Comparison of dairy cow step activity under different milking schedules
L. S. Hall![https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8338-0795](/media/client/orcid_16x16.png)
![https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4220-7408](/media/client/orcid_16x16.png)
A DairyNZ Ltd, Hamilton, New Zealand.
B Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Abstract
Variations in the number of milkings each day and their timing are becoming increasingly common. How these changes affect cow behaviour is poorly understood. When cows are milked less frequently, their walking to and from the dairy is reduced and their amount of time spent at pasture increases; however, the impact on activity under different milking schedules has not been measured.
The objective of this study was to identify any differences in cow walking activity (steps per hour) among three milking frequencies and three milking schedules of 3-in-2 (milking three times in 2 days), at two stages of lactation (34 and 136 days in milk), over a period of 6 weeks. Time spent eating was assessed to help explain differences in activity within a day.
Data were collected from five groups of 40 cows (n = 200) milked, as follows: once a day (OAD); twice a day (TAD); 3-in-2 (three groups) at intervals of 12–18–18 h, 10–19–19 h, and 8–20–20 h. All cows were fitted with AfiAct pedometers, which recorded steps per hour. Eight cows in each treatment group were also fitted with CowManager SensOor™ ear tags, which recorded minutes per hour spent eating.
Cow steps per hour increased with an increasing milking frequency in both trial periods. When data associated with walking to and from milking were removed, there were still differences in cow step activity. Cows milked OAD took 30% fewer steps than TAD cows. The diurnal pattern of eating time differed between these two trial groups. The effect of milking time among the 3-in-2 trials showed that the shorter the time between the milkings on the day the cows were milked twice, the greater the number of steps per hour. There were graphical eating differences between the 8–20–20 trial group and 12–18–18 trial group on the day that cows were milked twice.
We conclude that both the number and timings of milkings affect a cow’s step activity and grazing behaviour.
Farmers should minimise the amount of time cows spend away from the paddock, especially in the afternoon, to minimise any changes to natural behaviour.
Keywords: activity, behaviour, cow, dairy, frequency, milking, step, timing.
References
Alonso ME, González-Montaña JR, Lomillos JM (2020) Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals 10, 385-400.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Alsaaod M, Huber S, Beer G, Kohler P, Schüpbach-Regula G, Steiner A (2017) Locomotion characteristics of dairy cows walking on pasture and the effect of artificial flooring systems on locomotion comfort. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 8330-8337.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beauchemin KA (2018) Invited review: Current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 4762-4784.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beggs DS, Jongman EC, Hemsworth PE, Fisher AD (2018) Implications of prolonged milking time on time budgets and lying behavior of cows in large pasture-based dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 10391-10397.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Beggs DS, Jongman EC, Hemsworth PH, Fisher AD (2019) The effects of herd size on the welfare of dairy cows in a pasture-based system using animal- and resource-based indicators. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 3406-3420.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bewley JM, Boyce RE, Hockin J, Munksgaard L, Eicher SD, Einstein ME, Schutz MM (2010) Influence of milk yield, stage of lactation, and body condition on dairy cattle lying behaviour measured using an automated activity monitoring sensor. Journal of Dairy Research 77, 1-6.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Brumby P (1955) Ruakura studies on the grazing behaviour of dairy cattle. NZ Grassland Association 17, 96-106.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Clay N, Garnett T, Lorimer J (2020) Dairy intensification: drivers, impacts and alternatives. Ambio 49, 35-48.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Crossley R, Conneely M, Browne N, Sugrue K, de Boer IJM, Bokkers EAM (2020) The long road to lameness: considering walking distance as a challenge in pasture-based dairy production. In ‘WIAS annual conference 2020: frontiers in animal sciences’, Amsterdam, Netherlands. (WIAS: Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Culotta CP, Schmidt GH (1988) An economic evaluation of three times daily milking of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 1960-1966.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG (2005) Time of feed delivery affects the feeding and lying patterns of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 625-631.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Edwards JP (2018) Comparison of milk production and herd characteristics in New Zealand herds milked once or twice a day. Animal Production Science 59, 570-580.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Edwards JP, McMillan N, Bryant RH, Kuhn-Sherlock B (2022) Reducing milking frequency from twice each day to three times each two days affected protein but not fat yield in a pasture-based dairy system. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 4206-4217.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
