Defining the primary business measure of liveweight production for beef cows in northern Australia
Geoffry Fordyce
A E , Tamsin S. Barnes B , Michael R. McGowan B , Nigel R. Perkins B , David R. Smith C and Kieren D. McCosker D
A The University of Queensland, Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Carmody Road, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
B The University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Warrego Highway, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.
C Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, PO Box 976, Charters Towers, Qld 4820, Australia.
D Department of Primary Industry and Resources, PO Box 1346, Katherine, NT 0851, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: g.fordyce@uq.edu.au
Animal Production Science - https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20096
Submitted: 12 March 2020 Accepted: 27 August 2020 Published online: 19 April 2021
Abstract
Context: Annual liveweight production of a cow is the sum of the weight of its calf at weaning and its own annual liveweight change. Along with value per kg, annual liveweight production constitutes the business income contributed by the animal; however, it is not well described for north Australian beef herds.
Aims: This study aimed to quantify cow liveweight production and to measure impacts of reproduction and other risk factors.
Methods: Liveweight production data from 2122 Brahman and tropically adapted composite cows aged 2.5–8.5 years and grazing the four primary country types in northern Australia were analysed as a function of current and previous mating outcomes, mating age, breed, hip height, and body condition or liveweight.
Key results: Cow liveweight production was highly variable (coefficient of variation 40%) among and within years. Liveweight production of cows averaged 154 kg/year from their first mating, 168 kg/year from their second, and 190 kg/year from subsequent matings; however, production efficiency remained constant, with a liveweight production ratio of 0.31–0.32 kg produced annually per kg of grazing animal. Within environment, average weaner production (kg/cow) approximated the estimated average annual weight gain of yearling cattle. Weight of calves weaned contributed ~87% of annual liveweight production. Liveweight production averaged 103–143 kg higher for cows that weaned a calf than those that lost a calf, with the effect greater in older cows (P < 0.001). Liveweight production averaged 39–43 kg higher for non-pregnant cows than those that lost a calf (P < 0.001). These effects were attenuated by ~20% over a lifetime. Cows weaning a calf from a previous mating had liveweight production 57–85 kg higher (P < 0.001) than those not weaning a calf, having begun the year in poorer condition because of lactation. Calf weaning weight was 25 kg higher in mature cows than in first- and second-lactation cows. Liveweight production advantages of tropical composites over Brahmans appeared primarily associated with consistently higher calf weaning weights, and higher cow growth during their first reproductive year.
Conclusions: This research successfully demonstrated the concept of liveweight production in breeding beef cows, showing it to be primarily governed by available nutrition and mating outcome.
Implications: These findings provide a previously unavailable reference point for beef-systems management in northern Australia; for example, liveweight production could be used to determine the potential achievable increases in cow performance for a specific nutritional environment.
Keywords: body condition score, Brahman cross, calf loss, non-pregnancy, production, reproduction, tropical cattle, tropical pasture.
References
Arthur PF, Herd RM, Wilkins JF, Archer JA (2005) Maternal productivity of Angus cows divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 985–993.| Maternal productivity of Angus cows divergently selected for post-weaning residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Barwick SA, Johnston DJ, Burrow HM, Holroyd RG, Fordyce G, Wolcott ML, Sim WD, Sullivan MT (2009) Genetics of heifers performance in ‘wet’ and dry’ seasons and their relationships with steer performance in two tropical beef genotypes. Animal Production Science 49, 367–382.
| Genetics of heifers performance in ‘wet’ and dry’ seasons and their relationships with steer performance in two tropical beef genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Behrendt K, Weeks P (2017) How are global and Australian beef producers performing? Global agri benchmark network results 2016. Market Information Report. Meat & Livestock Australia, Sydney. Available at https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/11913560/mla_agribenchmark_sheepmeat_results_report_jan_2017.pdf [Verified 3 September 2020]
Bortolussi G, McIvor JG, Hodgkinson JJ, Coffey SG, Holmes CR (2005a) The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 2. Breeding herd performance and management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1075–1091.
| The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 2. Breeding herd performance and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bortolussi G, McIvor JG, Hodgkinson JJ, Coffey SG, Holmes CR (2005b) The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 3. Annual liveweight gains from pasture based systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1093–1108.
| The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 3. Annual liveweight gains from pasture based systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bunter KL, Johnston DJ, Wolcott ML, Fordyce G (2013) Factors associated with calf mortality in tropically adapted beef breeds managed in extensive Australian production systems. Animal Production Science 54, 25–36.
| Factors associated with calf mortality in tropically adapted beef breeds managed in extensive Australian production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dohoo I, Martin W, Stryhn H (2009) Veterinary epidemiologic research. VERInc, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada. Available at https://www.islandscholar.ca/islandora/object/ir:ir-batch6-2657/DC/Default%20Dublin%20Core%20Record [Verified 3 September 2020]
Fordyce G, Chandra K (2017) Growth of Brahman cross heifers to 2 years of age in the dry tropics. Animal Production Science 59, 148–159.
