Comparison of B-splines and non-linear functions to describe growth patterns and predict mature weight of female beef cattle
G. Cano A C , M. Blanco B , I. Casasús B , X. Cortés-Lacruz A and D. Villalba A DA Departament de Producció Animal, Universitat de Lleida, Avda. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
B Unidad de Producción y Sanidad Animal, CITA, Avda. Montañana 930, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain.
C Tests and Trials, S.L. Ignacio Luzán, 24, 22400 Monzón, Spain.
D Corresponding author. Email: dvillalba@prodan.udl.cat
Animal Production Science 56(11) 1787-1796 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15089
Submitted: 16 February 2015 Accepted: 29 May 2015 Published: 9 July 2015
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the ability of Basis spline (B-spline) models and five non-linear functions (Richards, Brody, Von Bertalanffy, Gompertz and Logistic) to describe the growth of females of a beef cattle breed and predict cow mature weight (A). Random regression models that included animal variation within function parameters were fitted using mixed model procedures. Comparisons were made among these functions for goodness of fit, standardised residuals and biological interpretability of the growth curve parameters. The B-spline function showed the best goodness of fit and within non-linear functions, the Richards and Von Bertalanffy functions estimated bodyweight at different periods accurately. The method of fitting the residual variance that provided the best goodness of fit in the model was the constant plus power variance function. The Richards function was found to be the best non-linear function and was compared with the B-spline function to predict mature weight. When the A parameter was estimated using fixed effects, it had a low correlation with the actual mature weight of the cow and the use of this estimate yielded no more gain in predictive accuracy of mature weight than the use of average breed mature weight. When A was estimated using fixed and random effects, it had a moderate correlation with actual mature weight for the B-spline and Richards functions. The use of both types of effects to estimate the maturity index reduced the error compared with the use of average mature weight, especially for the B-spline function, which is recommended as the best function to describe animal growth and predict mature weight.
Additional keywords: adult weight, B-spline, cows, growth curve, random regression.
References
Aggrey SE (2002) Comparison of three nonlinear and spline regression models for describing chicken growth curves. Poultry Science 81, 1782–1788.| Comparison of three nonlinear and spline regression models for describing chicken growth curves.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2Fgs1Gmuw%3D%3D&md5=10fbedb95c5483613a44c4852df10b5dCAS | 12512566PubMed |
Albertí P, Ripoll G, Goyache F, Lahoz F, Olleta JL, Panea B, Sañudo C (2005) Carcass characterisation of seven Spanish beef breeds slaughtered at two commercial weights. Meat Science 71, 514–521.
| Carcass characterisation of seven Spanish beef breeds slaughtered at two commercial weights.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22060927PubMed |
Álvarez-Rodríguez J, Palacio J, Sanz A (2010) Metabolic and luteal function in winter-calving Spanish beef cows as affected by calf management and breed. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 94, 385–394.
| Metabolic and luteal function in winter-calving Spanish beef cows as affected by calf management and breed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19663981PubMed |
Baldi F, Alencar MM, Albuquerque LG (2010) Random regression analyses using B-splines functions to model growth from birth to adult age in Canchim cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 127, 433–441.
| Random regression analyses using B-splines functions to model growth from birth to adult age in Canchim cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cbntF2ksg%3D%3D&md5=e08fa3bc44c3deed2fcf87648765848aCAS | 21077967PubMed |
Beltran JJ, Butts WT, Olson TA, Koger M (1992) Growth-patterns of 2 lines of Angus cattle selected using predicted growth-parameters. Journal of Animal Science 70, 734–741.
Berry DP, Horan B, Dillon P (2005) Comparison of growth curves of three strains of female dairy cattle. Animal Science 80, 151–160.
| Comparison of growth curves of three strains of female dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blanco M, Villalba D, Ripoll G, Sauerwein H, Casasús I (2008) Effects of pre-weaning concentrate feeding on calf performance, carcass and meat quality of autumn-born bull calves weaned at 90 or 150 days of age. Animal 2, 779–789.
| Effects of pre-weaning concentrate feeding on calf performance, carcass and meat quality of autumn-born bull calves weaned at 90 or 150 days of age.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhvFertbo%3D&md5=8299686a426f30fba967c0533dfd1b2bCAS | 22443604PubMed |
Blanco M, Casasús I, Villalba D (2010) A spline polynomial model to describe serum IGF-I concentration from birth to slaughter in calves: effects of weaning age, pre-weaning concentrate feeding and breed. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 38, 157–167.
