and metabolism in ruminants’. (Eds Y Ruckebusch, P Thivend) pp. 291–308. (MTP Press: Lancaster, UK)

de Varga A, Gasa J, Guada JA, Castrillo C (2000) Frequency of feeding and form of lucerne hay as factors affecting voluntary intake, digestibility, feeding behaviour, and marker kinetics in ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 801–809.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Warner ACI (1981) Rate of passage of digesta through the gut of mammals and birds. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews Series B 51, 789–820. open url image1

Warner ACI, Stacy BD (1968) The fate of water in the rumen. 2. Water balances throughout the feeding cycle in sheep. The British Journal of Nutrition 22, 389–410. open url image1

Weston RH, Hogan JP (1967) The digestion of chopped and ground roughages by sheep. 1. The movement of digesta through the stomach. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 789–801.
Crossref |
open url image1