Metabolic costs related to protein turnover, fat turnover, and rate of gain determine the energetically optimal size of growing sheep
Michael R. Murphy
A * and Bruce M. Hannon B †
A
B
† Deceased, February 2024. Responsible for conceptualisation, formal analysis, methodology, and project administration.
Handling Editor: James Dougherty
Abstract
An adequate understanding of the energy requirements of growing animals is critical to developing efficient livestock production systems. Previously, we often found an empirically cubic relationship between fasting heat production rates (R) of growing animals and their body mass (M). The cubic allowed estimation of their energetically optimal size, i.e. the M at which R/M was minimal.
Our objective was to determine whether causal physiological factors could be identified that explained the cubic relationship between R and M. Our hypothesis was that these energy costs related to fat turnover, protein turnover, and prior rate of gain.
First, we developed equations to describe how fat, protein, and growth changed as crossbred wethers grew in a study from the literature. Fractional turnover rates of fat and protein were then estimated using these equations and additional literature data. This information and body composition, growth, and R data for intact males from another study were used to parameterise a factorial model of R as a function of protein turnover, fat turnover, and rate of gain. Finally, we used the factorial model to predict R in the crossbred wether experiment.
A modified exponential equation, an allometric equation, and a monomolecular function described how fat, protein, and growth changed in crossbred wethers. The best factorial equation to describe R for growing intact males was as follows: R (MJ/day) = 0.038 (fractional turnover rate, per day) × 12.74 (MJ/kg of protein) × Protein (kg) + 0.012 (fractional turnover rate, per day) × 8.60 (MJ/kg of fat) × Fat (kg) + 4.64 (MJ/kg of gain) × Rate of gain (kg/day), with an observed versus predicted slope of one and an intercept of zero. This equation allowed prediction of R in the crossbred wethers. Predicted R versus M was best explained by a cubic function.
Quantifying energy costs related to fat turnover, protein turnover, and prior rate of gain explained the cubic relationship found previously between R and M in growing animals.
The cubic equation allows identification of the energetically optimal M of a growing animal, provided suitable R versus M data are available.
Keywords: body composition, energy, fasting heat production rate, fat, FHP, growth, maintenance, protein.
References
Bergman EN (1968) Glycerol turnover in the nonpregnant and ketotic pregnant sheep. American Journal of Physiology 215(4), 865-873.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Buckley BA, Baker JF, Dickerson GE, Jenkins TG (1990) Body composition and tissue distribution from birth to 14 months for three biological types of beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 68(10), 3109-3123.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Burrin DG, Ferrell CL, Britton RA, Bauer M (1990) Level of nutrition and visceral organ size and metabolic activity in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 64(2), 439-448.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Cabezas-Garcia EH, Lowe D, Lively F (2021) Energy requirements of beef cattle: current energy systems and factors influencing energy requirements for maintenance. Animals 11(6), 1642.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Ferrell CL, Koong LJ, Nienaber JA (1986) Effects of previous nutrition on body composition and maintenance energy costs of growing lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 56(3), 595-605.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Gonçalves CM, Schwaab M, Pinto JC (2013) Comparison between linear and nonlinear regression in a laboratory heat transfer experiment. Chemical Engineering Education 47(3), 161-169.
| Google Scholar |
Graham NMcC, Searle TW, Griffiths DA (1974) Basal metabolic rate in lambs and young sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25(6), 957-971.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hannon BM, Murphy MR (2016) Toward a theory of energetically optimal body size in growing animals. Journal of Animal Science 94(6), 2532-2541.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Koong LJ, Nienaber JA, Mersmann HJ (1983) Effects of plane of nutrition on organ size and fasting heat production in genetically obese and lean pigs. Journal of Nutrition 113(8), 1626-1631.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Koong LJ, Ferrell CL, Nienaber JA (1985) Assessment of interrelationships among levels of intake and production, organ size and fasting heat production in growing animals. Journal of Nutrition 115(10), 1383-1390.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Krishnamurti CR, Janssens SM (1988) Determination of leucine metabolism and protein turnover in sheep, using gas–liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. British Journal of Nutrition 59(1), 155-164.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Maeno H, Oishi K, Hirooka H (2013) Interspecies differences in the empty body chemical composition of domestic animals. Animal 7(7), 1148-1157.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
McLeod KR, Baldwin RL, VI (2000) Effects of diet forage:concentrate ratio and metabolizable energy intake on visceral organ growth and in vitro oxidative capacity of gut tissues in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 78(3), 760-770.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Murphy MR, Hannon BM (2021) Total, average and marginal rates of basal heat production during human growth. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 18(5), 6806-6818.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) (2016) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 8th revised edn. (The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA). 10.17226/19014
National Research Council (NRC) (1981) ‘Nutritional energetics of domestic animals and glossary of energy terms.’ (The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA) 10.17226/1670
National Research Council (NRC) (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world Camelids.’ (The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA). 10.17226/11654
Oddy VH, Dougherty JCH, Evered M, Clayton EH, Oltjen JW (2024) A revised model of energy transactions and body composition in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 102, skad403.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ogink NWM (1993) Genetic size and growth in goats. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Netherlands. Available at https://edepot.wur.nl/202358
Piñeiro G, Perelman S, Guerschman JP, Paruelo JM (2008) How to evaluate models: observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? Ecological Modelling 216(3–4), 316-322.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Reeds PJ, Wahle KW, Haggarty P (1982) Energy costs of protein and fatty acid synthesis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41(2), 155-159.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Richards FJ (1959) A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of Experimental Botany 10(29), 290-301.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rolfs Z, Frey BL, Shi X, Kawai Y, Smith LM, Welham NV (2021) An atlas of protein turnover rates in mouse tissues. Nature Communications 12(1), 6778.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Searle TW, Graham NMcC, O’Callaghan M (1972) Growth in sheep. I. The chemical composition of the body. Journal Agricultural Science 79(3), 371-382.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tedeschi LO (2006) Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agricultural Systems 89(2–3), 225-247.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wang Z, Zhang J, Ying Z, Heymsfield SB (2012) Organ-tissue level model of resting energy expenditure across mammals: new insights into Kleiber’s Law. International Scholarly Research Notices 2012, 673050.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
