Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Are there opportunities to improve lamb feedlot production efficiency? A cross-sectional survey

T. P. Keogh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9500-5933 A B * , S. R. McGrath https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-4267 A B , V. H. Oddy C , M. Hernandez-Jover B D , H. Dickson E and M. B. Allworth A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Fred Morley Centre, School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

B Graham Centre, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

C Livestock Industries Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, UNE, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

D School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

E AgriPartner Consulting, Clare, SA 5453, Australia.

* Correspondence to: tkeogh@csu.edu.au

Handling Editor: Andy Greer

Animal Production Science 62(4) 381-391 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21309
Submitted: 24 June 2021  Accepted: 11 November 2021   Published: 14 December 2021

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Feedlotting lambs has the potential to considerably increase the efficiency of lamb production in Australia. Many producers have turned to grain-finishing lambs to capitalise on high lamb prices and, due to the perceived profitability of this practice, further research to improve production has not been prioritised. Lambs are, however, difficult to adapt to a predominantly grain-based diet, often resulting in highly variable feed intake and growth rates.

Aims: The aim of this survey was to investigate the apparent growth rates and feed conversion ratios of lambs in current feedlotting enterprises. A secondary aim was to identify research priorities that could improve feedlot production efficiency.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between February and May 2020 among Australian lamb producers, with the target population being lamb producers using feedlots to finish lambs. Producer responses from 59 current lamb feedlotters were collated and analysed.

Key results: The most frequently reported growth rates were between 300 and 350 g/day, and most respondents reported a feed conversion ratio of 5:1. The incidence of shy feeders was a median of 3.5% and mortality was a median of 1%, with acidosis reported as the major contributor to mortality.

Conclusions: The results of the current survey indicate that for the majority of responding producers, lamb growth rates and feed conversion ratios are consistent with those predicted by the nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants (CSIRO 2007), and improvements in production are unlikely without significantly increasing nutrient intake. Shy feeders, acidosis and the intake of lowly digestible feeds are the clear limitations to production efficiency.

Implications: Research to improve productivity of lambs in feedlots needs to prioritise the implementation of feeding strategies that minimise social and nutritional issues, and promote maximum intake of nutrients.

Keywords: acidosis, feedlots, feed conversion efficiency, feed intake, lamb growth, lamb production, ruminant nutrition, shy feeders.


References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2020) Table 1: Agricultural commodities – Australia – 2018–2019. Available at https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/agriculture/agricultural-commodities-australia/latest-release. [Accessed 22 April 2021]

Barnes A, Beatty D, Stockman C, Miller D (2008) ‘Inanition of sheep.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: Sydney)

Beretta V, Kirby RM (2004) Nutritional characteristics of cereal grains. In ‘Feeding grain for sheep meat production.’ (Ed. HM Chapman) pp. 33–40. (Australian Sheep Industry CRC: Armidale)

Bowen MK, Ryan MP, Jordan DJ, Beretta V, Kirby RM, Stockman C, McIntyre BL, Rowe JB (2006) Improving sheep feedlot management. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 54, 27–34.

Bowman JGP, Sowell BF (1997) Delivery method and supplement consumption by grazing ruminants: a review. Journal of Animal Science 75, 543–550.
Delivery method and supplement consumption by grazing ruminants: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bryant RJ, Kirby RM (2004) Feeding sheep for finishing questionnaire - report and response summary. In ‘Feeding grain for sheep meat production’. (Ed. HM Chapman) pp. 99–108. (Australian Sheep Industry CRC: Armidale)

Burritt EA, Provenza FD (1997) Effect of an unfamiliar location on the consumption of novel and familiar foods by sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54, 317–325.
Effect of an unfamiliar location on the consumption of novel and familiar foods by sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

CSIRO (2007) ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)

Davies BL, Alford AR, Griffith GR (2009) Economic effects of alternate growth path, time of calving and breed type combinations across southern Australian beef cattle environments: feedlot finishing at the New South Wales experimental site. Animal Production Science 49, 535–541.
Economic effects of alternate growth path, time of calving and breed type combinations across southern Australian beef cattle environments: feedlot finishing at the New South Wales experimental site.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis J (Ed.) (2003) ‘Feedlotting lambs: a producer’s guide.’ (Landlinks Press, CSIRO: Canberra)

