Growth, body composition and body wrinkle are favourably correlated with reproductive performance in 2-8-year-old Merino sheep
J. A. Chapman![https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4519-7807](/media/client/orcid_16x16.png)
![https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-7585](/media/client/orcid_16x16.png)
![https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4758-4862](/media/client/orcid_16x16.png)
A Davies Livestock Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: jackie.chapman@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21101
Submitted: 22 February 2021 Accepted: 1 June 2021 Published online: 24 August 2021
Abstract
Context: Despite the increased economic importance of reproductive rate in Australian Merinos, there have been low genetic improvements in reproductive performance over the past several decades. Genetically improving reproductive traits through direct selection is restricted by low heritability, low selection intensity directly on reproductive traits, high recording costs and lack of accurate maternal pedigrees in the majority of industry breeding programs. However, indirect selection via correlated traits may be useful as a supplement to direct selection or even on its own where reproduction records are not collected.
Aims: The aims of the present study were to determine whether various production and quality traits have the potential to be used as indirect selection criteria for genetically improving lifetime reproductive rate, but also whether their selection could be detrimental to reproduction via unfavourable correlations.
Methods: Reproductive traits studied included pregnancy rate (ewes scanned pregnant per ewe joined), fetal number (number of fetuses scanned per ewe joined), number of lambs born (per ewe joined), number of lambs weaned (per ewe joined) and ewe rearing ability (number of lambs weaned per fetuses scanned). Using data from the SA Selection Demonstration Flocks project (1997–2005), reproductive traits were modelled against various visual and production traits to estimate correlations.
Key results: Favourable genetic correlations with reproductive traits were estimated with adult ewe bodyweight (0.37–0.50), hogget eye muscle depth (HEMD, 0.40–0.57), fat depth (HFAT, 0.27–0.48) and hogget body (HBWS) and neck wrinkle scores (–0.13 to –0.50). However, the estimates for genetic correlations with hogget eye muscle depth and fat depth were lower when bodyweight was fitted as a covariate, being 0.11–0.35 and 0.17–0.32 respectively. Genetic correlations with ewe rearing ability were generally unfavourable (except those with hogget body and neck wrinkle scores, which were –0.24 and –0.15 respectively), but were either negligible (adult ewe bodyweight, hogget eye muscle depth, fibre diameter and fleece weight) or low in magnitude(fat depth). Unfavourable genetic correlations were observed between fibre diameter and reproductive traits (0.13–0.33). Fleece weight had negligible genetic correlations with all reproductive traits studied (–0.08 to 0.10). Predictions of response to index selection using indirect criteria of one or more of yearling weight, HBWS, HEMD and HFAT measurements projected substantial genetic gains in the number of lambs weaned per ewe joined (NLW). Without reproduction records on the dams of candidates for selection, indirect selection using all four indirect criteria (yearling weight, HBWS, HEMD and HFAT) was predicted to achieve 112–168% of the genetic gains of direct selection for NLW. When all indirect and direct criteria for NLW are combined as part of index selection, even larger gains for NLW are predicted (from 164–215% of direct NLW genetic gains).
Conclusions: Findings from the present study suggest that bodyweight, HEMD and HFAT and HBWS could be potentially beneficial as indirect selection criteria for lifetime reproductive rate. Selection for reduced fibre diameter is potentially detrimental to reproductive performance; however, selection for improved fleece weight is unlikely to have any effect on genetic gain for reproductive traits.
Implications: Use of indirect selection for lifetime reproductive could allow for genetic gain when either used with or without the direct selection criteria of reproduction records.
Keywords: Merino, reproduction, indirect selection, correlations, heritability.
References
ABARES (2018) ‘Agricultural commodities report September 2018.’ Available at http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/research-topics/agricultural-commodities/sept-2018/wool [Accessed 14/04/2019].Adams NR, Briegel JR, Greeff JC, Bermingham EN (2006) Feed intake, body composition, and plasma metabolic hormones in Merino sheep that differ genetically in fleece weight or fibre diameter. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 27–32.
| Feed intake, body composition, and plasma metabolic hormones in Merino sheep that differ genetically in fleece weight or fibre diameter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bulmer MG (1971) Effect of selection on genetic variability. American Naturalist 105, 201–211.
Brien FD, Hinch GN, van der Werf JHJ, Brown DJ, Swan AA (2011) Selection strategies for the genetic improvement of reproductive performance in sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 19, 151–158.
Brien FD, Rutley DL, Mortimer SI, Hocking-Edwards JE (2013) Genetic relationships between lamb survival and meat traits. Proceedings of the Association of Advancement of Animal Breeding 20, 237–240.
Brien FD, Walkom SF, Swan AA, Brown DJ (2021) Substantial genetic gains in reducing breech flystrike and in improving productivity traits are achievable in Merino sheep by using index selection. Animal Production Science 61, 345–362.
| Substantial genetic gains in reducing breech flystrike and in improving productivity traits are achievable in Merino sheep by using index selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown DJ, Swan AA (2016) Genetic importance of fat and eye muscle depth in Merino breeding programs. Animal Production Science 56, 690–697.
| Genetic importance of fat and eye muscle depth in Merino breeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown DJ, Bunter KL, Swan AA (2007) Genetic correlations between production traits and components of reproduction in Merino sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 22, 31–34.
Brown DJ, Swan AA, Gill JS (2010) Within- and across-flock genetic relationships for breech flystrike resistance indicator traits. Animal Production Science 50, 1060–1068.
| Within- and across-flock genetic relationships for breech flystrike resistance indicator traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown DJ, Bunter KL, Swan AA (2017) Genetic correlations between production traits and components of reproduction in Merino sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 22, 31–34.
Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Thompson R (2015) ASReml-R Reference Manual Version 4. VSN International Ltd. Available at https://asreml.kb.vsni.co.uk/.
Bunter KL, Swan AA, Gurman PM, Brown DJ (2021) New genomically enhanced reproduction breeding vales for Merino sheep allow targeted selection for conception rate, litter size and ewe rearing ability. Animal Production Science 61, 333–336.
| New genomically enhanced reproduction breeding vales for Merino sheep allow targeted selection for conception rate, litter size and ewe rearing ability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dominik S, Swan AA (2018) Genetic and phenotypic parameters for reproduction, production and bodyweight traits in Australian fine-wool Merino sheep. Animal Production Science 58, 207–212.
| Genetic and phenotypic parameters for reproduction, production and bodyweight traits in Australian fine-wool Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dun R (1964) Skin folds and Merino breeding. 1. The net reproductive rates of flocks selected for and against skin fold. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 4, 376–385.
| Skin folds and Merino breeding. 1. The net reproductive rates of flocks selected for and against skin fold.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fowler D, Dun R (1966) Skin folds and Merino breeding. 4. The susceptibility of rams selected for a high degree of skin wrinkle to heat induced infertility. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 6, 121–127.
| Skin folds and Merino breeding. 4. The susceptibility of rams selected for a high degree of skin wrinkle to heat induced infertility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gifford DR, Ponzoni RW, Walkley JRW, Hynd PI, Ancell PMC (1992) A progress report on the estimation of phenotypic and genetic parameters for South Australian Merino sheep in the Turretfield resource flock. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 40, 114–116.
Hatcher S, Brown DJ, Brien FD, Hebart ML (2015) Genetic relationships between breech cover, wrinkle and lamb survival in Merino sheep Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 21, 354–357.
Hatcher S, Dominik S, Richards JS, Young J, Smith J, Tearle R, Brien FD, Hermann N (2018) Ewe culling and retention strategies to increase reproductive rates in Merino sheep. Animal Production Science 58, 1545–1551.
| Ewe culling and retention strategies to increase reproductive rates in Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huisman AE, Brown DJ (2009) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 3. Genetic relationships between ultrasound scan traits and other traits. Animal Production Science 49, 283–288.
| Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 3. Genetic relationships between ultrasound scan traits and other traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kemper KE, Hebart ML, Brien FD, Jaensch KS, Smith DH, Grimson RJ (2006) Genetic trends achieved under industry controlled different selection strategies. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Brazil. CD-Rom Communication 05–05. Available at http://www.wcgalp.org/proceedings/2006/genetic-trends-achieved-under-industry-control-different-selection-strategies [Verified 18 February 2021]
Lee GJ, Atkins KD, Sladek MA (2009a) Genetic parameters for lifetime reproductive performance of Merino ewes Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement in Animal Breeding Genetics 18, 382–385.
