Balancing future food security and greenhouse-gas emissions from animal-sourced protein foods in Southeast Asia
R. S. Hegarty
A * , T. P. Tee B C * , J. B. Liang B , H. Abu Hassim B D , M. H. M. Zainudin B , A. A. Azizi E , Y. Widiawati F , S. Pok A , S. C. L. Candyrine G and N. D. Rusli H
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Abstract
Southeast Asia’s human population is expected to rise by 100 million between 2023 and 2050, with an associated rise in animal-product output in the region’s low- to middle-income countries. Countries with the largest population are forecast to continue their increasing poultry consumption, with regional pig meat consumption also to rise, but much less than in China to the north, and much less in Muslim-dominant countries. The forecast growth in the regional ruminant population is more modest and the farm-gate greenhouse gas (GHG) cost per unit of human food protein generated is much higher for ruminant meat (203–584 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e)/kg protein) than for pig meat (18 kg/kg) or poultry (4 kg/kg). Changing human diets away from ruminant or any animal-sourced protein, is being explored to increase the human food supply at a lower GHG cost. However, with small-holder livestock production systems dominant across many regional countries, the social, land-use and broader economic roles of ruminants need consideration. Strategies to expand ruminant production but with a reduced GHG unit cost (emission intensity) are being pursued. Increasing individual animal-product output, largely through simple animal health and nutritional management decisions, can allow future food targets to be met at a lower GHG emission than if this additional food was produced by business-as-usual livestock production systems. Because the Paris Agreement recognises the priority of food provision over emission abatement, it seems reasonable that much of Southeast Asia should pursue emission intensity targets more than absolute emission targets, and reflect this in their nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Emission-intensity intentions are already apparent not just in NDCs but in emerging carbon markets.
Keywords: emission intensity, enteric methane, food security, greenhouse gas, livestock, nutrition, productivity, Southeast Asia.
References
Alcock D, Hegarty RS (2006) Effects of pasture improvement on productivity, gross margin and methane emissions of a grazing sheep enterprise. International Congress Series 1293, 103-106.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Alcock DJ, Hegarty RS (2011) Potential effects of animal management and genetic improvement on enteric methane emissions, emissions intensity and productivity of sheep enterprises at Cowra, Australia. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166-167, 749-760.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Álvarez ER, Castiblanco JS, Montoya MM (2024) Sustainable intensification of palm oil production through cattle integration: a review. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 48, 313-331.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Arndt C, Hristov AN, Price WJ, McClelland SC, Pelaez AM, Cueva SF, Oh J, Bannink A, Bayat AR, Crompton LA, Dijkstra J, Eugène MA, Kebreab E, Kreuzer M, McGee M, Martin C, Newbold CJ, Reynolds CK, Schwarm A, Shingfield KJ, Veneman JB, Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Yu Z-T (2021) Strategies to mitigate enteric methane emissions by ruminants: a way to approach the 2.0° C target. CABI AgriRxiv. 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00040
Arndt C, Hristov AN, Price WJ, McClelland SC, Pelaez AM, Cueva SF, Oh J, Dijkstra J, Bannink A, Bayat AR, Crompton LA, Crompton LA, Eugène MA, Enahoro D, Kebreab E, Kreuzer M, McGee M, Martin C, Newbold CJ, Reynolds CK, Schwarm A, Shingfield KJ, Veneman JB, Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Yu Z (2022) Full adoption of the most effective strategies to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants can help meet the 1.5°C target by 2030 but not 2050. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(20), e2111294119.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
ASEANstats (2023) ASEANStats data portal, Indicators, IMTS, Trade in Goods, 2023, Commodity 02. Available at http://data.aseanstats.org [Accessed 12 December 2024]
Bateki CA, Wassie SE, Wilkes A (2023) The contribution of livestock to climate change mitigation: a perspective from a low-income country. Carbon Management 14, 1-16.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beauchemin KA, Ungerfeld EM, Abdalla AL, Alvarez C, Arndt C, Becquet P, Benchaar C, Berndt A, Mauricio RM, McAllister TA, Oyhantçabal W, Salami SA, Shalloo L, Sun Y, Tricarico J, Uwizeye A, De Camillis C, Bernoux M, Robinson T, Kebreab E (2022) Invited review: current enteric methane mitigation options. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 9297-9326.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Besar NA, Suardi H, Phua M-H, James D, Mokhtar MB, Ahmed MF (2020) Carbon stock and sequestration potential of an agroforestry system in Sabah, Malaysia. Forests 11, 210.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bush RD (2024) Advances in smallholder large ruminant production and profitability in Southeast Asia over the past decade – lessons from the Mekong region: a review. Animal Production Science 64, AN23406.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Capper JL, Cady RA (2020) The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017. Journal of Animal Science 98, skz291.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Chang J, Peng S, Yin Y, Ciais P, Havlik P, Herrero M (2021) The key role of production efficiency changes in livestock methane emission mitigation. AGU Advances 2, e2021AV000391.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
da Silva GDP, Hesselberg T (2020) A review of the use of black soldier fly larvae, Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae), to compost organic waste in tropical regions. Neotropical Entomology 49, 151-162.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
DeRamus HA, Clement TC, Giampola DD, Dickison PC (2003) Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages: efficiency of grazing management systems. Journal of Environmental Quality 32, 269-277.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
DESA (1992) Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development, (Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992) Annex 1, Rio declaration on environment and development. Available at https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf [accessed 29 May 2024]
Drewnowski AP, Poulain J-P (2018) What lies behind the transition from plant-based to animal protein? AMA Journal of Ethics 20, E987-993.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Duynisveld JL, Charmley E (2018) Potato processing waste in beef finishing diets; effects on performance, carcass and meat quality. Animal Production Science 58, 546-552.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Džermeikaitė K, Krištolaitytė J, Antanaitis R (2024) Relationship between dairy cow health and intensity of greenhouse gas emissions. Animals 14, 829.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
ESCAP (2023) ESCAP-World Bank trade cost databank. Available at https://databank.worldbank.org/source/escap-world-bank-international-trade-costs. [accessed 21 May 2024]
FAO (2017) Global livestock Environmental Assessment Model: Model Description Version 2.0. Available at https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gleam/docs/GLEAM_2.0_Model_description.pdf [accessed 19 November 2024]
FAO (2018) World livestock: transforming the livestock sector through the sustainable development goals. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/CA1201EN/ca1201en.pdf [accessed 21 November 2024]
FAO (2023a) Pathways towards lower emissions: a global assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options from livestock agrifood systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Available at https://doi.org/10.4060/cc9029en [accessed 21 May 2024]
FAO (2023b) Methane emission in livestock and rice systems. Available at https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en?details=cc7607en [accessed 21 September 2023]
FAOSTAT (2023a) Food and agriculture data. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home [accessed 12 September 2023]
FAOSTAT (2023b) FAO domain Emission intensities. Methodological note, release October 2023. Available at https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/EI/EI_e.pdf [accessed 12 December 2024]
FAOSTAT (2024) Suite of food security indicators. Available at https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FS [accessed 21 November 2024]
FAO and NZAGRC (2017) Options for low emission development in the kenya dairy sector: reducing enteric methane for food security and livelihoods. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Available at https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/i7669en [accessed 21 May 2024]
Fathoni A, Boonkum W, Chankitisakul V, Duangjinda M (2022) An appropriate genetic approach for improving reproductive traits in crossbred Thai–Holstein cattle under heat stress conditions. Veterinary Sciences 9(4), 163.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gebbels JN, Kragt ME, Thomas DT, Vercoe PE (2022) Improving productivity reduces methane intensity but increases the net emissions of sheepmeat and wool enterprises. Animal 16, 100490.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gerber P, Vellinga T, Opio C, Steinfeld H (2011) Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livestock Science 139, 100-108.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
GFSI-UN (2023) Economic impact: global food security index report. Corteva Agriscience. Available at https://impact.economist.com/sustainability/project/food-security-index/reports/Economist_Impact_GFSI_2022_Global_Report_Sep_2022.pdf [accessed 21 November 2024]
Hamilton-Hart N (2019) Indonesia’s quest for food self-sufficiency: a new agricultural political economy? Journal of Contemporary Asia 49, 734-758.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Harrison MT, McSweeney C, Tomkins NW, Eckard RJ (2015) Improving greenhouse gas emissions intensities of subtropical and tropical beef farming systems using Leucaena leucocephala. Agricultural Systems 136, 138-146.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hegarty RS, Cortez Passetti RA, Dittmer KM, Wang Y, Shelton S, Emmet-Booth J, Wollenberg E, McAllister T, Leahy S, Beauchemin K, Gurwick N (2021) An evaluation of emerging feed additives to reduce methane emissions from livestock. Edn 1. A report coordinated by Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and the New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre (NZAGRC) initiative of the Global Research Alliance (GRA). Available at https://hdl.handle.net/10568/116489
Henson IE, Ruiz RR, Romero HM (2012) The greenhouse gas balance of the oil palm industry in Colombia: a preliminary analysis. I. Carbon sequestration and carbon offsets. Agronomía Colombiana 30(3), 359-369.
