Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Wheat crop surveys in southern New South Wales. 4. The response by grain yield and other wheat attributes to weeds

AC Taylor and WJ Lill

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 26(6) 709 - 715
Published: 1986

Abstract

Regular hand-weeding was undertaken in experiments located in 167 wheat crops in southern New South Wales from 1967 to 1970 to quantify the effect of weeds on 10 wheat attributes at flowering or maturity. Short annual grasses, skeleton weed, wild oats and annual legumes were the most widespread weeds, all of which tended to occur in mixed stands. At wheat flowering, over all sites, wheat DM, nitrogen concentration, nitrogen uptake, phosphorus uptake and number of ears were increased (P< 0.05) by 11.2, 3.3, 14.4, 13.6 and 7.8%, respectively by weeding; wheat phosphorus concentrations did not respond to weeding. At maturity, grain yield and nitrogen yield increased after weeding (P< 0.05) by 17.3 and 1 7.0%, respectively, but grain protein and kernel weight did not respond to weeding. Regression procedures were used to relate wheat responses to total weed DM and the DM of 8 weed classes. At flowering, for every 100 g of DM removed, wheat DM, nitrogen uptake, phosphorus uptake and ear number increased by 52.3 g m-2, 958 mg m-2, 92.6 mg m-2and 18.7 m-2, respectively. At maturity, grain yield and grain nitrogen yield increased by 31.9 g m-2 and 665 mg m-2, respectively, for every 100g m-2 of weed DM present at flowering. The regressions also showed that, at both flowering and maturity, fumitory, annual grasses and sundry weeds (a group made up of weeds not sufficiently widespread to consider separately) appeared to be the most aggressive weeds. Consideration of standardised responses of the wheat attributes increased by weeding showed that they all responded similarly when corrected for scale of measurement.

https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9860709

© CSIRO 1986

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions