Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH FRONT

Effect of volume of urine and mass of faeces on N2O and CH4 emissions of dairy-cow excreta in a tropical pasture

Abmael da Silva Cardoso A C , Bruno José Rodrigues Alves B , Segundo Urquiaga B and Robert Michael Boddey B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Animal Science, São Paulo State University, Via de acesso Professor Paulo Donato Castellane, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil.

B Embrapa Agrobiologia, Antiga Rodovia Rio-São Paulo, km 47. Seropédica, RJ, 23891-000, Brazil.

C Corresponding author. Email: abmael2@gmail.com

Animal Production Science 58(6) 1079-1086 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15392
Submitted: 18 July 2015  Accepted: 4 January 2016   Published: 8 March 2016

Abstract

We aimed to quantify nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions as a function of the addition of different quantities of bovine faeces and urine on soil under pasture. Two experiments were performed in randomised complete blocks with five replicates. In the first experiment, the emissions of CH4 and N2O were evaluated for 14 days after the addition of four amounts of faeces (0.0, 1.2, 1.8 and 2.4 kg of fresh faeces per plot), and in a second experiment, N2O emissions were evaluated for 43 days after addition of four volumes of urine (0.0, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 L). Urine and faeces came from crossbred (Fresian × Gir) dairy cows fed on pasture and concentrates. N2O emissions from faeces did not alter the emission factor (EF) according to the faeces weight (P = 0.73). N2O-N EF from faeces-N averaged 0.18% (±0.05) of total applied N. The volume of urine applied influenced N2O losses. The EF decreased linearly (P = 0.015) with increasing volumes of urine, being 4.9% (±0.75), 3.36% (±0.7) and 2.43% (±0.46) of N applied emitted as N2O for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 L volumes of urine respectively. The EF from urine was significantly (P < 0.0001) higher than the EF from faeces. There was no change to the CH4 emissions per kilogram of excreta when the amount of faeces added was varied (P = 0.87). However, the CH4 emitted increased linearly with the amount of faeces (P = 0.02). The CH4 EF was estimated to be 0.95 (±0.38) kg/head.year.

Additional keywords: bovine excrete, N2O emission factor, Pangola grass.


References

Alves BJR, Santos JCF, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM (1994) Métodos de determinação do nitrogênio em solo e planta. In ‘Manual de métodos empregados em estudos de microbiologia agrícola’. (Organisers RS Araújo, M Hungria) pp. 449–469. (Embrapa: Brasília, Brazil)

Alves BJR, Smith KA, Flores RA, Cardoso AS, Oliveira WRD, Jantalia CPJ, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM (2012) Selection of the most suitable sampling time for static chambers for the estimation of daily mean N2O flux from soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 46, 129–135.
Selection of the most suitable sampling time for static chambers for the estimation of daily mean N2O flux from soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XosFCnug%3D%3D&md5=03e1112ded0bcc238e8401d6893c03fdCAS |

Berndt A, Tomkins NW (2013) Measurement and mitigation of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical grazing system: a perspective from Australia and Brazil. Animal 7, 363–372.
Measurement and mitigation of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical grazing system: a perspective from Australia and Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23739477PubMed |

Bouwman AF (1996) Direct emission of nitrous oxide from agricultural soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 46, 53–70.
Direct emission of nitrous oxide from agricultural soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXotlCiuw%3D%3D&md5=1fef4494b327eb12be3d38de5091d6beCAS |

Cardoso AN, Saminez TC, Vargas MA (2001) Fluxo de gases-traço de efeito estufa na interface solo/atmosfera em solos de cerrado. Boletim Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Embrapa Cerrados 17, 1–23.

Chapuis-Lardy L, Wrage N, Metay A, Chottes J-L, Bernoux M (2007) Soil, a sink for N2O? A review. Global Change Biology 13, 1–17.
Soil, a sink for N2O? A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Klein CAM, Sherlock RR, Cameron KC, van der Weerden TJ (2001) Nitrous oxide emissions form agricultural soils in New Zealand: a review of current knowledge and directions for future research. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 31, 543–574.
Nitrous oxide emissions form agricultural soils in New Zealand: a review of current knowledge and directions for future research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gerber PJ, Steinfel DH, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) ‘Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities.’ (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome)

González-Avalos E, Ruiz-Suárez LG (2001) Methane emission factors from cattle manure in Mexico. Bioresource Technology 80, 63–71.
Methane emission factors from cattle manure in Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11554603PubMed |

Haynes RJ, Williams PH (1993) Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem. Advances in Agronomy 49, 119–199.
Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXltlygs7Y%3D&md5=7e66c458181ce52451e838bd2edf3b5eCAS |

Holter P (1997) Methane emissions from Danish cattle dung pats in the field. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 29, 31–37.
Methane emissions from Danish cattle dung pats in the field.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjtl2rs7g%3D&md5=147ba940a2df05167aebd7e1c82fef7bCAS |

IBGE (2014) ‘Produção da Pecuária Municipal 2013.’ (Fundação IBGE: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1996) Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, United Kingdom, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency (vol. 3 reference manual).

