Genetic relationships between internal parasite resistance and production traits in Merino sheep
D. J. Brown A B and N. M. Fogarty A C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Sheep CRC Ltd, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit*, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: neal.fogarty@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Animal Production Science 57(2) 209-215 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15469
Submitted: 20 August 2015 Accepted: 25 October 2015 Published: 4 March 2016
Abstract
Breeding Merino sheep that are resistant to internal parasites alleviates the high costs associated with treatment of worm infestation and loss of production, as well as mitigating the development of anthelmintic resistance among the major worm species. Faecal worm egg count ((cube root transformation), wec) can be used in sheep as a measure of internal parasite resistance. Accurate estimates of genetic parameters for wec are required for calculation of Australian Sheep Breeding Values and inclusion of worm resistance in sheep breeding programs. This study provides updated estimates of heritability for wec and its genetic correlations with production traits. Data were analysed from a wide range of Australian and New Zealand Merino sheep in the MERINOSELECT database, which included 141 flocks with 801 flock years and up to 217 137 animals with wec recorded in at least one of four ages (W = weaning, P = post weaning, Y = yearling, H = hogget). The heritability estimates ranged from 0.16 ± 0.01 for Ywec to 0.29 ± 0.01 for Wwec, with generally high genetic correlations between the ages. Bivariate analyses estimated genetic correlations between wec at the various ages and growth, carcass quality, reproduction and wool production traits at various ages. These genetic correlations were generally small or close to zero, albeit with some significantly different from zero. The moderate heritability for wec (0.2–0.3) and its high phenotypic variation (coefficient of variation >30%) shows that relatively rapid selection response for worm resistance could be achieved. Inclusion of wec in sheep breeding programs to increase worm resistance would be expected to have little if any impact on other important production traits. These genetic parameters have been incorporated into MERINOSELECT by Sheep Genetics to provide Australian Sheep Breeding Values for wec and appropriate indices for wool and meat production. There is evidence that genotype × environment interactions may be important in some environments by reducing the accuracy of Australian Sheep Breeding Values for wec. Hence it may be prudent for breeders to implement strategies that manage the risk of any impact of genotype × environment on their breeding program.
Additional keywords: genetic correlations, heritability, reproduction, wool.
References
Afolayan RA, Fogarty NM, Morgan JE, Gaunt GM, Cummins LJ, Gilmour AR (2009) Preliminary genetic correlations of milk production and milk composition with reproduction, growth, wool traits and worm resistance in crossbred ewes. Small Ruminant Research 82, 27–33.| Preliminary genetic correlations of milk production and milk composition with reproduction, growth, wool traits and worm resistance in crossbred ewes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Assenza F, Elsen JM, Legarra A, Carre C, Salle G, Robert-Granie C, Moreno CR (2014) Genetic parameters for growth and faecal worm egg count following Haemonchus contortus experimental infestations using pedigree and molecular information. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 46, 13
| Genetic parameters for growth and faecal worm egg count following Haemonchus contortus experimental infestations using pedigree and molecular information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24528625PubMed |
Bell AM, Eady SJ, Swan AA (2002) Genetic trends are an important tool for tracking genetic progress in worm resistance and other traits under selection. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 366–372.
Bishop SC, Stear MJ (1999) Genetic and epidemiological relationships between productivity and disease resistance: gastro-intestinal parasite infection in growing lambs. Animal Science 69, 515–524.
Brown DJ, Swan AA (2016a) Genetic parameters for liveweight, wool and worm resistance traits in multi-breed Australian meat sheep. 2. Genetic relationships between traits. Animal Production Science 56, 1449–1453.
| Genetic parameters for liveweight, wool and worm resistance traits in multi-breed Australian meat sheep. 2. Genetic relationships between traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown DJ, Swan AA (2016b) Genetic importance of fat and eye muscle depth in Merino breeding programs. Animal Production Science 56, 690–697.
| Genetic importance of fat and eye muscle depth in Merino breeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown DJ, Tier B (2003) Alternate methods of estimating breeding values for faecal egg count data from Merino studs across Australia. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 15, 115–118.
Brown DJ, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Graser HU, Woolaston RR, Ball AJ, Atkins KD, Banks RG (2007) Genetic evaluation for the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 187–194.
Brown DJ, Swan AA, Gill JS, Ball AJ, Banks RG (2016) Genetic parameters for liveweight, wool and worm resistance traits in multi-breed Australian meat sheep. 1. Description of traits, fixed effects, variance components and their ratios. Animal Production Science 56, 1442–1448.
| Genetic parameters for liveweight, wool and worm resistance traits in multi-breed Australian meat sheep. 1. Description of traits, fixed effects, variance components and their ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ciappesoni G, Goldberg V, Gimeno D (2013) Estimates of genetic parameters for worm resistance, wool and growth traits in Merino sheep of Uruguay. Livestock Science 157, 65–74.
| Estimates of genetic parameters for worm resistance, wool and growth traits in Merino sheep of Uruguay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doeschl-Wilson AB, Vagenas D, Kyriazakis I, Bishop SC (2008) Exploring the assumptions underlying genetic variation in host nematode resistance Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 40, 241–264.
Eady SJ, Woolaston RR, Mortimer SI, Lewer RP, Swan AA, Ponzoni RW (1996) Resistance to nematode parasites in Merino sheep: sources of genetic variation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 895–915.
| Resistance to nematode parasites in Merino sheep: sources of genetic variation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eady SJ, Woolaston RR, Barger IA (2003) Comparison of genetic and nongenetic strategies for control of gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep. Livestock Production Science 81, 11–23.
| Comparison of genetic and nongenetic strategies for control of gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fogarty NM, Banks RG, van der Werf JHJ, Ball AJ, Gibson JP (2007) The Information Nucleus – a new concept to enhance sheep industry genetic improvement. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 29–32.
Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ‘ASReml user guide release 3.0.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK) Available at http://www.vsni.co.uk [Verified 26 January 2016]
Goldberg V, Ciappesoni G, Aguilar I (2012) Genetic parameters for nematode resistance in periparturient ewes and post-weaning lambs in Uruguayan Merino sheep. Livestock Science 147, 181–187.
| Genetic parameters for nematode resistance in periparturient ewes and post-weaning lambs in Uruguayan Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Good B, Hanrahan JP, Crowley BA, Mulcahy G (2006) Texel sheep are more resistant to natural nematode challenge than Suffolk sheep based on faecal egg count and nematode burden. Veterinary Parasitology 136, 317–327.
| Texel sheep are more resistant to natural nematode challenge than Suffolk sheep based on faecal egg count and nematode burden.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD287jtFaqug%3D%3D&md5=4b74ccde5e57ab92b38b85c88bf09855CAS | 16414193PubMed |
Greeff JC, Karlsson LJE (2006) Breeding for worm resistance – whole farm benefits. In ‘Wool meets meat – tools for a modern sheep enterprise. Proceedings of the 2006 Australian sheep industry CRC conference, Orange, Australia’. (Eds PB Cronje, D Maxwell) pp. 102–108. (The Australian Sheep Industry CRC: Armidale, NSW)
Greeff JC, Karlsson LJE, Schlink AC (2014) Production benefits of breeding for worm resistance in Merino sheep in a Mediterranean environment. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th world congress of genetics applied to livestock production’. Paper 343.
Greeff JC, Safari E, Fogarty NM, Hopkins DL, Brien FD, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, van der Werf JHJ (2008) Genetic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits and their relationships to liveweight and wool production in hogget Merino rams. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 205–215.
| Genetic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits and their relationships to liveweight and wool production in hogget Merino rams.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czhslejtg%3D%3D&md5=f67dc97e0bfd452a0178173cdaafed0aCAS | 18479272PubMed |
Huisman AE, Brown DJ (2008) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 2. Genetic relationships between bodyweight traits and other traits. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1186–1193.
| Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 2. Genetic relationships between bodyweight traits and other traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huisman AE, Brown DJ, Ball AJ, Graser HU (2008) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 1. Description of traits, model comparison, variance components and their ratios. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1177–1185.
| Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 1. Description of traits, model comparison, variance components and their ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Karlsson LJE, Greeff JC (2006) Selection response in fecal worm egg counts in the Rylington Merino parasite resistant fock. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 809–811.
| Selection response in fecal worm egg counts in the Rylington Merino parasite resistant fock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kemper KE, Elwin RL, Bishop SC, Goddard ME, Woolaston RR (2009) Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis did not adapt to long-term exposure to sheep that were genetically resistant or susceptible to nematode infections. International Journal for Parasitology 39, 607–614.
| Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis did not adapt to long-term exposure to sheep that were genetically resistant or susceptible to nematode infections.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7ktlOqtw%3D%3D&md5=e4621c600768f1d43e805e161163d567CAS | 19027020PubMed |
Khusro M, van der Werf JHJ, Brown DJ, Ball A (2004) Across flock (co)variance components for faecal worm egg count, live weight, and fleece traits for Australian Merinos. Livestock Production Science 91, 35–43.
| Across flock (co)variance components for faecal worm egg count, live weight, and fleece traits for Australian Merinos.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Larsen JWA (2014) Sustainable internal parasite control of sheep in Australia. Small Ruminant Research 118, 41–47.
| Sustainable internal parasite control of sheep in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laurenson Y, Kyriazakis I, Bishop SC (2012) In silico exploration of the impact of pasture larvae contamination and anthelmintic treatment on genetic parameter estimates for parasite resistance in grazing sheep. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2167–2180.
| In silico exploration of the impact of pasture larvae contamination and anthelmintic treatment on genetic parameter estimates for parasite resistance in grazing sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtFehsbrK&md5=9c7665d717fbaafa7f918f581e708843CAS | 22767552PubMed |
Leathwick DM, Besier RB (2014) The management of anthelmintic resistance in grazing ruminants in Australia – strategies and experiences. Veterinary Parasitology 204, 44–54.
| The management of anthelmintic resistance in grazing ruminants in Australia – strategies and experiences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2czms1Wkuw%3D%3D&md5=8f8d54b5c45a14a38080dd209f6b0327CAS | 24439840PubMed |
Li L, Swan AA, Brown DJ, van der Werf JHJ (2015) Australian sheep breeding values for worm egg count retain predictive power across flocks in the presence of GxE. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 21, in press
Liu SM, Smith TL, Palmer DG, Karlsson LJE, Besier RB, Greeff JC (2005) Biochemical differences in Merino sheep selected for resistance against gastro-intestinal nematodes and genetic and nutritional effects on faecal worm egg output. Animal Science 81, 149–157.
| Biochemical differences in Merino sheep selected for resistance against gastro-intestinal nematodes and genetic and nutritional effects on faecal worm egg output.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVWqt7jL&md5=c8e54081417bfdd74baabee063b14d50CAS |
Macarthur FA, Kahn LP, Windon RG (2013) Immune response of twin-bearing Merino ewes when infected with Haemonchus contortus: effects of fat score and prepartum supplementation. Livestock Science 157, 568–576.
| Immune response of twin-bearing Merino ewes when infected with Haemonchus contortus: effects of fat score and prepartum supplementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marshall K, Maddox JF, Lee SH, Zhang Y, Kahn L, Graser HU, Gondro C, Walkden-Brown SW, van der Werf JHJ (2009) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep. Animal Genetics 40, 262–272.
| Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmslektr8%3D&md5=057beab00d3101db17bf0fc79187ef31CAS | 19291139PubMed |
Marshall K, Mugambi JM, Nagda S, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, Baker RL, Gibson JP (2013) Quantitative trait loci for resistance to Haemonchus contortus artificial challenge in Red Maasai and Dorper sheep of East Africa. Animal Genetics 44, 285–295.
| Quantitative trait loci for resistance to Haemonchus contortus artificial challenge in Red Maasai and Dorper sheep of East Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXmsVWrtbo%3D&md5=be877b133a5b9674fb0b5533cb63fe11CAS | 23051556PubMed |
Matebesi-Ranthimo PAM, Cloete SWP, Van Wyk JB, Olivier JJ (2014) The relationships between faecal worm egg count and subjectively assessed wool and conformation traits in the Tygerhoek Merino flock. South African Journal of Animal Science 44, 220–227.
| The relationships between faecal worm egg count and subjectively assessed wool and conformation traits in the Tygerhoek Merino flock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meszaros SA, Henshall JM, Burgess SK, Gray GD, Tier B (1999) Detection of a quantitative trait locus associated with a reduction of faecal egg count in Merino sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 13, 211–214.
MLA (2015) Priority list of endemic diseases for the red meat industries. Final Report B.AHE.0010, Meat and Livestock Australia, North Sydney.
Morris CA, Vlassoff A, Bisset SA, Baker RL, West CJ, Hurford AP (1997) Responses of Romney sheep to selection for resistance or susceptibility to nematode infection. Animal Science 64, 319–329.
| Responses of Romney sheep to selection for resistance or susceptibility to nematode infection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pollott GE, Greeff JC (2004a) Genetic relationships between faecal egg count and production traits in commercial Merino sheep flocks. Animal Science 79, 21–32.
Pollott GE, Greeff JC (2004b) Genotype x environment interactions and genetic parameters for fecal egg count and production traits of Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2840–2851.
Pollott GE, Karlsson LJE, Eady S, Greeff JC (2004) Genetic parameters for indicators of host resistance to parasites from weaning to hogget age in Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2852–2864.
Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR (2005) A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science 92, 271–289.
| A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Swan AA, Brien FD, Greeff JC, van der Werf JHJ (2007) Across population genetic parameters for wool, growth, and reproduction traits in Australian Merino sheep. 2. Estimates of heritability and variance components. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 177–184.
Swan AA, Brown DJ, Daetwyler HD, Hayes BJ, Kelly M, Moghaddar N, van der Werf JHJ (2014) Genomic evaluations in the Australian sheep industry. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th world congress of genetics applied to livestock production’. Paper 334.
Swan AA, Brown DJ, van der Werf JHJ (2015) Genetic variation within and between subpopulations of the Australian Merino breed. Animal Production Science
| Genetic variation within and between subpopulations of the Australian Merino breed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woolaston RR, Piper LR (1996) Selection of Merino sheep for resistance to Haemonchus contortus: genetic variation. Animal Science 62, 451–460.
| Selection of Merino sheep for resistance to Haemonchus contortus: genetic variation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Woolaston RR, Windon RG (2001) Selection of sheep for response to Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae: genetic parameters. Animal Science 73, 41–48.
