Alternative measures of cow–calf efficiency for Afrikaner, Bonsmara, Nguni, Angus and Simmental sired calves
G. M. Pyoos
A B * , M. M. Scholtz A B , M. D. MacNeil A B C , A. Theunissen B D and F. W. C. Neser B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A ARC-Animal Production Institute, Private Bag X2, Irene 0062, South Africa.
B Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences, UFS, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.
C Delta G, 145 Ice Cave Road, Miles City, MT 59301, USA.
D Northern Cape Department of Agricultural, Land Reform and Rural Development, Private Bag X9, Jan Kempdorp 8550, South Africa.
Animal Production Science 62(7) 668-675 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21479
Submitted: 8 April 2021 Accepted: 26 January 2022 Published: 3 March 2022
© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing
Abstract
Context: It is desirable to identify cows that produce higher weaning weights while consuming less feed in order to increase biological efficiency; however, there is no universally accepted metric for cow–calf efficiency.
Aim: Due to the common usage of ratios to express biological cow efficiency, despite their theoretical defects, these measures and alternatives to them were examined to understand better some of the complexities in improving cow efficiency.
Methods: The analyses were carried out using SAS. In model 1, 205-day calf weight/cow weight was used to define cow–calf efficiency and in model 3, 205-day calf weight per Large Stock Unit (LSU), which is a standard unit of energy consumed, was used to quantify efficiency. In models 2 and 4, 205-day calf weight was analysed using cow weight and Large Stock Unit, respectively, as covariates.
Key results: The use of ratios was biased in favour of the smaller Nguni cows. The Bonsmara and Angus sired calves attained 53% of the weight of their Nguni dams, and their weaning weight per Large Stock Unit was 169 ± 9 kg. However, Angus sired calves from Bonsmara dams were most efficient when efficiency was determined by analysis of covariance when cow weight and Large Stock Unit were used as covariates (162 ± 17 kg and 133 ± 22 kg), respectively.
Conclusions: The results indicate the difficulty in determining differences in cow–calf efficiency in the absence of a standard definition. The difference between output and input can be maximised, when traits are reported in consistent units like joules, financial currency, or carbon footprint.
Implications: This inconsistent definition of cow–calf efficiency makes its improvement challenging.
Keywords: analysis of covariance, breed additive effects, cow weight, crossbreeding, efficiency, large stock unit, ratios, weaning weight.
References
Acocks JPH (1975) ‘Veldtypes of South Africa.’ Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 40. (Botanical Research Institute, Government Printer: Pretoria)Arango JA, Van Vleck LD (2002) Size of beef cows: early ideas, new developments. Genetics and Molecular Research 1, 51–63.
| Size of beef cows: early ideas, new developments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14963813PubMed |
Atchley WR, Gaskins CT, Anderson D (1976) Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results. Systematic Biology 25, 137–148.
| Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Burns BM, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG (2010) A review of factors that impact on the capacity of beef cattle females to conceive, maintain a pregnancy and wean a calf—implications for reproductive efficiency in northern Australia. Animal Reproduction Science 122, 1–22.
| A review of factors that impact on the capacity of beef cattle females to conceive, maintain a pregnancy and wean a calf—implications for reproductive efficiency in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20447780PubMed |
Cartwright TC (1970) Selection criteria for beef cattle for the future. Journal of Animal Science 30, 706–711.
| Selection criteria for beef cattle for the future.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Koch RM, Dickerson GE (1986) Genetic diversity among cattle breeds and its use to increase beef production efficiency in a temperate environment. In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd world congress on genetics applied to livestock production’. (Eds GE Dickerson, RK Johnson) (University of Nebraska Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources: Lincoln)
Cundiff LV, Núñez-Dominguez R, Dickerson GE, Gregory KE, Koch RM (1992) Heterosis for lifetime production in Hereford, Angus, shorthorn, and crossbred cows. Journal of Animal Science 70, 2397–2410.
| Heterosis for lifetime production in Hereford, Angus, shorthorn, and crossbred cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1506303PubMed |
Curran-Everett D (2013) Explorations in statistics: the analysis of ratios and normalized data. Advances in Physiology Education 37, 213–219.