European Commission (2007) Attitudes of EU citizens towards Animal Welfare. (European Commission: Brussels, Belgium) Available at https://www.politique-animaux.fr/fichiers/eurobarometer_-_attitudes_of_eu_citizens_towards_animal_welfare-_2007.pdf
Fan B, Bryant R, Greer A (2022) Behavioral fingerprinting: acceleration sensors for identifying changes in livestock health. J 5, 435-454.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN (1997) A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare 6, 187-205.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gibb MJ, Huckle CA, Nuthall R (1998) Effect of time of day on grazing behaviour by lactating dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 53, 41-46.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Gregorini P (2012) Diurnal grazing pattern: its physiological basis and strategic management. Animal Production Science 52, 416-430.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Hall LS, Bryant RH, Edwards JP (2021) Brief communication: changes to cow behaviour when transitioning from twice a day to a 3-in-2 milking schedule. New Zealand Journal of Animal Science and Production 81, 51-53.
| Google Scholar |
Herbut P, Hoffmann G, Angrecka S, Godyń D, Vieira FMC, Adamczyk K, Kupczyński R (2021) The effects of heat stress on the behaviour of dairy cows – a review. Annals of Animal Science 21, 385-402.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Kadzere CT, Murphy MR, Silanikove N, Maltz E (2002) Heat stress in lactating dairy cows: a review. Livestock Production Science 77, 59-91.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Matthews LR, Cameron C, Sheahan AJ, Kolver ES, Roche JR (2012) Associations among dairy cow body condition and welfare-associated behavioral traits. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 2595-2601.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Munksgaard L, Jensen MB, Pedersen LJ, Hansen SW, Matthews L (2005) Quantifying behavioural priorities – effects of time constraints on behaviour of dairy cows, Bos taurus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 3-14.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Munksgaard L, Weisbjerg MR, Henriksen JCS, Løvendahl P (2020) Changes to steps, lying, and eating behavior during lactation in Jersey and Holstein cows and the relationship to feed intake, yield, and weight. Journal of Dairy Science 103, 4643-4653.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Napolitano F, Pacelli C, Girolami A, Braghieri A (2008) Effect of information about animal welfare on consumer willingness to pay for yogurt. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 910-917.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Neave HW, Edwards JP, Thoday H, Saunders K, Zobel G, Webster JR (2021) Do walking distance and time away from the paddock influence daily behaviour patterns and milk yield of grazing dairy cows? Animals 11, 2903.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
O’Driscoll K, O’Brien B, Gleeson D, Boyle L (2010) Milking frequency and nutritional level affect grazing behaviour of dairy cows: a case study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 122, 77-83.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
O’Driscoll K, Gleeson D, O’Brien B, Boyle L (2011) Does omission of a regular milking event affect cow comfort? Livestock Science 138, 132-143.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pereira GM, Heins BJ, Endres MI (2018) Technical note: Validation of an ear-tag accelerometer sensor to determine rumination, eating, and activity behaviors of grazing dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 2492-2495.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Roche JR, Friggens NC, Kay JK, Fisher MW, Stafford KJ, Berry DP (2009) Invited review: body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5769-5801.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Thomson NA, Barnes ML (1993) Effect of distance walked on dairy production and milk quality. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 53, 69-72.
| Google Scholar |
Tucker CB, Dalley DE, Burke J-LK, Clark DA (2007) Milking cows once daily influences behavior and udder firmness at peak and mid lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1692-1703.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |