Maternal body composition in seedstock herds. 1. Grazing management strategy influences perspectives on optimal balance of production traits and maternal productivity
S. J. Lee B D , I. K. Nuberg C and W. S. Pitchford B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies.
B School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, SA 5371, Australia.
C School of Agriculture Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, SA 5064, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: stephen.lee@adelaide.edu.au
Animal Production Science 58(1) 117-124 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13060
Submitted: 12 February 2013 Accepted: 6 June 2014 Published: 2 December 2016
Abstract
Seedstock breeders’ perspectives on topics associated with maternal productivity in beef cattle were investigated through the use of qualitative in-depth semi-structured interviews. Given the complexity of maternal productivity, it is possible that some issues may not be fully captured by recording performance and data analysis. This paper discusses theory emerging from content analysis of interview data on management and genetic factors affecting maternal productivity as detailed by seedstock breeders in southern Australia. Overall, 24 interviews were conducted as part of an intensive field-work component with seedstock breeders involved with the Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies’ Maternal Productivity Project. Qualitative content analysis of interview data revealed a considerable divergence in attitudes to cow management with regards to grazing management, body condition fluctuation and the utilisation of body fat reserves. Specifically, production systems diverged on the basis of animal management characterised by either ‘controlled’ or ‘variable input’ feeding strategies. Variation in management approach was associated with different perspectives on the perceived importance of selecting for production traits including growth, beef yield and milk compared with selection for perceived resilience traits including increased subcutaneous fat. The results demonstrated that among seedstock breeders targeting similar end markets, substantial variation in animal selection and management exists and this requires further characterisation to ensure breeding programs and animal management are optimal.
Additional keywords: attitudes, cattle, cattle breeding.
References
Accioly JM, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Hebart ML, Herd RM, Lee SJ, Jones FM, Laurence M, Speijers EJ, Walmsley BJ, Pitchford WS (2016) Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 4. Fat EBVs’ influence on fatness fluctuation and supplementary feeding requirements. Animal Production Science.| Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 4. Fat EBVs’ influence on fatness fluctuation and supplementary feeding requirements.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Archer JA, Arthur PF, Parnell PF, van de Ven RJ (1998a) Effect of divergent selection for yearling growth rate on female reproductive performance in Angus cattle. Livestock Production Science 57, 33–40.
| Effect of divergent selection for yearling growth rate on female reproductive performance in Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Archer JA, Herd RM, Arthur PF, Parnell PF (1998b) Correlated responses in rate of maturation and mature size of cows and steers to divergent selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle. Livestock Production Science 54, 183–192.
| Correlated responses in rate of maturation and mature size of cows and steers to divergent selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arthur PF, Archer JA, Johnston DJ, Herd RM, Richardson EC, Parnell PF (2001) Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2805–2811.
Balsiger PW (2004) Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale. Futures 36, 407–421.
| Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Carstens GE, Tedeschi LO (2006) Defining feed efficiency in beef cattle. Proceedings of Beef Improvement Federation 38th Annual Research Symposium and Annual Meeting 38, 12–21.
Chase C, Olson T (2006) Effect of frame size on reproductive and maternal performance of Brahman cattle. Florida Cattleman 71, 70–72.
Ciccioli NH, Wettemann RP, Spicer LJ (2003) Influence of body condition at calving and postpartum nutrition on endocrine function and reproductive performance of primiparous beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3107–3120.
Copping KJ, Accioly JM, Deland MPB, Edwards NJ, Graham JF, Hebart ML, Herd RM, Jones FM, Laurence M, Lee SJ, Speijers EJ, Pitchford WS (2016) Divergent genotypes for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 3. Performance of mature cows. Animal Production Science
| Divergent genotypes for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 3. Performance of mature cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ferguson MB, Young JM, Kearney GA, Gardner GE, Robertson IRD, Thompson AN (2010) The value of genetic fatness in Merino ewes differs with production system and environment. Animal Production Science 50, 1011–1016.
| The value of genetic fatness in Merino ewes differs with production system and environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Freetly HC, Nienaber JA, Brown-Brandl T (2008) Partitioning of energy in pregnant beef cows during nutritionally induced body weight fluctuation. Journal of Animal Science 86, 370–377.
| Partitioning of energy in pregnant beef cows during nutritionally induced body weight fluctuation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVajs7g%3D&md5=daf5569d09baf6944b88455a67ccd0c8CAS |
Garrick DJ, Golden BL (2009) Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today. Journal of Animal Science 87, E11–E18.
| Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3mtVWjsA%3D%3D&md5=cce14c710297087ff832cbe2877a6e76CAS |
Glazier DS (2009) Trade-offs. In ‘Resource allocation theory applied to farm animal production’. (Ed. WM Rauw) (CAB International: London) pp. 44–60.
Graser H, Tier B, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 913–921.
| Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hebart ML, Accioly JM, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Herd RM, Jones FM, Laurence M, Lee SJ, Lines DS, Speijers EJ, Walmsley BJ, Pitchford WS (2016) Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 5. Cow genotype affects feed efficiency and maternal productivity. Animal Production Science
| Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 5. Cow genotype affects feed efficiency and maternal productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hohenboken W Jenkins T Pollak J Bullock D Radakovich S 2005
Jenkins TG, Ferrell CL (1994) Productivity through weaning of nine breeds of cattle under varying feed availabilities: I. Initial evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2787–2797.
Jenkins TG, Ferrell CL (2007) Daily dry matter intake to sustain body weight of mature, nonlactating, nonpregnant cows. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1787–1792.
| Daily dry matter intake to sustain body weight of mature, nonlactating, nonpregnant cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXntV2msbo%3D&md5=c8b209e7ee3624dcd0e8eb4e2444ac02CAS |
Jones FM, Accioly JM, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Graham JF, Hebart ML, Herd RM, Laurence M, Lee SJ, Speijers EJ, Pitchford WS (2016) Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 1. Pregnancy rates of heifers differed between fat lines and were more affected by weight and fat. Animal Production Science
| Divergent breeding values for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 1. Pregnancy rates of heifers differed between fat lines and were more affected by weight and fat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Laurence M, Accioly JM, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Graham JF, Hebart ML, Herd RM, Jones FM, Lee SJ, Speijers EJ, Pitchford WS (2016) Divergent genotypes for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 2. Body composition but not reproduction was affected in first-parity cows on both low and high levels of nutrition. Animal Production Science
| Divergent genotypes for fatness or residual feed intake in Angus cattle. 2. Body composition but not reproduction was affected in first-parity cows on both low and high levels of nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lawrence RJ, Després C (2004) Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures 36, 397–405.
| Futures of transdisciplinarity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lee SJ (2012) An interdisciplinary study of maternal productivity in beef cattle. PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide, SA.
Lee S, Donoghue K, Hebart M, Pitchford W (2011) Milk and weight EBVs are associated with cow and calf gain during lactation but carcass EBVs are not. In ‘Proceedings of 19th Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics conference’, Perth. pp. 127–130.
Lee SJ, Donoghue KA, Pitchford WS (2016) Maternal body composition in seedstock herds. 2. Relationships between cow body composition and BREEDPLAN EBVs for Angus and Hereford cows. Animal Production Science
| Maternal body composition in seedstock herds. 2. Relationships between cow body composition and BREEDPLAN EBVs for Angus and Hereford cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mays N, Pope C (1995) Qualitative research: rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal 311, 109–112.
| Qualitative research: rigour and qualitative research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzjvVSisA%3D%3D&md5=75740cda7dfae939eb422a2988562513CAS |
Moore AD, Bell LW, Revell DK (2009) Feed gaps in mixed-farming systems: insights from the Grain & Graze program. Animal Production Science 49, 736–748.
| Feed gaps in mixed-farming systems: insights from the Grain & Graze program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Neuman WL (2003) ‘Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches.’ 5th edn. (Allyn & Bacon: Boston, MA)
Pitchford WS, Accioly JM, Banks RG, Barnes AL, Barwick SA, Copping KJ, Deland MPB, Donoghue KA, Edwards N, Hebart ML, Herd RM, Jones FM, Laurence M, Lee SJ, McKiernan WA, Parnell PF, Speijers EJ, Tudor GD, Graham JF (2016) Genesis, design and methods of the Beef CRC Maternal Productivity Project. Animal Production Science
| Genesis, design and methods of the Beef CRC Maternal Productivity Project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Teddlie C, Yu F (2007) Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 77–100.
| Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
ten Napel J, Bianchi F, Bestman M (2006) Utilising intrinsic robustness in agricultural production systems. In ‘Inventions for a sustainable development of agriculture’. pp. 32–53. (TransForum Agro & Groen: Zoetermeer, The Netherlands)
van der Veen AA, ten Napel J, Oosting SJ, van der Zijpp AJ, Groot Koerkamp PWG (2009) Robust performance: principles and potential applications in livestock production systems. In ‘7th European Federation for Information Technology in Agriculture, Food and the Environment conference’. (Eds A Bregt, S Wolfert, JE Wien, C Lokhorst) pp. 173–180. (Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands)
Vargas CA, Olson TA, Chase CC, Jr Hammond AC, Elzo MA (1999) Influence of frame size and body condition score on performance of Brahman cattle. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3140–3149.
Walmsley BJ, Lee SJ, Parnell PF, Pitchford WS (2016) A review of factors influencing key biological components of maternal productivity in temperate beef cattle. Animal Production Science
| A review of factors influencing key biological components of maternal productivity in temperate beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
