Heritability of muscle score and genetic and phenotypic relationships with weight, fatness and eye muscle area in beef cattle
D. L. Robinson A C , L. M. Cafe A and W. A. McKiernan A BA NSW Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Present address: 17 Fishing Point Road, Rathmines, NSW 2283, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: dorothy.robinson@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Animal Production Science 54(9) 1443-1448 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14347
Submitted: 13 March 2014 Accepted: 8 June 2014 Published: 21 July 2014
Abstract
To assess the potential for genetic improvement to help meet the increasing demand for high-yielding beef carcasses, the heritability of muscle score (MS) plus genetic and phenotypic correlations with weight and fatness traits were estimated on 1856 yearlings and 2596 weaners born from 1992 to 2012 in a predominantly Angus herd divergently selected for High/Low MS. In 2005, after noting that some cattle were positive for the 821_del11 myostatin mutation that causes muscle hypertrophy, procedures were modified to create a third group (HighHet) of High animals with one copy of this major gene. This allowed the additive genetic effects of MS to be assessed, and also the effect of the 821_del11 mutation. MS traits were found to be highly heritable (h2 = 56–63%), with an extremely high estimated genetic correlation of 99% between weaning and yearling MS. Estimated genetic correlations of MS with rib eye muscle area (EMA) in weaners and yearlings adjusted for either age or weight were 53–56%. Genetic correlations of MS with other traits were relatively low: liveweight (yearlings 5%, weaners 20%), rump fat (yearlings –7%, weaners 11%), rib fat (yearlings –17%, weaners –3%). Apart from weaning liveweight, the estimated genetic correlations were not significantly different from zero. MS had smaller estimated genetic correlations with fatness and weight traits than EMA adjusted for age. For yearlings and weaners born from 2010 to 2012, large significant differences were evident in MS of High and Low calves (4.5-point difference for yearlings; 3.4 points for weaners, on a 15-point scale) and significant differences in EMA (yearlings 2.5, weaners 1.5 cm2). In addition, the 821_del11 mutation reduced fatness, increased MS by 1.5–1.9 points and increased EMA by 2.8–3.6 cm2. With high heritability, low correlations with weight and fatness in weaners/yearlings, plus other research (Cafe et al. 2012, 2014a) showing no detrimental effect on maternal productivity or meat quality, but improvements in dressing percent, retail meat yield, meat : bone ratio and feedlot feed efficiency, the development of an estimated breeding value for MS could help improve the efficiency and profitability of beef production.
Additional keyword: genetic parameters.
References
Butler D, Cullis B, Gilmour A, Gogel B (2009) ‘ASReml-R Reference manual, version 3.’ (Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Qld)Cafe LM, McKiernan WA, Robinson DL, Walmsley BJ (2012) ‘Additional measurements on muscle line cattle.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: Sydney) Available at http://www.mla.com.au/Research-and-development/Final-report-details?projectid=15304 [Verified 19 June 2014]
Cafe LM, McKiernan WA, Robinson DL (2013) ‘Using muscling selection line cows to inform maternal productivity modelling. Final report on project B.SBP.0085.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: Sydney) Available at http://www.mla.com.au/Research-and-development/Final-report-details?projectid=15433 [Verified 19 June 2014]
Cafe L, McKiernan W, Robinson D (2014a) Selection for increased muscling is not detrimental to maternal productivity traits in Angus cows. Animal Production Science 54,
| Selection for increased muscling is not detrimental to maternal productivity traits in Angus cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Cafe LM, McKiernan WA, Robinson DL (2014b) Selection for increased muscling improved feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of Angus steers. Animal Production Science 54, in press.
Conroy S, Drennan M, Kenny D, McGee M (2009) The relationship of live animal muscular and skeletal scores, ultrasound measurements and carcass classification scores with carcass composition and value in steers. Animal 3, 1613–1624.
| The relationship of live animal muscular and skeletal scores, ultrasound measurements and carcass classification scores with carcass composition and value in steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38vpt1altw%3D%3D&md5=00d20c27e28f6f37b8304b25b4930cadCAS | 22444995PubMed |
Gilmour AR, Gogel B, Cullis B, Thompson R (2009) ‘ASReml user guide release 3.0.’ (VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Graser H, Tier B, Johnston D, Barwick S (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Animal Production Science 45, 913–921.
| Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Grobet L, Martin LJ, Poncelet D, Pirottin D, Brouwers B, Riquet J, Schoeberlein A, Dunner S, Ménissier F, Massabanda J, Fries R, Hanset R, Georges M (1997) A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle. Nature Genetics 17, 71–74.
| A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlvVGhtr8%3D&md5=55f9ba5334848284a7dfbd02da4b48dbCAS | 9288100PubMed |
MacNeil MD, Northcutt SL (2008) National cattle evaluation system for combined analysis of carcass characteristics and indicator traits recorded by using ultrasound in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2518–2524.
| National cattle evaluation system for combined analysis of carcass characteristics and indicator traits recorded by using ultrasound in Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1ams7rK&md5=3617678d405207ee2bfccffbed580902CAS | 18539834PubMed |
McKiernan WA (1995) Growth, carcass value and body measurements from high and low muscled bulls. MSc Thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
McKiernan WA 2002
McKiernan W (2007) ‘Muscle scoring beef cattle. Primefact No 328.’ (NSW DPI: Orange, NSW) Available at http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/livestock/beef/appraisal/publications/muscle-scoring-beef-cattle [Verified 22 June 2014]
McPhee M (2013) Initiative – trait measurement from 3D images. MLA final report for project B.BSC.0339. Meat and Livestock, Sydney.
O’Rourke BA, Dennis JA, Healy PJ, McKiernan WA, Greenwood PL, Cafe LM, Perry D, Walker KH, Marsh I, Parnell PF, Arthur PF (2009) Quantitative analysis of performance, carcass and meat quality traits in cattle from two Australian beef herds in which a null myostatin allele is segregating. Animal Production Science 49, 297–305.
| Quantitative analysis of performance, carcass and meat quality traits in cattle from two Australian beef herds in which a null myostatin allele is segregating.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Perry D, McKiernan W, Yeates A (1993) Muscle score: its usefulness in describing the potential yield of saleable meat from live steers and their carcasses. Animal Production Science 33, 275–281.
| Muscle score: its usefulness in describing the potential yield of saleable meat from live steers and their carcasses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reverter A, Johnston DJ, Graser HU, Wolcott ML, Upton WH (2000) Genetic analyses of live-animal ultrasound and abattoir carcass traits in Australian Angus and Hereford cattle. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1786–1795.
Robinson D, McDonald C, Hammond K, Turner J (1992a) Live animal measurement of carcass traits by ultrasound: assessment and accuracy of sonographers. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1667–1676.
Robinson DL, Sundstrom B, Hearnshaw H (1992b) Live muscle scoring of beef cattle: repeatability and relationship to other traits. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics 10’. pp. 330–333. Available at http://www.aaabg.org/proceedings/1992/ab92082.pdf [Verified 30 June 2014]
Robinson DL, Hammond K, McDonald CA (1993) Live animal measurement of carcass traits: estimation of genetic parameters for beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 71, 1128–1135.