| Explorations in statistics: the analysis of ratios and normalized data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24022766PubMed |
Dadi H, Jordaan GF, Schoeman SJ, Van der Westhuizen J (2002) The effect of Charolais and Hereford sires and straightbred and crossbred dams on pre-weaning growth of calves. South African Journal of Animal Science 32, 38–43.
| The effect of Charolais and Hereford sires and straightbred and crossbred dams on pre-weaning growth of calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davis ME, Rutledge JJ, Cundiff LV, Hauser ER (1983a) Life cycle efficiency of beef production: I. Cow efficiency ratios for progeny weaned. Journal of Animal Science 57, 832–851.
| Life cycle efficiency of beef production: I. Cow efficiency ratios for progeny weaned.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 6643301PubMed |
Davis ME, Rutledge JJ, Cundiff LV, Hauser ER (1983b) Life cycle efficiency of beef production: II. Relationship of cow efficiency ratios to traits of the dam and progeny weaned. Journal of Animal Science 57, 852–866.
| Life cycle efficiency of beef production: II. Relationship of cow efficiency ratios to traits of the dam and progeny weaned.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 6643302PubMed |
Dickerson GE (1969) Experimental approaches to utilizing breed resources. Animal Breeding Abstracts 37, 191–202.
Dickerson GE, Grimes JC (1947) Effectiveness of selection for efficiency of gain in Duroc swine. Journal of Animal Science 6, 265–287.
| Effectiveness of selection for efficiency of gain in Duroc swine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20258833PubMed |
Dillard EU, Rodriguez O, Robison OW (1980) Estimation of additive and nonadditive direct and maternal genetic effects from crossbreeding beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 50, 653–663.
| Estimation of additive and nonadditive direct and maternal genetic effects from crossbreeding beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 7372564PubMed |
Farrell LJ, Morris ST, Kenyon PR, Tozer PR (2021) Simulating beef cattle herd productivity with varying cow liveweight and fixed feed supply. Agriculture 11, 35
| Simulating beef cattle herd productivity with varying cow liveweight and fixed feed supply.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frahm RR, Marshall DM (1985) Comparisons among two-breed cross cow groups. I. Cow productivity and calf performance to weaning. Journal of Animal Science 61, 844–855.
| Comparisons among two-breed cross cow groups. I. Cow productivity and calf performance to weaning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gregory KE, Cundiff LV (1980) Crossbreeding in beef cattle: evaluation of systems. Journal of Animal Science 51, 1224–1242.
| Crossbreeding in beef cattle: evaluation of systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huang W, Carbone MA, Lyman RF, Anholt RRH, Mackay TFC (2020) Genotype by environment interaction for gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Communications 11, 5451
| Genotype by environment interaction for gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33116142PubMed |
Kenny DA, Fitzsimons C, Waters SM, McGee M (2018) Invited review: Improving feed efficiency of beef cattle – the current state of the art and future challenges. Animal 12, 1815–1826.
| Invited review: Improving feed efficiency of beef cattle – the current state of the art and future challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29779496PubMed |
Klosterman EW, Sanford LG, Parker CF (1968) Effect of cow size and condition and ration protein content upon maintenance requirements of mature beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 27, 242–246.
| Effect of cow size and condition and ration protein content upon maintenance requirements of mature beef cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 5637660PubMed |
Laker MC (2003) ‘Soil classification: a global desk reference.’ (CRC Press)
Leal WS, MacNeil MD, Carvalho HG, Vaz RZ, Cardoso FF (2018) Direct and maternal breed additive and heterosis effects on growth traits of beef cattle raised in southern Brazil. Journal of Animal Science 96, 2536–2544.
| Direct and maternal breed additive and heterosis effects on growth traits of beef cattle raised in southern Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29741708PubMed |
Lemes JS, Pimentel MA, Vaz RZ, Farias LB, Brauner CC (2017) Performance efficiency of pasture-raised primiparous beef cows of three different biotypes and two milk production levels. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 45, 1461
MacNeil MD, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Koch RM (1988) Crossbreeding systems for beef production. Applied Agricultural Research 3, 44–54.
