Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Ruminal degradation of maize starch is affected by sowing date

Nicolás E. Rusoci A B , Aníbal Cerrudo A C , María Delfina Montiel C , Natalia G. Izquierdo A D E and Enrique Pavan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0829-1717 A C *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar de Plata, RN 226 km 73.5, Balcarce 7620, Argentina. Email: cerrudo.anibal@inta.gob.ar

B EEA San Luis, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, RN 7 and 8, Villa Mercedes 5730, Argentina. Email: rusoci.nicolas@inta.gob.ar

C EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, RN 226 km 73.5, c.c. 276, Balcarce 7620, Argentina. Email: montiel.maria@inta.gob.ar

D Instituto de Innovación para el Desarrollo Agroalimentario y Agroenergético Sostenible (IIDEAGROS), Calle 526 e/10 y 11, La Plata 1900, Argentina. Email: izquierdo.natalia@inta.gob.ar

E Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, CABA C1425FQB, Argentina.

* Correspondence to: pavan.enrique@inta.gob.ar

Handling Editor: Karen Harper

Animal Production Science 64, AN21601 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21601
Submitted: 11 December 2021  Accepted: 18 March 2024  Published: 12 April 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Delaying sowing date of maize allows producers to achieve stabilised yield. Delays in the sowing date generate changes in the grain structure, which may affect the ruminal degradability of the maize starch.

Aims

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of maize sowing date on ruminal starch degradability, and how it is related with grain physical characteristics and source:sink ratio during the grain-filling period.

Methods

To study the effects of maize sowing date on grain physical characteristics and on starch in situ effective degradability (ED; 6%/h passage rate from the rumen), eight treatments were defined on the basis of eight different sowing dates in Argentina of a commercial semi-dentate maize hybrid (Dekalb 7210 VT3P), as follows: Treatment 1 (13 October), Treatments 2, 3, and 4 (4, 17 and 26 November respectively), Treatments 5, 6 and 7 (3, 15 and 28 December, respectively) and Treatment 8 (5 January). For each sowing date, three plots of maize were sown in a complete randomised-block design and harvested at grain physiological maturity.

Key results

Starch ED of ground (2.0-mm) grains ranged from 631 to 801 g/kg and showed a ‘J’-shape response, being lower for the sowing dates from 17 November to 3 December and highest on the sowing date of 5 January. Grain density increased until the sowing date of 17 November, and then decreased. Grain vitreousness and hardness were initially not affected, but started to decline after the sowing date of 17 November. Grain test weight was not affected until the sowing date of 15 December, when it started to decline. The source:sink ratio during the grain-filling period decreased as the sowing date was delayed. Effective starch degradability was negatively correlated with the physical characteristics evaluated and the source:sink ratio.

Conclusions

Delaying sowing date affected the maize source:sink ratio during the grain-filling period; this was associated with changes in grain physical characteristics and with an increase in ruminal starch degradability.

Implications

Delaying sowing date increases dry matter (DM) and starch effective degradability, and therefore could affect cattle weight gain and feed conversion efficiency.

Keywords: degradation, dry matter, grain, maize, rumen, physical characteristics, source:sink ratio, starch.

References

Andrade FH, Uhart SA, Cirilo A (1993) Temperature affects radiation use efficiency in maize. Field Crops Research 32(1–2), 17-25.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Bonelli LE, Monzón JP, Cerrudo A, Rizzalli RH, Andrade FH (2016) Maize grain yield components and source-sink relationship as affected by the delay in sowing date. Field Crops Research 198, 215-225.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cerrudo A (2018) Incidencia del ambiente y el tipo de híbrido en la composicion y la dureza del grano de maíz. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina.

Cerrudo A, Di Matteo J, Fernández E, Robles M, Pico LO, Andrade FH (2013) Yield components of maize as affected by short shading periods and thinning. Crop and Pasture Science 64(6), 580-587.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cerrudo A, Martinez D, Izquierdo NG, Cirilo AG, Laserna MP, Reinoso L, Valentinuz O, Balbi C, Andrade FH (2017) Environment, management, and genetic contributions to maize kernel hardness and grain yield. Crop Science 57(5), 2788-2798.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chaney AL, Marbach EP (1962) Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8(2), 130-132.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cirilo AG, Actis M, Andrade FH, Valentinuz OR (2011) Crop management affects dry-milling quality of flint maize kernels. Field Crops Research 122(2), 140-150.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Correa CES, Shaver RD, Pereira MN, Lauer JG, Kohn K (2002) Relationship between corn vitreousness and ruminal in situ starch degradability. Journal of Dairy Science 85(11), 3008-3012.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Di Matteo JA, Ferreyra JM, Cerrudo AA, Echarte L, Andrade FH (2016) Yield potential and yield stability of Argentine maize hybrids over 45 years of breeding. Field Crops Research 197, 107-116.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Dombrink-Kurtzman MA, Bietz JA (1993) Zein composition in hard and soft endosperm of maize. Cereal Chem 70(1), 105-108.
| Google Scholar |

Haddad SG, Nasr RE (2007) Partial replacement of barley grain for corn grain: associative effects on lambs’ growth performance. Small Ruminant Research 72(2–3), 92-95.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Huntington GB, Harmon DL, Richards CJ (2006) Sites, rates, and limits of starch digestion and glucose metabolism in growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84(13), E14-E24.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

López-Cedrón FX, Boote KJ, Ruíz-Nogueira B, Sau F (2005) Testing CERES-Maize versions to estimate maize production in a cool environment. European Journal of Agronomy 23(1), 89-102.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

MacRae JC, Armstrong DG (1968) Enzyme method for determination of α-linked glucose polymers in biological materials. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 19(10), 578-581.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Maddonni GA (2012) Analysis of the climatic constraints to maize production in the current agricultural region of Argentina – a probabilistic approach. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 107(3–4), 325-345.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

McAllister TA, Ribeiro G (2013) Microbial strategies in the ruminal digestion of starch. In ‘Proceedings of 50th Annual Meeting Brazilian Society Animal Science’, Campinas, Brazil. ed. Revista Brazileira de Zootecnia. pp. 140–151.

McAllister TA, Phillippe RC, Rode LM, Cheng K-J (1993) Effect of the protein matrix on the digestion of cereal grains by ruminal microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 71(1), 205-212.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Monteith JL (1972) Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosystems. The Journal of Applied Ecology 9(3), 747-766.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

National Research Council (2000) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 7th Revised edn: Update 2000. (The National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA)

Offner A, Sauvant D (2004) Prediction of in vivo starch digestion in cattle from in situ data. Animal Feed Science and Technology 111(1–4), 41-56.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Orskov ER, McDonald I (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science 92(2), 499-503.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Orskov ER, Hovell FD, Mould F (1980) The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Tropical Animal Production 5(3), 195-213.
| Google Scholar |

Otegui ME, Riglos M, Mercau JL (2021) Genetically modified maize hybrids and delayed sowing reduced drought effects across a rainfall gradient in temperate Argentina. Journal of Experimental Botany 72(14), 5180-5188.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Owens FN, Zinn RA, Kim YK (1986) Limits to starch digestion in the ruminant small intestine. Journal of Animal Science 63(5), 1634-1648.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Philippeau C, Le Deschault de Monredon F, Michalet-Doreau B (1999) Relationship between ruminal starch degradation and the physical characteristics of corn grain. Journal of Animal Science 77(1), 238-243.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Pomeranz Y, Hall GE, Czuchajowska Z, Lai FS (1986) Test weight, hardness and breakage susceptibility of yellow dent corn hybrids. Cereal Chemistry 63(4), 349-351.
| Google Scholar |

Ribeiro SS, Vasconcelos JT, Morais MG, Ítavo CBCF, Franco GL (2011) Effects of ruminal infusion of a slow-release polymer-coated urea or conventional urea on apparent nutrient digestibility, in situ degradability, and rumen parameters in cattle fed low-quality hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 164(1–2), 53-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ritchie SW, Hanway JJ, Benson GO (1989) How a corn plant develops. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension Service.

Sabry M, Nasser MEA, Kamel HEM, Abaza MA, Soltan YA (2022) Effect of replacing corn grains with date palm kernels on ruminal fermentation, feed degradability, and methane production under different initial in vitro pH conditions. Animal Biotechnology 33(6), 1268-1279.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

SENASA (1994) Resolución-1075-1994-SAGPYA - Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentos). Available at http://www.senasa.gob.ar/normativas/resolucion-1075-1994-sagpya-secretaria-de-agricultura-ganaderia-pesca-y-alimentos#anexoXXVI [Verified October 2020]

Soltan Y, Abdalla Filho A, Abdalla A, Berenchtein B, Schiavinatto P, Costa C (2021) Replacing maize with low tannin sorghum grains: lamb growth performance, microbial protein synthesis and enteric methane production. Animal Production Science 61(13), 1348-1355.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tripathi MK, Karim SA, Chaturvedi OH, Verma DL (2007) Nutritional value of animal feed grade wheat as replacement for maize in lamb feeding for mutton production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 87(13), 2447-2455.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Uhart SA, Andrade FH (1991) Source-sink relationships in maize grown in a cool-temperate area. Agronomie 11(10), 863-875.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Van Soest PJ (1994) ‘Nutritional ecology of the ruminant.’ 2nd edn. (Comstock Publishing Association: Ithaca, NY, USA)

Vásquez DR, Abadía B, Arreaza LC (2004) Aplicación de la Espectroscopia de Reflectancia en el Infrarrojo Cercano (NIRS) para la caracterización nutricional del pasto Guinea y del grano de maíz. Ciencia & Tecnología Agropecuaria 5(1), 49-55.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Wang C, Liu Q, Guo G, Huo WJ, Zhang YL, Pei CX, Zhang SL, Yang WZ, Wang H (2018) Effects of substituting corn with steam-flaked sorghum on growth, digestion and blood metabolites in young cattle fed feedlot diets. Animal Production Science 58, 299-306.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Yahaghi M, Liang JB, Balcells J, Valizadeh R, Alimon AR, Ho YW (2012) Effect of replacing barley with corn or sorghum grain on rumen fermentation characteristics and performance of Iranian Baluchi lamb fed high concentrate rations. Animal Production Science 52(4), 263-268.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |