Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The accuracy of genomic prediction for meat quality traits in Hanwoo cattle when using genotypes from different SNP densities and preselected variants from imputed whole genome sequence

Mohammed Bedhane https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4149-4118 A * , Julius van der Werf A , Sara de las Heras-Saldana A , Dajeong Lim B , Byoungho Park B , Mi Na Park B , Roh Seung Hee C and Samuel Clark A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.

B National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

C Hanwoo Genetic Improvement Centre, Nagi, Republic of Korea.

* Correspondence to: benegash@gmail.com

Handling Editor: Marina Fortes

Animal Production Science 62(1) 21-28 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20659
Submitted: 5 December 2020  Accepted: 1 August 2021   Published: 5 November 2021

© 2022 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context: Genomic prediction is the use of genomic data in the estimation of genomic breeding values (GEBV) in animal breeding. In beef cattle breeding programs, genomic prediction increases the rates of genetic gain by increasing the accuracy of selection at earlier ages.

Aims: The objectives of the study were to examine the effect of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) density and to evaluate the effect of using SNPs preselected from imputed whole-genome sequence for genomic prediction.

Methods: Genomic and phenotypic data from 2110 Hanwoo steers were used to predict GEBV for marbling score (MS), meat texture (MT), and meat colour (MC) traits. Three types of SNP densities including 50k, high-density (HD), and whole-genome sequence data and preselected SNPs from genome-wide association study (GWAS) were used for genomic prediction analyses. Two scenarios (independent and dependent discovery populations) were used to select top significant SNPs. The accuracy of GEBV was assessed using random cross-validation. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) was used to predict the breeding values for each trait.

Key results: Our result showed that very similar prediction accuracies were observed across all SNP densities used in the study. The prediction accuracy among traits ranged from 0.29 ± 0.05 for MC to 0.46 ± 0.04 for MS. Depending on the studied traits, up to 5% of prediction accuracy improvement was obtained when the preselected SNPs from GWAS analysis were included in the prediction analysis.

Conclusions: High SNP density such as HD and the whole-genome sequence data yielded a similar prediction accuracy in Hanwoo beef cattle. Therefore, the 50K SNP chip panel is sufficient to capture the relationships in a breed with a small effective population size such as the Hanwoo cattle population. Preselected variants improved prediction accuracy when they were included in the genomic prediction model.

Implications: The estimated genomic prediction accuracies are moderately accurate in Hanwoo cattle and for searching for SNPs that are more productive could increase the accuracy of estimated breeding values for the studied traits.

Keywords: Bias, genomic selection, GWAS, Korean beef cattle, meat quality, prediction accuracy, preselected SNPs, sequence data.


References

Al Kalaldeh M, Gibson J, Duijvesteijn N, Daetwyler HD, MacLeod I, Moghaddar N, Lee SH, van der Werf JHJ (2019) Using imputed whole-genome sequence data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for parasite resistance in Australian sheep. Genetics Selection Evolution 51, 32
Using imputed whole-genome sequence data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for parasite resistance in Australian sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Amer PR, Banos G (2010) Implications of avoiding overlap between training and testing data sets when evaluating genomic predictions of genetic merit. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3320–3330.
Implications of avoiding overlap between training and testing data sets when evaluating genomic predictions of genetic merit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20630248PubMed |

Beavis WD (1998) QTL analyses: power, precision, and accuracy. In ‘Molecular dissection of complex traits. Vol. 1998’. (Ed. AH Paterson) pp. 145–162. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA)
| Crossref |

Bedhane M, van der Werf JHJ, Al Kalaldeh M, Lim D, Park B, Park MN, Hee RS, Clark SA (2019a) Assessment of genomic prediction accuracy for meat quality traits in Hanwoo cattle. ‘Proceedings of the AAABG 23rd Conference. Vol. 23’, 27 October to 1 November 2019, Armidale, New South Wales. pp. 278–281. (Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics: Armidale, NSW, Australia)

Bedhane M, van der Werf J, Gondro C, Duijvesteijn N, Lim D, Park B, Park MN, Hee RS, Clark S (2019b) Genome-wide association study of meat quality traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using imputed whole-genome sequence data. Frontiers in Genetics 10, 1235
Genome-wide association study of meat quality traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using imputed whole-genome sequence data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31850078PubMed |

