Proximity sensors provide an accurate alternative for measuring maternal pedigree of lambs in Australian sheep flocks under commercial conditions
Beth Paganoni
A , Andrew van Burgel A , Claire Macleay A , Vicki Scanlan B and Andrew Thompson B C
A Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, 3 Baron Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia.
B College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: Andrew.Thompson@murdoch.edu.au
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21190
Submitted: 21 April 2021 Accepted: 12 July 2021 Published online: 2 September 2021
Journal compilation © CSIRO 2021 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Context: Proximity sensors were used recently to determine the maternal pedigree of lambs on a small plot with high accuracy. If this accuracy is maintained under commercial grazing conditions, this method could be a useful alternative to improving genetic gain in sheep, including reproduction traits.
Aims: To investigate using proximity sensors to determine the maternal pedigree of lambs and to define the level of interactions required to determine maternal pedigree confidently irrespective of differences in ewe age, lamb age, birth type, paddock size, flock size or stocking rate under commercial grazing conditions.
Methods: We compared maternal pedigree determined using the proximity sensors to DNA profiling (n = 10 flocks) and lambing rounds (n = 16 flocks). Ewes (n = 7315) and lambs (n = 8058) were fitted with proximity sensors under normal grazing conditions for each property for 1–3 days. Flocks varied in ewe age (adults, hoggets and ewe lambs), lamb age (up to 100 days old, except for 1 flock), birth type (singles, multiples), paddock size (0.25–320 ha), flock size (37–420 lambs) and stocking rate (2–100 dry sheep equivalents/ha, except for 1 flock).
Key results: An interaction ratio of >2 was required for a confident ewe–lamb match (ewe with the most interactions compared with the ewe with the second-most interactions for each lamb). Using this criterion, the average success of proximity sensors at matching a lamb to a ewe was 95% and the sensors were 97% accurate when compared with the pedigree results from lambing rounds or DNA. For lambs matched successfully, over 90% of this success was achieved in the first 7 h and over 99% in the first 20 h. While the success rate of matching a lamb to a ewe was not influenced significantly by ewe age, birth type, paddock size, flock size or stocking rate, the time to achieve sensor success was significantly quicker for singles than for twins and sensor accuracy was significantly higher for smaller paddocks with higher stocking rates.
Conclusions: Our results showed that proximity sensors can establish maternal pedigree effectively and accurately across a range of conditions experienced on commercial properties.
Implications: Private industry can now develop more cost-effective sensor technologies with greater confidence that will enhance recording of maternal pedigree and, hence, the rate of genetic gain across the sheep industry.
Keywords: genetics, reproduction, parentage, Bluetooth.
References
Alhamada M, Debus N, Lurette A, Bocquier F (2016) Validation of automated electronic oestrous detection in sheep as an alternative to visual observation. Small Ruminant Research 134, 97–104.| Validation of automated electronic oestrous detection in sheep as an alternative to visual observation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Alhamada M, Debus N, Lurette A, Bocquier F (2017) Automatic oestrus detection system enables monitoring of sexual behaviour in sheep. Small Ruminant Research 149, 105–111.
| Automatic oestrus detection system enables monitoring of sexual behaviour in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown DJ, Ball A, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Atkins KD, Graser HU, Banks W, Swan P, Woolaston R (2006) Sheep Genetics Australia: a national genetics evaluation system for Australian sheep. The 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Sheep Production, 13–18 August 2006, Belo Horizonte, Brasil, pp. 05–03.
Clarke BE, Young JM, Hancock S, Thompson AN (2019) Merino Lifetime productivity: economic value of meat and wool from wethers at yearling and adult age. Proceedings of the Association of Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 23, 516–519.
Dodds KG, Tate ML, Sise JA (2005) Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2271–2279.
| Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16160036PubMed |
Dwyer CM (2014) Maternal behaviour and lamb survival: from neuroendocrinology to practical application. Animal 8, 102–112.
| Maternal behaviour and lamb survival: from neuroendocrinology to practical application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24103485PubMed |
Greeff JC, Karrlson LJE (2020) Production benefits of breeding for worm resistance in Merino sheep. Animal Production Science 60, 1643–1653.
| Production benefits of breeding for worm resistance in Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Inglis L, Hancock S, Laurence M, Thompson A (2019) Behavioural measures reflect pain-mitigating effects of meloxicam in combination with Tri-Solfen® in mulesed Merino lambs. Animal 13, 2586–2593.
| Behavioural measures reflect pain-mitigating effects of meloxicam in combination with Tri-Solfen® in mulesed Merino lambs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30935436PubMed |
Kennedy JF, Bettenay RA (1950) Joining and lambing in an experimental flock of Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 76–92.
| Joining and lambing in an experimental flock of Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Langlands JP, Donald GE (1975) The intakes and growth rates of grazing Border Leicester × Merino lambs weaned at 21, 49 and 77 days. Animal Production 21, 175–181.
Lee GJ, Atkins KD, Sladek MA (2009) Heterogeneity of lifetime reproductive performance, its components and associations with wool production and liveweight of Merino ewes. Animal Production Science 49, 624–629.
| Heterogeneity of lifetime reproductive performance, its components and associations with wool production and liveweight of Merino ewes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lockwood A, Hancock S, Paganoni B, Macleay C, Kearney G, Sohi R, Thompson A (2019) Mob size of single-bearing or twin-bearing Merino ewes at lambing may not influence lamb survival at lambing when feed-on-offer is high. Animal 13, 1311–1318.
| Mob size of single-bearing or twin-bearing Merino ewes at lambing may not influence lamb survival at lambing when feed-on-offer is high.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30370897PubMed |
McLaren CE (1997) Dry sheep equivalents for different classes of livestock. Department of Primary Industries, Vic., Australia. Available at https://www.academia.edu/30819193/Dry_Sheep_Equivalents_for_comparing_different_classes_of_livestock
Morgan PD, Arnold GW (1974) Behavioural relationships between Merino ewes and lambs during the four weeks after birth. Animal Production 19, 169–176.
| Behavioural relationships between Merino ewes and lambs during the four weeks after birth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
O’Neill CJ, Bishop-Hurley GJ, Williams PJ, Reid DJ, Swain DL (2014) Using UHF proximity loggers to quantify male-female interactions: a scoping study or oestrous activity in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 151, 1–8.
| Using UHF proximity loggers to quantify male-female interactions: a scoping study or oestrous activity in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25449547PubMed |
Paganoni BL, Macleay CM, van Burgel A, Thompson AN (2020) Proximity sensors fitted to ewes and lambs during joining can indicate the birth date of lambs. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 170, 105249
| Proximity sensors fitted to ewes and lambs during joining can indicate the birth date of lambs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richards JS, Atkins KD (2007) Determining Pedigree by Association in Merino flocks. Proceedings Association of Advancement in Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 403–406.
Richards J, Atkins K, Mortimer M, Semple S, Pope C (2007) Pedigree assignment by electronic matching of lambs and dams. Trangie QPLUS Merinos. In ‘Proceedings of the Trangie QPLUS Open Day, Trangie Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, Australia’, 7 June 2007. (Ed. CE Pope) pp. 42–43. (NSW Department of Primary Industries.)
Smith FV, Van-Toller C, Boyes T (1966) The ‘critical period’ in the attachment of lambs and ewes. Animal Behaviour 14, 120–125.
| The ‘critical period’ in the attachment of lambs and ewes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 5918234PubMed |
Sohi R, Trompf J, Marriott H, Bervan A, Godoy BI, Weerasinghe M, Desai A, Jois M (2017) Determination of maternal pedigree and ewe–lamb spatial relationships by application of Bluetooth technology in extensive farming systems. Journal of Animal Science 95, 5145–5150.
| Determination of maternal pedigree and ewe–lamb spatial relationships by application of Bluetooth technology in extensive farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29293717PubMed |
Van der Werf J (2010) Value of alternative methods to determine parentage. Final Report B.BSC.0094, Meat and Lifestock Australia.
Walser E, Trompf J, Hague P, Yeomans M (1983) Preferences for sibling or mother in Dalesbred or Jacob twin lambs. Reproductive Development and Behaviour of Sheep. 1985, 393–401.
| Preferences for sibling or mother in Dalesbred or Jacob twin lambs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
