Predicting metabolisable energy intake by free-ranging cattle using multiple short-term breath samples and applied to a pasture case-study
R. M. Herd
A B F , P. F. Arthur C , R. S. Hegarty B , T. Bird-Gardiner D , K. A. Donoghue D and J. I. Velazco E
A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Livestock Industry Centre, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C NSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia.
D NSW Department of Primary Industries, Agricultural Research Centre, Trangie, NSW 2823, Australia.
E National Institute of Agricultural Research, Treinta y Tres 33000, Uruguay.
F Corresponding author. Email: robert.herd@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20162
Submitted: 3 April 2020 Accepted: 11 October 2020 Published online: 4 November 2020
Abstract
Context: Research into improving feed efficiency by ruminant animals grazing pastures has historically been restrained by an inability to measure feed intake by large numbers of individual animals. Recent advances in portable breath measurement technology could be useful for this purpose but methodologies need to be developed.
Aims: To evaluate predictive models for metabolisable energy intake (MEI) by free-ranging cattle using multiple short-term breath samples and then apply these to predict MEI by free-ranging cattle in a historic grazing experiment with cattle genetically divergent for residual feed intake (feed efficiency).
Methods: Predictive models for MEI were developed using bodyweight (BW) data, and carbon dioxide production rate (CPR) and methane production rate (MPR) from multiple short-term breath measurements, from an experiment with long-fed Angus steers on a grain-based diet, and an experiment with short-fed Angus heifers on a roughage diet. Heat production was calculated using CPR and MPR. Energy retained (ER) in body tissue gain by steers was calculated from BW, ADG, initial and final subcutaneous fat depths, and for both groups using feeding-standards equations.
Key results: Metabolic mid-test BW (MBW) explained 49 and 47% of the variation in MEI in the steer and heifer experiment, respectively, and for the steers adding ADG and then subcutaneous fat gain resulted in the models accounting for 60 and then 65% of the variation in MEI. In the steer experiment, MBW with CPR explained 57% of the variation in MEI, and including MPR did not account for any additional variation. In the heifer experiment, MBW with CPR explained 50%, and with MPR accounted for 52% of the variation in MEI. Heat production plus ER explained 60, 35 and 85% of the variation in MEI in the steer and the heifer experiments, and in the pooled data from both experiments, respectively.
Conclusions: Multiple short-term breath measurements, together simple BW data, can be used to predict MEI by free-ranging cattle in studies in which animals do not have feed-intake or ADG recorded.
Implications: This methodology can be used for research into improving feed efficiency by farm animals grazing pastures.
Keywords: average daily gain, carbon dioxide, feed efficiency, feed intake, grazing, metabolisable energy intake, methane, methane production rate, oxygen, pasture.
References
Arthur PF, Barchia IM, Weber C, Bird-Gardiner T, Donoghue KA, Herd RM, Hegarty RF (2017) Optimizing test procedures for estimating daily methane and carbon dioxide emissions in cattle using short-term breath measures. Journal of Animal Science 95, 645–656.| Optimizing test procedures for estimating daily methane and carbon dioxide emissions in cattle using short-term breath measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28380597PubMed |
Arthur PF, Bird-Gardiner T, Barchia IM, Donoghue KA, Herd RM (2018) Relationships among carbon dioxide, feed intake and feed efficiency traits in ad libitum fed beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 96, 4859–4867.
| Relationships among carbon dioxide, feed intake and feed efficiency traits in ad libitum fed beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30060045PubMed |
Bird-Gardiner T, Arthur PF, Barchia IM, Donoghue KA, Herd RM (2017) Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 95, 4391–4398.
| Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29108054PubMed |
Brouwer E (1965) Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In ‘Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on energy metabolism’. (Ed. K Blaxter) p 441–443. (Academic Press: London)
Burrus C, Gunter SA, Sanson DW, Moffet CA, Gregorini P (2018) Using carbon emissions, oxygen consumption, and energy retention to estimate dietary me intake by beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 96, 79
| Using carbon emissions, oxygen consumption, and energy retention to estimate dietary me intake by beef steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Caetano M, Wilkes MJ, Pitchford WS, Lee SJ, Hynd PI (2018) Energy relations in cattle can be quantified using open-circuit gas-quantification systems. Animal Production Science 58, 1807–1813.