Bhuiyan MSA, Lim D, Park M, Lee S, Kim Y, Gondro C, Park B, Lee S (2018) Functional partitioning of genomic variance and genome-wide association study for carcass traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using imputed sequence level SNP data. Frontiers in Genetics 9, 217
Functional partitioning of genomic variance and genome-wide association study for carcass traits in Korean Hanwoo cattle using imputed sequence level SNP data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29988410PubMed |

Boddhireddy P, Kelly MJ, Northcutt S, Prayaga KC, Rumph J, DeNise S (2014) Genomic predictions in Angus cattle: comparisons of sample size, response variables, and clustering methods for cross-validation. Journal of Animal Science 92, 485–497.
Genomic predictions in Angus cattle: comparisons of sample size, response variables, and clustering methods for cross-validation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24431338PubMed |

Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Kemper K, Savin K, Hayes BJ, Barendse W, Zhang Y, Reich CM, Mason BA, Bunch RJ, Harrison BE, Reverter A, Herd RM, Tier B, Graser H-U, Goddard ME (2013) Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurusBos indicus, and composite beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3088–3104.
Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurusBos indicus, and composite beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23658330PubMed |

Bolormaa S, Chamberlain AJ, Khansefid M, Stothard P, Swan AA, Mason B, Prowse-Wilkins CP, Duijvesteijn N, Moghaddar N, van der Werf JH, Daetwyler HD, MacLeod IM (2019) Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence in sheep. Genetics Selection Evolution 51, 1
Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brøndum RF, Su G, Janss L, Sahana G, Guldbrandtsen B, Boichard D, Lund MS (2015) Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 4107–4116.
Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25892697PubMed |

Browning SR, Browning BL (2007) Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. The American Journal of Human Genetics 81, 1084–1097.
Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17924348PubMed |

Calus MPL, Bouwman AC, Hickey JM, Veerkamp RF, Mulder HA (2014) Evaluation of measures of correctness of genotype imputation in the context of genomic prediction: a review of livestock applications. Animal 8, 1743–1753.
Evaluation of measures of correctness of genotype imputation in the context of genomic prediction: a review of livestock applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chang L-Y, Toghiani S, Ling A, Aggrey SE, Rekaya R (2018) High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection. BMC Genetics 19, 4
High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29304753PubMed |

Chen L, Vinsky M, Li C (2015) Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle. Animal Genetics 46, 55–59.
Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25393962PubMed |

Choi T, Lim D, Park B, Sharma A, Kim J-J, Kim S, Lee SH (2017) Accuracy of genomic breeding value prediction for intramuscular fat using different genomic relationship matrices in Hanwoo (Korean cattle). Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 30, 907–911.
Accuracy of genomic breeding value prediction for intramuscular fat using different genomic relationship matrices in Hanwoo (Korean cattle).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27383803PubMed |

Clark SA, Hickey JM, van der Werf JHJ (2011) Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 18
Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clark SA, Hickey JM, Daetwyler HD, van der Werf JHJ (2012) The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Genetics Selection Evolution 44, 4
The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crews DH, Kemp RA (2001) Genetic parameters for ultrasound and carcass measures of yield and quality among replacement and slaughter beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79, 3008–3020.
Genetic parameters for ultrasound and carcass measures of yield and quality among replacement and slaughter beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11811454PubMed |

Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (2008) Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS One 3, e3395
Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18852893PubMed |

Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (2010) The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics 185, 1021–1031.
The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20407128PubMed |

Daetwyler HD, Kemper KE, van der Werf JHJ, Hayes BJ (2012) Components of the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed sheep population. Journal of Animal Science 90, 3375–3384.
Components of the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed sheep population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23038744PubMed |

de las Heras-Saldana S, Lopez BI, Moghaddar N, Park W, Park J-e, Chung KY, Lim D, Lee SH, Shin D, van der Werf JHJ (2020) Use of gene expression and whole-genome sequence information to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 52, 54
Use of gene expression and whole-genome sequence information to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Druet T, Macleod IM, Hayes BJ (2014) Toward genomic prediction from whole-genome sequence data: impact of sequencing design on genotype imputation and accuracy of predictions. Heredity 112, 39–47.
Toward genomic prediction from whole-genome sequence data: impact of sequencing design on genotype imputation and accuracy of predictions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23549338PubMed |

Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM, Mason BA, Goddard ME (2012) Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 4114–4129.
Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22720968PubMed |

Frischknecht M, Meuwissen TH, Bapst B, Seefried FR, Flury C, Garrick D, Signer-Hasler H, Stricker C, Bieber A, Fries R, Russ I, Sölkner J, Bagnato A, Gredler-Grandl B (2018) Short communication: genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence variants in Brown Swiss cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 1292–1296.
Short communication: genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence variants in Brown Swiss cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29153527PubMed |

