Effect of perch type and stocking density on the behaviour and growth of broilers
Jiao Hongchao A B , Yongbin Jiang A B , Zhigang Song A , Jingpeng Zhao A , Xiaojuan Wang A and Hai Lin A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Laboratory of Econutrition, Department of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Shandong Key Lab for Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control, Taian, Shandong 271018, P. R. China.
B Authors contributed equally to the work.
C Corresponding author. Email: hailin@sdau.edu.cn
Animal Production Science 54(7) 930-941 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13184
Submitted: 9 December 2012 Accepted: 23 August 2013 Published: 22 October 2013
Abstract
Perching is a natural behaviour of wild and domesticated fowl. Perch availability has been used to improve the welfare of laying hens. However, the effect of perch availability on broiler rearing systems remains unclear. The present study investigated the effect of the interaction between perch availability and stocking density on the performance, behaviour, and health characteristics of broiler chickens. The behaviour, live performance, incidence of footpad and hock burn, lameness, and feather condition of the birds were investigated over a 5-week experimental period. One-day-old chicks (n = 1152) were subjected to a two (perches) × three (stocking densities) factorial design. The perch treatment provided housing either with or without perches. The three stocking densities were 12 (low stocking density, LSD), 16 (medium stocking density, MSD), or 20 (high stocking density, HSD) birds/m2 and corresponded to 48, 64, and 80 birds per pen beginning at 1 day of age. The perches consisted of a wooden perch and a PVC perch (which included a horizontal section and a sloped (13°) section). In pens with perches, the perch design provided 580 cm of linear perching space per pen. The results showed that the LSD chickens had a higher (4.0%, P < 0.05) feed intake than the MSD and HSD chickens. Perch use by broilers was low but increased with age and peaked at 5 weeks of age (7.4%). Stocking density affected perch use, as the MSD chickens perched more frequently on both the PVC (2.4%, P = 0.01) and wood perches (3.7%, P < 0.05) than the LSD (PVC perch, 1.8%; wood perch, 3.3%) and HSD groups (PVC perch, 1.9%; wood perch, 2.5%). Perch availability affected behavioural patterns by increasing eating (P < 0.05) and sitting (P < 0.001) and decreasing walking (P < 0.001). Perch availability tended to prevent the development of footpad burn (P = 0.053) but had no detectable effect (P > 0.05) on the gait score or the development of hock burn. These results suggest that perches have a limited effect on the performance, behaviour, and welfare of broilers stocked at high densities. However, the effect of the interaction of perch × age on feed intake (P < 0.05), bodyweight gain (P < 0.05), and behaviour (eating and walking), the effect of the interaction of density × age on wood perch use (P < 0.05), and the effect of the interaction of perch × density × age on sitting behaviour (P < 0.01) indicated that perches have different effects on broilers of different ages stocked at different densities.
Additional keywords: animal welfare, behaviour, broilers, perches, stocking density.
References
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 227–266.| Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE2c7mtlWmsQ%3D%3D&md5=e7a1d13af058402b7769df8f176a2db0CAS | 4597405PubMed |
Andrews SM, Omed HM, Phillips CJC (1997) The effect of a single or repeated period of high stocking density on the behavior and response to stimuli in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 76, 1655–1660.
Arnould C, Faure JM (2003) Use of pen space and activity of broiler chickens reared at two different densities. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84, 281–296.
| Use of pen space and activity of broiler chickens reared at two different densities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arnould C, Fraysse V, Mirabito L (2001) Use of pen space by broiler chickens reared in commercial conditions: access to feeders and drinkers. British Poultry Science 42, S7–S8.
Balog JM, Bayyari GR, Rath NC, Huff WE, Anthony NB (1997) Effect of intermittent activity on broiler production parameters. Poultry Science 76, 6–12.
Barnett JL, Tauson R, Downing JA, Janardhana V, Lowenthal JW, Butler KL, Cronin GM (2009) The effects of a perch, dust bath, and nest box, either alone or in combination as used in furnished cages, on the welfare of laying hens. Poultry Science 88, 456–470.
| The effects of a perch, dust bath, and nest box, either alone or in combination as used in furnished cages, on the welfare of laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjsF2htbY%3D&md5=26a243e2eceee7036da1d59a87d7b6f0CAS | 19211513PubMed |
Berg C (2004) Pododermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens. In ‘Measuring and auditing broiler welfare’. pp. 37–50. (CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK)
Bilgili SF, Alley MA, Hess JB, Nagaraj M (2006) Influence of age and sex on footpad quality and yield in broiler chickens reared on low and high density diets. Journal of Applied Poultry Science 15, 433–441.
