Shade effect on behaviour, physiology, performance, and carcass weight of heat-stressed feedlot steers in humid subtropical area†
M. E. A. Canozzi A , J. Clariget A , G. Roig B , E. Pérez A , V. Aznárez B , G. Banchero A and A. La Manna A *A Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, INIA La Estanzuela, Ruta 50 km 11, 70000 Colonia, Uruguay.
B MARFRIG Group, Ruta 2 km 288, 65000 Río Negro, Uruguay.
Animal Production Science 62(17) 1692-1705 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22128
Submitted: 13 October 2021 Accepted: 3 June 2022 Published: 12 July 2022
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing
Abstract
Context: Environmental conditions during hot weather decrease feed intake and cattle growth.
Aims: This study conducted over three consecutive years, during the summer, evaluated access to shade as a strategy to mitigate heat stress of finishing cattle in Uruguay.
Methods: Each year, 32 Bos taurus and/or Bos taurus crossbred steers (initially weighing 461 ± 28 kg) were blocked by initial liveweight and assigned to one of eight pens, where one of two treatments were applied, namely, no shade access or shade access (mean shaded area 4.5 m2/animal). Finishing diet was offered three times per day and cattle had ad libitum access to water. Twenty-four pens were considered in a randomised complete-block design. Average daily gain (ADG), dry matter intake (DMI) and feed efficiency were measured, and hot carcass weight was collected at slaughter. Ruminal pH and temperature were obtained using ruminal boluses. Feeding, drinking, rumination, inactive behaviours, respiration rate and painting score were observed.
Key results: Mean days on feed were 70.6 ± 5.5. The average THI ranged from 70 to 72. Steers with access to shade had greater DMI (P = 0.003), ADG (P = 0.004), and feed:gain ratio (P = 0.05) than did not shaded steers. Ruminal pH was higher (P < 0.0001) in shaded than in not shaded animals. The slaughter weight of shaded steers was 10 kg greater (P = 0.02) than that of not shaded steers. A trend (P = 0.06) to higher hot carcass weight after dressing was obtained by shaded steers. The average respiration rate and panting score was consistently lower (P < 0.0001) for shaded than for not shaded steers, except in the early morning. Access to shade increased the time spent by animals feeding (P = 0.008) and ruminating (P = 0.001), decreasing inactive time (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Shade could improve performance and welfare of feedlot cattle during summertime, even in regions with an average THI from 70 to 72.
Implications: Access to shade allowed fattening cattle to dissipate heat stored during the day at night and to alleviate the effect of heat load during summer in subtropical region.
Keywords: ADG, beef cattle, efficiency, feed intake, heat stress, management, performance, temperature.
References
AMS (1989) ‘Glossary of meteorology.’ 5th edn. (American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA, USA). Available at http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Heat_wave [Accessed 2 February 2020]AOAC International (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 15th edn. (AOAC International: Arlington, VA, USA)
Arias RA, Mader TL (2011) Environmental factors affecting daily water intake on cattle finished in feedlots. Journal of Animal Science 89, 245–251.
| Environmental factors affecting daily water intake on cattle finished in feedlots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20870953PubMed |
Armstrong DV (1994) Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2044–2050.
| Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 7929964PubMed |
Banchero G, Chalkling D, Mederos A (2016) Relevamiento de problemas sanitarios y de manejo durante la terminación en bovinos en sistemas de confinamiento en Uruguay. Veterinaria (Montevideo) 52, 4–13.
Barajas R, Cervantes BJ, Espino MA, Juárez F, Romo JA, Velasquez EA (2009) Influence of pen-shade on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of bulls naturally exposed long time to high temperature. In ‘Proceedings of the Western Section American Society of Animal Science. Vol. 61’, pp. 112–115.
