Segmentation of Australian meat consumers on the basis of attitudes regarding farm animal welfare and the environmental impact of meat production
Lenka Malek A C , Wendy J. Umberger A and John Rolfe B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Centre for Global Food and Resources, Faculty of the Professions, The University of Adelaide, Level 6 NEXUS 10 Tower, 10 Pulteney Street, SA 5005, Australia.
B School of Business and Law, Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: lenka.malek@adelaide.edu.au
Animal Production Science 58(3) 424-434 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17058
Submitted: 2 February 2017 Accepted: 1 June 2017 Published: 4 August 2017
Abstract
While public concern over the welfare of farm animals is believed to have intensified across Australia in recent years, no empirical research has sought to examine and quantify the heterogeneity in farm animal-welfare (FAW) concerns among Australian meat consumers. The present study is the first to address this knowledge gap. Data were collected in 2015 by using a comprehensive online survey instrument completed by a representative sample of 1009 Australian meat consumers. Sample quotas were set for age, gender and location. Using these data, we were able to segment meat consumers according to their attitudes towards FAW and perceptions regarding the environmental impact of meat production. Six unique segments were identified and characterised by purchase behaviour, livestock-management knowledge, farming background and experience, beliefs regarding the consumer/farmer implications of improved FAW, influential information sources, participation in FAW-related activities and socio-demographic variables. Our findings showed that the majority of Australian meat consumers (70%) hold neutral views regarding FAW. However, there are two segments, termed ‘concerned-FAW’ (10%) and ‘anti-FAW’ (20%), which expressed strong views with respect to FAW. Overall, consumer knowledge regarding livestock-management practices was low across all segments, with only 11–42% of consumers indicating that they felt sufficiently informed about FAW. This insight into perceptions of FAW by different segments and the impact of meat production on the environment can assist the industry in developing targeted information campaigns to address consumer concerns and allow better-informed meat purchase decisions.
Additional keywords: credence attributes, cluster analysis, factor analysis, online survey.
References
Abdel-Khalek AM (2006) Measuring hapiness with a single-item scale. Social Behavior and Personality 34, 139–150.| Measuring hapiness with a single-item scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Australian Chicken Meat Federation Inc (2013) ‘Growing meat chickens.’ Available at http://www.chicken.org.au/page.php?id=6 [Verified September 2015]
Australian Pork Limited (2017) ‘Housing.’ Available at http://australianpork.com.au/industry-focus/animal-welfare/housing/ [Verified September 2015]
Boogaard B, Oosting S, Bock B (2006) Elements of societal perception of farm animal welfare: a quantitative study in The Netherlands. Livestock Science 104, 13–22.
| Elements of societal perception of farm animal welfare: a quantitative study in The Netherlands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bourdieu P (1984) ‘A social critique of the judgement of taste.’ (Traducido del Francés por R. Nice, Routledge: Londres)
Bowd AD, Bowd AC (1989) Attitudes toward the treatment of animals: a study of Christian groups in Australia. Anthrozoos 3, 20–24.
| Attitudes toward the treatment of animals: a study of Christian groups in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cattle Council of Australia (2013) ‘Pasturefed cattle assurance system audit checklist.’ Available at http://www.pcaspasturefed.com.au/assets/documents/PCAS-Auditor-Checklist-Producer-Guide-100513%20(1)%20(1).pdf [Verified September 2015]
Coleman G (2007 )
de Boer J, Hoogland CT, Boersema JJ (2007) Towards more sustainable food choices: value priorities and motivational orientations. Food Quality and Preference 18, 985–996.
| Towards more sustainable food choices: value priorities and motivational orientations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
de Jonge J, van Trijp HCM (2013) The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare. Poultry Science 92, 3080–3095.
| The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Department of Agriculture and Food (2016) ‘Best practice marking of lambs.’ Available at https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/management-reproduction/best-practice-marking-lambs [Verified September 2015]
Field A (2000) ‘Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows: advanced techniques for beginners (introducing statistical methods series).’ (SAGE Publications Ltd: London)
Fischer A, Langers F, Bednar-Friedl B, Geamana N, Skogen K (2011) Mental representations of animal and plant species in their social contexts: results from a survey across Europe. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31, 118–128.
| Mental representations of animal and plant species in their social contexts: results from a survey across Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frewer LJ, Kole A, Kroon , Van de Kroon SMA, de Lauwere C (2005) Consumer attitudes towards the development of animal-friendly husbandry systems. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 18, 345–367.