| Energy relations in cattle can be quantified using open-circuit gas-quantification systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doreau M, Arbre M, Eugène M, Lascoux C, Rochette Y, Martin C (2018) Comparison of 3 methods for estimating enteric methane and carbon dioxide emission in nonlactating cows. Journal of Animal Science 96, 1559–1569.
| Comparison of 3 methods for estimating enteric methane and carbon dioxide emission in nonlactating cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29471429PubMed |
Gunter SA, Beck MR (2018) Measuring the respiratory gas exchange by grazing cattle using an automated, open-circuit gas quantification system. Translational Animal Science 2, 11–18.
| Measuring the respiratory gas exchange by grazing cattle using an automated, open-circuit gas quantification system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32704685PubMed |
Gunter SA, Bradford JA (2017) Technical note: effect of bait delivery interval in an automated head-chamber system on respiration gas estimates when cattle are grazing rangeland. The Professional Animal Scientist 33, 490–497.
| Technical note: effect of bait delivery interval in an automated head-chamber system on respiration gas estimates when cattle are grazing rangeland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hebart ML, Accioly JM, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Herd RM, Jones FM, Laurence M, Lee SJ, Lines DS, Speijers EJ, Walmsley BJ, Pitchford WS (2018) Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 5. Cow genotype affects feed efficiency and maternal productivity. Animal Production Science 58, 80–93.
| Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 5. Cow genotype affects feed efficiency and maternal productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herd RM, Pitchford WS (2011) Residual feed intake selection makes cattle leaner and more efficient. Engormix.com Published 31 August 2011. Available at http://en.engormix.com/MA-dairy-cattle/nutrition/articles/feed-efficiency-in-cattle-t1732/141-p0.htm [Verified 20 October 2020].
Herd RM, Velazco JI, Smith H, Arthur PF, Hine B, Oddy H, Dobos RC, Hegarty RS (2019) Genetic variation in residual feed intake is associated with body composition, behavior, rumen, heat production, hematology, and immune competence traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 97, 2202–2219.
| Genetic variation in residual feed intake is associated with body composition, behavior, rumen, heat production, hematology, and immune competence traits in Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30789654PubMed |
Johnson DE, Hill TM, Ward GM, Johnson KA, Branine ME, Carmean BR, Lowman DW (1995) Ruminants and other animals. In ‘Atmospheric methane: sources, sinks and role in global change’. (Ed. MAK Khalil) p. 199–229. (Springer-Verlag, New York, NY)
Pereira ABD, Utsumi SA, Dorich CD, Brito AF (2015) Integrating spot short-term measurements of carbon emissions and backward dietary energy partition calculations to estimate intake in lactating dairy cows fed ad libitum or restricted. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 8913–8925.
| Integrating spot short-term measurements of carbon emissions and backward dietary energy partition calculations to estimate intake in lactating dairy cows fed ad libitum or restricted.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Renand G, Vinet A, Decruyenaere V, Maupetit D, Dozias D (2019) Methane and carbon dioxide emission of beef heifers in relation with growth and feed efficiency. Animals 9, 1136
| Methane and carbon dioxide emission of beef heifers in relation with growth and feed efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
SAS (2012) ‘SAS STAT software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows.’ (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC)
SCA (2007). ‘Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
Velazco JI, Mayer DG, Zimmerman S, Hegarty RS (2016) Use of short-term breath measures to estimate daily methane production by cattle. Animal 10, 25–33.
| Use of short-term breath measures to estimate daily methane production by cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26303821PubMed |
Velazco JI, Herd RM, Cottle DJ, Hegarty RS (2017) Daily methane emissions and emission intensity of grazing beef cattle genetically divergent for residual feed intake. Animal Production Science 57, 627–635.
| Daily methane emissions and emission intensity of grazing beef cattle genetically divergent for residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