Barajas R, Garces P, Zinn RA (2013) Interactions of shade and feeding management on feedlot performance of crossbred steers during seasonal periods of high ambient temperature. The Professional Animal Scientist 29, 645–651.
| Interactions of shade and feeding management on feedlot performance of crossbred steers during seasonal periods of high ambient temperature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bernabucci U, Lacetera N, Baumgard LH, Rhoads RP, Ronchi B, Nardone A (2010) Metabolic and hormonal acclimation to heat stress in domesticated ruminants. Animal 4, 1167–1183.
| Metabolic and hormonal acclimation to heat stress in domesticated ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22444615PubMed |
Blackshaw JK, Blackshaw AW (1994) Heat stress in cattle and the effect of shade on production and behaviour: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 285–295.
| Heat stress in cattle and the effect of shade on production and behaviour: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blaine KL, Nsahlai IV (2011) The effects of shade on performance, carcass classes and behaviour of heat-stressed feedlot cattle at the finisher phase. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43, 609–615.
| The effects of shade on performance, carcass classes and behaviour of heat-stressed feedlot cattle at the finisher phase.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21104127PubMed |
Bond TE, Kelly CF, Heitman H (1958) Improving livestock environment in high temperature areas. Journal of Heredity 49, 75–79.
| Improving livestock environment in high temperature areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown-Brandl TM (2008) Heat stress in feedlot cattle. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 3, 1–14.
| Heat stress in feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA, Eigenberg RA, Hahn GL, Freetly H (2003) Thermoregulatory responses of feeder cattle. Journal of Thermal Biology 28, 149–157.
| Thermoregulatory responses of feeder cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA, Hahn GL (2005) Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle, Part 1: analyses of indicators. Biosystems Engineering 90, 451–462.
| Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle, Part 1: analyses of indicators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA (2013) Benefits of providing shade to feedlot cattle of different breeds. Transactions of the ASABE 56, 1563–1570.
| Benefits of providing shade to feedlot cattle of different breeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Busby D, Loy D (1996) Heat stress in feedlot cattle: producer survey results. Beef Research Report, paper 26. Available at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/beefreports_1996/26 [Accessed 17 March 2021]
Castañeda CA, Gaughan JB, Sakaguchi Y (2004) Relationships between climatic conditions and behaviour of feedlot cattle. Animal Production in Australia 25, 33–36.
Collier RJ, Baumgard LH, Zimbelman RB, Xiao Y (2019) Heat stress: physiology of acclimation and adaptation. Animal Frontiers 9, 12–19.
| Heat stress: physiology of acclimation and adaptation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32002234PubMed |
Crews DH Jr., Carstens GE (2012) Measuring individual feed intake and utilization in growing cattle. In ‘Feed efficiency in the beef industry’. (Ed. RA Hill) pp. 21–28. (Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ)
Davis MS, Mader TL, Holt SM, Parkhurst AM (2003) Strategies to reduce feedlot cattle heat stress: effects on tympanic temperature. Journal of Animal Science 81, 649–661.
| Strategies to reduce feedlot cattle heat stress: effects on tympanic temperature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12661645PubMed |
Eigenberg RA, Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA, Hahn GL (2005) Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle, Part 2: predictive relationships. Biosystems Engineering 91, 111–118.
| Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle, Part 2: predictive relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fuquay JW (1981) Heat stress as it affects animal production. Journal of Animal Science 52, 164–174.
| Heat stress as it affects animal production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 7195394PubMed |
Gaughan JB, Mader TL (2014) Body temperature and respiratory dynamics in un-shaded beef cattle. International Journal of Biometeorology 58, 1443–1450.
| Body temperature and respiratory dynamics in un-shaded beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24122341PubMed |
Gaughan JB, Holt SM, Hahn GL, Mader TL, Eigenberg R (2000) Respiration rate: is it a good measure of heat stress in cattle? Asian–Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 13, 329–332.
Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Holt SM, Hahn GL, Young BA (2002) Review of current assessment of cattle and microclimate during periods of high heat load. Animal Production in Australia 24, 77–80. http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/2002/gaughan1B.pdf
Gaughan JB, Davis MS, Hahn GL, Mader TL (2004) Wetting and the physiological responses of grain-fed cattle in a heated environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 253–260.
| Wetting and the physiological responses of grain-fed cattle in a heated environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Holt SM, Lisle A (2008) A new heat load index for feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86, 226–234.
| A new heat load index for feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17911236PubMed |
Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Holt SM, Sullivan ML, Hahn GL (2010) Assessing the heat tolerance of 17 beef cattle genotypes. International Journal of Biometeorology 54, 617–627.