| Google Scholar |
Hilmiati N, Ilham N, Nulik J, Rohaeni ES, deRosari B, Basuki T, Hau DK, Ngongo Y, Lase JA, Fitriawaty F, Surya S, Qomariyah N, Hadiatry MC, Ahmad SN, Qomariah R, Suyatno S, Munir IM, Hayanti SY, Panjaitan T, Yusriani Y (2024) Smallholder cattle development in Indonesia: learning from the past for an outcome-oriented development model. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 19(1), 169-184.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Horri M, Suyanto , Jusnita RAE (2023) Disease control management strategy in Bali cattle. Influence International Journal of Science Review 5, 333-342.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hristov AN, Ott T, Tricarico J, Rotz A, Waghorn G, Adesogan A, Dijkstra J, Montes F, Oh J, Kebreab E, Oosting SJ, Gerber PJ, Henderson B, Makkar HPS, Firkins JL (2013a) Special topics – mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: III. A review of animal management mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science 91, 5095-5113.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hristov AN, Oh J, Firkins JL, Dijkstra J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Makkar HPS, Adesogan AT, Yang W, Lee C, Gerber PJ, Henderson B, Tricarico JM (2013b) Special topics – mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science 91, 5045-5069.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hristov AN, Melgar A, Wasson D, Arndt C (2022) Symposium review: effective nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 8543-8557.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hunt G (2015) Carbon credits (Carbon Farming Initiative – Beef Cattle Herd Management) Methodology Determination 2015. Available at https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2015L01434/Html/Text#_Toc426038013 [accessed 23 March 2023]
IPCC (2018) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (Eds V Masson-Delmotte, P Zhai, HO Pörtner, D Roberts, J Skea, PR Shukla, A Pirani, W Moufouma-Okia, C Péan, R Pidcock, S Connors, JBR Matthews, Y Chen, X Zhou, MI Gomis, E Lonnoy, T Maycock, M Tignor, T Waterfield). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Khalil M, Berawi MA, Heryanto R, Rizalie A (2019) Waste to energy technology: the potential of sustainable biogas production from animal waste in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 105, 323-331.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kongthod T, Thanachit S, Anusontpornperm S, Wiriyakitnateekul W (2015) Effects of biochars and other organic soil amendments on plant nutrient availability in an ustoxic quartzipsamment. Pedosphere 25, 790-798.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Liu J, Wang M, Yang L, Rahman S, Sriboonchitta S (2020) Agricultural productivity growth and its determinants in south and Southeast Asian countries. Sustainability 12, 4981.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
LQBI (2019) Enhancing rural livelihoods in Laos by farmer training. Available at https://mekonglivestock.wordpress.com/2019/01/28/enhancing-rural-livelihoods-in-laos-by-farmer-training-cross-visits/ [accessed 21 May 2024]
MAFI (2021) Malaysia National Agrofood Policy 2021-2030 (NAP 2.0). Available at https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/mal211654.pdf
Mayberry D, Cowley F, Cramb R, Poppi D, Quigley S, McCosker K, Priyanti A (2016) Project improving the reproductive performance of cows and performance of fattening cattle in low input systems of Indonesia and northern Australia. Available at https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:bce11d4 [accessed 21 November 2024]
Mbow C, Rosenzweig CE, Barioni LG, Benton TG, Herrero M, Krishnapillai M, Ruane AC, Liwenga E, Pradhan P, Rivera-Ferre MG, Sapkota T, et al. (2019) Food Security (No. GSFC-E-DAA-TN78913). Available at https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2019/11/08_Chapter-5.pdf [accessed 21 May 2024]
McPhee MJ, Edwards C, Harden S, Naylor T, Phillips FA, Guppy C, Hegarty RS (2024) GrassGroTM simulation of pasture, animal performance and greenhouse emissions on low and high sheep productivity grazing systems: 1-year validation and 25-year analysis. Animal 18, 101088.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