Dickson H, Jolly S (2011) ‘National procedures and guidelines for intensive sheep and lamb feeding systems.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: Sydney)

Dixon RM, Stockdale CR (1999) Associative effects between forages and grains: consequences for feed utilisation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 757–774.
Associative effects between forages and grains: consequences for feed utilisation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Duddy G, Shands C, Bell A, Hegarty RS, Casburn G (2016) ‘Feedlotting lambs.’ (NSW Department of Primary Industries: Orange)

File GC (1976) The effects of roughage quality, physical form and mode of presentation with a wheat based diet on the performance of lot fed lambs. In ‘Proceedings of the 11th Australian society of animal production’. pp. 437–440. (Australian Society of Animal Production: Adelaide)

Galvani DB, Pires AV, Susin I, Gouvea VN, Berndt A, Chagas LJ, Dórea JRR, Abdalla AL, Tedeschi LO (2014) Energy efficiency of growing ram lambs fed concentrate-based diets with different roughage sources. Journal of Animal Science 92, 250–263.
Energy efficiency of growing ram lambs fed concentrate-based diets with different roughage sources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24352972PubMed |

Giason AG, Wallace AW (2006) ‘Lamb feedlot stocktake.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: Sydney)

Hegarty RS, Shands C, Marchant R, Hopkins DL, Ball AJ, Harden S (2006) Effects of available nutrition and sire breeding values for growth and muscling on the development of crossbred lambs. 1: Growth and carcass characteristics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 593–603.
Effects of available nutrition and sire breeding values for growth and muscling on the development of crossbred lambs. 1: Growth and carcass characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jolly S, Wallace A (2007) ‘Best practice for production feeding of lambs: a review of the literature.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: Sydney)

Kirby RM, Beretta V (2004) Feeding grain to confined sheep. In ‘Feeding grain for sheep meat production’. (Ed. HM Chapman) pp. 57–80. (Australian Sheep Industry CRC: Armidale)

Kirby RM, Jones FM, Ferguson DM, Fisher AD (2004) Adaptation to grain feeding. In ‘Feeding grain for sheep meat production’. (Ed. HM Chapman) pp. 81–98. (Australian Sheep Industry CRC: Armidale)

Litchfield F (2020) ‘Australian lamb: financial performance of lamb-producing farms, 2017–18 to 2019–20.’ (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences: Canberra, ACT)

Lubulwa M, Thompson T (2015) ‘Australian lamb: financial performance of slaughter lamb producing farms, 2012–13 to 2014–15.’ (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Econimics and Sciences: Canberra)

Meat and Livestock Australia (2020) MLA and AWI wool and sheepmeat survey report – sheepmeat. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/globalassets/mla-corporate/prices--markets/documents/trends--analysis/sheepmeat-survey/mla-awi-wool-sheepmeat-survey-june-2020.pdf. [Accessed 22 April 2021]

Oddy VH, Walmsley B (2013) ‘A scoping study to explore the limitations on productivity of meat sheep due to nutrient supply’. (Meat and Livestock Australia: Sydney)

Pratley JE (1991) Pasture management. In ‘Australian sheep and wool handbook’. (Ed. DJ Cottle) pp. 267–285. (Ikata Press: Melbourne)

R Core Team (2018) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria)

Rice M, Jongman EC, Butler KL, Hemsworth PH (2016) Relationships between temperament, feeding behaviour, social interactions, and stress in lambs adapting to a feedlot environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 183, 42–50.
Relationships between temperament, feeding behaviour, social interactions, and stress in lambs adapting to a feedlot environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rosa HJD, Bryant MJ (2003) Seasonality of reproduction in sheep. Small Ruminant Research 48, 155–171.
Seasonality of reproduction in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Swan AA, Banks RG, Brown DJ, Chandler HR (2017) An update on genetic progress in the Australian sheep industry. In ‘Proc. Assoc. Advmt. Anim. Breed. Genet’, Vol. 22, No. 1. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics)