Sheep of divergent genetic merit for wool growth do not differ in digesta kinetics while on restricted intakes
I. De Barbieri A C D , R. S. Hegarty A , V. H. Oddy B , M. C. Barnett A , L. Li A and J. V. Nolan AA School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Trevenna Road, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Beef Industry Centre, Department of Primary Industries NSW, Trevenna Road, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C National Institute for Agricultural Research, Tacuarembó, TBO 45000, Uruguay.
D Corresponding author. Email: idebarbieri@tb.inia.org.uy; ldebarbi@myune.edu.au
Animal Production Science 54(9) 1243-1247 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14319
Submitted: 12 March 2014 Accepted: 12 May 2014 Published: 10 July 2014
Abstract
Sheep selected for high wool growth were previously shown to exhibit higher microbial protein outflow from the rumen and higher uptake of amino nitrogen in portal blood than those selected for low wool growth. This suggests that genetic selection for wool growth may induce changes in foregut physiology. This study was undertaken to determine whether differences in digesta kinetics, especially mean retention mime (MRT), are associated with differences in fleece production between sheep with low or high estimated breeding values (EBVs) for fleece weight. Twenty mature Merino wethers with uniform EBVs for liveweight were allocated to two groups of 10 animals on the basis of high or low EBVs for yearling fleece weight. Five sheep with low-EBVs and five sheep with high-EBVs for fleece weight groups were allocated in a crossover design to low and high feeding-level treatments, which comprised a blended hay diet fed at maintenance or 1.5 times maintenance. All sheep were given single doses of chromium-mordanted fibre and cobalt-EDTA as inert, non-digestible markers. Digesta kinetics was determined by analysis of the faecal marker excretion patterns using a compartmental model. Higher feed intakes from animals fed 1.5 times maintenance were associated with higher rates of wool growth and higher masses of indigestible fibre in the gut, but reduced MRT of digesta. Although sheep with higher EBVs for fleece weight had higher wool growth rates, there was no indication that these wool growth differences were associated with differences in digesta kinetics. The lack of interaction between feeding level and genotype suggests that MRT did not contribute to genotype differences in wool growth in sheep fed restricted intakes. The differences in wool growth among commercial Merino sheep with divergent fleece weight EBVs achieved by multi-trait selection are not attributable to differences in digesta kinetics, at least when feed is not available ad libitum.
Additional keywords: estimated breeding values, feed intake, fleece weight, mean retention time.
References
Aharoni Y, Brosh A, Holzer Z (1999) Comparison of models estimating digesta kinetics and fecal output in cattle from fecal concentrations of single-dosed markers of particles and solutes. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2291–2304.Anderson DL, Henderson LJ (1986) Sealed chamber digestion for plant nutrient analyses. Agronomy Journal 78, 937–939.
| Sealed chamber digestion for plant nutrient analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL28XlvVOisrk%3D&md5=cf0b6e38f8243cdfacfd00232d62de71CAS |
Barnett MC (2013) Impact of gut kinetics on methane production within the sheep. PhD Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Barnett MC, Goopy JP, McFarlane JR, Godwin IR, Nolan JV, Hegarty RS (2012) Triiodothyronine influences digesta kinetics and methane yield in sheep. Animal Production Science 52, 572–577.
| Triiodothyronine influences digesta kinetics and methane yield in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XnvVOhs7Y%3D&md5=7ecca0ea759facedccdf9003e8e31f9fCAS |
Cottle DJ (2010) Digestion and metabolism. In ‘International sheep and wool handbook’. (Ed. DJ Cottle) pp. 295–330. (Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK)
De Barbieri I, Hegarty RS, Oddy VH, Li L, Blakely A, Velazco J, Donaldson A, Osborne E (2013) Association of wool growth with rumen function in sheep. In ‘Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – Australia (2013). Poster Abstracts’. (Ed. PB Cronje) pp. 21–22. (Animal Science, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England: Armidale, NSW)
Faichney GJ (2005) Digesta flow. In ‘Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism’. (Eds J Dijkstra, JM Forbes, J France) pp. 49–86. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK)
Fogarty NM, Safari E, Mortimer SI, Greeff JC, Hatcher S (2009) Heritability of feed intake in grazing Merino ewes and the genetic relationships with production traits. Animal Production Science 49, 1080–1085.
| Heritability of feed intake in grazing Merino ewes and the genetic relationships with production traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goopy JP, Donaldson A, Hegarty R, Vercoe PE, Haynes F, Barnett M, Oddy VH (2013) Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time. The British Journal of Nutrition 111, 578–585.
Grovum WL, Williams VJ (1977) Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. The British Journal of Nutrition 38, 425–436.
| Rate of passage of digesta in sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE1c%2FmtVygsw%3D%3D&md5=460d282c1ac1942248ec71b5c31e3526CAS | 588540PubMed |
Hegarty R (2004) Genotype differences and their impact on digestive tract function of ruminants: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 459–467.
| Genotype differences and their impact on digestive tract function of ruminants: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kahn LP (1996) Differences between Merino selection lines in microbial yield from the rumen and utilisation of protein for wool growth. PhD Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Langlands JP, Wheeler JL (1968) The dyebanding and tattooed patch procedures for estimating wool production and obtaining samples for the measurement of fibre diameter. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 8, 265–269.
| The dyebanding and tattooed patch procedures for estimating wool production and obtaining samples for the measurement of fibre diameter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee GJ, Atkins KD, Swan AA (2002) Pasture intake and digestibility by young and non-breeding adult sheep: the extent of genetic variation and relationships with productivity. Livestock Production Science 73, 185–198.
| Pasture intake and digestibility by young and non-breeding adult sheep: the extent of genetic variation and relationships with productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Li L, Oddy VH, Nolan JV (2008) Whole-body protein metabolism and energy expenditure in sheep selected for divergent wool production when fed above or below maintenance. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 657–665.
| Whole-body protein metabolism and energy expenditure in sheep selected for divergent wool production when fed above or below maintenance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXktleiurg%3D&md5=4000e8bb9055dab87603eca0d95a96adCAS |
Lush JM Gooden JM Annison EF 1991
Pinares-Patiño CS, Ulyatt MJ, Lassey KR, Barry TN, Holmes CW (2003) Rumen function and digestion parameters associated with differences between sheep in methane emissions when fed chaffed lucerne hay. The Journal of Agricultural Science 140, 205–214.
| Rumen function and digestion parameters associated with differences between sheep in methane emissions when fed chaffed lucerne hay.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pinares-Patiño CS, Ebrahimi SH, McEwan JC, Dodds KG, Clark H, Luo D (2011) Is rumen retention time implicated in sheep differences in methane emissions. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 71, 219–222.
Piper LR, Dolling HS (1969) Efficiency of conversion of food to wool. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 579–587.
| Efficiency of conversion of food to wool.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
SAS Institute (2003) ‘SAS/STAT User’s guide. Version 9.1 edn.’ (SAS Institute: Cary, NC)
SheepExplorer (2003) SheepExplorer spreadsheet. CSIRO GrazPlan. Available at http://www.grazplan.csiro.au/. [Verified 6 March 2013]
Smuts M, Meissner HH, Cronje PB (1995) Retention time of digesta in the rumen: its repeatability and relationship with wool production of Merino rams. Journal of Animal Science 73, 206–210.
Stefanovski D, Moate PJ, Boston RC (2003) WinSAAM: a windows-based compartmental modeling system. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental 52, 1153–1166.
| WinSAAM: a windows-based compartmental modeling system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXntVGlu7c%3D&md5=92ad760a94c7d98b7756b4699a042fc3CAS |
Thompson AN, Hynd PI (1998) Wool growth and fibre diameter changes in young Merino sheep genetically different in staple strength and fed different levels of nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 889–898.
| Wool growth and fibre diameter changes in young Merino sheep genetically different in staple strength and fed different levels of nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thompson BC, Dellow DW, Barry TN (1989) The effect of selection for fleece weight upon urea metabolism and digestive function in Romney sheep. Crop and Pasture Science 40, 1065–1074.
| The effect of selection for fleece weight upon urea metabolism and digestive function in Romney sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tsiplakou E, Hadjigeorgiou I, Sotirakoglou K, Zervas G (2011) Differences in mean retention time of sheep and goats under controlled feeding practices. Small Ruminant Research 95, 48–53.
| Differences in mean retention time of sheep and goats under controlled feeding practices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Udén P, Colucci PE, Van Soest PJ (1980) Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.
| Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 6779056PubMed |
Williams AJ, Winston RJ (1987) A study of the characteristics of wool follicle and fibre in Merino sheep genetically different in wool production. Crop and Pasture Science 38, 743–755.
| A study of the characteristics of wool follicle and fibre in Merino sheep genetically different in wool production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