| A spline polynomial model to describe serum IGF-I concentration from birth to slaughter in calves: effects of weaning age, pre-weaning concentrate feeding and breed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXisFGkt7w%3D&md5=e8c793ad2c19a0e3aeb76e548fe17fecCAS | 20022447PubMed |
Boligon AA, Mercadante MEZ, Lobo RB, Baldi F, Albuquerque LG (2012) Random regression analyses using B-spline functions to model growth of Nellore cattle. Animal 6, 212–220.
| Random regression analyses using B-spline functions to model growth of Nellore cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38votlGktw%3D%3D&md5=ba98bf505b77523e0355336cdeed3c2bCAS | 22436178PubMed |
Brody S (1945) ‘Bioenergetics and growth.’ (Reinhold Publishing Company: New York)
Brown JE, Fitzhugh HA, Cartwright TC (1976) Comparison of nonlinear models for describing weight-age relationships in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 42, 810–818.
Bullock KD, Bertrand JK, Benyshek LL (1993) Genetic and environmental parameters for mature weight and other growth measures in Polled Hereford cattle. Journal of Animal Science 71, 1737–1741.
Casasús I, Llorente M, Revilla R (1995) Grazing behaviour and performances of Pirenaica and Brown Swiss heifers. Annales de Zootechnie 44, 107
| Grazing behaviour and performances of Pirenaica and Brown Swiss heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Casasús I, Sanz A, Villalba D, Ferrer R, Revilla R (2002) Factors affecting animal performance during the grazing season in a mountain cattle production system. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1638–1651.
DeNise RS, Brinks JS (1985) Genetic and environmental aspects of the growth curve parameters in beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 61, 1431–1440.
Doren PE, Baker JF, Long CR, Cartwright TC (1989) Estimating parameters of growth curves of bulls. Journal of Animal Science 67, 1432–1445.
Engelken TJ (2008) Developing replacement beef heifers. Theriogenology 70, 569–572.
| Developing replacement beef heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cvhs1ygsQ%3D%3D&md5=a86b2d79b12ea68eb63bd2fb2b285252CAS | 18538837PubMed |
Fang Z, Bailey RL (2001) Nonlinear mixed effects modeling for slash pine dominant height growth following intensive silvicultural treatments. Forest Science 47, 287–300.
Ferrell CL (1982) Effects of postweaning rate of gain on onset of puberty and productive performance of heifers of different breeds. Journal of Animal Science 55, 1272–1283.
Fitzhugh HA (1976) Analysis of growth-curves and strategies for altering their shape. Journal of Animal Science 42, 1036–1051.
Forni S, Piles M, Blasco A, Varona L, Oliveira HN, Lôbo RB, Albuquerque LG (2009) Comparison of different nonlinear functions to describe Nelore cattle growth. Journal of Animal Science 87, 496–506.
| Comparison of different nonlinear functions to describe Nelore cattle growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXisFGgu7Y%3D&md5=fa6a39371f9bda4e22daebb2734cecc6CAS | 18708609PubMed |
Freetly HC, Kuehn LA, Cundiff LV (2011) Growth curves of crossbred cows sired by Hereford, Angus, Belgian blue, Brahman, Boran, and Tuli bulls, and the fraction of mature body weight and height at puberty. Journal of Animal Science 89, 2373–2379.
| Growth curves of crossbred cows sired by Hereford, Angus, Belgian blue, Brahman, Boran, and Tuli bulls, and the fraction of mature body weight and height at puberty.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXps1yqu7k%3D&md5=e43d749995f3b78fb9d023a38417340bCAS | 21531851PubMed |
Giraldo J, Vivas NM, Vila E, Badia A (2002) Assessing the (a)symmetry of concentration-effect curves: empirical versus mechanistic models. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 95, 21–45.
| Assessing the (a)symmetry of concentration-effect curves: empirical versus mechanistic models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmtVWlsbY%3D&md5=6c365060c1959e59455397b6b5eaa04aCAS |
Gregory KE, Laster DB, Cundiff LV, Smith GM, Koch RM (1979) Characterization of biological types of cattle – Cycle III: II. Growth rate and puberty in females. Journal of Animal Science 49, 461–471.
Iwaisaki H, Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Bertrand JK (2005) Genetic parameters estimated with multitrait and linear spline-random regression models using Gelbvieh early growth data. Journal of Animal Science 83, 757–763.
Johnson ZB, Brown CJ, Brown AH Jr (1990) Evaluation of growth patterns of beef cows. Bulletin. (Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station: Fayetteville, AR)
Laster DB, Smith GM, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE (1979) Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle II) II. Postweaning growth and puberty of heifers. Journal of Animal Science 48, 500–508.
López S, France J, Gerrits WJ, Dhanoa MS, Humphries DJ, Dijkstra J (2000) A generalized Michaelis-Menten equation for the analysis of growth. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1816–1828.
Lopez de Torre G, Candotti JJ, Reverter A, Bellido MM, Vasco P, Garcia LJ, Brinks JS (1992) Effects of growth curve parameters on cow efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 70, 2668–2672.
Martin JL, Creighton KW, Musgrave JA, Klopfenstein TJ, Clark RT, Adams DC, Funston RN (2008) Effect of prebreeding body weight or progestin exposure before breeding on beef heifer performance through the second breeding season. Journal of Animal Science 86, 451–459.
| Effect of prebreeding body weight or progestin exposure before breeding on beef heifer performance through the second breeding season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVajsLs%3D&md5=e4e8291fa92595c64cd9c448c646c5fbCAS | 17965334PubMed |
Meyer K (2005a) Advances in methodology for random regression analyses. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 847–858.
| Advances in methodology for random regression analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Meyer K (2005b) Random regression analyses using B-splines to model growth of Australian Angus cattle. Genetics, Selection, Evolution. 37, 473–500.
| Random regression analyses using B-splines to model growth of Australian Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16093011PubMed |
Patterson DJ, Perry RC, Kiracofe GH, Bellows RA, Staigmiller RB, Corah LR (1992) Management considerations in heifer development and puberty. Journal of Animal Science 70, 4018–4035.
Perotto D, Cue RI, Lee AJ (1992) Comparison of nonlinear functions for describing the growth curve of three genotypes of dairy cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72, 773–782.
| Comparison of nonlinear functions for describing the growth curve of three genotypes of dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinheiro JC, Bates D (2000) ‘Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS.’ (Springer: New York)
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2008) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/nlme.pdf [Verified 12 April 2012]
Revilla R, Olleta Jl, San Juan L, Blasco I (1992) Recría y manejo de novillas en zonas de montaña. Bovis 46, 45–65.
Rodríguez-Sánchez JA, Sanz A, Casasús I (2014) Effects of nutrition level during lactation and rearing periods on growth patterns, puberty onset and fertility rate in beef heifers. Proceedings of Western Section, American Society of Animal Science. pp. 191–194.
Schaeffer LR, Jamrozik J (2008) Random regression models: a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 145–146.
| Random regression models: a longitudinal perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czhslaqtQ%3D%3D&md5=5318b028cc83385d94b455f2362fb2e6CAS | 18479264PubMed |
Stockton MC, Wilson RK, Feuz DM, Stalker LA, Funston RN (2013) Using measurable physical characteristics to forecast beef heifer maturity: the identification of a maturity index. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4462–4468.
| Using measurable physical characteristics to forecast beef heifer maturity: the identification of a maturity index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhsVOlsbnM&md5=ff3669dae1471ea99b04f08e1c4ecf25CAS | 23825325PubMed |
Stockton MC, Wilson RK, Feuz DM, Stalker LA, Funston RN (2014) Bioeconomic factors of beef heifer maturity to consider when establishing criteria to optimally select and/or retain herd replacements. Journal of Animal Science 92, 4733–4740.
| Bioeconomic factors of beef heifer maturity to consider when establishing criteria to optimally select and/or retain herd replacements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhvFKrtrzL&md5=4fccae91cd9c0ba86634c4ed2749ac75CAS | 25149330PubMed |
Taylor SCS (1965) A relation between mature weight and time taken to mature in mammals. Animal Science 7, 203–220.
Tedeschi LO (2006) Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models. Agricultural Systems 89, 225–247.
| Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Titterington FM, Morrison SJ, Lively FO, Wylie ARG, Gordon AW, Browne MR (2015) An analysis of Northern Ireland farmers’ experiences of using a target-driven beef heifer growth management plan and development of an empirical model leading to the launch of a decision support tool to promote first calving of beef heifers at 24 months. Agricultural Systems 132, 107–120.
| An analysis of Northern Ireland farmers’ experiences of using a target-driven beef heifer growth management plan and development of an empirical model leading to the launch of a decision support tool to promote first calving of beef heifers at 24 months.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tjørve E, Tjørve KMC (2010) A unified approach to the Richards-model family for use in growth analyses: why we need only two model forms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 267, 417–425.
| A unified approach to the Richards-model family for use in growth analyses: why we need only two model forms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20831877PubMed |
Villalba D, Casasús I, Sanz A, Estany J, Revilla R (2000) Preweaning growth curves in Brown Swiss and Pirenaica calves with emphasis on individual variability. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1132–1140.