Effects of ruminal digesta retention time on methane emissions: a modelling approach
P. Huhtanen A B , M. Ramin A and E. H. Cabezas-Garcia AA Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden.
B Corresponding author. Email: pekka.huhtanen@slu.se
Animal Production Science 56(3) 501-506 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15507
Submitted: 29 August 2015 Accepted: 11 November 2015 Published: 9 February 2016
Abstract
The reasons for among-animal variations in methane (CH4) emissions are not fully understood. There is experimental evidence that ruminal digesta mean retention time (MRT) can affect CH4 emissions. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the contribution of among-animal variations in MRT on CH4 emissions and nutrient supply for dairy cow (default MRT = 34 h) and sheep (default MRT = 41 h), using the mechanistic Nordic dairy cow model Karoline. The simulations (n = 100) were made for a cow (bodyweight 600 kg) and for a sheep (bodyweight 60 kg) eating 20 kg and 1.0 kg DM/day, respectively. The diet for the dairy cow consisted of grass silage, barley and rapeseed meal (60 : 30 : 10 on a DM basis; crude protein 156 g/kg DM, neutral detergent fibre 450 g/kg DM) and the sheep diet was grass alone. Normal distribution of MRT values was assumed. Variability (coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.086) on default MRT was introduced by random-number generator of Excel. Intake, diet composition and digestion kinetic parameters were constant in all simulations, only ruminal MRT variables were changed in each simulation. Predicted CH4 emission increased with increased MRT for dairy cow (range from 407 to 488 g/day) and sheep (from 25.0 to 29.2 g/day). Increases in predicted CH4 emissions were partly associated with enhanced organic matter (OM) digestibility in dairy cow (from 0.715 to 0.758) and sheep (from 0.731 to 0.773). Greater CH4 emissions per kilogram digested OM with increased MRT were mainly related to reduced efficiency of microbial cell synthesis in the rumen both for dairy cows (22.8 ± 0.91 g N/kg OM truly digested; CV = 0.040) and for sheep (20.7 ± 0.92 g N/kg OM truly digested; CV = 0.044). Predicted CH4 yield was 20% and 17% greater in dairy cow and sheep, respectively, with the short (n = 10) compared with the long (n = 10) ruminal digesta MRT. Linear regression indicated that CH4 emissions increased by 0.37 (dairy cow) and 0.33 (sheep) g/kg DM intake per 1 h increase in ruminal digesta MRT. It is concluded that among-animal variation in MRT can markedly contribute to among-animal variation in CH4 emissions from ruminants.
Additional keywords: mean retention time, microbial efficiency, modelling, variability.
References
Allen MS, Mertens DR (1988) Evaluating constraints of fiber digestion by rumen microbes. The Journal of Nutrition 118, 261–270.Blaxter KL, Clapperton JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.
| Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF28XitFKktg%3D%3D&md5=6cde6902b771bbb1af70db2dca0760aaCAS | 5852118PubMed |
Broderick GA, Huhtanen P, Ahvenjärvi S, Reynal SM, Shingfield KJ (2010) Quantifying ruminal N metabolism using the omasal sampling technique in cattle: a meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3216–3230.
| Quantifying ruminal N metabolism using the omasal sampling technique in cattle: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVOhtrbP&md5=52e7c0138aa9303d81ec5cc71e9d69cfCAS | 20630238PubMed |
Cabezas-Garcia EH, Krizsan SJ, Shingfield KJ, Huhtanen P (2015) Effect of cow parameters on enteric methane production in dairy cows: an individual variation approach. Journal of Animal Science 93, 777
Chen XB, Chen YK, Franklin MF, Ørskov ER, Shand WJ (1992) The effect of feed intake and body weight on purine derivative excretion and microbial protein supply in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1534–1542.
Czerkawski JW (1986) ‘An introduction to rumen studies.’ (Robert Maxwell, M. C.: Oxford, UK)
Danfær A, Huhtanen P, Udén P, Sveinbjörnsson J, Volden H (2006) The Nordic dairy cow model, Karoline: description. In ‘Nutrient digestion and utilization in farm animals: modelling approaches’. (Eds E Kebreab J Dijkstra, A Bannink, WJJ Gerrits, J France) pp. 383–406. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Goopy JP, Donaldson A, Hegarty R, Vercoe PE, Haynes F, Barnett M, Oddy VH (2014) Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time. British Journal of Nutrition 111, 578–585.
| Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXisVCgtL8%3D&md5=cac2f7f0ba77edadd550219925926c12CAS | 24103253PubMed |
Huhtanen P, Ramin M, Udén P (2015) Nordic dairy cow model Karoline in predicting methane emissions: 1. Model description and sensitivity analysis. Livestock Science 178, 71–80.
| Nordic dairy cow model Karoline in predicting methane emissions: 1. Model description and sensitivity analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Janssen PH (2010) Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 160, 1–22.
| Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtV2itLvF&md5=8b633b0832b1c0985b793ee6af3ece67CAS |
Kennedy PM, Young BA, Cristopherson RJ (1977) Studies on the relationship between thyroid function, cold acclimation and retention time of digesta in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 45, 1084–1090.
Krizsan SJ, Ahvenjärvi S, Huhtanen P (2010) A meta-analysis of passage rate estimated by rumen evacuation with cattle and evaluation of passage rate prediction models. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5890–5901.
| A meta-analysis of passage rate estimated by rumen evacuation with cattle and evaluation of passage rate prediction models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXjs1KisL8%3D&md5=1a55e666fcf999495668144e5ec3e101CAS | 21094762PubMed |
Moss AR, Givens DI, Garnsworthy PC (1995) The effect of supplementing grass silage with barley on digestibility, in sacco degradability, rumen fermentation and methane production in sheep at two levels of intake. Animal Feed Science and Technology 55, 9–33.
| The effect of supplementing grass silage with barley on digestibility, in sacco degradability, rumen fermentation and methane production in sheep at two levels of intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinares-Patiño CS, Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR, Barry TN, Holmes CW (2003) Rumen function and digestion parameters associated with differences between sheep in methane emissions when fed chaffed lucerne hay. The Journal of Agricultural Science 140, 205–214.
| Rumen function and digestion parameters associated with differences between sheep in methane emissions when fed chaffed lucerne hay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinares-Patiño CS, Ebrahimi SH, McEwan JC, Clark H, Luo D (2011) Is rumen retention time implicated in sheep differences in methane emission? Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 71, 219–222.
Pinares-Patiño CS, Hickey SM, Young EA, Dodds KG, Maclean S, Molano G, Sandoval E, Kjestrup H, Harland R, Hunt C, Pickering NK, McEwan JC (2013) Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep. Animal 7, 316–321.
| Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23739473PubMed |
Ramin M, Huhtanen P (2015) Nordic dairy cow model Karoline in predicting methane emissions: 2. Model evaluation. Livestock Science 178, 81–93.
| Nordic dairy cow model Karoline in predicting methane emissions: 2. Model evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Russell JB, O’Connor JD, Fox DG, Van Soest PJ, Sniffen CJ (1992) A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3551–3561.
Schiemann R, Jentsch W, Wittenburg H (1971) Zur Abhängigkeit der Verdauchlichkeit der Energie und der Närstoffe von der Höhe der Futteraufnahme und der Rationszusammensetzung bei Milchkühen. Archiv fur Tierernahrung 21, 223–240.
| Zur Abhängigkeit der Verdauchlichkeit der Energie und der Närstoffe von der Höhe der Futteraufnahme und der Rationszusammensetzung bei Milchkühen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shi W, Moon CD, Leahy SC, Kang D, Froula J, Kittelmann S, Fan C, Deutsch S, Gagic D, Seedorf H, Kelly WJ, Atua R, Sang C, Soni P, Li D, Pinares-Patiño CS, McEwan JC, Janssen PH, Chen F, Visel A, Wang Z, Attwood GT, Rubin EM (2014) Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome. Genome Research 24, 1517–1525.
| Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhsFaksLnJ&md5=4a799e0c9c12ca2b77064b7ec58af1feCAS | 24907284PubMed |
Van Soest PJ (1994) ‘Nutritional ecology of the ruminant.’ (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY)
Wolin MJ (1960) A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. Journal of Dairy Science 43, 1452–1459.
| A theoretical rumen fermentation balance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF3MXjvVOlsw%3D%3D&md5=7625c558ea1b3b1c8bd14107b6626049CAS |
Yan T, Mayne CS, Gordon FG, Porter MG, Agnew RE, Patterson DC, Ferris CP, Kilpatrick DJ (2010) Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 2630–2638.
| Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVahs7nJ&md5=47618586068c7f660c691688f822f5fbCAS | 20494172PubMed |