Gilmour A, Gogel B, Cullis B, Welham S, Thompson R (2015) ‘ASReml user guide release 4.1 structural specification.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Goddard M (2009) Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136, 245–257.
Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18704696PubMed |

Goddard ME, Wray NR, Verbyla K, Visscher PM (2009) Estimating effects and making predictions from genome-wide marker data. Statistical Science 24, 517–529.
Estimating effects and making predictions from genome-wide marker data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007) The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177, 2389–2397.
The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18073436PubMed |

Hawlader A-M, Priscila B, Dajeong L, Park B, Gondro C (2017) A guide to imputation of low density single nucleotide polymorphism data up to sequence level. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genomics 1, 59–68.
A guide to imputation of low density single nucleotide polymorphism data up to sequence level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME (2009a) Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 433–443.
Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19164653PubMed |

Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME (2009b) Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genetics Research 91, 47–60.
Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19220931PubMed |

Hayes BJ, Pryce J, Chamberlain AJ, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME (2010) Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits. PLoS Genetics 6, e1001139
Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20927186PubMed |

Heidaritabar M, Calus MPL, Megens H-J, Vereijken A, Groenen MAM, Bastiaansen JWM (2016) Accuracy of genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in white layers. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 133, 167–179.
Accuracy of genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in white layers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26776363PubMed |

Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31, 423–447.
Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1174616PubMed |

Hickey JM, Keane MG, Kenny DA, Cromie AR, Mulder HA, Veerkamp RF (2008) Estimation of accuracy and bias in genetic evaluations with genetic groups using sampling. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1047–1056.
Estimation of accuracy and bias in genetic evaluations with genetic groups using sampling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18272854PubMed |

Howie B, Fuchsberger C, Stephens M, Marchini J, Abecasis GR (2012) Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing. Nature Genetics 44, 955–959.
Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22820512PubMed |

Hozé C, Fritz S, Phocas F, Boichard D, Ducrocq V, Croiseau P (2014) Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 3918–3929.
Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24704232PubMed |

Hwang JM, Cheong JK, Kim SS, Jung BH, Koh MJ, Kim HC, Choy YH (2014) Genetic analysis of ultrasound and carcass measurement traits in a regional Hanwoo steer population. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27, 457–463.
Genetic analysis of ultrasound and carcass measurement traits in a regional Hanwoo steer population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25049974PubMed |

Inoue K, Shoji N, Honda T, Oyama K (2017) Genetic relationships between meat quality traits and fatty acid composition in Japanese Black cattle. Animal Science Journal 88, 11–18.
Genetic relationships between meat quality traits and fatty acid composition in Japanese Black cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27072484PubMed |

Jo C, Cho SH, Chang J, Nam KC (2012) Keys to production and processing of Hanwoo beef: a perspective of tradition and science. Animal Frontiers 2, 32–38.
Keys to production and processing of Hanwoo beef: a perspective of tradition and science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee SH, van der Werf JHJ, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2008) Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP data. PLoS Genetics 4, e1000231
Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18949033PubMed |

Li Y, Kim J-J (2015) Effective population size and signatures of selection using bovine 50K SNP chips in Korean Native cattle (Hanwoo). Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 11, 143–153.
Effective population size and signatures of selection using bovine 50K SNP chips in Korean Native cattle (Hanwoo).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26244003PubMed |

Li B, Zhang N, Wang Y-G, George AW, Reverter A, Li Y (2018) Genomic prediction of breeding values using a subset of SNPs identified by three machine learning methods. Frontiers in Genetics 9, 237
Genomic prediction of breeding values using a subset of SNPs identified by three machine learning methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30023001PubMed |

Liu A, Lund MS, Boichard D, Karaman E, Fritz S, Aamand GP, Nielsen US, Wang Y, Su G (2020) Improvement of genomic prediction by integrating additional single nucleotide polymorphisms selected from imputed whole genome sequencing data. Heredity 124, 37–49.
Improvement of genomic prediction by integrating additional single nucleotide polymorphisms selected from imputed whole genome sequencing data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31278370PubMed |

Mehrban H, Lee DH, Moradi MH, IlCho C, Naserkheil M, Ibáñez-Escriche N (2017) Predictive performance of genomic selection methods for carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle: impacts of the genetic architecture. Genetics Selection Evolution 49, 1
Predictive performance of genomic selection methods for carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle: impacts of the genetic architecture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meuwissen T, Goddard M (2010) Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics 185, 623–631.
Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20308278PubMed |

Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829.
Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meuwissen T, Hayes B, Goddard M (2013) Accelerating improvement of livestock with genomic selection. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 1, 221–237.
Accelerating improvement of livestock with genomic selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25387018PubMed |

Moghaddar N, Swan AA, van der Werf JHJ (2017) Genomic prediction from observed and imputed high-density ovine genotypes. Genetics Selection Evolution 49, 40
Genomic prediction from observed and imputed high-density ovine genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moghaddar N, Khansefid M, van der Werf JHJ, Bolormaa S, Duijvesteijn N, Clark SA, Swan AA, Daetwyler HD, MacLeod IM (2019) Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations. Genetics Selection Evolution 51, 72
Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moser G, Tier B, Crump RE, Khatkar MS, Raadsma HW (2009) A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 56
A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ogawa S, Matsuda H, Taniguchi Y, Watanabe T, Kitamura Y, Tabuchi I, Sugimoto Y, Iwaisaki H (2017) Genomic prediction for carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle using single nucleotide polymorphism markers of different densities. Animal Production Science 57, 1631–1636.
Genomic prediction for carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle using single nucleotide polymorphism markers of different densities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PIW, Daly MJ, Sham PC (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. The American Journal of Human Genetics 81, 559–575.
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17701901PubMed |

Raymond B, Bouwman AC, Schrooten C, Houwing-Duistermaat J, Veerkamp RF (2018) Utility of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction. Genetics Selection Evolution 50, 27
Utility of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Riley DG, Chase CC, Hammond AC, West RL, Johnson DD, Olson TA, Coleman SW (2002) Estimated genetic parameters for carcass traits of Brahman cattle. Journal of Animal Science 80, 955–962.
Estimated genetic parameters for carcass traits of Brahman cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12008662PubMed |

Su G, Christensen OF, Ostersen T, Henryon M, Lund MS (2012) Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. PLoS One 7, e45293
Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23028912PubMed |

van Binsbergen R, Bink MC, Calus MP, van Eeuwijk FA, Hayes BJ, Hulsegge I, Veerkamp RF (2014) Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 46, 41
Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van den Berg I, Boichard D, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS (2016) Using sequence variants in linkage disequilibrium with causative mutations to improve across-breed prediction in dairy cattle: a simulation study. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 6, 2553–2561.
Using sequence variants in linkage disequilibrium with causative mutations to improve across-breed prediction in dairy cattle: a simulation study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van der Werf J (2009) 2. Principles of estimation of breeding values. GENE422/522 Genetic Evaluation and Breeding 2, 1–14.

VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS (2009) Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 16–24.
Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19109259PubMed |

VanRaden PM, Tooker ME, O’Connell JR, Cole JB, Bickhart DM (2017) Selecting sequence variants to improve genomic predictions for dairy cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 49, 32
Selecting sequence variants to improve genomic predictions for dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Veerkamp RF, Bouwman AC, Schrooten C, Calus MP (2016) Genomic prediction using preselected DNA variants from a GWAS with whole-genome sequence data in Holstein–Friesian cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 48, 95
Genomic prediction using preselected DNA variants from a GWAS with whole-genome sequence data in Holstein–Friesian cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wilkinson S, Wiener P, Archibald AL, Law A, Schnabel RD, McKay SD, Taylor JF, Ogden R (2011) Evaluation of approaches for identifying population informative markers from high density SNP chips. BMC Genetics 12, 45
Evaluation of approaches for identifying population informative markers from high density SNP chips.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21569514PubMed |

Wray NR, Yang J, Hayes BJ, Price AL, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2013) Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nature Reviews Genetics 14, 507–515.
Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23774735PubMed |

Xu S (2003) Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect. Genetics 165, 2259–2268.
Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14704201PubMed |

Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, Madden PA, Heath AC, Martin NG, Montgomery GW (2010) Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature Genetics 42, 565–569.
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20562875PubMed |

Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM (2011) GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. The American Journal of Human Genetics 88, 76–82.
GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21167468PubMed |

Yoon H, Seo K, Kim S, Cho Y, Na S, Park C, Jeon G (2002) Estimation of genetic parameters for direct genetic effect for carcass traits of Hanwoo (Korean Brown cattle) steers. In ‘Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Vol. 2002, Session 2’, 19–23 August 2002, Montpellier, France. p. 2.89.