Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Prediction of the methane conversion factor (Ym) for dairy cows on the basis of national farm data

A. L. F. Hellwing A C , M. R. Weisbjerg A , M. Brask A , L. Alstrup A , M. Johansen A , L. Hymøller A , M. K. Larsen B and P. Lund A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, AU Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.

B Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, AU Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.

C Corresponding author. Email: annelouise.hellwing@anis.au.dk

Animal Production Science 56(3) 535-540 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15520
Submitted: 31 August 2015  Accepted: 2 December 2015   Published: 9 February 2016

Abstract

Methane constitutes a significant loss of feed gross energy in ruminants, and there is an ongoing struggle for identifying feed and animal characteristics feasible for documentation of National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. The aim of the current study was to develop a model that predicts the methane conversion factor (Ym, % of gross energy) for dairy cows on the basis of data obtained from a range of our respiration studies, and, subsequently, to use this model to predict Ym for Holstein and Jersey cows on the basis of compiled average national farm data on dry matter intake, yield of energy-corrected milk and dietary composition. In total, 183 observations were compiled, including 41 rations from 10 experiments with Holstein dairy cows where methane emission was measured by means of indirect calorimetry using the same experimental equipment. Two models were developed; one using dry matter intake and feed composition as variables, and one using yield of energy corrected milk and feed composition as variables. The methane conversion factor was significantly reduced with increased content of starch and fat in the ration, whereas neutral detergent fibre content surprisingly did not have a significant effect in any model. On the basis of compiled data from practical Danish farms, the predicted Ym for dairy cows was 6.02% and 5.98% of gross energy intake for Holstein and Jersey cows, respectively, in the model with dry matter intake and 6.13% and 6.00% for Holstein and Jersey cows, respectively, in the model with energy-corrected milk yield. In conclusion, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change default value for Ym of 6.5% overestimates. Ym for both Holstein and Jersey cows fed rations typically used in intensive dairy producing countries in northern Europe.

Additional keywords: CH4, dry matter intake, gross energy, Holstein, Jersey, methane.


References

Alstrup L, Hellwing ALF, Lund P, Weisbjerg MR (2015) Effect of fat supplementation and stage of lactation on methane production in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 207, 10–19.
Effect of fat supplementation and stage of lactation on methane production in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXpsVWrsr8%3D&md5=2ade35b3ad4282c5af4f31dd85835df1CAS |

Brask M, Lund P, Weisbjerg MR, Hellwing ALF, Poulsen M, Larsen MK, Hvelplund T (2013a) Methane production and digestion of different physical forms of rapeseed as fat supplements in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 2356–2365.
Methane production and digestion of different physical forms of rapeseed as fat supplements in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXis1Oktr0%3D&md5=6b9d350afa7ecb4256ade84cd6672c38CAS | 23415515PubMed |

Brask M, Lund P, Hellwing ALF, Poulsen M, Weisbjerg MR (2013b) Enteric methane production, digestibility and rumen fermentation in dairy cows fed different forages with and without rapeseed fat supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 184, 67–79.
Enteric methane production, digestibility and rumen fermentation in dairy cows fed different forages with and without rapeseed fat supplementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtV2rur%2FE&md5=39d929860725892dc680a5d7aad02ff0CAS |

Brask M, Weisbjerg MR, Hellwing ALF, Bannink A, Lund P (2015) Methane production and diurnal variation measured in dairy cows and predicted from fermentation pattern and nutrient or carbon flow. Animal 9, 1795–1806.
Methane production and diurnal variation measured in dairy cows and predicted from fermentation pattern and nutrient or carbon flow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhslWltLjM&md5=7341f7967e35165db8ce60f3a8a9eff1CAS | 26245140PubMed |

Danfær A (2005) Methane emissions from dairy cows. In ‘Evaluering af mulige tiltag til reduktion af landbrugets methanemissioner’. (Eds JE Olesen, H Jørgensen, A Danfær, S Gyldenkærne, MH Mikkelsen, WAH Asmon, SO Petersen) pp. 12–24. Arbejdsrapport fra miljøstyrelsen no 11/2005. Available at http://www.miljoestyrelsen.dk/udgiv/publikationer/2005/87-7614-699-5/pdf/87-7614-700-2.pdf [Verified November 2015]

Grainger C, Beauchemin KA (2011) Can enteric methane production from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 302–320.

Hatew B, Podesta SC, Van Laar H, Pellikaan WF, Ellis JL, Dijkstra J, Bannink A (2015) Effects of dietary starch content and rate of fermentation on methane production in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 486–499.
Effects of dietary starch content and rate of fermentation on methane production in lactating dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhvFShtL7P&md5=86d675e9b0f148f2a28eb66c3483dd29CAS | 25465630PubMed |

Hellwing ALF, Lund P, Weisbjerg MR, Brask M, Hvelplund T (2012) Technical note: test of a low-cost and animal-friendly system for measuring methane emissions from dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6077–6085.
Technical note: test of a low-cost and animal-friendly system for measuring methane emissions from dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsVCns7bN&md5=e7f8f9b1a911e9a6fa50bfe28f531b84CAS |

Hellwing ALF, Brask M, Lund P, Weisbjerg MR (2013a) Effect of carbohydrate source and rumen pH on enteric methane from dairy cows. In ‘Emissions of gas and dust from livestock’. (Eds M Hassouna, N Guingand) pp. 206–208. (INRA: Rennes Cedex, France)

Hellwing ALF, Larsen M, Weisbjerg MR (2013b) Ruminal and intestinal starch digestibility of rolled and NaOH treated rye in dairy cows. In ‘Book of abstracts of the 64th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production. Vol. 19’. p. 421. (Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Hellwing ALF, Weisbjerg MR, Møller HB (2014) Enteric and manure-derived methane emissions and biogas yield of slurry from dairy cows fed grass silage or maize silage with and without supplementation of rapeseed. Livestock Science 165, 189–199.
Enteric and manure-derived methane emissions and biogas yield of slurry from dairy cows fed grass silage or maize silage with and without supplementation of rapeseed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hymøller L, Hellwing ALF, Lund P, Weisbjerg MR (2014) Milk production is unaffected by replacing barley or sodium hydroxide wheat with maize cob silage in rations for dairy cows. Animal 8, 738–747.
Milk production is unaffected by replacing barley or sodium hydroxide wheat with maize cob silage in rations for dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24594308PubMed |

IPCC (2006) Agriculture, forestry and other land use: emissions from livestock and manure management. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 4, 10.1–10.87.

IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Working Group I contribution. In ‘The fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’. (Eds TF Stocker, D Qin, GK Plattner, MMB Tignor, SK Allen, J Boschung, A Nauls, Y Xia, V Bex, PM Midgley) p. 1535. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Jaurena G, Cantet JM, Arroquy JI, Palladino RA, Wawrzkiewicz M, Colimbatto D (2015) Prediction of the Y m factor for livestock from on-farm accessible data. Livestock Science 177, 52–62.
Prediction of the Y m factor for livestock from on-farm accessible data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johansen M, Weisbjerg MR (2015) Increased pre-wilting increases metabolizable protein concentration in grass–clover silage. Journal of Animal Science 93, 611

Johnsen KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emission from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2483–2492.

Knapp JR, Laur GL, Vadas PA, Weiss WP, Tricarico JM (2014) Invited review: enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 3231–3261.
Invited review: enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXmtlCnt74%3D&md5=42df8b90d406a27b6bf18a49290f1725CAS | 24746124PubMed |

Lejonklev JS (2013) Transfer of aroma compounds and fatty acids from feed to bovine milk. PhD Thesis, Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Denmark.

Lesschen JP, van den Berg M, Westhoek HJ, Witzke HP, Oenema O (2011) Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 16–28.
Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lund P, Aaes O (2014) ‘Normtal for mængde og sammensætning af fæces og urin samt udskillelse af N, P og K i fæces og urin hos kvæg (2014/2015).’ (Aarhus University: Tjele, Denmark)

Martinussen H, Aaes O (2014) ‘Indhold af fedt i foderrationer til malkende køer og goldkøer.’ (Knowledgecentre for Agriculture: Skejby, Danmark)

Mikkelsen MH, Albrektsen R, Gyldenkærne S (2013) Danish emission inventories for agriculutre. Inventories 1985–2011. Scientific report no 108 from DCE – Danish Centre for Enviroment and Energy, Aarhus University, Denmark. Available at http://dce.au.dk/udgivelser/vr/nr-101-150/abstracts/no-108-danish-emission-inventories-for-agriculture/ [Verified November 2015]

Münger A, Kreuzer M (2008) Absence of persistent methane emission differences in three breeds of dairy cows. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 77–82.
Absence of persistent methane emission differences in three breeds of dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ramin M, Huhtanen P (2013) Development of equations for predicting methane emissions from ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 2476–2493.
Development of equations for predicting methane emissions from ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXitlemt7s%3D&md5=80e2f676e1278d10e26ca08df4003d02CAS | 23403199PubMed |

Sjaunja LO, Baevre L, Junkkarinen L, Pedersen J, Setälä JA (1991) Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula. In ‘Proceedings of the 27th biennial session on the International Committee for Recording (ICAR)’. (Eds Y Gaillon, Y Chabert) pp. 156–157. EAAP publication no. 50. (Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Volden H, Nielsen NI (2011) Energy and metabolizable protein supply. In ‘NorFor – The Nordic feed evaluation system’. (Ed. H Volden) pp. 81–84. EAAP publication No. 130. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands)