Comparative performance of cattle and buffalo on the Sepik Plains, Papua New Guinea

Abstract

Fifty female Brahman-cross cattle and 50 water buffalo were run on the infertile native pastures of the Sepik lowland plains, Papua New Guinea; half the buffalo, and all the cattle, received mineral supplementation (phosphate, Ca, Cu and Co). After the beginning of the experiment all animals were able to maintain, but not improve, their weights. The liveweights attained were everywhere less than those attained on more fertile pastures elsewhere in Papua New Guinea, the discrepancy being greater for cattle than for buffalo. Supplementation improved both the mean liveweight of buffalo and the growth rate of the calves. Calf mortality was 18 per cent in both species. Despite the longer gestation period, the buffalo produced nearly 50 per cent more calves than the cattle; buffalo more often than not conceived while still lactating, whereas cattle did so only rarely. There was some evidence of a long-term improvement in fertility as a result of supplementation. It is concluded that under these difficult conditions buffalo are a better proposition than cattle.