| Consumer attitudes towards the development of animal-friendly husbandry systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Georgy D, Mallery P (2001) ‘SPSS for windows, step by step: a simple guide and reference.’ (Allynand Bacon: Boston, MA)
Gliem RR, Gliem JA (2003) Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In ‘Midwest research-to-practice conference in adult, continuing, and community education’. pp. 82–88. (ScholarWorks, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis)
Herzog HA, Betchart NS, Pittman RB (1991) Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals. Anthrozoos 4, 184–191.
| Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hills AM (1993) The motivational bases of attitudes toward animals. Society & Animals 1, 111–128.
| The motivational bases of attitudes toward animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Humane Research Council (2014) ‘Animal tracker Australia: baseline survey results – June 2014.’ Available at https://www.voiceless.org.au/content/animal-tracker-australia-0 [Verified 3 October 2016]
Kellert SR (1989) Perceptions of animals in America. In ‘Perceptions of animals in American culture’. (Ed. RJ Hoage) pp. 5–24. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC)
Kellert SR (1996) ‘The value of life.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC)
Kendall HA, Lobao LM, Sharp JS (2006) Public concern with animal well‐being: pace, social structural location, and individual wxperience*. Rural Sociology 71, 399–428.
| Public concern with animal well‐being: pace, social structural location, and individual wxperience*.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kjærnes U (2007) ‘Attitudes of consumers, retailers and producers to farm animal welfare.’ (Eds U Kjærnes, M Miele, J Roex) (Cardiff University, School of City and Regional Planning: Cardiff, UK)
Lea E, Worsley A (2008) Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours. Appetite 50, 207–214.
| Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meat & Livestock Australia (2012) ‘About us: the environment and sustainability.’ Available at http://www.australian-meat.com/Foodservice/About_Us/Environment_and_Sustainability/ [Verified 20 October 2016]
Meuwissen MP, Van der Lans IA (2005) rade-offs between consumer concerns: an application for pork supply chains. Food Economics-Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C 2, 27–34.
Needham MD (2010) Value orientations toward coral reefs in recreation and tourism settings: a conceptual and measurement approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 18, 757–772.
| Value orientations toward coral reefs in recreation and tourism settings: a conceptual and measurement approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Osborne JW, Costello AB (2009) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review 12, 131–146.
Paul ES (2000) Empathy with animals and with humans: are they linked? Anthrozoos 13, 194–202.
| Empathy with animals and with humans: are they linked?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Paul E, Serpell J (1993) Childhood pet keeping and humane attitudes in young adulthood. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 2, 321–337.
Petrie C (2016) ‘Live export: a chronology.’ Law and bills digest section. Parliament of Australia, http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1617/Chronology/LiveExport#_ftn20
Robins RW, Hendin HM, Trzesniewski KH (2001) Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 151–161.
| Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the rosenberg self-esteem scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rozin P, Markwith M, Stoess C (1997) Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: the transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science 8, 67–73.
| Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: the transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schröder MJ, McEachern MG (2004) Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: a focus on animal welfare. International Journal of Consumer Studies 28, 168–177.
| Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: a focus on animal welfare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sheep Standards and Guidelines Writing Group (2013) ‘Sheep standards and guidelines: tail docking.’ Available at http://www.animalwelfarestandards.net.au/files/2011/05/Sheep-Tail-docking-discussion-paper-5. 3.13.pdf [Verified September 2015]
Signal TD, Taylor N (2006) Attitudes to animals in the animal protection community compared to a normative community sample. Society & Animals 14, 265–274.
| Attitudes to animals in the animal protection community compared to a normative community sample.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Signal TD, Taylor N (2007) Attitude to animals and empathy: comparing animal protection and general community samples. Anthrozoos 20, 125–130.
| Attitude to animals and empathy: comparing animal protection and general community samples.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS(2001) ‘Using multivariate statistics.’ (Allyn and Bacon: Needham Heights, MA)
Taylor N, Signal TD (2005) Empathy and attitudes to animals. Anthrozoos 18, 18–27.
| Empathy and attitudes to animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Te Velde H, Aarts N, Van Woerkum C (2002) Dealing with ambivalence: farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 15, 203–219.
| Dealing with ambivalence: farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens F (2007) Segmentation based on consumers’ perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 15, 91–107.
Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens FA (2008) Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livestock Science 116, 126–136.
| Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Worsley A, Lea E (2008) Consumer concerns about food and health: examination of general and specific relationships with personal values and demographics. British Food Journal 110, 1106–1118.
| Consumer concerns about food and health: examination of general and specific relationships with personal values and demographics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