Bizeray D, Estevez I, Leterrier C, Faure JM (2002a) Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79, 27–41.
| Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bizeray D, Estevez I, Leterrier C, Faure JM (2002b) Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poultry Science 81, 767–773.
Blokhuis HJ (1984) Rest in poultry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12, 289–303.
| Rest in poultry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bokkers EAM, Koene P (2003) Behaviour of fast- and slow growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 59–72.
| Behaviour of fast- and slow growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Buijs S, Keeling LJ, Rettenbacher S, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens FAM (2009) Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poultry Science 88, 1536–1543.
| Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1Mvns1Srug%3D%3D&md5=ad8a79c576c5031a432fb8ba8e8f9c67CAS | 19590066PubMed |
Buijs S, Keeling LJ, Vangestel C, Baert J, Vangeyte J, Tuyttens FAM (2010) Resting or hiding? Why broiler chickens stay near walls and how density affects this. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 124, 97–103.
| Resting or hiding? Why broiler chickens stay near walls and how density affects this.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Campo JL, Gil MG, Dávila SG, Munoz I (2005) Influence of perches and footpad dermatitis on tonic immobility and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio of chickens. Poultry Science 84, 1004–1009.
Cornetto T, Estevez I (2001) Influence of vertical panels on use of space by domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71, 141–153.
| Influence of vertical panels on use of space by domestic fowl.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11179566PubMed |
Dawkins MS, Donnelly CA, Jones TA (2004) Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427, 342–344.
| Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14737165PubMed |
Dozier WA, Thaxton JP, Branton SL, Morgan GW, Miles DM, Roush WB, Lott BD, Vizzier-Thaxton Y (2005) Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Science 84, 1332–1338.
Dozier WA, Thaxton JP, Purswell JL, Olanrewaju HA, Branton SL, Roush WB (2006) Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poultry Science 85, 344–351.
Duncan IJH (1998) Behavior and behavioral needs. Poultry Science 77, 1766–1772.
Estevez I (2007) Density allowances for broilers: where to set the limits? Poultry Science 86, 1265–1272.
Estevez I, Tablante N, Pettit-Riley RL, Carr L (2002) Use of cool perches by broiler chickens. Poultry Science 81, 62–69.
Feddes JJR, Emmanuel EJ, Zuidhof MJ (2002) Broiler performance, bodyweight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poultry Science 81, 774–779.
Garner JP, Falcone C, Wakenell P, Martin M, Mench JA (2002) Reliability and validity of a modified gait scoring system and its use in assessing tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. British Poultry Science 43, 355–363.
| Reliability and validity of a modified gait scoring system and its use in assessing tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjvVektw%3D%3D&md5=616ecdbdadd2962bcd9418df499c9f9bCAS | 12195794PubMed |
Gyles NR, Kan J, Smith RM (1962) The heritability of breast blister condition and breast feather coverage in a white rock broiler strain. Poultry Science 41, 13–17.
| The heritability of breast blister condition and breast feather coverage in a white rock broiler strain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hall AL (2001) The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 10, 23–40.
Heckert RA, Estevez I, Russek-Cohen E, Pettit-Riley R (2002) Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poultry Science 81, 451–457.
Knowles TG, Kestin SC, Haslam SM, Brown SN, Green LE, Butterworth A, Pope SJ, Pfeiffer D, Nicol CJ (2008) Leg disorders in broiler chickens: prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PLoS ONE 3, e1545
| Leg disorders in broiler chickens: prevalence, risk factors and prevention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18253493PubMed |
Le Van NF, Estevez I, Stricklin WR (2000) Use of horizontal and angled perches by broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65, 349–365.
| Use of horizontal and angled perches by broiler chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leone EH, Estevez I (2008a) Space use according to the distribution of resources and level of competition. Poultry Science 87, 3–13.
| Space use according to the distribution of resources and level of competition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sjksVKgug%3D%3D&md5=c14e2893e4802d3409cbfe5ae49ba85bCAS | 18079443PubMed |
Leone EH, Estevez I (2008b) Use of space in the domestic fowl: separating the effects of enclosure size, group size and density. Animal Behaviour 76, 1673–1682.
| Use of space in the domestic fowl: separating the effects of enclosure size, group size and density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Martin P, Bateson P (1986) ‘Measuring behaviour. An introductory guide.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Moreira JA, Mendes A, Garcia RG, Garcia EA, Roça RO, Nääs LA, Dalanezi JA, Pelícia KI (2006) Evaluation of strain, dietary energy level and stocking density on broiler feathering. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 8, 15–22.
Newberry RC, Hall JW (1990) Use of pen space by broiler chickens: Effects of age and pen size. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 25, 125–136.
| Use of pen space by broiler chickens: Effects of age and pen size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nielsen BL, Juul-Madsen HR, Steenfeldt S, Kjaer JB, Sørensen P (2010) Feeding activity in groups of newly hatched broiler chicks: Effects of strain and hatching time. Poultry Science 89, 1336–1344.
| Feeding activity in groups of newly hatched broiler chicks: Effects of strain and hatching time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3crgtlyntA%3D%3D&md5=63f99bb366f7d0ae1cca4a4397c026c6CAS | 20548060PubMed |
Olsson IAS, Keeling LJ (2000) Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68, 243–256.
| Night-time roosting in laying hens and the effect of thwarting access to perches.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pettit-Riley R, Estevez I (2001) Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71, 127–140.
| Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11179565PubMed |
Pickel T, Schrader L, Scholz B (2011) Pressure load on keel bone and foot pads in perching laying hens in relation to perch design. Poultry Science 90, 715–724.
| Pressure load on keel bone and foot pads in perching laying hens in relation to perch design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M3ntVChsQ%3D%3D&md5=2b2180a5ff9617bc08f910e8a0776598CAS | 21406354PubMed |
Puron D, Santamaria R, Segura JC, Alamilla JL (1995) Broiler performance at different stocking densities. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 4, 55–60.
Ravindran V, Thomas DV, Thomas DG, Morel PCH (2006) Performance and welfare of broilers as affected by stocking density and zinc bacitracin supplementation. Animal Science Journal 77, 110–116.
| Performance and welfare of broilers as affected by stocking density and zinc bacitracin supplementation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XisFCisLw%3D&md5=ca319c976d520cadd6c661e08c6b9903CAS |
Reiter K, Bessei W (2009) Effect of locomotor activity on leg disorder in fattening chicken. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 122, 264–270.
SAS Institute (1998) ‘User’s Guide Statistics.’ (SAS Institute: Cary, NC)
Shepherd EM, Fairchild BD (2010) Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poultry Science 89, 2043–2051.
| Footpad dermatitis in poultry.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cfjsVamtg%3D%3D&md5=2843776789bf8f07d2d48abfc9ef52d9CAS | 20852093PubMed |
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Arc sine transformation for proportions. In ‘Statistical Methods’. 8th edn. pp. 289–290. (Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA USA)
Sørensen P, Su G, Kestin SC (2000) Effects of age and stocking density on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 79, 864–870.
Su G, Sørensen P, Kestin SC (2000) A note on the effects of perches and litter substrate on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 79, 1259–1263.
Sun ZW, Yan L, Yuan L, Jiao HC, Song ZG, Guo YY, Lin H (2011) Stocking density affects the growth performance of broilers in a sex-dependent fashion. Poultry Science 90, 1406–1415.
| Stocking density affects the growth performance of broilers in a sex-dependent fashion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tablante NL, Estevez I, Russek-Cohen E (2003) Effect of perches and stocking density on tibial dyschondroplasia and bone mineralization as measured by bone ash in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 12, 53–59.
Tauson R (1984) Effects of a perch in conventional cages for laying hens. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A 34, 193–209.
| Effects of a perch in conventional cages for laying hens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thomas DG, Ravindran V, Thomas DV, Camden BJ, Cottam YH, Morel PCH, Cook CJ (2004) Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 52, 76–81.
| Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7js1ajuw%3D%3D&md5=bc0297302c673c668d8eb6300adba184CAS | 15768100PubMed |
Ventura BA, Siewerdt F, Estevez I (2010) Effects of barrier perches and density on broiler leg health, fear, and performance. Poultry Science 89, 1574–1583.
| Effects of barrier perches and density on broiler leg health, fear, and performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cnns1Ckug%3D%3D&md5=5c4effac015e81a07e9392482bb7d20eCAS | 20634509PubMed |
Ventura BA, Siewerdt F, Estevez I (2012) Access to barrier perches improves behavior repertoire in broilers. PLoS ONE 7, e29826
| Access to barrier perches improves behavior repertoire in broilers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xitlyrtrc%3D&md5=4b26053fdbeeb0ae92f1f2a5a1c56c29CAS | 22299026PubMed |
Weeks CA, Danbury TD, Davies HC, Hunt P, Kestin SC (2000) The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67, 111–125.
| The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10719194PubMed |
Zhang HF, Jiao HC, Song ZG, Lin H (2011) Effect of alum-amended litter and stocking density on ammonia release and footpad and hock dermatitis of broilers. Agricultural Sciences in China 10, 777–785.
| Effect of alum-amended litter and stocking density on ammonia release and footpad and hock dermatitis of broilers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
