Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Use of two different methods for glucose determination in sheep under normoglycemic, hypoglycemic, and hyperglycemic conditions: an evaluation of practical diagnostic methods in ovines

Marina Galindo Chenard A , Jade de Menezes Paes Bastos https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-3138 A * , Matheus Dias Valle A , Isabelle Magalhães da Cunha A , Nayro Xavier de Alencar A , Daniel Augusto Barroso Lessa A , Guilherme Nunes de Souza B , Nathalie Costa da Cunha A and Michel Abdalla Helayel A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Niterói, RJ, Brazil.

B Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.

* Correspondence to: jadepaes@id.uff.br

Handling Editor: Sathya Velmurugan

Animal Production Science 64, AN24165 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN24165
Submitted: 28 April 2024  Accepted: 21 June 2024  Published: 16 July 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Animals can present abnormal blood glucose concentrations because of various diseases or pathological conditions, stress, or hunger. Early diagnosis prevents complications, economic losses, and death. The use of a portable glucometer (PGM) has been shown to be a good, simple, and practical alternative method with good precision and accuracy for assessing blood glucose in humans and companion animals.

Aims

The objective of this work was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a portable glucometer (PGM) for assessing glycemia in normoglycemic, hypoglycemic, and hyperglycemic sheep.

Methods

Blood glucose was evaluated in 60 normoglycemic, 15 hypoglycemic, and 15 hyperglycemic sheep. Blood samples were collected and analysed within 2 h by using PGM and the enzymatic method (EM). Each test was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for two cutoff points, namely, one for hypoglycemia and the other for hyperglycemia.

Key results

The results of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (P < 0.05) for all groups evaluated did not show a normal distribution for the values evaluated by PGM and EM. Despite the significant difference found between the medians of the methods and the low homogeneity according to the coefficient of variation (CV), there was a homogeneous and linear dispersion of the results. The Bland–Altman test showed that the mean difference between the two methods was close to zero, denoting good agreement, precision, and accuracy of PGM when compared to EM.

Conclusions

PGM presents high accuracy and precision for assessing glycemia in sheep, providing satisfactory and reliable results when compared with EM.

Implications

The use of PGM facilitates the veterinarian’s routine, promoting early diagnosis, field examinations, and monitoring of metabolic diseases.

Keywords: blood, enzymatic method, glucose, hyperglycemic, hypoglycemic, metabolism, normoglycemic, portable glucometer, sheep.

References

Carvalho JS, De Jesus TKS, Delfino GdOA, de Morais Santos PV, Passos HS, da Silva Soares LL, Araújo CASCd, Ulian CMV, Soares PC, Rizzo H (2020) Validation of the Freestyle® Optium Neo portable meter for determination of glucose in sheep with single and twin pregnancies. Agrarian Academic Journal 3(3), 119-127.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chenard MG, Valle MD, da Cunha IM, de Alencar NX, Lessa DAB, de Souza GN, da Cunha NC, Carvalho VdAN, Caldas SA, Helayel MA (2022) Validation of a portable glucose meter in blood glucose measurement in normoglycemic goats induced to hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Small Ruminant Research 214, 106741.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Feitosa FLF (2008) ‘Veterinary semiology the art of diagnosis.’ 3rd edn. (Editora Roca: São Paulo, Brazil)

Helayel MA, Costa Da Cunha NC, Moron SE, Ribeiro da Silva PCA, Magalhães da Cunha I, Galindo Chenard M, Xavier M, Nogueira Carvalho VdA, de Souza Nunes G, Lopes SdP (2020) Comparative analysis between portable glucometer and enzymatic method for measuring glycemia in cattle. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 48, 1734.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Hirakata VN, Camey SA (2009) Bland-Altman Analysis of Agreement Between Methods. Clinical and Biomedical Research 29(3), 261-268.
| Google Scholar |

Kaneko JJ, Harvey J, Bruss M (2008) ‘Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals.’ 6th edn. (Academic: San Diego, CA, USA)

Katsoulos PD, Minas A, Karatzia MA, Pourliotis K, Christodoulopoulos G (2011) Evaluation of a portable glucose meter for use in cattle and sheep. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 40(2), 245-247.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kramer M (1988) ‘Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: a primer for clinical investigation and decision making.’ (Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany)

Monteiro SCM, Gomes E, Belfort IK, Avelar MF, Sampaio RM (2015) Comparative analysis of capillary and venous blood glucose with glucometer versus laboratory dosage. Revista de Pesquisa em Saúde 16(1), 41-44 Available at https://periodicoseletronicos.ufma.br/index.php/revistahuufma/article/view/4075.
| Google Scholar |

Panousis N, Brozos C, Karagiannis I, Giadinis ND, Lafi S, Kritsepi-Konstantinou M (2012) Evaluation of the Xceed(R) precision meter for on-site monitoring of blood beta-hydroxybutyric acid and glucose concentrations in dairy sheep. Research in Veterinary Science 93(1), 435-439.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pichler M, Damberger A, Schwendenwein I, Drillich M, Iwersen M (2014) Thresholds of whole-blood β-hydroxybutyrate and glucose concentrations measured with an electronic hand-held device to identify ovine hyperketonemia. Journal of Dairy Science 97(3), 1388-1399.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Radostite OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD (2007) ‘Veterinary medicine: a textbook on diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats.’ 10th edn. (WB Saunders: Edinburgh, UK)

Rebel A, Rice MA, Fahy BG (2012) The accuracy of point-of-care glucose measurements. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 6(2), 396-411.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Regnault TRH, Oddy HV, Nancarrow C, Sriskandarajah N, Scaramuzzi RJ (2004) Glucose-stimulated insulin response in pregnant sheep after acute suppression of plasma nonesterified fatty acid concentrations. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2, 64.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Reynolds JEF (1989) Insulin. In ‘Martindale: the extra pharmacopoeia’. 29th edn. (Eds W Martindale, JEF Reynolds) pp. 391–398. (Pharmaceutical Press: London, UK)

Santos FCO, Mendonça CL, Filho APS, Carvalho CCD, Soares PC, Afonso JAB (2011) Biochemical and hormonal indicators of natural cases of gestational toxemia in sheep. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 31(11), 974-980.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Silva TV, Sandrini CNM, Corrêa FAF, Prado RS (2008) Clinical, laboratory changes and treatment of pregnancy toxemia in small ruminants. In ‘Proceedings of the 35th Conbravet - Brazilian Congress of Veterinary Medicine’. pp. 1–5.

Stämpfli H, Oliver-Espinosa O, Smith B (2015) Sample collection and interpretation of laboratory tests. In ‘Large animal internal medicine’. 5th edn. (Ed. BP Smith) pp. 349–373. (Elsevier Mosby Inc.: St Louis, USA)

Thrall MA (2015) ‘Veterinary clinical hematology and biochemistry.’ 2nd edn. (Roca: São Paulo, Brazil)