Substantial genetic gains in reducing breech flystrike and in improving productivity traits are achievable in Merino sheep by using index selection
F. D. Brien
A C , S. F. Walkom B , A. A. Swan B and D. J. Brown B
A Davies Livestock Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia.
B Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (a joint venture of the NSW Department of Primary Industries and University of New England), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: forbes.brien@adelaide.edu.au
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20248
Submitted: 22 April 2020 Accepted: 28 September 2020 Published online: 20 October 2020
Journal Compilation © CSIRO 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND
Abstract
Context: The availability of effective indirect rather than direct selection criteria for genetically reducing breech flystrike is crucial for the Australian wool industry, as expression of breech flystrike is routinely suppressed by management interventions to minimise the risks to sheep health, welfare and productivity. Understanding how much genetic gain can be made in reducing breech strike, while also selecting for other key traits is important in choosing breeding objectives, particularly for Merino genetic improvement programs.
Aims: We predicted genetic gains from within-flock selection to reduce breech flystrike incidence (FS) and improve productivity under a range of scenarios that all used indirect selection criteria in the genetic evaluation of FS.
Methods: Three breeding objectives were modelled, by adding FS as a trait to the breeding objective for the Dual Purpose Plus (DP+), Fibre Production Plus (FP+) and Merino Production Plus (MP+) indexes available from MERINOSELECT. A large range of economic values were examined for FS, from 0 to –$240/strike.sheep per year in $20 increments. For all scenarios, full records of productivity traits and pedigree information were assumed to be available for use as selection criteria, as well as records of breech wrinkle, dag and breech cover scores. Predictions were conducted for scenarios assuming (a) moderate heritability for FS (b) low heritability for FS, and (c) low heritability for FS, but higher heritability for dag score than assumed for scenarios (a) and (b).
Key results: After 10 years of selection, under assumption (a) predicted genetic gains in FS ranged from 0, up to maximum reductions of 0.19, 0.21, and 0.20/strike.sheep per year from use of the FP+FS, MP+FS and DP+FS indexes, respectively. Under assumption (b) predictions of genetic gain for FS were considerably lower and ranged from 0 to maximum reductions of 0.04, 0.06 and 0.06/strike.sheep per year based on use of FP+FS, MP+FS and DP+FS indexes, respectively. Under assumption (c), predicted genetic gains in FS were very similar to those under assumption (b). When 70% of the maximum gains in FS studied were targeted, from 70% to 93% of genetic gains in the overall index (excluding FS) were predicted to be retained when FS had moderate heritability, and from 85% to 95% when FS had low heritability.
Conclusions and implications: There is a practical range of economic values for FS (from –$60 to –$80/strike.sheep per year for MP+FS and DP+FS indexes and –$60 to –$140/strike.sheep per year for a FP+FS index when the heritability of FS is moderate and –$100 to –$200/strike.sheep per year for a MP+FS index and –$140 to –$240/strike.sheep per year for FP+FS and DP+FS indexes when the heritability of FS is low), that could be used in breeding programs to genetically reduce FS, while retaining competitive levels of genetic gains for other important traits. Reduction of FS is achievable to low levels, after 10–20 years of index selection, similar to levels achieved by mulesing (0.01/strike.sheep per year in average seasonal conditions).
Keywords: breech, breech cover, breech indicator traits, breech wrinkle, dag score, flystrike, heritability, indirect selection, Merino, MERINOSELECT indexes, sheep.
References
Atkins KD (1987) Resistance to fleece rot and body strike: its role in a breeding objective for Merino sheep. In ‘Proceedings of the Sheep Blowfly and Flystrike Management Workshop’, Trangie, NSW, Department of Agriculture, pp. 3.1–3.7.AWI (2019) 2017 Merino Husbandry Practices Survey. Available at https://www.wool.com/globalassets/wool/sheep/research-publications/welfare/surveys/2017-awi-merino-husbandry-practices-survey-website-version.pdf [Verified 23 January 2020]
Bird-Gardiner TL, Brown DJ, Smith JL, Mortimer SI, Refshauge G (2013) Inheritance of flystrike recorded in a non-seasonal rainfall environment. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 20, 183–186.
Bird-Gardiner TL, Brown DJ, Smith JL, Mortimer SI, Refshauge G (2014) Breech strike indicator traits for Merino sheep in non-seasonal rainfall environments. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production’, Vancouver, Canada. Communication 891. (World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). Available at http://www.wcgalp.org/proceedings/2014/breech-strike-indicator-traits-merino-sheep-non-seasonal-rainfall-environments [Verified 7 October 2020]
Blackman N (2005) Mulesing of sheep in Australia – a global issue. Australian Veterinary Journal 83, 456
| Mulesing of sheep in Australia – a global issue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16119415PubMed |
Brien FD, Walkom SF, Swan AA, Brown DJ (2019) Breeding for reduced breech flystrike as part of multi-trait selection. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 23, 528–531.
Brown DJ, Swan AA (2016) Genetic importance of fat and eye muscle depth in Merino breeding programs. Animal Production Science 56, 690–697.
| Genetic importance of fat and eye muscle depth in Merino breeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown DJ, Swan AA, Gill JS (2010) Within- and across-flock genetic relationships for breech flystrike resistance indicator traits. Animal Production Science 50, 1060–1068.
| Within- and across-flock genetic relationships for breech flystrike resistance indicator traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bulmer MG (1971) Effect of selection on genetic variability. American Naturalist 105, 201–211.
| Effect of selection on genetic variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dominik S (2019) Genotyping of breech flystrike resource – update. Final Report of Project ON-00515. Australian Wool Innovation. July 2019. Available at https://www.wool.com/globalassets/wool/sheep/research -publicationswelfare/flystrike-research-update/on515-project-final-report-genotyping-of-breech-flystrike-resource-for-publication.pdf [Verified 29 August 2019]
Dun RB (1964) Skins folds and Merino breeding. 1. The net reproductive rates of flocks selected for and against skin fold. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 4, 376–385.
| Skins folds and Merino breeding. 1. The net reproductive rates of flocks selected for and against skin fold.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dun RB, Hamilton BA (1965) Skin folds and Merino breeding. 2. The relative influence of the ram and ewe on fertility and perinatal lamb mortality in flocks selected for and against skin fold. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 5, 236–242.
| Skin folds and Merino breeding. 2. The relative influence of the ram and ewe on fertility and perinatal lamb mortality in flocks selected for and against skin fold.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greeff JC, Karlsson LJE (2009) Opportunities to breed for resistance to breech strike in Merino sheep in a Mediterranean environment. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18, 272–278.
Greeff JC, Karlson J, Schlink AC, Stanwyck N, Underwood N (2012) Breed more robust sheep – less effort. Agribusiness Sheep Updates, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA.
Greeff JC, Karlsson LJE, Schlink AC (2014) Identifying indicator traits for breech strike in Merino sheep in a Mediterranean environment. Animal Production Science 54, 125–140.
| Identifying indicator traits for breech strike in Merino sheep in a Mediterranean environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greeff J, Karlsson J, Schlink AC, Stanwyck N, O’Neal R, Windsor A, Bell S (2016) Final Report to Australian Wool Innovation Ltd. Project ON-00169. Breeding for breech flystrike resistance. Phase 2. Department of Agriculture and Food WA, South Perth. Available at https://www.wool.com/globalassets/wool/sheep/research-publications/welfare/breeding/200826-on-169-dafwa-breeding-project-final-report—pub-app.pdf [Verified 28 August 2020]
Greeff JC, Karlsson LJE, Schlink AC, Gilmour AR (2018a) Factors explaining the incidence of breech strike in a Mediterranean environment in unmulesed and uncrutched Merino sheep. Animal Production Science 58, 1279–1288.
| Factors explaining the incidence of breech strike in a Mediterranean environment in unmulesed and uncrutched Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greeff JC, Schlink AC, Karlsson LJE (2018b) Impact of sire on the lifetime susceptibility of their progeny to breech strike in a Mediterranean environment. Animal Production Science 58, 1522–1530.