| Growth of Brahman cross heifers to 2 years of age in the dry tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fordyce G, Tyler R, Anderson VJ (1990) Effect of reproductive status, body condition and age of Bos indicus cross cows early in a drought on survival and subsequent reproductive performance. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 315–322.
| Effect of reproductive status, body condition and age of Bos indicus cross cows early in a drought on survival and subsequent reproductive performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fordyce G, Anderson A, McCosker KD, Williams PJ, Holroyd RG, Corbet NJ, Sullivan MS (2013) Liveweight prediction from hip height, condition score, fetal age and breed in tropical female cattle. Animal Production Science 53, 275–282.
| Liveweight prediction from hip height, condition score, fetal age and breed in tropical female cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gaden B (2005). Identifying live animal condition scores suitable for the Australian livestock export industry. Final Report, LIVE.120. Meat & Livestock Australia, Sydney. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/search-rd-reports/final-report-details/Live-Export/Identifying-live-animal-condition-scores-suitable-for-the-Australian-livestock-export-industry/612 [Verified 3 September 2020]
Henderson A, Perkins N, Banney S (2013) Determining property-level rates of breeder cow mortality in northern Australia. Final Report, B.NBP.0664. Meat & Livestock Australia Limited, Sydney. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/Research-and-development/Search-RD-reports/final-report-details/Productivity-On-Farm/Determining-property-level-rates-of-breeder-cow-mortality-in-northern-Australia-including-literature-review/438# [Verified 4 September 2020]
Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PJ, Corbet NJ, Grant T (2014) Genetics of early and lifetime annual reproductive performance in cows of two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 54, 1–15.
| Genetics of early and lifetime annual reproductive performance in cows of two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lubritz DL, Forrest K, Robison OW (1989) Age of cow and age of dam effects on milk production of Hereford cows. Journal of Animal Science 67, 2544–2549.
| Age of cow and age of dam effects on milk production of Hereford cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 2808160PubMed |
McBryde K, Pilkington R, Fordyce G, Smith D, Limburg N (2013) Measuring milk yield in beef cattle. In Proceedings of the northern beef research update conference’. 12–15 August 2013, Cairns, Qld. p. 177. (North Australia Beef Research Council) Available at http://www.nabrc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2013-NBRUC-Proceedings.pdf [Verified 3 September 2020]
McGowan MR, McCosker K, Fordyce G, Smith D, O’Rourke PK, Perkins N, Barnes T, Marquet L, Morton J, Newsome T, Menzies D, Burns BM, Jephcott S (2014) North Australian beef fertility project: Cash Cow. Final Report, B.NBP.0382. Meat & Livestock Australia, Sydney. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/search-rd-reports/final-report-details/Productivity-On-Farm/Northern-Australian-beef-fertility-project-CashCow/370 [Verified 3 September 2020]
McLean I, Holmes P, Counsell D (2014) The Northern beef report: 2013 Northern beef situation analysis. Final Report, B.COM.0348. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney. Available at https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/search-rd-reports/final-report-details/Productivity-On-Farm/The-Northern-beef-report-2013-Northern-beef-situation-analysis/234 [Verified 3 September 2020]
McLennan SR (2014) Optimising growth paths of beef cattle in northern Australia for increased profitability. Final Report, B.NBP.0391. Meat & Livestock Australia, Sydney. https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/search-rd-reports/final-report-details/Productivity-On-Farm/Optimising-growth-paths-of-beef-cattle-in-northern-Australia-for-increased-profitability/372 [Verified 3 September 2020]
O’Rourke PK, Entwistle KW, Arman C, Esdale CR, Burns BM (1991) Fetal development and gestational changes in Bos taurus and Bos indicus genotypes in the tropics. Theriogenology 36, 839–853.
| Fetal development and gestational changes in Bos taurus and Bos indicus genotypes in the tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16727053PubMed |
Smith DR, Fordyce G, Shaw KA, Smith PC, Laing AR (2001) Northern stocking rate demonstration. Project Report NHT.962011. National Heritage Trust, Canberra, ACT.
Textor J, Hardt J, Knüppel S (2011) DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiology 22, 745
| DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21811114PubMed |
Walmsley BJ, Lee SJ, Parnell PF, Pitchford WS (2018) A review of factors influencing key biological components of maternal productivity in temperate beef cattle. Animal Production Science 58, 1–19.
| A review of factors influencing key biological components of maternal productivity in temperate beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Westreich D, Greenland S (2013) The table 2 fallacy: presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients. American Journal of Epidemiology 177, 292–298.
| The table 2 fallacy: presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23371353PubMed |