MacNeil MD, Mokolobate MC, Scholtz MM, Jordaan FJ, Neser FWC (2017a) Alternative approaches to evaluation of cow efficiency. South African Journal of Animal Science 47, 118–123.
| Alternative approaches to evaluation of cow efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MacNeil MD, Cardoso FF, Hay E (2017b) Genotype by environment interaction effects in genetic evaluation of preweaning gain for Line 1 Hereford cattle from Miles City, Montana. Journal of Animal Science 95, 3833–3838.
| Genotype by environment interaction effects in genetic evaluation of preweaning gain for Line 1 Hereford cattle from Miles City, Montana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28992010PubMed |
Meissner HH, Hofmeyr HS, Van Rensburg WJJ, Pienaar JP (1983) ‘Classification of livestock for realistic prediction of substitution values in terms of a biologically defined Large Stock Unit.’ Technical Communication No. 175. (Department of Agriculture: Pretoria)
Mokolobate MC, Scholtz MM, Neser FWC, Buchanan G (2015) Approximation of forage demands for lactating beef cows of different body weights and frame sizes using the Large Stock Unit. Applied Animal Husbandry & Rural Development 8, 34–38.
Morales R, Phocas F, Solé M, Demyda-Peyrás S, Menéndez-Buxadera A, Molina A (2017) Breeding beef cattle for an extended productive life: evaluation of selection criteria in the Retinta breed. Livestock Science 204, 115–121.
| Breeding beef cattle for an extended productive life: evaluation of selection criteria in the Retinta breed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Neser FWC, van Wyk JB, Fair MD, Lubout P, Crook BJ (2012) Estimation of genetic parameters for growth traits in Brangus cattle. South African Journal of Animal Science 42, 469–473.
| Estimation of genetic parameters for growth traits in Brangus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
NRC (2016) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 8th revised edn. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources Division on Earth and Life Studies. National Research Council. (National Academies Press: Washington, DC)
Pyoos GM, Scholtz MM, MacNeil MD, Theunissen A, Neser FWC (2020) Genetic effects from an Afrikaner, Bonsmara, and Nguni three-breed diallel and top-crosses of Angus and Simmental sires. South African Journal of Animal Science 50, 366–377.
| Genetic effects from an Afrikaner, Bonsmara, and Nguni three-breed diallel and top-crosses of Angus and Simmental sires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robison OW, McDaniel BT, Rincon EJ (1981) Estimation of direct and maternal additive and heterotic effects from crossbreeding experiments in animals. Journal of Animal Science 52, 44–50.
| Estimation of direct and maternal additive and heterotic effects from crossbreeding experiments in animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 7240038PubMed |
Schoeman SJ, van Zyl JGE, de Wet R (1993) Direct and maternal additive and heterotic effects in crossbreeding Hereford, Simmentaler and Afrikaner cattle. South African Journal of Animal Science 23, 61–66.
Scholtz MM, MacNeil MD, Chadyiwa MC, Neser FWC (2022) Genetic analysis of traits needed to optimize improvement in beef cow-calf efficiency in Afrikaner cattle. In ‘Proceedings of the world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, 3–8 July 2022, Rotterdam, The Netherlands’. (in press)
Sessim AG, de Oliveira TE, López-González FA, de Freitas DS, Barcellos JOJ (2020) Efficiency in cow-calf systems with different ages of cow culling. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7, 476
| Efficiency in cow-calf systems with different ages of cow culling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32851045PubMed |
Theunissen A, Scholtz MM, Neser FWC, MacNeil MD (2013) Crossbreeding to increase beef production: additive and non-additive effects on weight traits. South African Journal of Animal Science 43, 143–152.
| Crossbreeding to increase beef production: additive and non-additive effects on weight traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson WR, Meiske JC, Goodrich RD, Rust JR, Byers FM (1983) Influence of body composition on energy requirements of beef cows during winter. Journal of Animal Science 56, 1241–1252.
| Influence of body composition on energy requirements of beef cows during winter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 6863170PubMed |
Thompson LR, Beck MR, Buskirk DD, Rowntree JE, McKendree MGS (2020) Cow efficiency: modeling the biological and economic output of a Michigan beef herd. Translational Animal Science 4, 166
| Cow efficiency: modeling the biological and economic output of a Michigan beef herd.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Williams JL, Aguilar I, Rekaya R, Bertrand JK (2010) Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for growth and carcass traits in cattle using published crossbreeding studies. Journal of Animal Science 88, 460–466.
| Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for growth and carcass traits in cattle using published crossbreeding studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19820043PubMed |