| Impact of sire on the lifetime susceptibility of their progeny to breech strike in a Mediterranean environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greeff JC, Karlsson LJE, Schlink AC (2019) Are breech strike, dags and breech wrinkle genetically the same trait in crutched, uncrutched and mulesed Merino sheep? Animal Production Science 59, 1777–1782.
| Are breech strike, dags and breech wrinkle genetically the same trait in crutched, uncrutched and mulesed Merino sheep?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hatcher S, Preston JWV (2017) Phenotypic relationships of breech cover, wrinkle and wool coverage scores with key production traits and their implications for Australian Merino sheep management to reduce flystrike. Small Ruminant Research 157, 47–53.
| Phenotypic relationships of breech cover, wrinkle and wool coverage scores with key production traits and their implications for Australian Merino sheep management to reduce flystrike.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hatcher S, Preston JWV (2018) Genetic relationships of breech cover, wrinkle and wool coverage scores with key production traits in Australian Merino sheep. Small Ruminant Research 164, 48–57.
| Genetic relationships of breech cover, wrinkle and wool coverage scores with key production traits in Australian Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
James PJ (2006) Genetic alternatives to mulesing and tail docking in sheep: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1–18.
| Genetic alternatives to mulesing and tail docking in sheep: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lane J, Jubb T, Shephard R, Webb-Ware J, Fordyce G (2015) Priority list of endemic diseases for the red meat industries. Final report of project B.AHE.0010, Meat & Livestock Australia, North Sydney.
Lloyd J (2012) Tail length in unmulesed Australian Merino sheep. Report for Australian Wool Innovation, December 2012. Project Number WP599.
Matebesi-Ranthimo PAM, Cloete SWP, van Wyk JB, Olivier JJ (2018) Relationship of ewe reproduction with subjectively assessed wool and conformation traits in the Elsenburg Merino flock. South African Journal of Animal Science 48, 29–38.
| Relationship of ewe reproduction with subjectively assessed wool and conformation traits in the Elsenburg Merino flock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ponzoni RW (1984) The importance of resistance to fleece rot and body strike in the breeding objective of Australian Merino sheep. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 32, 33–40.
Richards JS, Atkins KD (2010) Will genetics offer a permanent solution to breech strike? Animal Production Science 50, 1053–1059.
| Will genetics offer a permanent solution to breech strike?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rutten MJM, Bijma P, Woolliams JA, van Arendonk JAM (2002) SelAction: Software to predict selection response and rate of inbreeding in livestock breeding programs. The Journal of Heredity 93, 456–458.
| SelAction: Software to predict selection response and rate of inbreeding in livestock breeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sheep Genetics (2019) MERINOSELECT indexes. A ram breeder’s guide. http://www.sheepgenetics.org.au/Resources/Brochures-and-fact-sheets [Verified 17 March 2020]
Smith J (2016) Breeding for breech flystrike resistance, Phase 3 CSIRO. Project Final Report to Australian Wool Innovation Ltd. Project No. ON-00169 (WP.639). Available at https://www.wool.com/globalassets/wool/sheep/research-publications/welfare/breeding/200826-on-169-csiro-breeding-project-final-report—pub-app.pdf [Verified 28 August 2020]
Smith DH, Safari E, Brien FD, Jaensch KS, Grimson RJ (2009a) The relationships between crutch cover score and production and easy care traits in Merino sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18, 338–341.
Smith J, Brewer H, Dyall T (2009b) Heritability and phenotypic correlations for breech strike and breech strike resistance indicators in Merinos. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18, 334–337.
Turner HN, Young SSY (1969) ‘Quantitative genetics in sheep breeding.’ (Macmillan Australia: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Walkom SF, Brown DJ (2014) Breeding for resilience and resistance in Merino sheep. In ‘Breeding focus 2014 – improving resilience’. (Eds S Hermesch, S Dominik) pp. 141–154. (Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England: Armidale, NSW, Australia). Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268632531_Breeding_Focus_2014_-_Improving_Resilience [Verified 20 August 2020]
