A meta-analysis comparing four measurement methods to determine the relationship between methane emissions and dry-matter intake in New Zealand dairy cattle
Arjan Jonker
A D , Peter Green A , Garry Waghorn B , Tony van der Weerden C , David Pacheco A and Cecile de Klein C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Grasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Ltd, Tennent Drive, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.
B Independent Scientist, 6 Berkeley Avenue, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand.
C Invermay Agricultural Research Centre, AgResearch Ltd, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel 9092, New Zealand.
D Corresponding author. Email: arjan.jonker@agresearch.co.nz
Animal Production Science 60(1) 96-101 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18573
Submitted: 7 September 2018 Accepted: 7 November 2018 Published: 6 December 2018
Abstract
Enteric methane (CH4) emissions and dry-matter intake (DMI) can be accurately and precisely measured in respiration chambers (RC), whereas automated head chambers (GreenFeed; GF) and the SF6 tracer method can provide estimates of CH4 emissions from grazing cattle. In New Zealand, most dairy cattle graze pasture and, under these conditions, DMI also has to be estimated. The objective of the current study was to compare the relationship between CH4 production and DMI of New Zealand dairy cattle fed forages using the following four measurement methods: RC with measured DMI (RC); sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) with measured DMI (SF6-DMI); SF6 with DMI estimated from prediction equations or indigestible markers (SF6); GF with measured or estimated DMI (GF). Data were collected from published literature from New Zealand trials with growing and lactating dairy cattle fed forage-based diets and data were analysed using a mixed-effect model. The intercept of the linear regression between CH4 production and DMI was not significantly different from zero and was omitted from the model. However, residual variance (observed–predicted values) increased with an increasing DMI, which was addressed by log-transforming CH4 per unit of DMI and this model was used for final data analysis. The accuracy of the four methods for predicting log CH4 per unit of DMI was similar (P = 0.55), but the precision (indicated by residuals) differed (P < 0.001) among methods. The residual standard deviations for SF6, GF and SF6-DMI were 4.6, 3.4 and 2.1 times greater than the residuals for RC. Hence, all methods enabled accurate prediction of CH4 per unit of DMI, but methodology for determining both CH4 and DMI affected their precision (residuals).
Additional keywords: C-Lock GreenFeed, greenhouse gas, growing, lactating, non-lactating, respiration chamber, SF6 tracer technique.
References
Appuhamy JAD, France J, Kebreab E (2016) Models for predicting enteric methane emissions from dairy cows in North America, Europe, and Australia and New Zealand. Global Change Biology 22, 3039–3056.| Models for predicting enteric methane emissions from dairy cows in North America, Europe, and Australia and New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arthur PF, Barchia IM, Weber C, Bird-Gardiner T, Donoghue KA, Herd RM, Hegarty RS (2017) Optimizing test procedures for estimating daily methane and carbon dioxide emissions in cattle using short-term breath measures. Journal of Animal Science 95, 645–656.
Cavanagh A, McNaughton L, Clark H, Greaves C, Gowan JM, Pinares-Patino C, Dalley D, Vlaming B, Molano G (2008) Methane emissions from grazing Jersey × Friesian dairy cows in mid lactation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 230–233.
| Methane emissions from grazing Jersey × Friesian dairy cows in mid lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Charmley E, Williams SRO, Moate PJ, Hegarty RS, Herd RM, Oddy VH, Reyenga P, Staunton KM, Anderson A, Hannah MC (2016) A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia. Animal Production Science 56, 169–180.
| A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CSIRO (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Deighton MH, Williams SRO, Hannah MC, Eckard RJ, Boland TM, Wales WJ, Moate PJ (2014) A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 197, 47–63.
| A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doreau M, Arbre M, Rochette Y, Lascoux C, Eugène M, Martin C (2018) Comparison of 3 methods for estimating enteric methane and carbon dioxide emission in nonlactating cows. Journal of Animal Science 96, 1559–1569.
| Comparison of 3 methods for estimating enteric methane and carbon dioxide emission in nonlactating cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ellis JL, Kebreab E, Odongo NE, Beauchemin K, McGinn S, Nkrumah JD, Moore SS, Chistopherson R, Murdoch GK, McBride BW, Okine EK, France J (2009) Modelling methane production from beef cattle using linear and nonlinear approaches. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1334–1345.
| Modelling methane production from beef cattle using linear and nonlinear approaches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Escobar-Bahamondes P, Oba M, Beauchemin KA (2017) An evaluation of the accuracy and precision of methane prediction equations for beef cattle fed high-forage and high-grain diets. Animal 11, 68–77.
| An evaluation of the accuracy and precision of methane prediction equations for beef cattle fed high-forage and high-grain diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garnett EJ (2012) ‘Evaluation of the GreenFeed system for methane estimation from grazing dairy cows.’ (Massey University: Palmerston North, New Zealand)
Grainger C, Clarke T, McGinn SM, Auldist MJ, Beauchemin KA, Hannah MC, Waghorn GC, Clark H, Eckard RJ (2007) Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 2755–2766.
| Methane emissions from dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and chamber techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregorini P, Beukes PC, Hanigan MD, Waghorn G, Muetzel S, McNamara JP (2013) Comparison of updates to the Molly cow model to predict methane production from dairy cows fed pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 5046–5052.
| Comparison of updates to the Molly cow model to predict methane production from dairy cows fed pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hammond KJ, Muetzel S, Waghorn GC, Pinares-Patiño CS, Burke JL, Hoskin SO (2009) The variation in methane emissions from sheep and cattle is not explained by the chemical composition of ryegrass. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 69, 174–178.
Hammond KJ, Hoskin SO, Burke JL, Waghorn GC, Koolaard JP, Muetzel S (2011) Effects of feeding fresh white clover (Trifolium repens) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on enteric methane emissions from sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 398–404.
| Effects of feeding fresh white clover (Trifolium repens) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on enteric methane emissions from sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hammond KJ, Humphries DJ, Crompton LA, Green C, Reynolds CK (2015) Methane emissions from cattle: Estimates from short-term measurements using a GreenFeed system compared with measurements obtained using respiration chambers or sulphur hexafluoride tracer. Animal Feed Science and Technology 203, 41–52.
| Methane emissions from cattle: Estimates from short-term measurements using a GreenFeed system compared with measurements obtained using respiration chambers or sulphur hexafluoride tracer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hristov AN, Kebreab E, Niu M, Oh J, Bannink A, Bayat AR, Boland TB, Brito AF, Casper DP, Crompton LA, Dijkstra J, Eugene M, Garnswhorty PC, Haque N, Hellwing ALF, Huhtanen P, Kreuzer M, Kuhla B, Lund B, Madsen J, Martin C, Moate PJ, Muetzel S, Munoz C, Peiren N, Powell JM, Reynolds CK, Schwarm A, Shingfield KJ, Sorlien TM, Weisbjerg MR, Yanez-Ruiz DR, Yu Z (2018) Symposium review: uncertainties in enteric methane inventories, measurement techniques, and prediction models. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 6655–6674.
| Symposium review: uncertainties in enteric methane inventories, measurement techniques, and prediction models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) Chapter 10. Emissions from livestock and manure management. In ‘Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, agriculture, forestry and other land use. Vol. 4’. (Eds HS Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara, K Tanabe) pp. 10.1–10.87. (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies: Hayama, Japan)
Jonker A, Molano G, Antwi C, Waghorn GC (2016a) Enteric methane and carbon dioxide emissions measured using respiration chambers, the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique, and a GreenFeed head-chamber system from beef heifers fed alfalfa silage at three allowances and four feeding frequencies. Journal of Animal Science 94, 4326–4337.
| Enteric methane and carbon dioxide emissions measured using respiration chambers, the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique, and a GreenFeed head-chamber system from beef heifers fed alfalfa silage at three allowances and four feeding frequencies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jonker A, Muetzel S, Molano G, Pacheco D (2016b) Effect of fresh pasture forage quality, feeding level and supplementation on methane emissions from growing beef cattle. Animal Production Science 56, 1714–1721.
Jonker A, Molano G, Koolaard J, Muetzel S (2017a) Methane emissions from lactating and non-lactating dairy cows and growing cattle fed fresh pasture. Animal Production Science 57, 643–648.
| Methane emissions from lactating and non-lactating dairy cows and growing cattle fed fresh pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jonker A, Scobie D, Dynes R, Edwards G, De Klein C, Hague H, McAuliffe R, Taylor A, Knight T, Waghorn GC (2017b) Feeding diets with fodder beet decreased methane emissions from dry and lactating dairy cows in grazing systems. Animal Production Science 57, 1445–1450.
| Feeding diets with fodder beet decreased methane emissions from dry and lactating dairy cows in grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jonker A, Farrell L, Scobie D, Dynes R, Edwards G, Hague H, McAuliffe R, Taylor A, Knight T, Waghorn GC (2018) Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from lactating dairy cows grazing mature ryegrass/white clover or a diverse pasture comprising ryegrass, legumes and herbs. Animal Production Science.
Kolver ES, Aspin PW (2006) Supplemental fumarate did not influence milksolids or methane production from dairy cows fed high quality pasture. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66, 409–415.
Lee JM, Woodward SL, Waghorn G, Clark DA (2004) Methane emissions by dairy cows fed increasing proportions of white clover (Trifolium repens) in pasture. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 66, 151–155.
MfE (2018) ‘New Zealand‘s greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2016. Ref. ME 1351.’ (Ministry for the Environment: Wellington, New Zealand)
Molano G, Clark H, Knight TW, Cavanagh A (2006) Methane emissions from growing beef cattle grazing hill country pasture. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66, 172–175.
Muñoz C, Yan T, Wills DA, Murray S, Gordon AW (2012) Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 3139–3148.
| Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nielsen NI, Volden H, Åkerlind M, Brask M, Hellwing ALF, Storlien T, Bertilsson J (2013) A prediction equation for enteric methane emission from dairy cows for use in NorFor. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica. Section A, Animal Science 63, 126–130.
| A prediction equation for enteric methane emission from dairy cows for use in NorFor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinares-Patiño CS, Lassey KR, Martin RJ, Molano G, Fernandez M, MacLean S, Sandoval E, Luo D, Clark H (2011) Assessment of the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique using respiration chambers for estimation of methane emissions from sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 201–209.
| Assessment of the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique using respiration chambers for estimation of methane emissions from sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinares-Patiño CS, Franco FE, Molano G, Kjestrup H, Sandoval E, MacLean S, Battistotti M, Koolaard J, Laubach J (2016) Feed intake and methane emissions from cattle grazing pasture sprayed with canola oil. Livestock Science 184, 7–12.
| Feed intake and methane emissions from cattle grazing pasture sprayed with canola oil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sakar D, R Core Team (2018) ‘nlme: nonlinear mixed effects models.’ R package version 3.1-137. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html [Verified 25 November 2018]
Ramírez-Restrepo CA, Clark H, Muetzel S (2016) Methane emissions from young and mature dairy cattle. Animal Production Science 56, 1897–1905.
| Methane emissions from young and mature dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2018) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at https://www.R-project.org [Verified 25 November 2018]
Robertson LJ, Waghorn GC (2002) Dairy industry perspectives on methane emissions and production from cattle fed pasture or total mixed rations in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 62, 213–218.
Sun XZ, Hoskin SO, Zhang GG, Molano G, Muetzel S, Pinares-Patiño CS, Clark H, Pacheco D (2012) Sheep fed forage chicory (Cichorium intybus) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) have similar methane emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 172, 217–225.
| Sheep fed forage chicory (Cichorium intybus) or perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) have similar methane emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sun X, Pacheco D, Luo D (2016) Forage brassica: a feed to mitigate enteric methane emissions? Animal Production Science 56, 451–456.
| Forage brassica: a feed to mitigate enteric methane emissions?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR, Shelton ID, Walker CF (2002) Seasonal variation in methane emission from dairy cows and breeding ewes grazing ryegrass/white clover pasture in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 217–226.
| Seasonal variation in methane emission from dairy cows and breeding ewes grazing ryegrass/white clover pasture in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Vugt SJ, Waghorn GC, Clark DA, Woodward SL (2005) Impact of monensin on methane production and performance of cows fed forage diets. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 65, 362–366.
Velazco JI, Mayer DG, Zimmerman S, Hegarty RS (2016) Use of short-term breath measures to estimate daily methane production by cattle. Animal 10, 25–33.
| Use of short-term breath measures to estimate daily methane production by cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Veneman JB, Muetzel S, Hart KJ, Faulkner CL, Moorby JM, Perdok HB, Newbold CJ (2015) Does dietary mitigation of enteric methane production affect rumen function and animal productivity in dairy cows? PLoS One 10, e0140282
| Does dietary mitigation of enteric methane production affect rumen function and animal productivity in dairy cows?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waghorn GC, Hegarty RS (2011) Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 291–301.
| Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waghorn GC, Tavendale MH, Woodfield DR (2002) Methagonesis from forage fed to sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 64, 167–171.
Waghorn GC, Jonker A, Macdonald KA (2016) Measuring methane from grazing dairy cows using GreenFeed. Animal Production Science 56, 252–257.
| Measuring methane from grazing dairy cows using GreenFeed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Waugh CD, Clark DA, Waghorn GC, Woodward SL (2005) Feeding maize silage to dairy cows: implications for methane emissions. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 65, 356–361.
Woodward SL, Waghorn GC, Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR (2001) Early indications that feeding Lotus will reduce methane emissions from ruminants. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 61, 23–26.
Woodward SL, Waghorn GC, Lassey KR, Laboyrie PG (2002) Does feeding sulla (Hedysarum coronarium) reduce methane emission from dairy cows? Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 62, 227–230.
Woodward SL, Waghorn GC, Thomson NA (2006) Supplementing dairy cows with oils to improve performance and reduce methane? does it work? Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66, 176–181.
Woodward SL, Waghorn GC, Watkins KA, Bryant MA (2009) Feeding birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) reduces the environmental impacts of dairy farming. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 69, 179–183.