McRoberts KC, Nicholson CF, Parsons D, Nam LV, Ba NX, Ketterings QM, Cherney DJR (2018) Structure and impact of cattle manure trade in crop–livestock systems of Vietnam. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 33, 86-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Michalk DL, Kemp DR, Badgery WB, Wu J, Zhang Y, Thomassin PJ (2019) Sustainability and future food security – a global perspective for livestock production. Land Degradation & Development 30, 561-573.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mota-Rojas D, Braghieri A, Álvarez-Macías A, Serrapica F, Ramírez-Bribiesca E, Cruz-Monterrosa R, Masucci F, Mora-Medina P, Napolitano F (2021) The use of draught animals in rural labour. Animals 11, 2683-2700.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Murray CJL, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Abdollahi M, Abdollahpour I, Abegaz KH, et al. (2020) Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet 396, 1223-1249.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nasution SS, Girsang BM, Hariati H (2021) Evaluation of the effect of sociocultural factors on the children stature in langkat regency, Indonesia. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 9, 461-466.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
OECD/FAO (2022) OECD–FAO Agricultural Outlook 2023–2032. OECD Publishing, Paris, France. Available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2022-2031_f1b0b29c-en [accessed 21 November 2024]
OECD/FAO (2023) OECD–FAO Agricultural Outlook 2023–2032. OECD Publishing, Paris, France. Available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2023-2032_08801ab7-en [accessed 21 May 2025]
Pethick DW, Bryden WL, Mann NJ, Masters DG, Lean IJ (2023) The societal role of meat: the Dublin Declaration with an Australian perspective. Animal Production Science 63, 1805-1826.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pham-Thanh L, Magnusson U, Can-Xuan M, Nguyen-Viet H, Lundkvist Å, Lindahl J (2020) Livestock development in Hanoi City, Vietnam: challenges and policies. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7, 566.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Poppi DP, Quigley SP, Mayberry DE, Cowley F, Harper KJ, McLennan SR (2017) Bridging the gap: strategies to increase live weight gain and profitability in beef cattle in Indonesia. Improving Livestock Productivity, Quality and Safety to Respond to the Increasing Demand from Upper and Middle-Class Consumers. Available at https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29654 [accessed 21 May 2024]
Romasanta RR, Sander BO, Gaihre YK, Alberto MC, Gummert M, Quilty J, Nguyen VH, Castalon AG, Balingbing C, Sandro J, Correa T, Jr, Wassmann R (2017) How does burning of rice straw affect CH4 and N2O emissions? A comparative experiment of different on-field straw management practices. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 239, 143-153.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Rose S, Khatri-Chhetri A, Dittmer K, Stie, M, Wilkes A, Shelton SW, Arndt C, Wollenberg EK (2021) Livestock management ambition in the new and updated nationally determined contributions: 2020–2021: analysis of agricultural sub-sectors in national climate change strategies. Available at https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115885 [accessed 21 May 2024]
Rustinsyah R (2019) The significance of social relations in rural development: a case study of a beef-cattle farmer group in Indonesia. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management 7, 100088.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Sarmin S, Liang JB (1992) Economic comparisons between draught buffalo use and mechanized in-field transportation of fruit bunches in the palm oil industry in Malaysia. In ‘Proceedings of the sixth AAAP animal science congress Vol. III’, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. p. 297. (Faculty of Agriculture. Department of Animal Science. The Animal Husbandry Association of Thailand: Bangkok Thailand)
Savian JV, Neto AB, de David DB, Bremm C, Schons RMT, Genro TCM, do Amaral GA, Gere J, McManus CM, Bayer C, de Faccio Carvalho PC (2014) Grazing intensity and stocking methods on animal production and methane emission by grazing sheep: implications for integrated crop–livestock system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 190, 112-119.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schmidt MI (1992) The relationship between cattle and savings: a cattle-owner perspective. Development Southern Africa 9, 433-444.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Schmidt H-P, Kammann C, Hagemann N, Leifeld J, Bucheli TD, Sánchez Monedero MA, Cayuela ML (2021) Biochar in agriculture: a systematic review of 26 global meta-analyses. GCB Bioenergy 13, 1708-1730.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Syarifuddin H, Afdal M, Yurleni Y, Hamidah A, Devitriano D, Poy TT (2024) Sustainability analysis and decision-making strategy for swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis carabauesis) conservation in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Open Agriculture 9, 20220293.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tee TP, Goh YM, Zainudin MHM, Candyrine SCL, Sommart K, Kongphitee K, Sumamal W, Phaowphaisal I, Namsilee R, Angthong W, Sunato S, Keaokliang O, Maeda K, Thu NV, Trung TT, Dong NTK, Purnomoadi A, Kurihara M, Jayanegara A, Higuchi K, Kobayashi Y, Ohtani F, Abe H, Terada F, Kumagai H, Matsuyama H, Nonaka I, Takusari N, Shiba N, Hosoda K, Suzuki T, Kamiya Y, Nishida T, Hayasaka K, Shibata M, Wang M, Tan ZL, Wang R, Kebreab E, van Lingen HJ, Hristov AN, Liang JB (2022) Enteric methane emission models for diverse beef cattle feeding systems in South-east Asia: a meta-analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 294, 115474.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tenrisanna V, Kasim SN (2020) Trends and forecasting of meat production and consumption in Indonesia: livestock development strategies. IOP conference series: Earth and Environmental Science 492, 012156.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tiemann T, Douxchamps S (2023) Opportunities and challenges for integrated smallholder farming systems to improve soil nutrient management in Southeast Asia. World Development Sustainability 3, 100080.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Torres CMME, Jacovine LAG, Nolasco de Olivera Neto S, Fraisse CW, Soares CPB, de Castro Neto F, Ferreira LR, Zanuncio JC, Lemes PG (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration by agroforestry systems in southeastern Brazil. Scientific Reports 7, 16738.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Tubiello FN, Karl K, Flammini A, Gütschow J, Obli-Laryea G, Conchedda G, Pan X, Qi SY, Heiðarsdóttir HH, Wanner N, Quadrelli R, Rocha Souza L, Benoit P, Hayek M, Sandalow D, Mencos Contreras E, Rosenzweig C, Rosero Moncayo J, Conforti P, Torero M (2022) Pre- and post-production processes increasingly dominate greenhouse gas emissions from agri-food systems. Earth System Science Data Discussions 14, 1795-1809.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
UNDESA (2021) Circular agriculture for sustainable rural development. Policy Brief No. 105. Available at https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/PB_105.pdf [accessed 01 October 2024]
UNDESA (2022) World population prospects 2022: summary of results. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division [UNDESA]. Available at https://population.un.org/wpp/Graphs/Probabilistic/POP/TOT/920
UNFCCC (2023) Nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement: synthesis report by the secretariate. Available at https://unfccc.int/documents/632334 [accessed 21 May 2024]
Widarjono A, Rucbha SM (2016) Household food demand in Indonesia: a two-stage budgeting approach. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business 31, 163-177.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, De Vries W, Majele Sibanda L, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell SE, Srinath Reddy K, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray CJL (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet 393, 447-492.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
World Bank (2023) GDP per capita. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD [accessed 10 March2023]
World Economic Forum (2023) What is the future of sustainable protein in Asia-Pacific? Three expert leaders share their views. Available at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/06/protein-transition-asia-pacific/ [accessed 21 May 2023]
Yanti Y, Yayota M (2017) Agricultural by-products as feed for ruminants in tropical area: nutritive value and mitigating methane emission. Reviews in Agricultural Science 5, 65-76.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zhang M, Feng J-C, Sun L, Li P, Huang Y, Zhang S, Yang Z (2022) Individual dietary structure changes promote greenhouse gas emission reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production 366, 132787.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zubieta ÁS, Savian JV, de Souza Filho W, Wallau MO, Gómez AM, Bindelle J, Bonnet OJF, de Faccio Carvalho PC (2021) Does grazing management provide opportunities to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants in pastoral ecosystems? Science of The Total Environment 754, 142029.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