Lee GJ, Atkins KD, Sladek MA (2009b) Heterogeneity of lifetime reproductive performance, its components and associations with wool production and liveweight in Merino ewes Animal Production Science 49, 624–629.
| Heterogeneity of lifetime reproductive performance, its components and associations with wool production and liveweight in Merino ewesCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
MLA (2019) ‘Australian Prices & Markets’. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/prices-markets/[Verified 18 February 2021]
Mortimer SI, Robinson DL, Atkins KD, Brien FD, Swan AA, Taylor PJ, Fogarty NM (2009) Genetic parameters for visually assessed traits and their relationships to wool production and liveweight in Australian Merino sheep. Animal Production Science 49, 32–42.
| Genetic parameters for visually assessed traits and their relationships to wool production and liveweight in Australian Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Piper LR, Swan AA, Brewer HG (2009) Effects on lifetime reproductive performance of phenotypic selection for fleece weight, fibre diameter, body weight and related selection indexes. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement in Animal Breeding Genetics 18, 102–105.
Piper LR, Swan AA, Brewer HG (2013) ‘Current flock effects on lifetime reproductive performance of simulated selection at hogget age in Merino sheep for fleece weight, fibre diameter, body weight and relevant selection indexes. III. High rainfall region results. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement in Animal Breeding Genetics 20, 102–105.
Purvis IW, Atkins KD, Piper LR (1987) Genetic parameters for reproductive traits. Merino improvement programs in Australia (Ed. by B.J. McGuirk) 229–242 (Australian Wool Corporation: Melbourne).
R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org
Richards JS, Atkins KD (2010) Will genetics offer a permanent solution to breech strike? Animal Production Science 50, 1053–1059.
| Will genetics offer a permanent solution to breech strike?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rutten MJM, Bijma P, Woolliams JA, van Arendonk JAM (2002) SelAction: Software to predict selection response and rate of inbreeding in livestock breeding programs. The Journal of Heredity 93, 456–458.
| SelAction: Software to predict selection response and rate of inbreeding in livestock breeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR (2005) A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science 92, 271–289.
| A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sheep Genetics (2014) ‘MERINOSELECT indexes.’ (Sheep Genetics: Armidale, NSW). Available at http://www.sheepgenetics.org.au/Getting-started/ASBVs-and-Indexes/MERINOSELECT-Indexes [verified 22 February 2021]
Sheep Genetics (2019) MERINOSELECT indexes. A ram breeder’s guide. Available at http://www.sheepgenetics.org.au/Resources/Brochures-and-fact-sheets [verified 12 February 2021]
Swan AA, Piper LR, Brewer HG, Purvis IW (2001) Genetic variation in reproductive performance of fine wool Merinos. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 417–420.
van der Werf JHJ (2021) Teaching software used for quantitative genetics at UNE. Available at http://www-personal.une.edu.au/~jvanderw/software.htm [verified 12 February 2021]
Walkom SF, Brown DJ (2017) Impact of liveweight, fat and muscle sire breeding values on ewe reproduction is minimal but variable across Australian grazing systems. Animal Production Science 57, 1952–1961.
| Impact of liveweight, fat and muscle sire breeding values on ewe reproduction is minimal but variable across Australian grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walkom SF, Bunter KL, Swan AA, Clark SA (2019) Graphical modelling of the relationship between body reserves and yearling reproduction in maternal sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement in Animal Breeding Genetics 23, 103–106.
Young SSY, Turner HN, Dolling CHS (1963) Selection for fertility in Australian Merino sheep Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 460–482.
| Selection for fertility in Australian Merino sheepCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |