Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Innovation in an expanding market: Australian pork is not a commodity

E. P. Bittner A E , H. Ashman A , M. Hastie A , R. J. van Barneveld B , A. H. Hearn C , N. Thomson D and F. R. Dunshea A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B SunPork Group, Murarrie, Qld 4172, Australia.

C School of Languages and Linguistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

D School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: bittnere@unimelb.edu.au

Animal Production Science 57(12) 2339-2344 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17299
Submitted: 8 May 2017  Accepted: 31 July 2017   Published: 20 November 2017

Abstract

The growing Asian middle class, the proliferation of export markets and a more discerning domestic consumer base are creating new opportunities and challenges for the Australian pork industry. To fully capitalise on these opportunities and face these new challenges, the right questions need to be asked by the Australian pork industry. We need to know not only what our consumers want, but who our consumers are. The present paper aims to demonstrate that novel approaches to investigate consumer attitudes will be required, and it cannot be assumed that current productions systems, products and marketing strategies are optimal for the changing environment and the creation of new premium market opportunities. With new markets and new products come new consumers; identifying who those consumers are, the networks they operate within as food consumers, and what influences their purchasing decisions are the key to their adopting Australian pork as premium produce in a new global market.

Additional keywords: consumer-aided design, export, Kano model.


References

Anonymous (2014) ‘Chinese diaspora across the world: a general overview.’ (Academy for Cultural Diplomacy) Available at http://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/index.php?chinese-diaspora [Verified 5 June 2017]

Anonymous (2016) Number of monthly active twitter users worldwide from 1st quarter 2010 to 4th quarter 2016 (in millions). In ‘Statista, the statistics portal’. Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly-active-twitter-users/ [Verified 16 May 2017]

Anonymous (2017) Food boom restores towns’ hunger to succeed. In ‘The Australian’. Available at http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/food-boom-restores-towns-hunger-to-succeed/news-story/1970e609ae9b0d36b00f7ad9f255cdfe [Verified 17 May 2017]

Australian Pork Limited (APL) (2010) ‘Submission to the productivity commission inquiry into bilateral and regional trade agreements.’ (Australian Pork Ltd: Canberra)

Australian Pork Limited (APL) (2016) Australian Pork Limited annual report 2015–2016. Australian Pork Ltd, Canberra.

Berger C, Blauth R, Boger D, Bolster C, Burchill G, DuMouchel W, Pouliot F, Richter R, Rubinoff A, Shen D, Timko M, Walden D (1993) Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality Management Journal 4, 3–36.

Centre for International Economics (CIE) (2012) ‘Payoffs from R&D along the food value chain.’ (Centre for International Economics: Canberra)

Chen CC, Chuang MC (2008) Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design. International Journal of Production Economics 114, 667–681.
Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Costa AIA, Dekker M, Jongen WMF (2004) An overview of means-end theory: potential application in consumer-oriented food product design. Trends in Food Science and Technology 15, 403–415.
An overview of means-end theory: potential application in consumer-oriented food product design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjs1CntLk%3D&md5=2d2904fad3943f8a44b9955d363bf770CAS |

Covert A (2014) Gmail at 10: how Google dominated email. In ‘CNN Tech’. Available at http://money.cnn.com/2014/04/01/technology/gmail/ [Verified 01 May 2017]

Dans E (2016) Why can’t Twitter make money? In ‘Medium’. Available at https://medium.com/enrique-dans/why-cant-twitter-make-money-a6f3cc622926#.o8tbwsj8v [Verified 1 July 2017]

Hooker L (2016) How did Google become the world’s most valuable company? In ‘BBC news’. Available at http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35460398 [Verified 5 May 2017]

Kano N, Seraku N, Takahashi F, Tsuji S (1984) ‘Attractive quality and must-be quality’ Hinshitsu. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 14, 39–48.

Lopetcharat K, Beckley J (2012) Qualitative multivariate analysis. In ‘Toolbox: a field guide to consumer understanding and research’. (Eds J Beckley, D Paredes, K Lopetcharat) pp. 100–121. (John Wiley & Sons)

Patel N (2015) 90% of Startups fail: here’s what you need to know about the 10%. In ‘Forbes’. Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilpatel/2015/01/16/90-of-startups-will-fail-heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-10/#1056c5a66679 [Verified 17 May 2017]

Peel DS (2014) Opportunities and challenges in global pork and beef markets. In ‘Structural transitions in global agriculture’. (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City: Kansas City, KS)

Prescott J, Bell GA (1995) Cross-cultural determinants of food acceptability: recent research on sensory perceptions and preferences. Trends in Food Science & Technology 6, 201–205.
Cross-cultural determinants of food acceptability: recent research on sensory perceptions and preferences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXmslOjsbk%3D&md5=a2cd07af6841c7b91f564e5ec580e9f2CAS |

Satell G (2014) A look back at why blockbuster really failed and why it didn’t have to. In ‘Forbes’. Available at https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2014/09/05/a-look-back-at-why-blockbuster-really-failed-and-why-it-didnt-have-to/&refURL=&referrer=#5850a5a6261a [Verified 5 May 2017]

Sauerwein E, Bailom F, Matzler K, Hinterhuber HH (1996) The Kano model: how to delight your customers. In ‘Preprints. Vol. I of the IX’. pp. 313–327. (International Seminar on Production Economics: Innsbruck, Austria)

Schneider M, Sharma S (2014) China’s pork miracle? Agribusiness and development in China’s pork industry. Global meat complex: the China series. (Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy: Washington, DC)

Thompson C (2015) How the ‘Uber effect’ is changing work. In ‘CNBC’. Available at http://www.cnbc.com/2015/03/13/how-the-uber-effect-is-changing-work.html [Verified 20 May 2017]

Tontini G (2007) Integrating Kano model and QFD for designing new products. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 18, 599–612.
Integrating Kano model and QFD for designing new products.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Barneveld RJ (2013) OPINION: delivering science for maximum industry benefit: a commercial perspective on enhancing research outcomes for the pork industry. In ‘Manipulating pig production XIV’. (Eds JR Pluske, JM Pluske) pp. 21–29. (Australasian Pig Science Association: Melbourne)

van Wulfen G (2015) 10 ways to reduce the innovation failure rate. In ‘Enabling factors’. Available at http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2015/12/04/10-ways-to-reduce-the-innovation-failure-rate/ [Verified 1 June 2017]