Single-step genomic evaluation of lambing ease in Australian terminal sire breed sheep
L. Li
A , P. M. Gurman A , A. A. Swan A and D. J. Brown A B
A Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (a joint venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries and the University of New England), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: dbrown2@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21257
Submitted: 12 May 2021 Accepted: 27 August 2021 Published online: 1 October 2021
Abstract
Context: Australian sheep breeding values (ASBVs) for the categorical trait of lambing ease are routinely estimated by Sheep Genetics via a threshold model. This has been pedigree-only, and has not utilised genomic information.
Aim: The present study aimed to update the genetic evaluation model and parameters for lambing ease for terminal sire sheep (dominated by White Suffolk and Poll Dorset breeds). The model includes correlations with birthweight and gestation length. Cross-validation was used to determine the value of the improved models and the inclusion of genomic information.
Methods: New data-preparation pipelines were developed to accommodate improved data-filtering methods and contemporary group construction. Genetic parameters, including correlations among traits, were estimated using continuous and threshold models, with various combinations of effects in mixed animal models. Cross-validation of breeding values was performed against progeny performance, by using forward prediction.
Key results: The increased volume of data, improved data preparation steps and enhanced evaluation software now allow a more complex model to be fitted, including maternal, sire by flock-year and genetic group effects, which were significant for all traits, along with the inclusion of multiple sire groups in the pedigree. However, the inclusion of the direct-maternal covariance and sire by flock-year terms resulted in unrealistically inflated estimates of some components, and thus the final covariance matrices required some adjustments. Cross-validation of breeding values was performed against progeny performance using forward prediction. For all traits, the phenotype accuracies and estimated breeding value correlations were higher from the new model without genomics than were those from the current routine evaluation. The benefit from including genomic information based on cross-validation is minimal currently but is expected to improve as the size of the reference population grows. Further work is required to define acceptable data-quality thresholds for the construction of datasets for routine breeding value estimation.
Conclusions: The new model and parameters resulted in ASBVs with an improved predictive ability, with increased accuracy and reduced bias compared with the current analysis. Furthermore, a small increase in accuracy was observed for all traits from utilising genomic information in the model.
Implications: The new genetic evaluation procedures and models will be used to update those being applied in the routine Sheep Genetics evaluation system and also support further index development for the terminal sire breeds in Australia.
Keywords: sheep, dystocia, threshold model, validation, breeding values, genomic, birth weight, gestation length.
References
Brown D (2007) Variance components for lambing ease and gestation length in sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 268–271.Brown DJ, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Graser HU, Woolaston RR, Ball AJ, Atkins KD, Banks RG (2007) Genetic evaluation for the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 187–194.
Brown DJ, Swan AA, Johnston D, Graser HU (2009) Sire by flock-year interactions for body weight in Poll Dorset sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18, 48–51.
Brown DJSwan AABoerner VLi LGurman PMMcMillan AJvan der Werf JHJChandler HRTier BBanks RG (2018 )
Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (2015) ‘ASReml user guide release 4.2 structural specification.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Huisman AE, Brown DJ, Ball AJ, Graser H (2008) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 1. Description of traits, model comparison, variance components and their ratios. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1177–1185.
| Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 1. Description of traits, model comparison, variance components and their ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kanungo T, Mount DM, Netanyahu NS, Piatko CD, Silverman R, Wu AY (2002) An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24, 881–892.
| An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Legarra A, Reverter A (2018) Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 50, 53
| Semi-parametric estimates of population accuracy and bias of predictions of breeding values and future phenotypes using the LR method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30400768PubMed |
Li L, Brown DJ (2016) Estimation of genetic parameters for lambing ease, birthweight and gestation length in Australian sheep. Animal Production Science 56, 934–940.
| Estimation of genetic parameters for lambing ease, birthweight and gestation length in Australian sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Li L, Swan AA, Tier B (2017) Approximating the accuracy of single step EBVs. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 22, 89–92.
Meyer K (2003) Estimates of variances due to sire x herd effects for weights of Hereford cattle. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 131–134.
Sheep-Genetics (2014) ‘Understanding Lambing Ease ASBVs.’ Available at http://www.sheepgenetics.org.au/files/58ed7ad1-e2e8-492f-9bd3-a08500b37fc3/Understanding-Lambing-Ease-ASBVs-041109.pdf
Snell EJ (1964) A scaling procedure for ordered categorical data. Biometrics 20, 592–607.
| A scaling procedure for ordered categorical data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Torres-Vázquez JA, Samaraweera AM, Jeyaruban G, Johnston DJ, Boerner V (2021) Determination of optimum weighting factors for single-step genetic evaluation via genetic variance partitioning. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 24, In press.
Tsuruta S, Misztal I (2006) THRGIBBS1F90 for estimation of variance components with threshold and linear models. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production’, 13–18 August 2006, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. pp. 27–31.