IUSS (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006. World Soil Resources Reports, FAO, Rome, Italy.

Jarvis SC, Lovell RD, Panayides R (1995) Patterns of methane emissions from excreta of grazing cattle. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 27, 1581–1588.
Patterns of methane emissions from excreta of grazing cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXhtVSntrbE&md5=965de6438cf32e30b9f44cba926c00daCAS |

Lessa ACR, Madari BE, Paredes DS, Boddey RM, Urquiaga S, Jantalia CP, Alves BJR (2014) Bovine urine and dung deposited on Brazilian savannah pastures contribute differently to direct and indirect soil nitrous oxide emissions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 103, 190–194.

Lima MA, Young MCP, Neves MC, Carvalho EC (2010) ‘Emissões de metano por fermentação entérica e manejo de dejetos de animais.’ (Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia: Brasília, Brazil)

Lodman DW, Braine ME, Carmean BR, Zimmerman P, Ward GM, Johnson DE (1993) Estimates of methane emissions form manure of US cattle. Chemosphere 26, 189–199.
Estimates of methane emissions form manure of US cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXitFylu7Y%3D&md5=424d477c1bf773ba9ac478bc0468d01fCAS |

Mazzetto AM, Barneze AS, Feigl BJ, van Groenigen JW, Oenema O, Cerri CC (2014) Temperature and moisture affect methane and nitrous oxide emission from bovine manure patches in tropical conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 76, 242–248.
Temperature and moisture affect methane and nitrous oxide emission from bovine manure patches in tropical conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhtVCisb%2FO&md5=3b11361868df1b0dbaad7aa56d8b83c2CAS |

MCTI (2014) ‘Estimativas anuais de emissões de gases de efeito estufa no brasil.’ 2nd edn. (Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação: Brasília, Brazil)

Moss AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J (2000) Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annales de Zootechnie 49, 231–253.
Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnt12msrk%3D&md5=966d2c9e72fe5bd5abd2fafbda5b3e88CAS |

Muñoz C, Saggar S, Berben P, Giltrap D (2011) Influence of waiting time alter insertion of base chamber into soil on produced greenhouse gas fluxes. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 71, 610–614.
Influence of waiting time alter insertion of base chamber into soil on produced greenhouse gas fluxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R core team (2014) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna)

Ruser R, Schillings R, Steindl H, Flessa H, Beese F (1998) Soil compaction and fertilization effects on nitrous oxide and methane fluxes in potato fields. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62, 1587–1595.
Soil compaction and fertilization effects on nitrous oxide and methane fluxes in potato fields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjslygtQ%3D%3D&md5=1fed6436692c7a397ab30f6fdebe27eaCAS |

Saggar S, Hedley CB, Tate KR (2003) Methane sources and sinks in New Zealand grazed pastures. New Zealand Soil News 51, 6–7.

Saggar S, Bolan NS, Bhandral R, Hedley CB, Luo JA (2004) Review of emissions of methane, ammonia, and nitrous oxide from animal excreta deposition and farm effluent application in grazed pastures. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 513–544.
Review of emissions of methane, ammonia, and nitrous oxide from animal excreta deposition and farm effluent application in grazed pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhvFyltbg%3D&md5=1eda5246c68e39c4af432bbd5652271bCAS |

Sherlock RR, de Klein CAM, Li Z (2003) Determination of N2O and CH4 emission factors from animal excreta, following a summer application in 3 regions of New Zealand. A final report of NZOnet study prepared for Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, New Zealand.

Sordi A, Dieckow J, Bayer C, Alburquerque MA, Piva JT, Zanatta JA, Tomazi M, da Rosa CM, de Moraes A (2014) Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patches in a subtropical Brazilian pastureland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 190, 94–103.
Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patches in a subtropical Brazilian pastureland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhs1GrsLfF&md5=3b41f26cd38f4c1dead5392b6f0a0303CAS |

van der Weerden LJ, de Klein CAM, Hoogendoorn CJ (2011) Disaggregating nitrous oxide emission factors for ruminant urine and dung deposited onto pastoral soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 141, 426–436.
Disaggregating nitrous oxide emission factors for ruminant urine and dung deposited onto pastoral soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXntlGntL0%3D&md5=7ed116b42956e787d18ecda220c2d991CAS |

van Groenigen JW, Kuikman PJ, de Groot WJM, Velthof GL (2005) Nitrous oxide emissions from urine treated soil as influenced by urine composition and soil physical conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37, 463–473.
Nitrous oxide emissions from urine treated soil as influenced by urine composition and soil physical conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtFGgsrnF&md5=12b09cbcf935fa1988658ba13238db2aCAS |

Wu D, Dong W, Oenema O, Wang Y, Trebs I, Hu C (2013) N2O consumption by low-nitrogen soil and its regulation by water and oxygen. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 60, 165–172.
N2O consumption by low-nitrogen soil and its regulation by water and oxygen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXktlOjt7k%3D&md5=669e0707a0eb6a783151411c41c38982CAS |