Genetic variation within and between subpopulations of the Australian Merino breed
Andrew A. Swan A C D , Daniel J. Brown A C and Julius H. J. van der Werf B CA Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU*), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C The CRC for Sheep Industry Innovation, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: andrew.swan@une.edu.au
Animal Production Science 56(1) 87-94 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14560
Submitted: 8 May 2014 Accepted: 10 September 2014 Published: 19 February 2015
Abstract
Genetic variation within and between Australian Merino subpopulations was estimated from a large breeding nucleus in which up to 8500 progeny from over 300 sires were recorded at eight sites across Australia. Subpopulations were defined as genetic groups using the Westell–Quaas model in which base animals with unknown pedigree were allocated to groups based on their flock of origin if there were sufficient ‘expressions’ for the flock, or to one of four broad sheep-type groups otherwise (Ultra/Superfine, Fine/Fine-medium, Medium/Strong, or unknown). Linear models including genetic groups and additive genetic breeding values as random effects were used to estimate variance components for 12 traits: yearling greasy and clean fleece weight (ygfw and ycfw), yearling mean and coefficient of variation of fibre diameter (yfd and ydcv), yearling staple length and staple strength (ysl and yss), yearling fibre curvature (ycuv), yearling body wrinkle (ybdwr), post-weaning weight (pwt), muscle (pemd) and fat depth (pfat), and post-weaning worm egg count (pwec). For the majority of traits, the genetic group variance ranged from approximately equal to two times larger than the additive genetic (within group) variance. The exceptions were pfat and ydcv where the genetic group to additive variance ratios were 0.58 and 0.22, respectively, and pwec and yss where there was no variation between genetic groups. Genetic group correlations between traits were generally the same sign as corresponding additive genetic correlations, but were stronger in magnitude (either more positive or more negative). These large differences between genetic groups have long been exploited by Merino ram breeders, to the extent that the animals in the present study represent a significantly admixed population of the founding groups. The relativities observed between genetic group and additive genetic variance components in this study can be used to refine the models used to estimate breeding values for the Australian Merino industry.
Additional keywords: random genetic groups, sheep.
References
Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Casey AE (1999) Do we need to include genetic groups to improve the precision of Merino sire evaluation. Proceedings of the Conference for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 13, 58–61.Brown DJ, Huisman AE, Swan AA, Graser H-U, Woolaston RR, Ball AJ, Atkins KD, Banks RB (2007) Genetic evaluation for the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the Conference for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 17, 187–194.
Brown D, Swan A, Gill J (2010) Within- and across-flock genetic relationships for breech flystrike resistance indicator traits. Animal Production Science 50, 1060–1068.
| Within- and across-flock genetic relationships for breech flystrike resistance indicator traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brown DJ, Swan AA, Gill JS, Banks RG (2013) Strategies to objectively group Merino flocks in sheep genetics. Proceedings of the Conference for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 20, 66–69.
Coelli KA, Atkins KD, Casey AE, Semple SJ (1996) Genetic differences among Merino bloodlines from NSW and Victorian wether comparisons (1984–1995). Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 44, 178–195.
Eady S, Woolaston R, Mortimer S, Lewer R, Raadsma H, Swan A, Ponzoni R (1996) Resistance to nematode parasites in Merino sheep: sources of genetic variation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 895–915.
| Resistance to nematode parasites in Merino sheep: sources of genetic variation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ‘ASReml user guide release 3.0.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK) Available at http://www.vsni.co.uk [Verified 10 November 2014]
Huisman AE, Brown DJ (2009a) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 3. Genetic relationships between ultrasound scan traits and other traits. Animal Production Science 49, 283–288.
| Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 3. Genetic relationships between ultrasound scan traits and other traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huisman AE, Brown DJ (2009b) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 4. Genetic relationships between and within wool traits. Animal Production Science 49, 289–296.
| Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 4. Genetic relationships between and within wool traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Huisman AE, Brown DJ, Ball AJ, Graser H (2008) Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 1. Description of traits, model comparison, variance components and their ratios. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1177–1185.
| Genetic parameters for bodyweight, wool, and disease resistance and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. 1. Description of traits, model comparison, variance components and their ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lewer RP, Woolaston RR, Howe RR (1992) Studies on Western Australian Merino sheep. 1. Stud, strain and environmental effects on hogget performance. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1381–1397.
| Studies on Western Australian Merino sheep. 1. Stud, strain and environmental effects on hogget performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Massy C (2007) ‘The Australian Merino: the story of a nation.’ (Random House Australia: Sydney)
Mortimer SI, Atkins KD (1989) Genetic evaluation of production traits between and within flocks of Merino sheep. I. Hogget fleece weights, body weight and wool quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 433–443.
| Genetic evaluation of production traits between and within flocks of Merino sheep. I. Hogget fleece weights, body weight and wool quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mortimer SI, Atkins KD (1993) Genetic evaluation of production traits between and within flocks of Merino sheep. II. Component traits of the hogget fleece. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 1523–1539.
| Genetic evaluation of production traits between and within flocks of Merino sheep. II. Component traits of the hogget fleece.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Quaas R (1988) Additive genetic model with groups and relationships. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 91–98.
| Additive genetic model with groups and relationships.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR (2005) A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science 92, 271–289.
| A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Safari E, Fogarty N, Gilmour A, Atkins K, Mortimer S, Swan A, Brien F, Greeff J, Van der Werf J (2007a) Across population genetic parameters for wool, growth, and reproduction traits in Australian Merino sheep. 2. Estimates of heritability and variance components. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 177–184.
Safari E, Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR, Atkins KD, Mortimer SI, Swan AA, Brien FD, Greeff JC, van der Werf JHJ (2007b) Genetic correlations among and between wool, growth and reproduction traits in Merino sheep. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 65–72.
| Genetic correlations among and between wool, growth and reproduction traits in Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3nvVCrsw%3D%3D&md5=6d4366f3ee82e51766434249130414daCAS | 17488356PubMed |
Swan A, Purvis I, Piper L (2008) Genetic parameters for yearling wool production, wool quality and bodyweight traits in fine wool Merino sheep. Animal Production Science 48, 1168–1176.
| Genetic parameters for yearling wool production, wool quality and bodyweight traits in fine wool Merino sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Swan AA, Brown DJ, Banks RG (2009) Genetic progress in the Australian sheep industry. Proceedings of the Conference for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18, 326–329.
van der Werf J, Kinghorn B, Banks R (2010) Design and role of an information nucleus in sheep breeding programs. Animal Production Science 50, 998–1003.
| Design and role of an information nucleus in sheep breeding programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Westell R, Quaas R, Van Vleck LD (1988) Genetic groups in an animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 1310–1318.
| Genetic groups in an animal model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
