Effect of animal and diet parameters on methane emissions for pasture-fed cattle
Stefan Muetzel
A * , Rina Hannaford A and Arjan Jonker A
A
Abstract
Estimates of enteric methane emissions for agricultural emissions trading schemes or national inventories can be a simple single emission factor, but the accuracy of the predictions may be affected by other diet- and animal-related parameters.
Determine the animal and dietary factors that affect methane yield (methane per unit of dry-matter intake) in pasture-fed cattle.
Methane emissions and dry-matter intake (DMI) of cattle of various ages and in different physiological stages that were fed different-quality fresh-cut pastures were quantified in respiration chambers. The animals used in the various trials were post-weaned calves, heifers and steers of various ages and some older lactating dairy cows. Diet quality of the pastures offered was determined using near-infrared spectroscopy. Mixed linear modelling was used to assess the impacts of animal and diet parameters on methane emissions.
Our results indicated that diet quality does not have a major effect on methane production. For individual composition parameters, the correlation (Pearson’s r) with methane production was less than 0.25. Only estimates of metabolisable energy (ME) content showed a higher correlation (r = 0.43). However, despite this correlation, ME, like the other diet composition variables, was not a useful parameter to predict daily methane production, as indicated by the Akaike’s information criterion (AICc). Including data on concentrate supplementation at a level of 30% of the DMI did not improve the prediction of methane production. The resulting model indicated that besides DMI, bodyweight, physiological state and sex significantly affected methane production. Methane production was mostly explained by DMI. This was illustrated by the observation that when methane production is expressed per kilogram DMI (methane yield, g kg−1 DMI) none of the diet or animal related characteristics showed a significant correlation with methane yield. The model performed well, but needs to be validated with an independent dataset.
For ryegrass-based pasture dry-matter intake is the single most important factor that affects methane yield, while pasture composition has no effect and animal-related factors such as physiological stage and age only appear to modulate methane emissions.
Our findings have implications for methane accounting and national inventories in pastoral agricultural systems, which account for the majority of ruminant production systems.
Keywords: cattle, enteric, grazing, greenhouse gases, inventory, lactation, methane, pasture, pasture composition.
References
Appuhamy JADRN, France J, Kebreab E (2016) Models for predicting enteric methane emissions from dairy cows in North America, Europe, and Australia and New Zealand. Global Change Biology 22, 3039-3056.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Barton K (2022) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.46.0. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/MuMIn.pdf
Bates D, Machler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM (2006) Enteric methane emissions from growing beef cattle as affected by diet and level of intake. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 86, 401-408.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beauchemin KA, McAllister TA, McGinn SM (2009) Dietary mitigation of enteric methane from cattle. CAB reviews: perspectives in agriculture, veterinary Science. Nutrition and Natural Resources 4, 1-8.
| Google Scholar |
Brask M, Lund P, Weisbjerg MR, Hellwing ALF, Poulsen M, Larsen MK, Hvelplund T (2013) Methane production and digestion of different physical forms of rapeseed as fat supplements in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 2356-2365.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Charmley E, Williams SRO, Moate PJ, Hegarty RS, Herd RM, Oddy VH, Reyenga P, Staunton KM, Anderson A, Hannah MC (2016) A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia. Animal Production Science 56, 169-180.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Corson DC, Waghorn GC, Ulyatt MJ, Lee J-C (1999) NIRS: forage analysis and livestock feeding. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 61, 127-132.
| Google Scholar |
Doreau M, van der Werf HMG, Micol D, Dubroeucq H, Agabriel J, Rochette Y, Martin C (2011) Enteric methane production and greenhouse gases balance of diets differing in concentrate in the fattening phase of a beef production system. Journal of Animal Science 89, 2518-2528.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Estermann BL, Sutter F, Schlegel PO, Erdin D, Wettstein HR, Kreuzer M (2002) Effect of calf age and dam breed on intake, energy expenditure, and excretion of nitrogen, phosphorus, and methane of beef cows with calves. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1124-1134.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Hammond KJ, Jones AK, Humphries DJ, Crompton LA, Reynolds CK (2016) Effects of diet forage source and neutral detergent fiber content on milk production of dairy cattle and methane emissions determined using GreenFeed and respiration chamber techniques. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 7904-7917.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Jiao H, Yan T, Wills DA, Carson AF, McDowell DA (2014a) Development of prediction models for quantification of total methane emission from enteric fermentation of young Holstein cattle at various ages. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 183, 160-166.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jiao HP, Dale AJ, Carson AF, Murray S, Gordon AW, Ferris CP (2014b) Effect of concentrate feed level on methane emissions from grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 7043-7053.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Jonker A, Muetzel S, Molano G, Pacheco D (2016) Effect of fresh pasture forage quality, feeding level and supplementation on methane emissions from growing beef cattle. Animal Production Science 56, 1714-1721.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jonker A, Molano G, Koolaard J, Muetzel S (2017) Methane emissions from lactating and non-lactating dairy cows and growing cattle fed fresh pasture. Animal Production Science 57, 643-648.