| Assessing the heat tolerance of 17 beef cattle genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19458966PubMed |
Goering H, Van Soest P (1970) ‘Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications).’ Agriculture Handbook No. 379. (US Agricultural Research Service: Washington, DC, USA)
Gonzalez-Rivas PA, Sullivan M., Cottrell JJ, Leury BJ, Gaughan JB, Dunshea FR (2018) Effect of feeding slowly fermentable grains on productive variables and amelioration of heat stress in lactating dairy cows in a sub-tropical summer. Tropical Animal Health and Production 50, 1763–1769.
| Effect of feeding slowly fermentable grains on productive variables and amelioration of heat stress in lactating dairy cows in a sub-tropical summer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29796791PubMed |
Grandin T (2016) Evaluation of the welfare of cattle housed in outdoor feedlot pens. Veterinary and Animal Science 1–2, 23–28.
| Evaluation of the welfare of cattle housed in outdoor feedlot pens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32734021PubMed |
Hagenmaier JA, Reinhardt CD, Bartle SJ, Thomson DU (2016) Effect of shade on animal welfare, growth performance, and carcass characteristics in large pens of beef cattle fed a beta agonist in a commercial feedlot. Journal of Animal Science 94, 5064–5076.
| Effect of shade on animal welfare, growth performance, and carcass characteristics in large pens of beef cattle fed a beta agonist in a commercial feedlot.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28046169PubMed |
Hahn GL (1999) Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. Journal of Animal Science 77, 10–20.
| Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15526777PubMed |
Hahn GL, Mader TL (1997) Heat waves in relation to thermoregulation, feeding behavior, and mortality of feeder cattle. In ‘Proceedings of the international livestock environment symposium Minneapolis. Vol. 5’, pp. 563–567.
Hahn GL, Nienaber JA (1993) Characterizing stress in feeder cattle. Report no. 4 (ARS-71). US Meat Animal Research Center.
Hahn GL, Bond TE, Kelly CF (1963) Walls influence interior radiant environment of livestock shelters for shade. California Agriculture 17, 10–11.
| Walls influence interior radiant environment of livestock shelters for shade.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harris L (1970) ‘Compilación de datos analíticos y biológicos en la preparación de cuadros de composición de alimentos para uso en los trópicos de América Latina.’ (Department of Animal Science, Florida University: Gainesville, FL, USA)
Hubbard KG, Stooksbury DE, Hahn GL, Mader TL (1999) A climatological perspective on feedlot cattle performance and mortality related to the temperature-humidity index. Journal of Production Agriculture 12, 650–653.
| A climatological perspective on feedlot cattle performance and mortality related to the temperature-humidity index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Koknaroglu H, Otles Z, Mader T, Hoffman MP (2008) Environmental factors affecting feed intake of steers in different housing systems in the summer. International Journal of Biometeorology 52, 419–429.
| Environmental factors affecting feed intake of steers in different housing systems in the summer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18087729PubMed |
Lacetera N (2019) Impact of climate change on animal health and welfare. Animal Frontiers 9, 26–31.
| Impact of climate change on animal health and welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32002236PubMed |
LCI (1970) ‘Patterns of transit losses.’ (Livestock Conservation, Inc., Omaha, NE, USA)
Lees AM, Sejian V, Wallage AL, Steel CC, Mader TL, Lees JC, Gaughan JB (2019) The impact of heat load on cattle. Animals 9, 322
| The impact of heat load on cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lees AM, Lees JC, Sejian V, Sullivan ML, Gaughan JB (2020) Influence of shade on panting score and behavioural responses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus feedlot cattle to heat load. Animal Production Science 60, 305–315.
| Influence of shade on panting score and behavioural responses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus feedlot cattle to heat load.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mader TL (2003) Environmental stress in confined beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 81, E110–E119.
| Environmental stress in confined beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mader TL (2014) Bill E. Kunkle interdisciplinary beef symposium: Animal welfare concerns of cattle exposed to adverse environmental conditions. Journal of Animal Science 92, 5319–5324.
| Bill E. Kunkle interdisciplinary beef symposium: Animal welfare concerns of cattle exposed to adverse environmental conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25414102PubMed |
Mader TL, Davis MS (2004) Effect of management strategies on reducing heat stress of feedlot cattle: feed and water intake. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3077–3087.
