Methane production and in vitro digestibility of low quality forages treated with a protease or a cellulase
J. M. Cantet A C , D. Colombatto A B and G. Jaurena AA Department of Animal Production, School of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, C1417DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
B National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) of Argentina, Av. Rivadavia 1917, C1033AAJ, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C Corresponding author. Email: jcantet@agro.uba.ar
Animal Production Science 56(10) 1700-1706 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14988
Submitted: 5 December 2014 Accepted: 24 March 2015 Published: 16 June 2015
Abstract
The objective was to assess the impact of application of two enzyme mixtures on the in vitro dry matter digestibility, neutral detergent fibre digestibility, net cumulative gas production and methane production after 24 h of incubation of Milium coloratum (formely Panicum coloratum) and a Patagonian meadow grassland. A protease (Protex 6-L) and a fibrolytic enzyme (Rovabio) were assessed at three application rates (30, 60 and 90 mg/100 mL of distiller water) on the substrates. Meadow samples were higher to Milium ones (P < 0.05) for in vitro dry matter digestibility and net cumulative gas production at 24 h. Nevertheless, Milium was ~11% higher than meadow (P < 0.05) for methane when expressed as a proportion of digested dry matter (g/kg). Rovabio did not induce differences in any variable, but the addition of Protex reduced (P < 0.05) in vitro dry matter digestibility in both substrates without bringing about differences in methane production. Collectively, the addition of these enzymes did not benefit in vitro ruminal fermentation of low quality forages.
Additional keywords: cell wall hydrolysis, enzymes, greenhouses gases, in vitro gas production, ruminant.
References
Adesogan AT, Ma ZX, Romero JJ, Arriola KG (2014) Improving cell wall digestion and animal performance with fibrolytic enzymes. Journal of Animal Science 92, 1317–1330.| Improving cell wall digestion and animal performance with fibrolytic enzymes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXms1Cjsrw%3D&md5=fef60cb02687a9e9ad617e13410703ceCAS | 24663173PubMed |
AOAC International (formerly the Association of Official Analytical Chemists) (1990) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ (AOAC: Arlington, VA)
Asa R, Tanaka A, Uehara A, Shinzato I, Toride Y, Usui N, Hirakawa K, Takahashi J (2010) Effects of protease-resistant antimicrobial substances produced by lactic acid bacteria on rumen methanogenesis. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 23, 700–707.
| Effects of protease-resistant antimicrobial substances produced by lactic acid bacteria on rumen methanogenesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXpt1aisbY%3D&md5=0cf41f61f56938283d9532d838247ebbCAS |
Beauchemin KA, Colombatto D, Morgavi DP, Yang WZ (2003) Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 81, E37–E47.
Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O’ Mara F, McAllister TA (2008) Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 21–27.
| Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXovVGn&md5=6ae1cf9889bdef55e5354cf57109b8ccCAS |
Bedford MR (2000) Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition – their current value and future benefits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 86, 1–13.
| Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition – their current value and future benefits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXlsVyjsLw%3D&md5=90fb83fc01b025a963f6847cf5332dc2CAS |
Colombatto D, Beauchemin KA (2009) A protease additive increases fermentation of alfalfa diets by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1097–1105.
| A protease additive increases fermentation of alfalfa diets by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXislaqsrs%3D&md5=cb487dd0bc9a7d5352ef630235bfa016CAS | 19028863PubMed |
Colombatto D, Hervás G, Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA (2003a) Effects of enzyme supplementation of a total mixed ration on microbial fermentation in continuous culture, maintained at high and low pH. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2617–2627.
Colombatto D, Morgavi DP, Furtado AF, Beauchemin KA (2003b) Screening of exogenous enzymes for ruminant diets: relationship between biochemical characteristics and in vitro ruminal degradation. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2628–2638.
Colombatto D, Mould FL, Bhat MK, Morgavi DP, Beauchemin KA, Owen E (2003c) Influence of fibrolytic enzymes on the hidrolysis and fermentation of pure cellulose and xylan by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1040–1050.
Colombatto D, Mould FL, Bhat MK, Owen E (2003d) Use of fibrolytic enzymes to improve the nutritive value of ruminant diets: a biochemical and in vitro rumen degradation assessment. Animal Feed Science and Technology 107, 201–209.
| Use of fibrolytic enzymes to improve the nutritive value of ruminant diets: a biochemical and in vitro rumen degradation assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXkt1yit7k%3D&md5=b5d8c635245150091cf5597201b59ea5CAS |
Colombatto D, Mould FL, Bhat MK, Phipps RH, Owen E (2004a) In vitro evaluation of fibrolytic enzymes as additives for maize (Zea mays L.) silage. I. Effects of ensiling temperature, enzyme source and addition level. Animal Feed Science and Technology 111, 111–128.
| In vitro evaluation of fibrolytic enzymes as additives for maize (Zea mays L.) silage. I. Effects of ensiling temperature, enzyme source and addition level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1Omurk%3D&md5=08f273aafca0bc3c3d945821fcad95d6CAS |
Colombatto D, Mould FL, Bhat MK, Phipps RH, Owen E (2004b) In vitro evaluation of fibrolytic enzymes as additives for maize (Zea mays L.) silage. III. Comparison of enzymes derived from psychrophilic, mesophilic or thermophilic sources. Animal Feed Science and Technology 111, 145–159.
| In vitro evaluation of fibrolytic enzymes as additives for maize (Zea mays L.) silage. III. Comparison of enzymes derived from psychrophilic, mesophilic or thermophilic sources.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1Omurc%3D&md5=baf617d44070933c19d507c0d5b2ee1eCAS |
Dong Y, Bae HD, McAllister TA, Mathison GW, Cheng KJ (1999) Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes, alfa-bromoethanesulfonate and monensin on fermentation in a rumen simulation (RUSITEC) system. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79, 491–498.
| Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes, alfa-bromoethanesulfonate and monensin on fermentation in a rumen simulation (RUSITEC) system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhtl2ms7c%3D&md5=f9182b76337782528bd6c1a95671477fCAS |
Elghandour MMY, Salem AZM, Gonzalez-Ronquillo M, Bórquez JL, Gado HM, Odongo NE, Peñuelas CG (2013) Effects of exogenous enzymes on in vitro gas production kinetics and ruminal fermentation of four fibrous feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 179, 46–53.
| Effects of exogenous enzymes on in vitro gas production kinetics and ruminal fermentation of four fibrous feeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXkvFCmug%3D%3D&md5=249fb2e79ef92ae7fc6b09939037be65CAS |
Eun JS, Beauchemin KA (2005) Effects of a proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2140–2153.
| Effects of a proteolytic feed enzyme on intake, digestion, ruminal fermentation and milk production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXksFyrurg%3D&md5=f0a5f63c02e37ae1cbeb61b438cfccf8CAS | 15905444PubMed |
Eun JS, Beauchemin KA (2007) Enhancing in vitro degradation of alfalfa hay and corn silage using feed enzymes. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 2839–2851.
| Enhancing in vitro degradation of alfalfa hay and corn silage using feed enzymes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXlvFOit7w%3D&md5=99a413273edec6b13dd92c45486c2218CAS | 17517724PubMed |
Eun JS, Beauchemin KA (2008) Relationship between enzymic activities and in vitro degradation of alfalfa hay and corn silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145, 53–67.
| Relationship between enzymic activities and in vitro degradation of alfalfa hay and corn silage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXpsVKrtLg%3D&md5=f823fb6dfbf0540468c5228cc86bdfceCAS |
Feng P, Hunt CW, Pritchard GT, Julien WE (1996) Effect of enzyme preparations on in situ and in vitro degradation and in vivo digestive characteristics of mature cool-season grass forage in beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 74, 1349–1357.
Gado HM, Salem AZM, Robinson PH, Hassan M (2009) Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, extent of ruminal fermentation as well as milk production and composition in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 154, 36–46.
| Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, extent of ruminal fermentation as well as milk production and composition in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1aisLbO&md5=6ded78594272f4c5ba65805fd84c5f6aCAS |
Giraldo LA, Carro MD, Ranilla MJ, Tejido ML (2007a) Influence of fibrolytic enzymes on in vitro methane production and rumen fermentation of a substrate containing 60% of grass hay. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19, 185–187.
Giraldo LA, Ranilla MJ, Tejido ML, Carro MD (2007b) Influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes and fumarate on methane production, microbial growth and fermentation in Rusitec fermenters. British Journal of Nutrition 98, 753–761.
| Influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes and fumarate on methane production, microbial growth and fermentation in Rusitec fermenters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlWhsrjP&md5=3f9a40775ed1786e49cf4dbf1d291032CAS | 17475087PubMed |
Giraldo LA, Tejido ML, Ranilla MJ, Carro MD (2008) Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on in vitro ruminal fermentation of substrates with different forage: concentrate ratios. Animal Feed Science and Technology 141, 306–325.
| Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on in vitro ruminal fermentation of substrates with different forage: concentrate ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXislWhtbc%3D&md5=d5b51cc405a6e5a36b971d7c4519ed40CAS |
Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) ‘Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications) laboratory handbook. No. 379.’ (USDA, Agricultural Research Services: Washington, DC)
Grainger C, Beauchemin KA (2011) Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 308–320.
| Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
He ZX, He ML, Walker ND, McAllister TA, Yang WZ (2014) Using a fibrolytic enzyme in barley-based diets containing wheat dried distillers grains with solubles: ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and growth performance of feedlot steers. Journal of Animal Science 92, 3978–3987.
| Using a fibrolytic enzyme in barley-based diets containing wheat dried distillers grains with solubles: ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and growth performance of feedlot steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhslSjtbnK&md5=30112dc70f727992bba9595934a6f8b9CAS | 24987082PubMed |
Jalilvand G, Odongo NE, López S, Naserian A, Valizadeh R, Shahrodi FE, Kebreab E, France J (2008) Effects of different levels of an enzyme mixture on in vitro gas production parameters of contrasting forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146, 289–301.
| Effects of different levels of an enzyme mixture on in vitro gas production parameters of contrasting forages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFCku7fF&md5=59e2a531c072b1d1a3021fa2194d239aCAS |
Jaurena G, Livraghi E, Alvarez Ugarte D, Ceccaldi E, Molina R (2009) Conservación de forraje de vegas como heno enrollado en la isla de Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Revista Argentina de Producción Animal 29, 99–110. [in Spanish, English abstract]
Jaurena G, Livraghi E, Alvarez Ugarte D, Ceccaldi E, Molina R (2010) Ensiling natural meadow forage in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 722–728.
| Ensiling natural meadow forage in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johnson KA, Johnson DE (1995) Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2483–2492.
McGinn SM, Beauchemin KA, Coates T, Colombatto D (2004) Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast, and fumaric acid. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3346–3356.
Moe PW, Tyrrell HF (1979) Methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 1583–1586.
| Methane production in dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3cXlt1Og&md5=6ede30c398880dc1770472cae031e0e4CAS |
Pinos-Rodríguez JM, González SS, Mendoza GD, Bárcena R, Cobos MA, Hernández A, Ortega ME (2002) Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme on ruminal fermentation and digestibility of alfalfa and rye-grass hay fed to lambs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 3016–3020.
Raffrenato E, Fievisohn R, Cotanch KW, Grant RJ, Van Soest PJ, Chase L, Van Amburgh ME (2009) aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: what have we learned? In ‘Proceeding of the Cornell nutrition conference for feed manufacturers’, 71st Meeting, 20–22 October 2009. pp. 77–93. (Department of Animal Science, NY State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University: Ithaca, NY)
Rhodes NM, Udén P (1998) Promising tropical grasses and legumes as feed resources in Central Tanzania. III. Effect of feeding level on digestibility and voluntary intake of four grasses by sheep. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 70, 79–95.
Rode LM, Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA (1999) Fibrolytic enzyme supplements for dairy cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2121–2126.
| Fibrolytic enzyme supplements for dairy cows in early lactation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXmslaiu7s%3D&md5=738a5fbad89cdb5617c931d286cfc085CAS | 10531597PubMed |
Salem AZM, El-Adawy M, Gado H, Camacho LM, González-Ronquillo M, Alsersy H, Borhami B (2011) Effects of exogenous enzymes on nutrients digestibility and growth performance in sheep and goats. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 14, 867–874.
SAS Institute (2013) ‘SAS user’s guide: statistics, 12.3.’ (SAS Institute, Inc.: Cary, NC)
Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Multiple comparisons. In ‘Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrial approach.’ 2nd edn. (Eds C Napiel, JW Maisel) pp. 185–186. (McGraw-Hill Publisher: New York, NY)
Stokes MR (1992) Effects of an enzyme mixture, an inoculant, and their interaction on silage fermentation and dairy production. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 764–773.
| Effects of an enzyme mixture, an inoculant, and their interaction on silage fermentation and dairy production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK383jsFektA%3D%3D&md5=66335545883761bd3cd87e65476d3dabCAS | 1569268PubMed |
Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J (1994) A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48, 185–197.
| A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tomás A, Gastaldi L, Gaggiotti M, Romero L (2009) Rendimiento y valor nutritivo de materiales de Panicum coloratum var. Makarikariensis Revista Argentina de Producción Animal 29, 564–565 [in Spanish, English abstract].
Van Soest PJ (1994) ‘Nutritional ecology of the ruminant.’ 2nd edn. (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY)
Van Soest PJ, Wine RH, Moore LA (1966) Estimation of the true digestibility of forages by the in vitro digestion of cell walls. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th international grasslands congress’. (Ed. HA Steppler) pp. 438–441. (Finish Grassland Association: Helsinki, Finland)