Action learning in partnership with Landcare and catchment management groups to support increased pasture sowings in southern inland Queensland
D. L. Lloyd A B , B. Johnson A , S. M. O’Brien A and D. N. Lawrence AA Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: david.lloyd@dpi.qld.gov.au
Animal Production Science 49(10) 907-915 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08298
Submitted: 30 December 2008 Accepted: 18 May 2009 Published: 16 September 2009
Abstract
The incorporation of sown pastures as short-term rotations into the cropping systems of northern Australia has been slow. The inherent chemical fertility and physical stability of the predominant vertisol soils across the region enabled farmers to grow crops for decades without nitrogen fertiliser, and precluded the evolution of a crop–pasture rotation culture. However, as less fertile and less physically stable soils were cropped for extended periods, farmers began to use contemporary farming and sown pasture technologies to rebuild and maintain their soils. This has typically involved sowing long-term grass and grass–legume pastures on the more marginal cropping soils of the region.
In partnership with the catchment management authority, the Queensland Murray–Darling Committee (QMDC) and Landcare, a pasture extension process using the LeyGrain™ package was implemented in 2006 within two Grain & Graze projects in the Maranoa-Balonne and Border Rivers catchments in southern inland Queensland. The specific objectives were to increase the area sown to high quality pasture and to gain production and environmental benefits (particularly groundcover) through improving the skills of producers in pasture species selection, their understanding and management of risk during pasture establishment, and in managing pastures and the feed base better. The catalyst for increasing pasture sowings was a QMDC subsidy scheme for increasing groundcover on old cropping land. In recognising a need to enhance pasture knowledge and skills to implement this scheme, the QMDC and Landcare producer groups sought the involvement of, and set specific targets for, the LeyGrain workshop process. This is a highly interactive action learning process that built on the existing knowledge and skills of the producers.
Thirty-four workshops were held with more than 200 producers in 26 existing groups and with private agronomists. An evaluation process assessed the impact of the workshops on the learning and skill development by participants, their commitment to practice change, and their future intent to sow pastures.
The results across both project catchments were highly correlated. There was strong agreement by producers (>90%) that the workshops had improved knowledge and skills regarding the adaptation of pasture species to soils and climates, enabling a better selection at the paddock level. Additional strong impacts were in changing the attitudes of producers to all aspects of pasture establishment, and the relative species composition of mixtures.
Producers made a strong commitment to practice change, particularly in managing pasture as a specialist crop at establishment to minimise risk, and in the better selection and management of improved pasture species (particularly legumes and the use of fertiliser). Producers have made a commitment to increase pasture sowings by 80% in the next 5 years, with fourteen producers in one group alone having committed to sow an additional 4893 ha of pasture in 2007–08 under the QMDC subsidy scheme.
The success of the project was attributed to the partnership between QMDC and Landcare groups who set individual workshop targets with LeyGrain presenters, the interactive engagement processes within the workshops themselves, and the follow-up provided by the LeyGrain team for on-farm activities.
Cramb RA,
Catacutan D,
Culasero-Arellano Z, Mariano K
(2007) The ‘Landcare’ approach to soil conservation in the Philippines: an assessment of farm-level impacts. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 721–726.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
[Verified 8 May 2009]
Lawrence DN,
Cawley ST, Hayman PT
(2000) Developing answers and learning in extension for dryland nitrogen management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 527–539.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lewin K
(1947) Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations 1, 5–41.
| Crossref |
Llewellyn RS,
Pannell DJ,
Lindner RK, Powles SB
(2005) Targeting key perceptions when planning and evaluating extension. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1627–1633.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lloyd DL,
Johnson B, O’Brien SM
(2007a) Sown pasture grasses and legumes for marginal cropping lands in southern inland Queensland. Tropical Grasslands 41, 164–173.
Pannell DJ,
Marshall GR,
Barr N,
Curtis A,
Vanclay F, Wilkinson R
(2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1407–1424.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Puckridge DW, French RJ
(1983) The annual legume pasture in cereal-ley farming systems in southern Australia: a review. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 9, 229–267.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Strong WM,
Dalal RC,
Weston EJ,
Lehane KJ,
Cooper JE,
King AJ, Holmes CJ
(2006) Sustaining productivity of a Vertosol at Warra, Queensland, with fertilisers, no-tillage or legumes. 9. Production and nitrogen benefits from mixed grass and legume pastures in rotation with wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 375–385.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomas GA,
Titmarsh GW,
Freebairn DM, Radford BJ
(2007) No-tillage and conservation farming practices in grain growing areas of Queensland – a review of 40 years of development. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 887–898.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vanclay F
(2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 213–222.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Winter WH, Doyle PT
(2008) Increased profitability and social outcomes from livestock in smallholder crop-livestock systems in developing countries: the ACIAR experience. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 799–805.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Appendix 1. Workshop group locations
Maranoa-Balonne: Begonia, Condamine, Yalebone Creek, Donnybrook, Dulacca, Hodgson, Meandarra, Miles, Roma, St George, Surat, Wyambeh.
Border Rivers: Billa Billa, East Moonie/Pipeclay Creek, Goondiwindi, Goondoola, Inglewood, Millmerran, Moonie, Nindigully, Weangallon, Stanthorpe, Talwood, Teelba, Texas, Toobeah.
Private agronomist workshop: Goondiwindi.
Appendix 2. On-farm activities and field days
Activities
Tropical grass and temperate and/or tropical legume species comparisons, including the use of phosphorus and sulfur fertiliser with legumes, as follows:
Goondoola group, two properties – caatinga stylo (Stylosanthes seabrana), desmanthus (Desmanthus virgatus), Bisset creeping blue grass (Bothriochloa insculpta), Floren blue grass (Dichanthium aristatum) and leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala).
Talwood, Goondiwindi, St George groups, four properties – Medway pertusa (Bothriochloa pertusa).
Teelba group, one property – caatinga stylo, desmanthus, Bisset creeping blue grass, Floren blue grass.
East Moonie group, three properties – medics (Medicago spp.) into old, established bambatsi panic (Panicum coloratum) pasture,various grasses with desmanthus and caatinga stylo, yellow serradella (Ornithopus compressus).
Moonie group, three properties – various grasses and legumes.
Yalebone Creek group, one property – caatinga stylo into ripped buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) pasture.
Donnybrook group, five properties – leucaena, desmanthus, medic into rundown buffel grass.
Begonia group, two properties – various grasses and legumes, sulla (Sulla coronarium).
Field days
Goondoola group, two properties – sown pasture development in 2006–07.
Billa Billa group, one property – pasture management.
Condamine group, three properties – sown pasture development in 2007–08.