| Effect of management strategies on reducing heat stress of feedlot cattle: feed and water intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15484961PubMed |
Mader TL, Dahlquist JM, Hahn GL, Gaughan JB (1999) Shade and wind barrier effects on summertime feedlot cattle performance. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2065–2072.
| Shade and wind barrier effects on summertime feedlot cattle performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10461983PubMed |
Mader TL, Davis MS, Brown-Brandl T (2006) Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84, 712–719.
| Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16478964PubMed |
Mader TL, Davis MS, Gaughan JB (2007) Effect of sprinkling on feedlot microclimate and cattle behavior. International Journal of Biometeorology 51, 541–551.
| Effect of sprinkling on feedlot microclimate and cattle behavior.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17364184PubMed |
Mader TL, Gaughan JB, Johnson LJ, Hahn GL (2010) Tympanic temperature in confined beef cattle exposed to excessive heat load. International Journal of Biometeorology 54, 629–635.
| Tympanic temperature in confined beef cattle exposed to excessive heat load.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19404683PubMed |
Mitlöhner FM, Morrow JL, Dailey JW, Wilson SC, Galyean ML, Miller MF, McGlone JJ (2001a) Shade and water misting effects on behavior, physiology, performance, and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2327–2335.
| Shade and water misting effects on behavior, physiology, performance, and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11583419PubMed |
Mitlöhner FM, Morrow-Tesch JL, Wilson SC, Dailey JW, McGlone JJ (2001b) Behavioral sampling techniques for feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1189–1193.
| Behavioral sampling techniques for feedlot cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11374538PubMed |
Mitlöhner FM, Galyean ML, McGlone JJ (2002) Shade effects on performance, carcass traits, physiology, and behavior of heat-stressed feedlot heifers. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2043–2050.
| Shade effects on performance, carcass traits, physiology, and behavior of heat-stressed feedlot heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12211371PubMed |
Morrison SR (1983) Ruminant heat stress: effect on production and means of alleviation. Journal of Animal Science 57, 1594–1600.
| Ruminant heat stress: effect on production and means of alleviation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 6370944PubMed |
NASEM (2016) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 8th edn. (National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA)
Nienaber JA, Hahn GL (2007) Livestock production system management responses to thermal challenges. International Journal of Biometeorology 52, 149–157.
| Livestock production system management responses to thermal challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17530301PubMed |
Nienaber JA, Hahn GL, Brown-Brandl TA, Eigenberg RA (2007) Summer heat waves: extreme years. In ‘Proceedings of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers’, Paper no. 074084.
| Crossref |
Schutz JS, Wagner JJ, Neuhold KL, Archibeque SL, Engle TE (2011) Effect of feed bunk management on feedlot steer intake. The Professional Animal Scientist 27, 395–401.
| Effect of feed bunk management on feedlot steer intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Beauchemin KA, Gibb DJ, Crews DH, Hickman DD, Streeter M, McAllister TA (2003) Effect of bunk management on feeding behavior, ruminal acidosis and performance of feedlot cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 81, E149–E158.
| Effect of bunk management on feeding behavior, ruminal acidosis and performance of feedlot cattle: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sejian V, Bhatta R, Gaughan JB, Dunshea FR, Lacetera N (2018) Review: adaptation of animals to heat stress. Animal 12, s431–s444.
| Review: adaptation of animals to heat stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30139399PubMed |
Silanikove N (2000) Effects of heat stress on the welfare of extensively managed domestic ruminants. Livestock Production Science 67, 1–18.
| Effects of heat stress on the welfare of extensively managed domestic ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
St-Pierre NR, Cobanov B, Schnitkey G (2003) Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. Journal of Dairy Science 86, E52–E77.
| Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Summer A, Lora I, Formaggioni P, Gottardo F (2019) Impact of heat stress on milk and meat production. Animal Frontiers 9, 39–46.
| Impact of heat stress on milk and meat production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32002238PubMed |
Thom EC (1959) The discomfort index. Weatherwise 12, 57–61.
| The discomfort index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van laer E, Moons CPH, Sonck B, Tuyttens FAM (2014) Importance of outdoor shelter for cattle in temperate climates. Livestock Science 159, 87–101.
| Importance of outdoor shelter for cattle in temperate climates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
| Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1660498PubMed |