Automated feeding of sheep. 1. Changes in feeding behaviour in response to restricted and ad libitum feeding
R. Behrendt
A D , S. K. Muir A , M. Moniruzzaman B , G. Kearney C and M. I. Knight A
A Agriculture Victoria, 915 Mount Napier Road, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.
B Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.
C 36 Paynes Road, Hamilton, Vic. 3300, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: ralph.behrendt@agriculture.vic.gov.au
Animal Production Science 61(3) 246-255 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20146
Submitted: 12 March 2020 Accepted: 4 August 2020 Published: 14 September 2020
Abstract
Context: Automated feeding units allow the recording of individual feeding behaviour of group-housed sheep and provide data for research into feed efficiency.
Aim: It was hypothesised that measures of feeding behaviour such as the number of non-feeding events, meal size, eating rate and meal duration would change under different levels of feeding.
Method: Maternal Composite ewes (n = 126, 18 per pen) were fed a hay-based pellet using automated feeding units (2 per pen) for four periods differing in total daily feed allowance (kg/day) and meal allowance (g/meal). Sheep were initially fed ad libitum (meal allowance ~1000 g) for 19 days during an adaptation period, before restricted feeding for 41 days at daily allowances of 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%, 140% and 180% of estimated maintenance requirements, with a meal allowance of ~100 g. These restricted daily allowances were the experimental treatments that were randomly applied to sheep and replicated three times per pen. The daily allowance was then adjusted to 1.4 kg/day (with a ~200 g meal allowance) for all sheep over 5 days, before ad libitum feeding of all sheep for a period of 16 days. All feeding and non-feeding events were recorded.
Key results: Under restricted feeding, sheep altered the timing of their meals to consume more meals during the early morning after daily allowances were reset at 0000 hours. This change was more pronounced for sheep fed a smaller proportion of maintenance. The number of non-feeding events (~8/day) was not affected by the level of restricted feeding, but meal size was smaller, meal duration was longer and eating rate was lower for sheep fed 40% of their maintenance requirement. Under ad libitum feeding, sheep reverted to a preferred meal size and number of meals, with fewer than two non-feeding events per day, but differences in eating rate remained.
Conclusions: Sheep feeding behaviours adapt and respond quickly to changes in daily allowance and offered meal size, but the similar number of non-feeding events at different proportions of maintenance feeding suggest that non-feeding events may not reflect levels of hunger.
Implications: Our observations suggest that sheep are capable of learning and adapting to different levels of feeding and that this may allow for automated feeding systems to supplementary feed larger numbers of sheep under extensive situations.
Additional keywords: allowance, eating rate, feed intake, maintenance, meal size, restriction.
References
AFIA – Laboratory Methods Manual (2014) ‘A reference manual of standard methods for the analysis of fodder.’ Version 8, April 2014. Publication no. 03/001. Australian Fodder Industry Association Limited, Melbourne.Bowman JGP, Sowell (1997) Delivery method and supplement consumption by grazing ruminants: a review. Journal of Animal Science 75, 543–550.
| Delivery method and supplement consumption by grazing ruminants: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CSIRO (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Ruminants.’ (CSIRO Australia: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)
CSIRO (2012) ‘ME required CSIRO plant industry.’ Available at https://grazplan.csiro.au/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/ME_Required.xls [Verified 27 July 2020]
D’Eath RB, Tolkamp BJ, Kyriazakis I, Lawrence AB (2009) ‘Freedom from hunger’ and preventing obesity: the animal welfare implications of reducing food quantity or quality. Animal Behaviour 77, 275–288.
De Paula Vieira A, Guesdon V, de Passillé AM, Gräfin von Keyserlingk MA, Weary DM (2008) Behavioural indicators of hunger in dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109, 180–189.
| Behavioural indicators of hunger in dairy calves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (1997) GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises. II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77–126.
| GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises. II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Friggens NC, Nielsen BL, Kyriazakis I, Tolkamp BJ, Emmans GC (1998) Effects of feed composition and stage of lactation on the short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 3268–3277.
| Effects of feed composition and stage of lactation on the short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 9891272PubMed |
Galvani DB, Pires CC, Wommer TP, Oliveira F, Santos MF (2010) Chewing patterns and digestion in sheep submitted to feed restriction. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 94, e366–e373.
| Chewing patterns and digestion in sheep submitted to feed restriction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20662966PubMed |
Ginane C, Bonnet M, Baumont R, Revell DK (2015) Feeding behaviour in ruminants: a consequence of interactions between a reward system and the regulation of metabolic homeostasis. Animal Production Science 55, 247–260.
| Feeding behaviour in ruminants: a consequence of interactions between a reward system and the regulation of metabolic homeostasis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Iason GR, Mantecon AR, Sim DA, Gonzalez J, Foreman E, Bermudez FF, Elston DA (1999) Can grazing sheep compensate for a daily foraging time constraint? Journal of Animal Ecology 68, 87–93.
| Can grazing sheep compensate for a daily foraging time constraint?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jefferies BC (1961) Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32, 19–21.
Jensen MB (2006) Computer-controlled milk feeding of group-housed calves: the effect of milk allowance and weaning type. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 201–206.
| Computer-controlled milk feeding of group-housed calves: the effect of milk allowance and weaning type.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16357283PubMed |
Jorgensen GHM, Boe KE (2014) Initial experiments with an electronic feeding station for ewes. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A: Animal Science 64, 253–259.
| Initial experiments with an electronic feeding station for ewes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Macleay C, Blumer S, Hancock S, Inglis L, Paganoni B, Rose G, Thompson AN (2016) Feed intake for sheep can be measured precisely in less than 35 days. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production’, 4–7 July 2016, Adelaide, 222–223.
Muir SK, Linden NP, Kennedy A, Calder G, Kearney G, Roberts R, Knight MI, Behrendt R (2020) Technical note: validation of an automated feeding system for measuring individual animal feed intake in sheep housed in groups. Translational Animal Science 4, 1006–1016.
| Technical note: validation of an automated feeding system for measuring individual animal feed intake in sheep housed in groups.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Muir SK, Linden N, Knight M, Behrendt R, Kearney G (2018) Sheep residual feed intake and feeding behaviour: are ‘nibblers’ or ‘binge eaters’ more efficient? Animal Production Science 58, 1459–1464.
| Sheep residual feed intake and feeding behaviour: are ‘nibblers’ or ‘binge eaters’ more efficient?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) ‘Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes.’ 8th edn. (Australian Government, National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra, ACT, Australia)
Newman JA, Penning PD, Parsons AJ, Harvey A, Orr RJ (1994) Fasting affects intake behaviour and diet preference of grazing sheep. Animal Behaviour 47, 185–193.
| Fasting affects intake behaviour and diet preference of grazing sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nielsen BL (1999) On the interpretation of feeding behaviour measures and the use of feeding rate as an indicator of social constraint. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 79–91.
| On the interpretation of feeding behaviour measures and the use of feeding rate as an indicator of social constraint.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sibbald A (1997) The effect of body condition on the feeding behaviour of sheep with different times or access to food. Animal Science 64, 239–246.
| The effect of body condition on the feeding behaviour of sheep with different times or access to food.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Verbeek E, Waas JR, McLeay L, Matthews LR (2011) Measurement of feeding motivation in sheep and the effects of food restriction. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 132, 121–130.
| Measurement of feeding motivation in sheep and the effects of food restriction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Verbyla AP, Cullis BR, Kenward MG, Welham SJ (1999) The analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data by using smoothing splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C. Applied Statistics 48, 269–311.
| The analysis of designed experiments and longitudinal data by using smoothing splines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