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jonker A, Green P, Waghorn G, van der Weerden T, Pacheco D, de Klein C (2020) A meta-analysis comparing four measurement methods to determine the relationship between methane emissions and dry-matter intake in New Zealand dairy cattle. Animal Production Science 60, 96-101.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Knight TW, Molano G, Clark H, Cavanagh A (2008) Methane emissions from weaned lambs measured at 13, 17, 25 and 35 weeks of age compared with mature ewes consuming a fresh forage diet. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2), 240-243.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82, 1-26.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Litherland AJ, Lambert MG (2007) Factors affecting the quality of pastures and supplements produced on farms. In ‘Pastures and supplements for grazing animals. Occasional Publication, no. 14’. (Eds PV Rattray, IM Brookes, AM Nicol) pp. 81–96. (New Zealand Society of Animal Production: Hamilton, New Zealand)
Lopez S, Carro MD, Gonzalez JS, Ovejero FJ (1998) Comparison of different in vitro and in situ methods to estimate the extent and rate of degradation of hays in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 73, 99-113.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mc Court A, Yan T, Mayne CS, Porter MG (2006) Prediction of methane output in beef cattle from indirect respiration calorimetry data. International Congress Series 1293, 46-49.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ministry for the Environment (2020) New Zealand’s greenhouse gas inventory 1990-2018. Available at https://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Climate%20Change/new-zealands-greenhouse-gas-inventory-1990-2018-vol-1.pdf [Verified 24 July 2018]
Moe PW, Tyrrell HF (1979) Methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 1583-1586.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Niu M, Kebreab E, Hristov AN, Oh J, Arndt C, Bannink A, Bayat AR, Brito AF, Boland T, Casper D, Crompton LA, Dijkstra J, Eugène MA, Garnsworthy PC, Haque MN, Hellwing ALF, Huhtanen P, Kreuzer M, Kuhla B, Lund P, Madsen J, Martin C, McClelland SC, McGee M, Moate PJ, Muetzel S, Muñoz C, O’Kiely P, Peiren N, Reynolds CK, Schwarm A, Shingfield KJ, Storlien TM, Weisbjerg MR, Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Yu Z (2018) Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database. Global Change Biology 24, 3368-3389.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Perry LA, Al Jassim R, Gaughan JB, Tomkins NW (2017) Effect of feeding forage characteristic of wet- or dry-season tropical C4 grass in northern Australia, on methane production, intake and rumen outflow rates in Bos indicus steers. Animal Production Science 57, 2033-2041.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pickering N, Gibb J, Wear S, Fick J, Tomlin H (2022) Methodology for calculation of New Zealand’s agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, Version 7. Available at https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/13906-detailed-methodologies-for-agricultural-greenhouse-gas-emission-calculation
Pinares-Patiño CS, Hunt C, Martin R, West J, Lovejoy P, Waghorn GC (2018) Chapter 1: New Zealand Ruminant Methane Measurement Centre, AgResearch, Palmerston North. In ‘Technical manual on respiration chamber design’. (Eds C Pinares, G Waghorn) pp. 9–28. (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry: Wellington, New Zealand)
R Core Team (2021) ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R foundation for statistical computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at https://www.R-project.org
Russell VL (2022) emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.7.4-1. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
Stergiadis S, Zou C, Chen X, Allen M, Wills D, Yan T (2016) Equations to predict methane emissions from cows fed at maintenance energy level in pasture-based systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 220, 8-20.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Swainson N, Muetzel S, Clark H (2018) Updated predictions of enteric methane emissions from sheep suitable for use in the New Zealand national greenhouse gas inventory. Animal Production Science 58, 973-979.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ungerfeld EM (2020) Metabolic hydrogen flows in rumen fermentation: principles and possibilities of interventions. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 589.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
van Gastelen S, Dijkstra J, Bannink A (2019) Are dietary strategies to mitigate enteric methane emission equally effective across dairy cattle, beef cattle, and sheep? Journal of Dairy Science 102, 6109-6130.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
van Lingen HJ, Niu M, Kebreab E, Valadares Filho SC, Rooke JA, Duthie C-A, Schwarm A, Kreuzer M, Hynd PI, Caetano M, Eugène M, Martin C, McGee M, O’Kiely P, Hünerberg M, McAllister TA, Berchielli TT, Messana JD, Peiren N, Chaves AV, Charmley E, Cole NA, Hales KE, Lee S-S, Berndt A, Reynolds CK, Crompton LA, Bayat A-R, Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Yu Z, Bannink A, Dijkstra J, Casper DP, Hristov AN (2019) Prediction of enteric methane production, yield and intensity of beef cattle using an intercontinental database. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 283, 106575.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wilson GF, Moller S, Parker WJ, Hodgson J (1995) Seasonal differences in pasture composition and nutritional implications. Dairyfarming Annual 47, 46-56.
| Google Scholar |
Wolin MJ (1960) A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. Journal of Dairy Science 43, 1452-1459.
| Google Scholar |
Yan T, Agnew RE, Gordon FJ, Porter MG (2000) Prediction of methane energy output in dairy and beef cattle offered grass silage-based diets. Livestock Production Science 64, 253-263.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Yan T, Porter MG, Mayne CS (2009) Prediction of methane emission from beef cattle using data measured in indirect open-circuit respiration calorimeters. Animal 3, 1455-1462.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
